Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Crytek Filing Lawsuit Against CIG

1363739414253

Comments

  • BananaSoupBananaSoup Member UncommonPosts: 180
    edited April 2018
    @Eldurian I find people like you the most hilarious. "I play hard games therefore i'm very smart and sophisticated. Others that don't play hard games are dumb, unintelligent and shallow in comparison with my greatness". People that use games to "feel better about themselves" seem to have severe real-life issues or some voids (like no partner or no social life).
    So what's your issue? What makes you unhappy and feel low in real life?
  • rpmcmurphyrpmcmurphy Member EpicPosts: 3,502
    Eldurian said:
    rpmcmurphy said:

    No, what I am saying is that people should not act surprised if people laugh at them for spending 16.6x the amount of a AAA game on a pre-purchase which is now 6 years in the making and woefully behind schedule while being one of the most poorly performing, content shy alphas I have ever seen especially when bearing in mind the $180 million price tag, the 500 person team which has had numerous members paraded around as a kind of who's who in game development.

    What I'm saying is I think WoW players have no standards. I mean for ****'s sake they had skilltrees simplified and then removed from the game because they were "too mathy". They watch videos of how to do dungeons and then run through the dungeons knowing everything that will happen step by step because it's the same dungeon every time. All their quests are cut and pastes of like the same 5 quests. Their PvP is either confined to arenas or entirely pointless. Utter crap game for people who lack the brains and drive to want to have to think about or be challenged by their game. They just want to mindlessly grind through the same content over and over again and be rewarded with shinies. They are the epitome of the participation trophy mentality.

    And honestly most WoW clones are little better. And 90% of MMOs are WoW clones. So what's that say about your average MMO player?

    That's my honest opinion.

    Should I go drop it on the WoW subsection? If no, then why not? The SWTOR section because everything I said applies to SWTOR?

    Maybe because it's inflammatory and completely unproductive. All it would do is cause fights, and no productive discussion would come from it. I would be a troll for posting it there no matter how true I feel it is.

    What I dislike about this conversation is something I said earlier, that drama requires both sides participating. Choosing to point fingers at one side is in itself inflammatory and counter-productive, it causes fights.
    There were extremely vigilant pro-SC posters on these forums who would argue and troll any criticism, they were central in turning threads into huge off-topic threadnaughts, clearly being inflammatory and counter-productive themselves. Thankfully a lot of that has stopped and the drama has died down quite considerably.

  • EldurianEldurian Member EpicPosts: 2,736
    @Eldurian you seem to ignore the fact that baiting is just as idiotic as trolling.  If you're trying to compare sides, both have participated in baiting, attacking, and trolling one another.  You can't explain away baiting or trolling by claiming passionate superiority for fans.  Doesn't fly.  Both sides contribute, it's just that only one appears to want to claim a forum or subforum for themselves.
    I don't consider discussing something you enjoy baiting people to come troll you about it. As stupid as I find WoW people have a right to like it and I have no call to go bring my opinions that that game uses leveling and gear-grind as a crutch to make content enjoyable to sub-par gamers to their section.

    If a WoW topic pops up in the feed or someone writes an article about WoW I generally ignore it because I know I hate that game, short of a complete overhaul I will never enjoy that game, so why would I go there to troll people who like it?

    This constant assertion that people who hate this game and people who love this game have equally legitimate reasons to be here is crap, and I refuse to acknowledge it's merits. Largely because I perfectly understand the other side of the argument.

    I hate about 90% of the games talked about in these forums, so I don't use 90% of the forum subsections. I float between sections on games that I have at least some level of interest in. I am already doing what I feel the trolls in this section should be doing as well. I could easily be trolling the sections of the games most of them probably enjoy but am not, so in terms of the golden rule of "treat other's as you would like to be treated" I am already affording them the respect they refuse to afford us. But if they want to come here and start a fight I will fight back and I will do it like an arrogant prick who occupies the moral highground, because I do.
    MadFrenchie
  • EldurianEldurian Member EpicPosts: 2,736
    edited April 2018
    @Eldurian I find people like you the most hilarious. "I play hard games therefore i'm very smart and sophisticated. Others that don't play hard games are dumb, unintelligent and shallow in comparison with my greatness". People that use games to "feel better about themselves" seem to have severe real-life issues or some voids (like no partner or no social life).
    So what's your issue? What makes you unhappy and feel low in real life?
    I game together with my fiancé who I've been happily together with for 4 years, and have as many RL friends as I need to be happy so not either of the things you asserted. Guess you can just keep guessing.

    I'll give you one idea though. Maybe I just enjoy challenging myself and hate how people who equate anyone who doesn't enjoy leveling as "lazy" simply because we don't prefer doing content a trained ape could do for thousands of hours. And it's made me a bit bitter how the level grinders have destroyed this entire genre.

    Maybe listening to people brag about their levels and act like it makes them someone has turned me off to level grinders in the same way many PVEers hate PVPers.
  • MadFrenchieMadFrenchie Member LegendaryPosts: 8,505
    edited April 2018
    If you truly think the fans have not baited or trolled, you're not looking at this objectively.

