Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Awesome Star Citizen Video - just awesome.

2

Comments

  • Darkfalz89Darkfalz89 Member UncommonPosts: 581
    edited February 2016
    Reading over this thread the games finest supporters have gotten awfully quiet the moment specific questions are asked minus one person failing at saying anything remotely pertinent to the topic at hand. I can safely say I have not followed this game in the least bit, but from all the internet fights and bad press that endlessly surround this game it feels like the most successfully funded kickstarted piece of vaporware I have seen to date. The only time videos pop up to me all I see is the same station and a very nice takeoff and touchdown animation and tons of ships or about some well known actor voicing some other part of the game/motioncap mumbo jumbo. You can definitely see the steady flow of development going where it needs to be; more ships =/= more ways to tug on that IV drip to the poor clueless folks wallets. 

    If what the above poster rings true 4 years is a tremendous amount of time for a unplayable alpha is it not? I swear I remember back when the project was funded YEARS ago and are you telling me this is honestly all they have to show for it? I thought I met some delusional lemmings in my time on the OF and forums here for FFXIV. Some of the people that actually actively support the game make me really question where these people set the boundaries of reality and that which is not real and will probably never be.
  • SmartySmartSmartySmart Member UncommonPosts: 312
    edited February 2016
    Educate yourself (even if it's from kotaku)

    http://kotaku.com/five-things-i-didn-t-get-about-making-video-games-unti-1687510871

    Crying foul is easy for the standard keyboard warrior...

    There is no game? What's your game? Moaning? Weak mindset. Other question: What is a game?

    Glorified tech demo? It has been stated many times that SC Alpha is a testbed and helps the development that is hidden from the public eye (showing everything would minimize the essence of the whole thing... exploring and being curious about the game/lore/mechanics).

    It should be ready by now after over 3 years? Maybe if CIG end of 2012 already was at full force and had the manpower. But building a company from the ground up takes away many resources (time). And if you grow too fast it can be quite unstable. Also 3/4/5 years are not long for the whole project.

    It seems CR wants his dream game to be build (in the best possible way), some naysayers and overly attached SC critics live in their own dreamworld.

    It was stated that the SC fans have become quiet... maybe they become tired of the repetitive critic and bitching. I was. And catching up with all the drama is heavy... sometimes funny and often leads to facepalm.
  • Adjuvant1Adjuvant1 Member RarePosts: 2,100
    Educate yourself (even if it's from kotaku)

    http://kotaku.com/five-things-i-didn-t-get-about-making-video-games-unti-1687510871

    Crying foul is easy for the standard keyboard warrior...

    There is no game? What's your game? Moaning? Weak mindset. Other question: What is a game?

    Glorified tech demo? It has been stated many times that SC Alpha is a testbed and helps the development that is hidden from the public eye (showing everything would minimize the essence of the whole thing... exploring and being curious about the game/lore/mechanics).

    It should be ready by now after over 3 years? Maybe if CIG end of 2012 already was at full force and had the manpower. But building a company from the ground up takes away many resources (time). And if you grow too fast it can be quite unstable. Also 3/4/5 years are not long for the whole project.

    It seems CR wants his dream game to be build (in the best possible way), some naysayers and overly attached SC critics live in their own dreamworld.

    It was stated that the SC fans have become quiet... maybe they become tired of the repetitive critic and bitching. I was. And catching up with all the drama is heavy... sometimes funny and often leads to facepalm.
    This is like a form letter response, and it is as insulting to honesty as it is to intelligence.

    Fine. You believe there's all this hidden work, behind the scenes, we're not being shown because it will somehow ruin the surprise of a finished game. I can believe that with story aspect of Squadron 42. However, Squadron 42 is not subject to the "increased scope" or "additional features" which give excuse for the delayed development process of SC mmo. Squadron 42 was originally slated for summer of 2014, it will not release until well into 2017. How do you explain this?

    Further, if, indeed, this is truly a "testbed", and there, indeed, exists much other work, why is there no "testbed" of planetary landing/ embarkment, actual fps combat, inter-system travel, ship weapon/accessory modules, etc? That included, were it to crash every 10 minutes, were it to be horribly bugged, would be some more semblance of an "alpha". Look, you say potato, I say potato. You say "testbed", I say "tech demo". You see this inside...



