Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

How's the state of the game?

1246

Comments

  • DrucalionDrucalion Member UncommonPosts: 22

    Am I the only person who loves this game. My PC broke a while back and now i just ordered a new one. I have just to wait another week or so and then i can resub and start playing again. I can't wait.

    There is always so many negative comments about this game everywhere but it's sooo much better than Wow IMO. I played Wow for 6 years and then just got tired it and started playing Swtor. I have all classes doing end game content and IMO the endgame is better than any other |MMO, the rewards are better and look better, the character creation is so much better than most MMO's, the events and content updates are better and more frequent than most other MMO's and the story lines were awesome. The idea of having companions was a stroke of genius aswell.

    A few months ago I resubbed for a month back at Wow, I played for a few hours and then didn't play again,  after Swtors graphics I just couldn't go back to Wows old dated and cartoony graphics. IMO that game is now so old people are just not prepared to play a game that is so dated anymore, I mean the character creation of Wow is just horrible lol

  • simpliussimplius Member UncommonPosts: 1,134

    come back, when you have played swtor for 6 years, with a sub

    that should put Things into perspective

    the character creator  is a Little below standard, and on par with wows

    the companions is one of the games biggest advantages, thumbs up on that one

    wow is getting old, yes, its a miracle , that theyre still going so strong

     

  • simpliussimplius Member UncommonPosts: 1,134
    Originally posted by bobdole1979
    Originally posted by simplius
     

    if you think, that an 8 year old game has the same economy, as a rather new game..

    when wow goes F2P, they will prolly double their playerbase, maybe they will do it after titans launch

    wow could pay for an expansion every year, yes, but quality takes time

    every wow expansion has enough content, to bridge the gap, til the next one

    makeb was paid by the hyped launch, lets see, when they can make more of that

    AFAIK, the same goes for GSF, theyve been talking about it for a long time

    so, what you have, is :

    4 raids

    3 FPs

    one warzone

    and, the dailys

    impressive, after only 2 years, the same time, as a full wow expansion

     

    1. Yeah GSF, 4 raids 3 fps one warzone and the dailies oh and the new event and 2 companions is all in 1 year.  That's the same time as 2 WoW content patches. 

    oh and a ton of new features

     

    2. no... every WoW expansion does not have enough content to bridge the gap.  You have to be the biggest troll if you think that.      There was a 10 month gap from the last Cataclysim content patch till Mists of Pandaraia. 

    why do you think WoW is losing players so fast? Its the months in between content patches yeah WoW averges 5 months between content patches

     

    3.  "Quality takes time"  ill just leave that there

     

    4.  WoW peaked at around 12 million.  To assume they only had 50 million is a gross missunderstanding of how these things work.

     

    5.  yes 1 million is enough for second place.   No other western MMO has ever achieved 1 million players. well unless you count Runescape but if we do then Runescape is #1.  

    6.  I didn't mention in this thread.    Wait so for a star wars game to be popular the majority of Star Wars fans must be playing it forever?

    So by your logic then SWG is the least popular Star Wars MMO. 

    2. yes, it does , TO THE CASUAL PLAYER, which is their main segment

    and their main source of income

    3. it does..5 months, or would you argue with REAL $ numbers? theyre on wows side..again

    4. wow was never F2P, maybe theyre not counting free trial accounts?

    5. ill just leave that, Theres many smaller games now, maybe youre right

    6.that is the only way , to find the most popular STAR WARS game..many players buying it, and playing it

    if you look at raw numbers , yes , SWG was even lesser popular, than swtor

    but Theres so many other variables, that a direct comparison wouldnt be "fair"..or useful

    SWG launched as sandbox, but tried to convert to themepark

    they pissed off most of the playerbase , but they couldnt get new ones, we were in blizzards grasp

    thats 2 for the panda, 0 for the jedi

    when the third iteration of this epic IP is born, the panda will prolly be too old, to compete

    but then, TITAN will be on the street, so...

  • gervaise1gervaise1 Member EpicPosts: 6,919
    Originally posted by bobdole1979

    snip

    1. actually it would be for at least 1 month.   But the 1 million active acounts has been said as "we are steady at 1 million active accounts"

    See the difference?

     

    2. Ok I do you see what is actually said in that statement?  10 million accounts.   Not 10 million subscriptions but 10 million accounts.  I'm sure WoW has over 300 million accounts. 

    The 10 million accounts is not relevent to the disscusion.  

     

    The 1 million is ACTIVE PLAYERS.  It is saying there are 1 MILLION (SOME FREE SOME PAID) are playing the game on average every MONTH.   Do you understand?   This is why SWTOR is the second largest Western MMO

    Try to work a little harder on your reading comprehension. 

     

    3. No you have it wrong.  They said Subs were down but REVENUE was up 20% from what it was over a year ago which would put it during the time where it had over 1 million subscripsions  

    So they are saying that even though subs dropped since the last quarter the overall income for the game is WAY UP.  this is because of the cash shop.  

