[PRESS] Chris Roberts calls people incredibly supportive and positive

Adjuvant1

SEANMCAD said:

Adjuvant1 said:

Well, here's where 2.2 is for now.

https://twitter.com/discolando/status/700389770623488001

so although I am not a supporter of SC I think that comment was a bit dickish and not even needed to make the same point

What do you mean. Although I didn't use quotes, you can follow the conversation. It's only 1.5 pages. Grumpyhobbit expressed "no one knows the status", I said "we'll know the status with 2.2", then "oh, here's the status". What part was "dickish"?

SEANMCAD

Adjuvant1 said:

SEANMCAD said:

Adjuvant1 said:

Well, here's where 2.2 is for now.

so although I am not a supporter of SC I think that comment was a bit dickish and not even needed to make the same point

What do you mean. Although I didn't use quotes, you can follow the conversation. It's only 1.5 pages. Grumpyhobbit expressed "no one knows the status", I said "we'll know the status with 2.2", then "oh, here's the status". What part was "dickish"?

because as we all know things like that happen because of specific settings and or machines. It doesnt happen to all players. You are cherry picking the worst examples you can find to make a point that really dosent even need the worst examples to be a valid point

Adjuvant1

SEANMCAD said:

Adjuvant1 said:

SEANMCAD said:

Adjuvant1 said:

Well, here's where 2.2 is for now.

so although I am not a supporter of SC I think that comment was a bit dickish and not even needed to make the same point

What do you mean. Although I didn't use quotes, you can follow the conversation. It's only 1.5 pages. Grumpyhobbit expressed "no one knows the status", I said "we'll know the status with 2.2", then "oh, here's the status". What part was "dickish"?

because as we all know things like that happen because of specific settings and or machines. It doesnt happen to all players. You are cherry picking the worst examples you can find to make a point that really dosent even need the worst examples to be a valid point

Quick, make up a reason to seem right, seanmcad thinks to himself.

That's funny you said cherry picking, though. Tomatoes, cherries, cherry tomatoes.

It's not specific to some machines. Why the hell would the people in-studio be subject to what you describe. That's Lando's twitter. He's not just some compatibility test plebian.

SEANMCAD

Adjuvant1 said:

SEANMCAD said:

Adjuvant1 said:

SEANMCAD said:

Adjuvant1 said:

Well, here's where 2.2 is for now.

so although I am not a supporter of SC I think that comment was a bit dickish and not even needed to make the same point

What do you mean. Although I didn't use quotes, you can follow the conversation. It's only 1.5 pages. Grumpyhobbit expressed "no one knows the status", I said "we'll know the status with 2.2", then "oh, here's the status". What part was "dickish"?

because as we all know things like that happen because of specific settings and or machines. It doesnt happen to all players. You are cherry picking the worst examples you can find to make a point that really dosent even need the worst examples to be a valid point

Quick, make up a reason to seem right, seanmcad thinks to himself.

That's funny you said cherry picking, though. Tomatoes, cherries, cherry tomatoes.

It's not specific to some machines. Why the hell would the people in-studio be subject to what you describe. That's Lando's twitter. He's not just some compatibility test plebian.

as a critic of SC myself what I have noticed is that most critics of SC feel some need to go to the most extreeme dickish level they can think of to make a point and more often then not its 1. the wrong point or 2. the point dosent even require that level of extremism to still be 100% correct and understood.

I am not sure why people do it but they do

Adjuvant1

I don't need to do that. I cite my references and give the best, to my understanding, clear vision, without company propaganda, possible for an attentive observer. People are always welcome to question my sources or ask for clarification on my presentation.

You... don't have this.

Amana

Response threads are another form of creating a duplicate topic. Leave reactions in the original.