    ...I'm looking right at this, with 20/20 vision.



    You need alot more substance to your argument than, "I believe". I actually am compelled to hope for you, but the reality doesn't line up. Add to this the fact so many statements and projections out of Robert's mouth do not come true. Citing the latest, the fact 2.2 is 3 weeks late, I will tell you, is just becoming "another thing", nothing shocking, nothing special. He doesn't even acknowledge or apologize for it, just hides out, waiting for it to blow over. You're defending a group of people with very little respect for their audience. I have no clue why you don't see that.




  • ErillionErillion Member EpicPosts: 10,328
    About SC fans being quiet.... The best way to deal with SomethingAwful.com agitprop is to ignore SA agitprop. Learned that from dealing with SA/Goons in EVE. I see their very predictable, very boring modus operandi being applied here in this subforum too. Let those posters post their threads ... the continually rising number of SC players show that their activities basically have the opposite effect from what they are trying to achieve. For those of you that do not know the SA forum and posters... lucky you!


    Have fun
  • BrenicsBrenics Member RarePosts: 1,939
    @SmartySmart So now they are hiding the game from backers? I really could believe that if they came out and at least said that. Like the Division did with their beta, telling us character creation was partially active and also a lot of content will be missing from game until release. Little honesty goes a long way, something we are missing with a lot of KS games. 
    I'm not perfect but I'm always myself!

    Star Citizen – The Extinction Level Event


    4/13/15 > ELE has been updated look for 16-04-13.

    http://www.dereksmart.org/2016/04/star-citizen-the-ele/

    Enjoy and know the truth always comes to light!

  • SmartySmartSmartySmart Member UncommonPosts: 312
    Yes SA and goons want their part in this... they can not let this past. Not that I have anything against the Goons in SC. They are passionate to a certain degree. Let's see how their "master plan" works out ;) They are quite successful with their social hacking.
  • Adjuvant1Adjuvant1 Member RarePosts: 2,100
    Erillion said:
    About SC fans being quiet.... The best way to deal with SomethingAwful.com agitprop is to ignore SA agitprop. Learned that from dealing with SA/Goons in EVE. I see their very predictable, very boring modus operandi being applied here in this subforum too. Let those posters post their threads ... the continually rising number of SC players show that their activities basically have the opposite effect from what they are trying to achieve. For those of you that do not know the SA forum and posters... lucky you!


    Have fun
    Yes, yes, last year it was all "Derek Smart followers" who were the detractors and trolls. This year, all the blame is on the nebulous "goons", the bogeymen from "that other site". It's every type of person, Erillion, people from all walks of life, waking up to see how this project is being mismanaged and advancing at an unacceptable pace, with deceit, gaslighting, and public shaming to "fall in line" rife in the mix.

    While the "bogeyman" story seems to hold sway over a number of redditors, some good population of $1000+ backers are truly annoyed and concerned with all manners of issues. Next you'll say, "can't please everyone!", but that situation is by CIG's own design, the way they've propagandized the project and made so many promises, so many "uh-huhs" and so many "oh, we don't want that either!", in so many directions, just to get backer dollars.

    Who will be the culprit of widespread derision next? The FTC? That wasn't a joke, by the way.
  • SmartySmartSmartySmart Member UncommonPosts: 312
    edited February 2016
    Adjuvant1 said:
    This is like a form letter response, and it is as insulting to honesty as it is to intelligence
    Fine. You believe there's all this hidden work, behind the scenes, we're not being shown because it will somehow ruin the surprise of a finished game. I can believe that with story aspect of Squadron 42. However, Squadron 42 is not subject to the "increased scope" or "additional features" which give excuse for the delayed development process of SC mmo. Squadron 42 was originally slated for summer of 2014, it will not release until well into 2017. How do you explain this?

    Further, if, indeed, this is truly a "testbed", and there, indeed, exists much other work, why is there no "testbed" of planetary landing/ embarkment, actual fps combat, inter-system travel, ship weapon/accessory modules, etc? That included, were it to crash every 10 minutes, were it to be horribly bugged, would be some more semblance of an "alpha". Look, you say potato, I say potato. You say "testbed", I say "tech demo". You see this inside...