    Do you understand? 

     

    Post a link. Post several.

    The 10m was in the link you posted which had the 1m number - so same source. From what EA has said 10m accounts is, as you say, crap. Anyway - post a link to 1m steady. (I have seen Jorgenssen's steady comment - in the sense of financially steady - but not a 1M steady link.)

    Post where EA said that SWTORs was 20% up. Or reread it. The comment was made against a basket of games one of which was FIFA. You will find specific comments about FIFA but not about SWTOR - except for the comment that SWTOR was (mainly) responsible for the drop in sub revenue. I added the mainly to show that their statement was - again - about a basket of games. 

    An analogy. 12months ago you were renting; now you have a mortgage. You can say: my rent is way down as in ZERO compared to 12 months ago but my mortgage payments are way UP compared with 12 months ago. Pretty obvious. It doesn't say whether you are paying more or less however. 

    Now canvass everyone in your workplace / guild / school / church congregation / guild - whatever. Add up everyones rent payments and mortgage payments. Compare to 12 months ago. statement: rents are 20% up mainly due to the football ground doing a sale and leaseback deal along with Bobdole moving into rented but mortgage payments are well down due to the football ground no longer paying a mortgage. Based on that would I be able to say that you are paying 20% than you were 12 months ago. No.

    You will find specific statements about FIFA mainly, some on BF3 etc. If you find any on SWTOR in the financial reports please share. As I said the last highlight report said nothing about SWTOR. The last two quarterly reports have mentioned SWTOR only as one of a basket of games when talking about f2p etc. revenue and sub etc. revenue. I add the etc. by the way because they are not just talking about sub and f2p revenue but about advertising, royalties and a host of other stuff. A basket of games, a basket of revenue streams.

    I hate to see people misled. As I say it will be interesting to see what the courts make of the lawsuit resulting from BF4. If you think I have reading comprehension difficulties however paste what was said and I will eat humble pie.

    And, as above, post a link to a 1m number at the time of the 2013 Q1 report (back in August) - all I picked up for August was that subs were down 25% from the f2p launch number. (Don't say EA didn't say that - again - as I pasted the comment in an earlier post and you said oh right, they did).

    And why does it matter? Well they posted a 2.2m number last May (1.7m + 500k subs) and if they only have 1m now (link please) then that is a drop of over 50%. So if in August they had 1.5m - say - then that x2 revenue you are going on about might have been from a higher number of accounts.

    Just post some links - reputable sources would be good. Actual Eric quotes say not things that people think he said - as in 10m .... which you said was crap.    

  • gervaise1gervaise1 Member EpicPosts: 6,919
    Originally posted by bobdole1979
    Originally posted by simplius
     

    if you think, that an 8 year old game has the same economy, as a rather new game..

    when wow goes F2P, they will prolly double their playerbase, maybe they will do it after titans launch

    wow could pay for an expansion every year, yes, but quality takes time

    every wow expansion has enough content, to bridge the gap, til the next one

    makeb was paid by the hyped launch, lets see, when they can make more of that

    AFAIK, the same goes for GSF, theyve been talking about it for a long time

    so, what you have, is :

    4 raids

    3 FPs

    one warzone

    and, the dailys

    impressive, after only 2 years, the same time, as a full wow expansion

     

    1. Yeah GSF, 4 raids 3 fps one warzone and the dailies oh and the new event and 2 companions is all in 1 year.  That's the same time as 2 WoW content patches. 

    oh and a ton of new features

     

    2. no... every WoW expansion does not have enough content to bridge the gap.  You have to be the biggest troll if you think that.      There was a 10 month gap from the last Cataclysim content patch till Mists of Pandaraia. 

    why do you think WoW is losing players so fast? Its the months in between content patches yeah WoW averges 5 months between content patches

     

    3.  "Quality takes time"  ill just leave that there

     

    4.  WoW peaked at around 12 million.  To assume they only had 50 million is a gross missunderstanding of how these things work.

     

    5.  yes 1 million is enough for second place.   No other western MMO has ever achieved 1 million players. well unless you count Runescape but if we do then Runescape is #1.  

    6.  I didn't mention in this thread.    Wait so for a star wars game to be popular the majority of Star Wars fans must be playing it forever?

    So by your logic then SWG is the least popular Star Wars MMO. 

    1. Content is in the eye of the beholder. Will be interesting to see what 2014 brings though. Still nothing on the drums - sorry GSF is coming to f2p in January! 

    2. To be accurate WoW 5.4 was September 2012; 5.3 was May 2013; 5.2 was March 2013 and 5.1 was November 2012. So 4 content drops in the last 13 months. So comparing a years worth of SWTOR to 2 content patches is off. 10 moths from 4.3 (November 2011) to MoP however (September 2012) as you say. 

