Originally posted by BarryManilow Originally posted by ThinmanOriginally posted by Shrubber Originally posted by ghoul31WOW is really destroying EQ2. Its not even close anymoreThat is pretty crazy.I predicted this long ago.. muahahahahahhahahahahahhahahahah. ha. mu...ah...ha..ha. ha. mu. Lineage I and II are totally kicking WoW's ass!!1one!1 muahahahhahahahah..ha.mu.ah.hahhaha.ma. High School humor roxxorz d00d.
I make a good-natured post and you come back insulting me. Good show, you're a tool.
Originally posted by Frutron I dont think there should be any doubt about the fact that GW will be included, after all its been at the top of the PC charts for 3 weeks and has only managed to push down WoW to 4th place. What this means is that lots of people who havent played these games before are flocking to the genre, albeit in a slightly different form. This is the kind of new data that these analysis guys EAT up with a spoon. My guess is that Arenanet will probably provide data on the number of active accounts, like the ones that have been logged into at least once in the last week or something.
GW will never be included because it isn't an MMO and it doesn't have any subscribers. If they included it, it would be a flat line at zero.
As for people talking about how many people are playing this game or that at prime time, that chart doesn't have anything to do with active players, it has to do with subscribers.
Originally posted by Frutron I dont think there should be any doubt about the fact that GW will be included, after all its been at the top of the PC charts for 3 weeks and has only managed to push down WoW to 4th place. What this means is that lots of people who havent played these games before are flocking to the genre, albeit in a slightly different form. This is the kind of new data that these analysis guys EAT up with a spoon. My guess is that Arenanet will probably provide data on the number of active accounts, like the ones that have been logged into at least once in the last week or something.
GW will never be included because it isn't an MMO and it doesn't have any subscribers. If they included it, it would be a flat line at zero.
As for people talking about how many people are playing this game or that at prime time, that chart doesn't have anything to do with active players, it has to do with subscribers.
if you take the number of primetime players and multiply it by 10, it gives you a pretty good idea of how many people are playing it. So you could put Guild wars on there.
Comments
I make a good-natured post and you come back insulting me. Good show, you're a tool.
_______________________________________________________________________
Looking forward (cautiously) to: Age of Conan, Dark Solstice, Armada Online.
Will soon try: Guild Wars
Overall: Amazed and bewhildered at the current sad state of the artform of gaming.
GW will never be included because it isn't an MMO and it doesn't have any subscribers. If they included it, it would be a flat line at zero.
As for people talking about how many people are playing this game or that at prime time, that chart doesn't have anything to do with active players, it has to do with subscribers.
GW will never be included because it isn't an MMO and it doesn't have any subscribers. If they included it, it would be a flat line at zero.
As for people talking about how many people are playing this game or that at prime time, that chart doesn't have anything to do with active players, it has to do with subscribers.
if you take the number of primetime players and multiply it by 10, it gives you a pretty good idea of how many people are playing it. So you could put Guild wars on there.