    ...I'm looking right at this, with 20/20 vision.



    You need alot more substance to your argument than, "I believe". I actually am compelled to hope for you, but the reality doesn't line up. Add to this the fact so many statements and projections out of Robert's mouth do not come true. Citing the latest, the fact 2.2 is 3 weeks late, I will tell you, is just becoming "another thing", nothing shocking, nothing special. He doesn't even acknowledge or apologize for it, just hides out, waiting for it to blow over. You're defending a group of people with very little respect for their audience. I have no clue why you don't see that.




    So I have insulted your intellect? Nice :)

    You think you are better than others. You like to disguise and make things more complex as necessary. Also trolling. SA?

    Of course there is hidden work. Open development doesn't mean to show every little bit. But I know that you are quite aware of that.

    No. SQ42 is also affected by the increased scope. More money, more resources, more ways to approach the initial goal and expand it (detail, lore, gameplay mechanics, etc.). Furthermore SC and SQ42 use the same tech and as SC expanded its scope, SQ42 was also affected by it. 

    How I explain the delay of SQ42? Really? Just google some games and how often and how long they have been delayed. This is nothing spectacular in the game development biz. If you read the link that insulted your intellect you might understand why.... oh sorry that also insulted your intellect. 

    READ IT AGAIN... SLOWLY ;)

    Testbed, tech demo, alpha... these are just words for people to supply their argumentation. Call it what you like. I call it how I like it. It is what it is and there are so many new vids from this "not a game" everyday that one must wonder what's the fuss about, eh?

    So CR is lying when he says that 2.2 comes out in 3 weeks and it does not? Did you miss the part when he says (always) that this is not promised and he HOPES that it will be ready by then? He openly admitted that he is not so good in promising dates and delivering. He admitted it. That is not lying. 

    Oh no he is not the man I think he is? Yes I do not know him personally but from preserving his behavior towards fans he seems quite a nice guy... a little daydreamer he is but everything starts as a thought. Also I am old enough to have been there in the old days and as a passionate gamer (not such a mmo junkie like you... no offense btw.) and a people person I can most of the time see how someone is. I know he can be excentric and a little bit narcissistic but a lot of bosses have these psycholical profile.

    Overall he is quite a nice guy. Believe me. You might not like him but that does not make him a bad person. But that is up to your own personality I know very little about.

    I never said 2.2 will be something special.
  • BrenicsBrenics Member RarePosts: 1,939
    Oh no he is not the man I think he is? Yes I do not know him personally but from preserving his behavior towards fans he seems quite a nice guy... a little daydreamer he is but everything starts as a thought.

    LOL so you do not know him!


    Overall he is quite a nice guy. Believe me. You might not like him but that does not make him a bad person. But that is up to your own personality I know very little about.

    Yet you sound like you do know him, can't have it both ways. :-D

    Think they call that double talk!
    I'm not perfect but I'm always myself!

    Star Citizen – The Extinction Level Event


    4/13/15 > ELE has been updated look for 16-04-13.

    http://www.dereksmart.org/2016/04/star-citizen-the-ele/

    Enjoy and know the truth always comes to light!

  • SmartySmartSmartySmart Member UncommonPosts: 312
    Adjuvant1 said:
    Erillion said:
    About SC fans being quiet.... The best way to deal with SomethingAwful.com agitprop is to ignore SA agitprop. Learned that from dealing with SA/Goons in EVE. I see their very predictable, very boring modus operandi being applied here in this subforum too. Let those posters post their threads ... the continually rising number of SC players show that their activities basically have the opposite effect from what they are trying to achieve. For those of you that do not know the SA forum and posters... lucky you!


    Have fun
    Yes, yes, last year it was all "Derek Smart followers" who were the detractors and trolls. This year, all the blame is on the nebulous "goons", the bogeymen from "that other site". It's every type of person, Erillion, people from all walks of life, waking up to see how this project is being mismanaged and advancing at an unacceptable pace, with deceit, gaslighting, and public shaming to "fall in line" rife in the mix.