    5. Once you start to count f2p accounts then a whole other number of games have to be included as well in any comparison. If you are just looking at western games then yes Runescape, and Clone Wars, and Free Worlds, and WoW as it is western and has f2p accounts to level 20. Arguablt co-op games as well. Now if you you cannot look at WoW because it has non-western accounts - well SWTOR has non-western accounts as well. Why it had Asiatic servers. Or are you saying every non-western account left when they closed the servers. And I want that the links to 1m for several time periods from reputable sources as well.

    At the end of the day 2nd or 4th or 10tgh place for a f2p game doesn't mean a great deal. It comes down to spend, retention and cost of acquisition. f2p accounts are like gadflies - a huge cloud arrives and they die quickly. You need to keep the light burning bright to get more and that costs advertising dollars. Or development dollars to generate content to generate publicity. And looking forward looks very dark. The f2p launch brought a cloud of gadflies; Makeb brought another cloud; GSF ... not so sure.

  • bobdole1979bobdole1979 Member Posts: 210
    Originally posted by gervaise1
    Originally posted by bobdole1979

    snip

    1. actually it would be for at least 1 month.   But the 1 million active acounts has been said as "we are steady at 1 million active accounts"

    See the difference?

     

    2. Ok I do you see what is actually said in that statement?  10 million accounts.   Not 10 million subscriptions but 10 million accounts.  I'm sure WoW has over 300 million accounts. 

    The 10 million accounts is not relevent to the disscusion.  

     

    The 1 million is ACTIVE PLAYERS.  It is saying there are 1 MILLION (SOME FREE SOME PAID) are playing the game on average every MONTH.   Do you understand?   This is why SWTOR is the second largest Western MMO

    Try to work a little harder on your reading comprehension. 

     

    3. No you have it wrong.  They said Subs were down but REVENUE was up 20% from what it was over a year ago which would put it during the time where it had over 1 million subscripsions  

    So they are saying that even though subs dropped since the last quarter the overall income for the game is WAY UP.  this is because of the cash shop.  

    Do you understand? 

     

    Post a link. Post several.

    The 10m was in the link you posted which had the 1m number - so same source. From what EA has said 10m accounts is, as you say, crap. Anyway - post a link to 1m steady. (I have seen Jorgenssen's steady comment - in the sense of financially steady - but not a 1M steady link.)

    Post where EA said that SWTORs was 20% up. Or reread it. The comment was made against a basket of games one of which was FIFA. You will find specific comments about FIFA but not about SWTOR - except for the comment that SWTOR was (mainly) responsible for the drop in sub revenue. I added the mainly to show that their statement was - again - about a basket of games. 

    An analogy. 12months ago you were renting; now you have a mortgage. You can say: my rent is way down as in ZERO compared to 12 months ago but my mortgage payments are way UP compared with 12 months ago. Pretty obvious. It doesn't say whether you are paying more or less however. 

    Now canvass everyone in your workplace / guild / school / church congregation / guild - whatever. Add up everyones rent payments and mortgage payments. Compare to 12 months ago. statement: rents are 20% up mainly due to the football ground doing a sale and leaseback deal along with Bobdole moving into rented but mortgage payments are well down due to the football ground no longer paying a mortgage. Based on that would I be able to say that you are paying 20% than you were 12 months ago. No.

    You will find specific statements about FIFA mainly, some on BF3 etc. If you find any on SWTOR in the financial reports please share. As I said the last highlight report said nothing about SWTOR. The last two quarterly reports have mentioned SWTOR only as one of a basket of games when talking about f2p etc. revenue and sub etc. revenue. I add the etc. by the way because they are not just talking about sub and f2p revenue but about advertising, royalties and a host of other stuff. A basket of games, a basket of revenue streams.

    I hate to see people misled. As I say it will be interesting to see what the courts make of the lawsuit resulting from BF4. If you think I have reading comprehension difficulties however paste what was said and I will eat humble pie.

    And, as above, post a link to a 1m number at the time of the 2013 Q1 report (back in August) - all I picked up for August was that subs were down 25% from the f2p launch number. (Don't say EA didn't say that - again - as I pasted the comment in an earlier post and you said oh right, they did).

    And why does it matter? Well they posted a 2.2m number last May (1.7m + 500k subs) and if they only have 1m now (link please) then that is a drop of over 50%. So if in August they had 1.5m - say - then that x2 revenue you are going on about might have been from a higher number of accounts.

    Just post some links - reputable sources would be good. Actual Eric quotes say not things that people think he said - as in 10m .... which you said was crap.    

    yes do please post links backing up your arguements. 

    The burden of proof is on you.

    This thread is asking about the state of the game which these facts can be said about it

     

    1.  It has a very healthy population

    2. They have added more content in a year then WoW and most other MMOs add.  

    3. They are continuing adding new content every 6-8 weeks which is HUGE in the MMO world

    4. they are making a healthy profit. 