    While the "bogeyman" story seems to hold sway over a number of redditors, some good population of $1000+ backers are truly annoyed and concerned with all manners of issues. Next you'll say, "can't please everyone!", but that situation is by CIG's own design, the way they've propagandized the project and made so many promises, so many "uh-huhs" and so many "oh, we don't want that either!", in so many directions, just to get backer dollars.

    Who will be the culprit of widespread derision next? The FTC? That wasn't a joke, by the way.
    Nothing wrong being concerned when you have invested so much money but that does not give people the right to give CIG orders on how to do things. 

    The initiation of this whole mess was used by DerpShit successfully and he won some goons, uninformed people and unhappy, disappointed backers for his cause. If you have been around you know of his masterplan he did with Algonon, tried with STO and tried it with SC. And this is no conspiracy... that's his mindset as NPD person.

    Enough of him... he has enough air time over r/dereksmart. 

    Goons are goons, some play with "named above", some support him but most of them do their thing (like I said in my last post: social hacking but mostly trolling, being fixed on a certain group person and just being ugly). Fact is that they stir up people, groups, etc. and misuse information.

    They use propaganda tactics (not saying that there is no pro SC propaganda). But what is better? Building or destroying? Yes men like to build things to tear them down afterwards... But that is something different. 

    FTC is a joke as proven before. Even if someone manages to give the. Something they could work on, then I am convinced that it will be nothing noteworthy. DS tried to initiate FTC, FBI and what else comes in your mind... yes he talks much but he was your best chance. Missed.
  • SmartySmartSmartySmart Member UncommonPosts: 312
    Brenics said:
    Oh no he is not the man I think he is? Yes I do not know him personally but from preserving his behavior towards fans he seems quite a nice guy... a little daydreamer he is but everything starts as a thought.

    LOL so you do not know him!


    Overall he is quite a nice guy. Believe me. You might not like him but that does not make him a bad person. But that is up to your own personality I know very little about.

    Yet you sound like you do know him, can't have it both ways. :-D

    Think they call that double talk!
    That is what I preserved from his public appearance.

    I do not know how he is when he is private... and I do not want to know as I do not want to know how your private life is and what you do when you are all alone. We preserve what we observe and what we observe also depends on our mindset/psyche.

    When you are emphatically you can read people (without guarantee of being right). But you can see if someone is a good or bad person. 

    Did you really LOL? 
  • SmartySmartSmartySmart Member UncommonPosts: 312
    Therefore you can clearly see that CR is a by far more honest than that other guy.
  • BrenicsBrenics Member RarePosts: 1,939
    Therefore you can clearly see that CR is a by far more honest than that other guy.
    You can't say either one is honest or dishonest because you like me do not personally know either CR or DS. But from the day CR returned DS money without being asked and attacked him for stating big problems with the game shows less than honesty. 
    I'm not perfect but I'm always myself!

    Star Citizen – The Extinction Level Event


    4/13/15 > ELE has been updated look for 16-04-13.

    http://www.dereksmart.org/2016/04/star-citizen-the-ele/

    Enjoy and know the truth always comes to light!

  • WylfWylf Member UncommonPosts: 376
    Why in heaven's name did y'all have to ruin a perfectly neutral, nice post about someone who did some roleplaying and put together a clever video.  This was never a will they build it topic. OP clearly said: "Amazing what a player can do with just a little imagination.   Roleplayers will get this.  Made just a couple of days ago in the current build of the PU. "  It's akin to Cosplay, it's not about the game it's about the visual, and  giving credit to people who put a little bit of work into something.
  • Darkfalz89Darkfalz89 Member UncommonPosts: 581
    edited February 2016
    Erillion said:
    About SC fans being quiet.... The best way to deal with SomethingAwful.com agitprop is to ignore SA agitprop. Learned that from dealing with SA/Goons in EVE. I see their very predictable, very boring modus operandi being applied here in this subforum too. Let those posters post their threads ... the continually rising number of SC players show that their activities basically have the opposite effect from what they are trying to achieve. For those of you that do not know the SA forum and posters... lucky you!