     

    Feel free to try and dispute those facts.

  • bobdole1979bobdole1979 Member Posts: 210
    Originally posted by simplius
    Originally posted by bobdole1979
    Originally posted by simplius
     

    if you think, that an 8 year old game has the same economy, as a rather new game..

    when wow goes F2P, they will prolly double their playerbase, maybe they will do it after titans launch

    wow could pay for an expansion every year, yes, but quality takes time

    every wow expansion has enough content, to bridge the gap, til the next one

    makeb was paid by the hyped launch, lets see, when they can make more of that

    AFAIK, the same goes for GSF, theyve been talking about it for a long time

    so, what you have, is :

    4 raids

    3 FPs

    one warzone

    and, the dailys

    impressive, after only 2 years, the same time, as a full wow expansion

     

    1. Yeah GSF, 4 raids 3 fps one warzone and the dailies oh and the new event and 2 companions is all in 1 year.  That's the same time as 2 WoW content patches. 

    oh and a ton of new features

     

    2. no... every WoW expansion does not have enough content to bridge the gap.  You have to be the biggest troll if you think that.      There was a 10 month gap from the last Cataclysim content patch till Mists of Pandaraia. 

    why do you think WoW is losing players so fast? Its the months in between content patches yeah WoW averges 5 months between content patches

     

    3.  "Quality takes time"  ill just leave that there

     

    4.  WoW peaked at around 12 million.  To assume they only had 50 million is a gross missunderstanding of how these things work.

     

    5.  yes 1 million is enough for second place.   No other western MMO has ever achieved 1 million players. well unless you count Runescape but if we do then Runescape is #1.  

    6.  I didn't mention in this thread.    Wait so for a star wars game to be popular the majority of Star Wars fans must be playing it forever?

    So by your logic then SWG is the least popular Star Wars MMO. 

    2. yes, it does , TO THE CASUAL PLAYER, which is their main segment

    and their main source of income

    3. it does..5 months, or would you argue with REAL $ numbers? theyre on wows side..again

    4. wow was never F2P, maybe theyre not counting free trial accounts?

    5. ill just leave that, Theres many smaller games now, maybe youre right

    6.that is the only way , to find the most popular STAR WARS game..many players buying it, and playing it

    if you look at raw numbers , yes , SWG was even lesser popular, than swtor

    but Theres so many other variables, that a direct comparison wouldnt be "fair"..or useful

    SWG launched as sandbox, but tried to convert to themepark

    they pissed off most of the playerbase , but they couldnt get new ones, we were in blizzards grasp

    thats 2 for the panda, 0 for the jedi

    when the third iteration of this epic IP is born, the panda will prolly be too old, to compete

    but then, TITAN will be on the street, so...

    1. I see you admit you lost that arugment

     

    2.  Do you think WoW is magical?  That some how its content takes longer to get through then other MMOs?  Siege of Orgrimmar the last content patch (WHICH CAME OUT IN SEPTEMBER)   has already been beaten many times over.

     

    It was BEAT IN 24 HOURS!

     

    There is not another content patch due till whenever Warlords of Dranror is released.   

     

    3.  I play WoW and SWTOR.  I have yet to find a single WoW raid that is as good as Terror From Beyond.  Not to mention SWTOR has interesting World Bosses.    I can't think of a single SWTOR raid that was beat in 24 hours after it was released.

     

    4.  yeah i know its not F2P but millions upon millions have played WoW.  Many tried for a month then quit some for 1 expansion. 

     

    5. ok

     

    6.  Even when SWG lanuched it was considered a failure.  Why do you think they did the NGE and CU? 

  • RebelScum99RebelScum99 Member Posts: 1,090
    Originally posted by DocBrody

    Still going downhill like any other themepark, that era will very likely be over in 2014/15.

     

    Boy, are you going to be disappointed.  

  • simpliussimplius Member UncommonPosts: 1,134
    Originally posted by bobdole1979
    Originally posted by simplius
    Originally posted by bobdole1979
    Originally posted by simplius
     

    if you think, that an 8 year old game has the same economy, as a rather new game..

    when wow goes F2P, they will prolly double their playerbase, maybe they will do it after titans launch

    wow could pay for an expansion every year, yes, but quality takes time

    every wow expansion has enough content, to bridge the gap, til the next one

    makeb was paid by the hyped launch, lets see, when they can make more of that

    AFAIK, the same goes for GSF, theyve been talking about it for a long time

    so, what you have, is :

    4 raids

    3 FPs

    one warzone

    and, the dailys

    impressive, after only 2 years, the same time, as a full wow expansion

     

    1. Yeah GSF, 4 raids 3 fps one warzone and the dailies oh and the new event and 2 companions is all in 1 year.  That's the same time as 2 WoW content patches. 

    oh and a ton of new features

     

    2. no... every WoW expansion does not have enough content to bridge the gap.  You have to be the biggest troll if you think that.      There was a 10 month gap from the last Cataclysim content patch till Mists of Pandaraia. 

    why do you think WoW is losing players so fast? Its the months in between content patches yeah WoW averges 5 months between content patches

     

    3.  "Quality takes time"  ill just leave that there

     

    4.  WoW peaked at around 12 million.  To assume they only had 50 million is a gross missunderstanding of how these things work.

     

    5.  yes 1 million is enough for second place.   No other western MMO has ever achieved 1 million players. well unless you count Runescape but if we do then Runescape is #1.  

    6.  I didn't mention in this thread.    Wait so for a star wars game to be popular the majority of Star Wars fans must be playing it forever?

    So by your logic then SWG is the least popular Star Wars MMO. 

    2. yes, it does , TO THE CASUAL PLAYER, which is their main segment

    and their main source of income

    3. it does..5 months, or would you argue with REAL $ numbers? theyre on wows side..again

    4. wow was never F2P, maybe theyre not counting free trial accounts?

    5. ill just leave that, Theres many smaller games now, maybe youre right

    6.that is the only way , to find the most popular STAR WARS game..many players buying it, and playing it

    if you look at raw numbers , yes , SWG was even lesser popular, than swtor

    but Theres so many other variables, that a direct comparison wouldnt be "fair"..or useful

    SWG launched as sandbox, but tried to convert to themepark

    they pissed off most of the playerbase , but they couldnt get new ones, we were in blizzards grasp

    thats 2 for the panda, 0 for the jedi

    when the third iteration of this epic IP is born, the panda will prolly be too old, to compete

    but then, TITAN will be on the street, so...

    1. I see you admit you lost that arugment

     

    2.  Do you think WoW is magical?  That some how its content takes longer to get through then other MMOs?  Siege of Orgrimmar the last content patch (WHICH CAME OUT IN SEPTEMBER)   has already been beaten many times over.

     

    It was BEAT IN 24 HOURS!

     

    There is not another content patch due till whenever Warlords of Dranror is released.   

     

    3.  I play WoW and SWTOR.  I have yet to find a single WoW raid that is as good as Terror From Beyond.  Not to mention SWTOR has interesting World Bosses.    I can't think of a single SWTOR raid that was beat in 24 hours after it was released.

     

    4.  yeah i know its not F2P but millions upon millions have played WoW.  Many tried for a month then quit some for 1 expansion. 

     

    5. ok

     

    6.  Even when SWG lanuched it was considered a failure.  Why do you think they did the NGE and CU? 

    1. if he is happy with the content, he gets, why..and how, would i argue with that?

    but, looking at the raw stats, other games have more to offer

    2. why would i care if some hardcores rush through a raid?

    is there enough content for me? yes

    3. who cares about raids? raiders do...i dont

    4.roughly 50 mios players over 8 years, so the average wow player is subbed for about a year

    how long is the average swtor player subbed? if he is subbed, at all?

    6.didnt there go several months , before that?

    AFAIK, they only started tweaking, after they saw wows numbers soar

    i didnt play SWG, so i wont defend it

    by that defintion, swtor is a even bigger failure

    why did they go F2P in a year? because they wanted, to make all the STAR WARS fans happy?

    or. because, they couldnt sell their product, at a standard, and FIXED Price?

     

  • simpliussimplius Member UncommonPosts: 1,134
    Originally posted by bobdole1979
    Originally posted by gervaise1
    Originally posted by bobdole1979

    snip

    1. actually it would be for at least 1 month.   But the 1 million active acounts has been said as "we are steady at 1 million active accounts"

    See the difference?

     

    2. Ok I do you see what is actually said in that statement?  10 million accounts.   Not 10 million subscriptions but 10 million accounts.  I'm sure WoW has over 300 million accounts. 

    The 10 million accounts is not relevent to the disscusion.  

     

    The 1 million is ACTIVE PLAYERS.  It is saying there are 1 MILLION (SOME FREE SOME PAID) are playing the game on average every MONTH.   Do you understand?   This is why SWTOR is the second largest Western MMO

    Try to work a little harder on your reading comprehension. 

     

    3. No you have it wrong.  They said Subs were down but REVENUE was up 20% from what it was over a year ago which would put it during the time where it had over 1 million subscripsions  

    So they are saying that even though subs dropped since the last quarter the overall income for the game is WAY UP.  this is because of the cash shop.  

    Do you understand? 

     

    Post a link. Post several.

    The 10m was in the link you posted which had the 1m number - so same source. From what EA has said 10m accounts is, as you say, crap. Anyway - post a link to 1m steady. (I have seen Jorgenssen's steady comment - in the sense of financially steady - but not a 1M steady link.)