    Have fun
    Just ran across this thread as a happenstance so I can't say I knew of this secret organization of baseless/clueless/incorrect/notwhiteknights that threaten the very foundation of others that were duped into dropping large sum (and probably still dropping a monthly sum to purchase all the new ships) of money into vaporware. Those who still continue to shovel more money on to the pile in a effort to sate their denial of the game ever releasing. I'm sure 4 years from now you will be spewing the same apologist soaked responses like a Religious extremist. After the first or 100th x employee of the company tells you "there is no game there" to the point of Roberts himself telling you and the level of denial will be so extreme that it just wont penetrate that skull. 

    Maybe one of the supposed modules will see the light of day, makes me question why not complete the game you sold your backers on rather than try to make 3 games at the same time? I mean reading the responses is like talking to someone trying to sell a religion to me. Once again I can be completely off base but some of the posts I have read just in this thread just are so transparently supportive of the game that you would have to be a donkey so you couldn't smell the BS from a mile away. There is always a "reason" and a "explanation" because the guy could do no wrong. There's all these variables; hold on while I trip over the long list of excuses you two just spouted. I mean keyboard warriors or not when you take that amount of money and you REPEATEDLY raise the stakes full well knowing they may lead to the game never seeing light of day you still have a responsibility at the end of the day. 

    The bottom line is I really feel bad for the backers as far as the current state of the game goes. Maybe in 2-3 years we may see a semblance of a completed project. As for the testbed for a project behind the scenes makes me giggle to no end though, its as if delusion has reached such a peak that its become palpable and we are just making shit up as we cross (or its been confirmed but still would not make me find it any less hilarious). I just know in 2-3 years from now if its the same crap and/or the company finally cant fool you guys anymore and folds it wont feel the least bad. It will be something to laugh about years and years to come. 

  • SmartySmartSmartySmart Member UncommonPosts: 312
    Brenics said:
    Therefore you can clearly see that CR is a by far more honest than that other guy.
    You can't say either one is honest or dishonest because you like me do not personally know either CR or DS. But from the day CR returned DS money without being asked and attacked him for stating big problems with the game shows less than honesty. 
    Brenics said:
    Therefore you can clearly see that CR is a by far more honest than that other guy.
    You can't say either one is honest or dishonest because you like me do not personally know either CR or DS. But from the day CR returned DS money without being asked and attacked him for stating big problems with the game shows less than honesty. 
    Sorry Brenics but this shows me how uninformed you are. I read the forums before the refund and you could clearly see the uproar he started. The forum became toxic in a very short amount of time... and there was no real reason to. Critic was always there and more during times when there was no new content but that was something completely different. 

    What he did is part of social hacking and his hostile takeover attempt. And no this is no stupid talk. As I stated so many times: I know his past, his "legacy". 

    What at is so dishonest in refunding a toxic person who has an agenda (promoting LOD, attempted uproar with the goal of becoming a consultant and then doing his social hacking tactics).

    I am a little bit worried that you can not see this. Go in my post history and read a bit what brought me here. Just do your research on DS. Go over to Reddit and dig out the real infos about him and ignore the dedication others have for him. Read the old Google user groups. Just watch Kate Clicks parody about him. 

    I do do not hate him but I do not like his intentions.

    Or maybe your just trolling me.
  • DistopiaDistopia Member EpicPosts: 21,183
    edited February 2016
    Reading over this thread the games finest supporters have gotten awfully quiet the moment specific questions are asked minus one person failing at saying anything remotely pertinent to the topic at hand. I can safely say I have not followed this game in the least bit, but from all the internet fights and bad press that endlessly surround this game it feels like the most successfully funded kickstarted piece of vaporware I have seen to date. The only time videos pop up to me all I see is the same station and a very nice takeoff and touchdown animation and tons of ships or about some well known actor voicing some other part of the game/motioncap mumbo jumbo. You can definitely see the steady flow of development going where it needs to be; more ships =/= more ways to tug on that IV drip to the poor clueless folks wallets. 

    If what the above poster rings true 4 years is a tremendous amount of time for a unplayable alpha is it not? I swear I remember back when the project was funded YEARS ago and are you telling me this is honestly all they have to show for it? I thought I met some delusional lemmings in my time on the OF and forums here for FFXIV. Some of the people that actually actively support the game make me really question where these people set the boundaries of reality and that which is not real and will probably never be.
    Technically no 4 years isn't tremendous if this game (the persistent universe) has a 5-6 year cycle. Secondly in many cases there's a testing build and a build they apply those changes from testing to, Alpha is all about system testing, not just in performance, scalability, etc.. but also whether a given feature is fun as a game-play mechanic. SO in that sense the current test bed makes sense. I'm basing this solely on actual being in F&F testing (pre-alpha), real alphas: pre-marketing ploy, etc.. Whether it actually applies to SC is another thing entirely.   Either way... again no 4 years isn't that odd considering the scope, no matter what some folks here want to try and argue.

    For every minute you are angry , you lose 60 seconds of happiness."-Emerson


  • Darkfalz89Darkfalz89 Member UncommonPosts: 581
    Distopia said:
    Technically no 4 years isn't tremendous if this game (the persistent universe) has a 5-6 year cycle. Secondly in many cases there's a testing build and a build they apply those changes from testing to, Alpha is all about system testing, not just in performance, scalability, etc.. but also whether a given feature is fun as a game-play mechanic. SO in that sense the current test bed makes sense. I'm basing this solely on actual being in F&F testing (pre-alpha), real alphas: pre-marketing ploy, etc.. Whether it actually applies to SC is another thing entirely.   Either way... again no 4 years isn't that odd considering the scope, no matter what some folks here want to try and argue.
    Then I was just simply overboard with the way I worded it, more of the side of its been 4 years and its all that has been shown from it. Its a combination of that and promises were made as well as release dates that never saw the light of day (according to some posters here so keep that in mind). 
  • TealaTeala Member RarePosts: 7,627
    Wylf said:
    Why in heaven's name did y'all have to ruin a perfectly neutral, nice post about someone who did some roleplaying and put together a clever video.  This was never a will they build it topic. OP clearly said: "Amazing what a player can do with just a little imagination.   Roleplayers will get this.  Made just a couple of days ago in the current build of the PU. "  It's akin to Cosplay, it's not about the game it's about the visual, and  giving credit to people who put a little bit of work into something.
     I posted this for just the reason you mention, come back a day later to find it full of crap posting.   ::sigh:: Don't care for the moderation regarding SC.  There was no reason for this post to be filled with trolling by the same certain individuals - none.   It is just a cool video, and clearly the guy that made it really seemed to enjoy making it.  So I thought I would share it here.  


  • SmartySmartSmartySmart Member UncommonPosts: 312
    Erillion said:
    About SC fans being quiet.... The best way to deal with SomethingAwful.com agitprop is to ignore SA agitprop. Learned that from dealing with SA/Goons in EVE. I see their very predictable, very boring modus operandi being applied here in this subforum too. Let those posters post their threads ... the continually rising number of SC players show that their activities basically have the opposite effect from what they are trying to achieve. For those of you that do not know the SA forum and posters... lucky you!


    Have fun
    Just ran across this thread as a happenstance so I can't say I knew of this secret organization of baseless/clueless/incorrect/notwhiteknights that threaten the very foundation of others that were duped into dropping large sum (and probably still dropping a monthly sum to purchase all the new ships) of money into vaporware. Those who still continue to shovel more money on to the pile in a effort to sate their denial of the game ever releasing. I'm sure 4 years from now you will be spewing the same apologist soaked responses like a Religious extremist. After the first or 100th x employee of the company tells you "there is no game there" to the point of Roberts himself telling you and the level of denial will be so extreme that it just wont penetrate that skull. 

    Maybe one of the supposed modules will see the light of day, makes me question why not complete the game you sold your backers on rather than try to make 3 games at the same time? I mean reading the responses is like talking to someone trying to sell a religion to me. Once again I can be completely off base but some of the posts I have read just in this thread just are so transparently supportive of the game that you would have to be a donkey so you couldn't smell the BS from a mile away. There is always a "reason" and a "explanation" because the guy could do no wrong. There's all these variables; hold on while I trip over the long list of excuses you two just spouted. I mean keyboard warriors or not when you take that amount of money and you REPEATEDLY raise the stakes full well knowing they may lead to the game never seeing light of day you still have a responsibility at the end of the day. 