    Post where EA said that SWTORs was 20% up. Or reread it. The comment was made against a basket of games one of which was FIFA. You will find specific comments about FIFA but not about SWTOR - except for the comment that SWTOR was (mainly) responsible for the drop in sub revenue. I added the mainly to show that their statement was - again - about a basket of games. 

    An analogy. 12months ago you were renting; now you have a mortgage. You can say: my rent is way down as in ZERO compared to 12 months ago but my mortgage payments are way UP compared with 12 months ago. Pretty obvious. It doesn't say whether you are paying more or less however. 

    Now canvass everyone in your workplace / guild / school / church congregation / guild - whatever. Add up everyones rent payments and mortgage payments. Compare to 12 months ago. statement: rents are 20% up mainly due to the football ground doing a sale and leaseback deal along with Bobdole moving into rented but mortgage payments are well down due to the football ground no longer paying a mortgage. Based on that would I be able to say that you are paying 20% than you were 12 months ago. No.

    You will find specific statements about FIFA mainly, some on BF3 etc. If you find any on SWTOR in the financial reports please share. As I said the last highlight report said nothing about SWTOR. The last two quarterly reports have mentioned SWTOR only as one of a basket of games when talking about f2p etc. revenue and sub etc. revenue. I add the etc. by the way because they are not just talking about sub and f2p revenue but about advertising, royalties and a host of other stuff. A basket of games, a basket of revenue streams.

    I hate to see people misled. As I say it will be interesting to see what the courts make of the lawsuit resulting from BF4. If you think I have reading comprehension difficulties however paste what was said and I will eat humble pie.

    And, as above, post a link to a 1m number at the time of the 2013 Q1 report (back in August) - all I picked up for August was that subs were down 25% from the f2p launch number. (Don't say EA didn't say that - again - as I pasted the comment in an earlier post and you said oh right, they did).

    And why does it matter? Well they posted a 2.2m number last May (1.7m + 500k subs) and if they only have 1m now (link please) then that is a drop of over 50%. So if in August they had 1.5m - say - then that x2 revenue you are going on about might have been from a higher number of accounts.

    Just post some links - reputable sources would be good. Actual Eric quotes say not things that people think he said - as in 10m .... which you said was crap.    

    yes do please post links backing up your arguements. 

    The burden of proof is on you.

    This thread is asking about the state of the game which these facts can be said about it

     

    1.  It has a very healthy population

    2. They have added more content in a year then WoW and most other MMOs add.  

    3. They are continuing adding new content every 6-8 weeks which is HUGE in the MMO world

    4. they are making a healthy profit. 

     

    Feel free to try and dispute those facts.

    1. okay

    2. except STO, and wow is on a skeleton crew, theyre using most resources on titan

    3. that cycle is the norm now, not the exception

    oddly enougn, the EXCEPTION is still doing best..by far

    4. Again: if they can sell recolored STAR WARS pixels, for 20$ a pop, its hard NOT to have a profit

    and, where does the profit go? back in the game, or in EAs pockets?

  • simpliussimplius Member UncommonPosts: 1,134
    Originally posted by RebelScum99
    Originally posted by DocBrody

    Still going downhill like any other themepark, that era will very likely be over in 2014/15.

     

    Boy, are you going to be disappointed.  

    if anything, they will increase the amount  of half -finished themeparks, by a substantial number

    how many sandboxes on the Horizon? 2? 3?

    a themepark wont get your average dev rich, but it will give him a job

    and me something, to bitch about

    we dont get, what we want, but, at least, we get SOMETHING

  • bobdole1979bobdole1979 Member Posts: 210
    Originally posted by simplius
    Originally posted by bobdole1979
      

    yes do please post links backing up your arguements. 

    The burden of proof is on you.

    This thread is asking about the state of the game which these facts can be said about it

     

    1.  It has a very healthy population

    2. They have added more content in a year then WoW and most other MMOs add.  

    3. They are continuing adding new content every 6-8 weeks which is HUGE in the MMO world

    4. they are making a healthy profit. 

     

    Feel free to try and dispute those facts.

    1. okay

    2. except STO, and wow is on a skeleton crew, theyre using most resources on titan

    3. that cycle is the norm now, not the exception

    oddly enougn, the EXCEPTION is still doing best..by far

    4. Again: if they can sell recolored STAR WARS pixels, for 20$ a pop, its hard NOT to have a profit

    and, where does the profit go? back in the game, or in EAs pockets?

    2.  STO really???  You think STO has released more conent this year?  Ok lets see the links.

     

    ROFL WoW is on a Skeleton CREW???? OMG you have to be the biggest troll here.    Ok show me the links saying that WoW is on a skeleton crew.  Keep in mind they have been working on the new expansion for a while now.