    The bottom line is I really feel bad for the backers as far as the current state of the game goes. Maybe in 2-3 years we may see a semblance of a completed project. As for the testbed for a project behind the scenes makes me giggle to no end though, its as if delusion has reached such a peak that its become palpable and we are just making shit up as we cross. I just know in 2-3 years from now if its the same crap and/or the company finally cant fool you guys anymore and folds it wont feel the least bad. It will be something to laugh about years and years to come. 

    Welcome to the Internet (regarding the SA forum and the "goons").

    Why hasn't there been an ex employee stating that there is no game. Just because of NDA? No I don't think so. If there really would be that much trouble someone somewhere who really worked there would have said something. All we see are ex employees unhappy with some approaches or workflows but none has underlined people's vaporware argument. And no... the Escapist article is proven wrong in many ways.

    You say that one of the modules will maybe see the light of day? What about what we already have? Yes it's no complete game but again... 3/4/5 years are nothing special considering the complexity and scope of what CIG is trying to do. Some things they already released and demonstrated (even if denied by others) have really never been done before. But most part of the project is mostly just hard work coding coding coding. 

    3 games? You mean the SQ42 episodes that where part of the early crowdfunding goals? Nothing new. If they would change that and just make Episode 1 than you an imagine how people would react.

    Why does being very supportive alert your BS detector? Is healthy dedication something bad? Yes some are overly attached but who isn't into something? 

    The he stakes have not been raised after 64 million because of scope overflow.

    Do not feel bad for SC supporters. Most of them are aware of the risks. Why are you worried at all? Why do you REALLY care? Why not care about other problems this world really has? 
  • DistopiaDistopia Member EpicPosts: 21,183
    edited February 2016
    Distopia said:
    Technically no 4 years isn't tremendous if this game (the persistent universe) has a 5-6 year cycle. Secondly in many cases there's a testing build and a build they apply those changes from testing to, Alpha is all about system testing, not just in performance, scalability, etc.. but also whether a given feature is fun as a game-play mechanic. SO in that sense the current test bed makes sense. I'm basing this solely on actual being in F&F testing (pre-alpha), real alphas: pre-marketing ploy, etc.. Whether it actually applies to SC is another thing entirely.   Either way... again no 4 years isn't that odd considering the scope, no matter what some folks here want to try and argue.
    Then I was just simply overboard with the way I worded it, more of the side of its been 4 years and its all that has been shown from it. Its a combination of that and promises were made as well as release dates that never saw the light of day (according to some posters here so keep that in mind). 
     I perfectly understand that. It's that, that gives the current "outlook" traction. Really that's why you see so much from one side and little from the other in these debates. AS it stands one side has an upper hand at present in these discussions. Whether it's a legit project or not it's simply easier to shed a negative light than it is a positive one. As all you have to really say is, look what's available, it's hard to argue one way or the other about things we can't physically see.

    For every minute you are angry , you lose 60 seconds of happiness."-Emerson


  • Adjuvant1Adjuvant1 Member RarePosts: 2,100

    So I have insulted your intellect? Nice :)

    Yeh, and you're doing it more.


    No. SQ42 is also affected by the increased scope. More money, more resources, more ways to approach the initial goal and expand it (detail, lore, gameplay mechanics, etc.). Furthermore SC and SQ42 use the same tech and as SC expanded its scope, SQ42 was also affected by it. 

    Actually, it's been discussed SQ42 and SC will have very different coding for ship maneuverability, and, well, alot of things. Do you follow this game at all?


    READ IT AGAIN... SLOWLY ;)

    Ok. I did. You were mistaken the first time. Now you're just brazenly wrong.


    So CR is lying when he says that 2.2 comes out in 3 weeks and it does not? Did you miss the part when he says (always) that this is not promised and he HOPES that it will be ready by then? He openly admitted that he is not so good in promising dates and delivering. He admitted it. That is not lying. 

    We were told there will be monthly updates, whether they're feature-complete or otherwise. 2.2 was for January, and that's why it's 3 weeks late. I guess that means February's will be sometime in April, and so on. Again, do you even know the game about which you're speaking? This is Star Citizen, from CIG, not "Hallucination in SmartySmart Land: Adventure Island".