     

    3.  Really?  What other MMOs are on a 6 week content cycle?

    4.  Well as we have seen them hiring more developers and add new content every 6 weeks I would say back in the game. 

  • firefly2003firefly2003 Member UncommonPosts: 2,527
    Originally posted by doodphace

    Its got a million active players a month, of which a little under 500k of those are subscribers. Most MMOs on the market would dream for those numbers

    Unfortunately, I prefer a quality game over numbers any day, and the quality of this game stinks......


  • simpliussimplius Member UncommonPosts: 1,134
    Originally posted by bobdole1979
    Originally posted by simplius
    Originally posted by bobdole1979
      

    yes do please post links backing up your arguements. 

    The burden of proof is on you.

    This thread is asking about the state of the game which these facts can be said about it

     

    1.  It has a very healthy population

    2. They have added more content in a year then WoW and most other MMOs add.  

    3. They are continuing adding new content every 6-8 weeks which is HUGE in the MMO world

    4. they are making a healthy profit. 

     

    Feel free to try and dispute those facts.

    1. okay

    2. except STO, and wow is on a skeleton crew, theyre using most resources on titan

    3. that cycle is the norm now, not the exception

    oddly enougn, the EXCEPTION is still doing best..by far

    4. Again: if they can sell recolored STAR WARS pixels, for 20$ a pop, its hard NOT to have a profit

    and, where does the profit go? back in the game, or in EAs pockets?

    2.  STO really???  You think STO has released more conent this year?  Ok lets see the links.

     

    ROFL WoW is on a Skeleton CREW???? OMG you have to be the biggest troll here.    Ok show me the links saying that WoW is on a skeleton crew.  Keep in mind they have been working on the new expansion for a while now.

     

    3.  Really?  What other MMOs are on a 6 week content cycle?

    4.  Well as we have seen them hiring more developers and add new content every 6 weeks I would say back in the game. 

    i see the problem here: you believe more in a LINK, than in actual FACTS

    you want links, find them yourself, or look at the game

    blizzard saying" were just gonna take the same Money, but give you lesser for it"...of course, they would say that

    wow financed big parts of starcraft 2  and diablo 3

    GW2 and STO both have very fast content cycles, Theres prolly more, that i dont know

  • DamonVileDamonVile Member UncommonPosts: 4,818
    Originally posted by simplius
     

    i see the problem here: you believe more in a LINK, than in actual FACTS

    you want links, find them yourself, or look at the game

     

    umm... no, you don't see the problem. A LINK  is to an official source where you got that info from. It is a fact. You just saying it, doesn't mean anything. The burden of proof is on you. Telling him to go look it up himself only means you don't know where the original source came from...or you just made it up yourself.

  • simpliussimplius Member UncommonPosts: 1,134

    considering, how many links there are on pretty much every subject, i dont put too much faith in them

    i can link you to a nazi site, that tells you, to kill jews

    i can link you to al quaida, telling you the same about westeners

    does that mean, that theyre right?

    if i did provide links,,would that make him less happy, with his game?

    would it make me happier, with mine?

    and , even if it did

    Companies dont make MISTAKES, right?

    Companies dont LIE, right?

    a link is just pixels, i believe more in reality

  • Ice-QueenIce-Queen Member UncommonPosts: 2,483
    If it were doing well, it would be all over gaming news how spectacular they're doing. It'll be put in maintenance mode and slowly die, just like Warhammer, It's EA.

    image

    What happens when you log off your characters????.....
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GFQhfhnjYMk
    Dark Age of Camelot

  • DamonVileDamonVile Member UncommonPosts: 4,818
    Originally posted by simplius

    considering, how many links there are on pretty much every subject, i dont put too much faith in them

    i can link you to a nazi site, that tells you, to kill jews

    i can link you to al quaida, telling you the same about westeners

    does that mean, that theyre right?

    if i did provide links,,would that make him less happy, with his game?

    would it make me happier, with mine?

    and , even if it did

    Companies dont make MISTAKES, right?

    Companies dont LIE, right?

    a link is just pixels, i believe more in reality

    Not really sure how the nazi reference is even relevant nor do I want you to elaborate on it...

    You're not trying to prove his game is bad with links, you're trying to prove what you're saying is founded in "reality" Good and bad games are not "facts" ever.

    Like you saying wow is on a skeleton crew and everyone is working on Titan. Well anyone following that would know it's not true because Blizzard scaled it back from a team of 100 down to 30 last year....here is a link http://venturebeat.com/2013/05/28/blizzard-delays-unannounced-mmo-until-2016-resets-whole-project-exclusive/  

    See how that works ?

    Now I have no information on where all those devs went but we didn't hear about any layoffs so they still work for blizzard somewhere. Since no one really knows ( that I've heard ) we'd just be arguing opinions on if they went back to wow or not, but with a new x-pack on it's way...my guess is some of them did.

     

  • NildenNilden Member EpicPosts: 3,916
    Fun Fact: TOR has 8 U.S. servers and both City of Heroes and Star Wars Galaxies had more than 8 U.S. servers when they were shut down.