    Oh no he is not the man I think he is? Yes I do not know him personally...
    Well, it's good you admit you don't know him. I'd have preferred you admitted you didn't know jack else, but a little honesty goes a ways...


    Overall he is quite a nice guy. Believe me. You might not like him but that does not make him a bad person. But that is up to your own personality I know very little about.

    People who are habitually, chronically late are not "nice people". They have little respect for others and little respect for themselves. You're standing up for a guy who's right now "hiding out" in Frankfurt, while you step to the plate for him. If you weren't so tragically wrong, I'd say it would earn you marks in some afterlife. As it is, it amounts to a vomitous pile of fail.

  • Darkfalz89Darkfalz89 Member UncommonPosts: 581
    edited February 2016
    Erillion said:
    Welcome to the Internet (regarding the SA forum and the "goons").

    Why hasn't there been an ex employee stating that there is no game. Just because of NDA? No I don't think so. If there really would be that much trouble someone somewhere who really worked there would have said something. All we see are ex employees unhappy with some approaches or workflows but none has underlined people's vaporware argument. And no... the Escapist article is proven wrong in many ways.

    You say that one of the modules will maybe see the light of day? What about what we already have? Yes it's no complete game but again... 3/4/5 years are nothing special considering the complexity and scope of what CIG is trying to do. Some things they already released and demonstrated (even if denied by others) have really never been done before. But most part of the project is mostly just hard work coding coding coding. 

    3 games? You mean the SQ42 episodes that where part of the early crowdfunding goals? Nothing new. If they would change that and just make Episode 1 than you an imagine how people would react.

    Why does being very supportive alert your BS detector? Is healthy dedication something bad? Yes some are overly attached but who isn't into something? 

    The he stakes have not been raised after 64 million because of scope overflow.

    Do not feel bad for SC supporters. Most of them are aware of the risks. Why are you worried at all? Why do you REALLY care? Why not care about other problems this world really has? 
    Caring would be a stretch, its more of seeing how little good has come from kickstarter/crowdfunding in general/vs. actual completed games its given us. The difference between those and SC is the scope, the average backer from SC has a considerably larger buy in and wouldn't put it past people to have put well over 1k USD by now or simply at launch. I didn't mean for them to simply release Episode one and stop, merely treat it as episodic series while picking away at the MMO concept. That way you have some form of a segment of a COMPLETED product. Will people still whine and complain and naysay? More than likely yes but you wouldn't at least be able to call it vaporware or "no game". 

    Probably would totally be a hypocrite of me to say I would treat this game in a completely different light if it had SOMETHING done. To simply see "Episode 1 released" and It would totally throw me off the fishy trail. Watching telltale series games like Walking dead or the GoT edition/King's quest and the "Life is strange" series have done very well for the type of game it is. Obviously you need to draw a line when a game is MADE to be episode vs cut into pieces and sold separately like the new Hitman game. 
  • Adjuvant1Adjuvant1 Member RarePosts: 2,100
    Teala said:
    Wylf said:
    Why in heaven's name did y'all have to ruin a perfectly neutral, nice post about someone who did some roleplaying and put together a clever video.  This was never a will they build it topic. OP clearly said: "Amazing what a player can do with just a little imagination.   Roleplayers will get this.  Made just a couple of days ago in the current build of the PU. "  It's akin to Cosplay, it's not about the game it's about the visual, and  giving credit to people who put a little bit of work into something.
     I posted this for just the reason you mention, come back a day later to find it full of crap posting.   ::sigh:: Don't care for the moderation regarding SC.  There was no reason for this post to be filled with trolling by the same certain individuals - none.   It is just a cool video, and clearly the guy that made it really seemed to enjoy making it.  So I thought I would share it here.  


    Hey, I posted a "nice SC video" and people started attacking me. You want "usual suspects", take another look through the order of events. Anyway, you seem to be a well adjusted forum contributor, and should be well aware these types of things can devolve. I'm personally unconcerned if the op is a "granola girl" or the queen of England. Two sides to an issue are going to get represented.
  • JakobmillerJakobmiller Member RarePosts: 694
    What a video haha. Increadible :P
This discussion has been closed.