    "You CAN'T buy ships for RL money." - MaxBacon

    "classification of games into MMOs is not by rational reasoning" - nariusseldon

    Love Minecraft. And check out my Youtube channel OhCanadaGamer

    Try a MUD today at http://www.mudconnect.com/ 

  • simpliussimplius Member UncommonPosts: 1,134
    Originally posted by DamonVile
    Originally posted by simplius

    considering, how many links there are on pretty much every subject, i dont put too much faith in them

    i can link you to a nazi site, that tells you, to kill jews

    i can link you to al quaida, telling you the same about westeners

    does that mean, that theyre right?

    if i did provide links,,would that make him less happy, with his game?

    would it make me happier, with mine?

    and , even if it did

    Companies dont make MISTAKES, right?

    Companies dont LIE, right?

    a link is just pixels, i believe more in reality

    Not really sure how the nazi reference is even relevant nor do I want you to elaborate on it...

    You're not trying to prove his game is bad with links, you're trying to prove what you're saying is founded in "reality" Good and bad games are not "facts" ever.

    Like you saying wow is on a skeleton crew and everyone is working on Titan. Well anyone following that would know it's not true because Blizzard scaled it back from a team of 100 down to 30 last year....here is a link http://venturebeat.com/2013/05/28/blizzard-delays-unannounced-mmo-until-2016-resets-whole-project-exclusive/  

    See how that works ?

    Now I have no information on where all those devs went but we didn't hear about any layoffs so they still work for blizzard somewhere. Since no one really knows ( that I've heard ) we'd just be arguing opinions on if they went back to wow or not, but with a new x-pack on it's way...my guess is some of them did.

     

    read the date, this article is more, than ½ a year old

    and do note: most of the article is based on rumours and speculations

    that is its biggest strength, IMO

    it prolly happened, but NO WAY would the suits admit it

    i knew, that they had reset Titan, but i didnt know about the cutbacks

    its obviously giving them a lot of trouble, beating a legend is pretty hard

    and note the $$ number, where did all those Money go?

    Theres prolly countries, that have less Money, than that

    scary thought

  • simpliussimplius Member UncommonPosts: 1,134
    Originally posted by nilden
    Fun Fact: TOR has 8 U.S. servers and both City of Heroes and Star Wars Galaxies had more than 8 U.S. servers when they were shut down.

    weird..SWG servers had jedi protection , but that didnt help

    these were ancient servers, prolly run on oil lamps, and stone tablets

    swtor has modern SUPER servers, to prevent the same fate

  • TheLizardbonesTheLizardbones Member CommonPosts: 10,910


    Originally posted by nilden
    Fun Fact: TOR has 8 U.S. servers and both City of Heroes and Star Wars Galaxies had more than 8 U.S. servers when they were shut down.

    Would you care to add the number of players per server to that statistic or are you just assuming that 2005 era servers are comparable to 2012 era servers?

    I can not remember winning or losing a single debate on the internet.

  • simpliussimplius Member UncommonPosts: 1,134
    Originally posted by lizardbones

     


    Originally posted by nilden
    Fun Fact: TOR has 8 U.S. servers and both City of Heroes and Star Wars Galaxies had more than 8 U.S. servers when they were shut down.


    Would you care to add the number of players per server to that statistic or are you just assuming that 2005 era servers are comparable to 2012 era servers?

     

    he is trolling, and he is a true artist in his field

    GUIDE ME, MASTER!!!!

  • CazNeergCazNeerg Member Posts: 2,198
    Originally posted by firefly2003
    Originally posted by doodphace

    Its got a million active players a month, of which a little under 500k of those are subscribers. Most MMOs on the market would dream for those numbers

    Unfortunately, I prefer a quality game over numbers any day, and the quality of this game stinks......

    I don't think that word means what you think it means.  "Quality" doesn't mean "what I like," so failure to conform to your tastes does not indicate a lack of it.

    Peace is a lie, there is only passion.
    Through passion, I gain strength.
    Through strength, I gain power.
    Through power, I gain victory.
    Through victory, my chains are broken.
    The Force shall free me.

  • bobdole1979bobdole1979 Member Posts: 210
    Originally posted by simplius

    considering, how many links there are on pretty much every subject, i dont put too much faith in them

    i can link you to a nazi site, that tells you, to kill jews

    i can link you to al quaida, telling you the same about westeners

    does that mean, that theyre right?

    if i did provide links,,would that make him less happy, with his game?

    would it make me happier, with mine?

    and , even if it did

    Companies dont make MISTAKES, right?

    Companies dont LIE, right?

    a link is just pixels, i believe more in reality

    GODWIN'S LAW

     

    That's the second time you've lost

     

    Seeing as you can't provide ANY links backing up what you say I'm not worried about.

     

    So where did you hear that WoW is on a skeleton crew?

This discussion has been closed.