    EDIT- additionally, your using subforum to claim moral superiority rings hollow.  Nobody gives a shit what subforum a thread is posted in.  I don't even browse these forums by forum section, I solely load the recent discussions.  Most of the time, I don't even know what section these threads are in.  So seriously man, you're offbase here.
    Orinori

    image
  • Quizar1973Quizar1973 Member UncommonPosts: 251
    Grunty said:
    I guess the topic of the thread doesn't matter anymore.  
    Exaclly...These plebs are goin way off the topic of this discusstion....It should just be removed now...LMAO
    No one shall Rent space in my head!!!!!  B)
  • MadFrenchieMadFrenchie Member LegendaryPosts: 8,505
    Grunty said:
    I guess the topic of the thread doesn't matter anymore.  
    Exaclly...These plebs are goin way off the topic of this discusstion....It should just be removed now...LMAO
    The topic is 39 pages.  The idea that we have any one topic we can discuss for 39 pages is a little unrealistic.  If this were a news announcement by the team, I'd give a little more leeway, but a user posted topic will go where the community wants it to go.  Considering any time someone updates the thread with news in the case, it generally reignites discussion about said case and game, I'm thinking Bill and the gang aren't expressly worried if the discussion wanders between updates.

    image
  • EldurianEldurian Member EpicPosts: 2,736
    @MadFrenchie - We can agree to disagree on the subforum section thing. When a post about I game that I don't like pops up in my subform feed I just skip past. It's not like I have time in the day to respond to every topic on these forums or that my opinion matters in most of them / that I even care about what's being said in most of them. Even in the Pub I haven't bashed any particular game too heavy for the most part and focus more on the elements of those games I dislike because bashing features is more productive and specific than bashing games. 

    But how about this:

    https://forums.mmorpg.com/discussion/comment/7318867/#Comment_7318867

    Specifically posting content bashing a game in it's own subforum. Sure the express intent of that topic isn't to start a fight.
  • MadFrenchieMadFrenchie Member LegendaryPosts: 8,505
    Eldurian said:
    @MadFrenchie - We can agree to disagree on the subforum section thing. When a post about I game that I don't like pops up in my subform feed I just skip past. It's not like I have time in the day to respond to every topic on these forums or that my opinion matters in most of them / that I even care about what's being said in most of them. Even in the Pub I haven't bashed any particular game too heavy for the most part and focus more on the elements of those games I dislike because bashing features is more productive and specific than bashing games. 

    But how about this:

    https://forums.mmorpg.com/discussion/comment/7318867/#Comment_7318867

    Specifically posting content bashing a game in it's own subforum. Sure the express intent of that topic isn't to start a fight.
    Who cares if it is?  It's about the game.  Erillion is currently attempting to clarify, as am I, what exactly is even happening with that.  Posting it in the Pub wouldn't have been appropriate, it's not a general MMORPG topic.

    image
  • KefoKefo Member EpicPosts: 4,229
    Eldurian said:
    @Eldurian you seem to ignore the fact that baiting is just as idiotic as trolling.  If you're trying to compare sides, both have participated in baiting, attacking, and trolling one another.  You can't explain away baiting or trolling by claiming passionate superiority for fans.  Doesn't fly.  Both sides contribute, it's just that only one appears to want to claim a forum or subforum for themselves.
    I don't consider discussing something you enjoy baiting people to come troll you about it. As stupid as I find WoW people have a right to like it and I have no call to go bring my opinions that that game uses leveling and gear-grind as a crutch to make content enjoyable to sub-par gamers to their section.

    If a WoW topic pops up in the feed or someone writes an article about WoW I generally ignore it because I know I hate that game, short of a complete overhaul I will never enjoy that game, so why would I go there to troll people who like it?

    This constant assertion that people who hate this game and people who love this game have equally legitimate reasons to be here is crap, and I refuse to acknowledge it's merits. Largely because I perfectly understand the other side of the argument.

    I hate about 90% of the games talked about in these forums, so I don't use 90% of the forum subsections. I float between sections on games that I have at least some level of interest in. I am already doing what I feel the trolls in this section should be doing as well. I could easily be trolling the sections of the games most of them probably enjoy but am not, so in terms of the golden rule of "treat other's as you would like to be treated" I am already affording them the respect they refuse to afford us. But if they want to come here and start a fight I will fight back and I will do it like an arrogant prick who occupies the moral highground, because I do.
    Lol so much wrong with this post and you still don’t see it. Bravo!
  • BeansnBreadBeansnBread Member EpicPosts: 7,254
    He's a poor little victim.
    ScotchUp
  • EldurianEldurian Member EpicPosts: 2,736
    Who cares if it is?  It's about the game.  Erillion is currently attempting to clarify, as am I, what exactly is even happening with that.  Posting it in the Pub wouldn't have been appropriate, it's not a general MMORPG topic.
    Because nobody who cares about this game cares whether they spent a bit of money to get a YouTuber to promote their content or not. There are people starving to death in the world and here we are debating if Star Citizen gave away a few free computer parts to promote their product.

    No supporters will be turned off by that. It's literally one of those situations where someone is finding any excuse to attack their favorite game they love to hate. On the troll level it's about on a par with when that one guy on the SOTA forums was like "Stop taking old people's retirement money!!!" because one of the SOTA posters said they spend retirement funds on the game.

    Nobody cares. The obvious intent is to bash Star Citizen because they want a fight.
  • BeansnBreadBeansnBread Member EpicPosts: 7,254
    edited April 2018
    I bash (criticise) Star Citizen (or more appropriately, RSI) because they lie about things in order to entice people to contribute money. It appears that some people take things that are said about a video game extremely personally. It gets to the point when people start embarrassing themselves by trying to play the victim and acting like they have to fight back on behalf of a game or game company. But really, the way I see it at least is that CiG/RSI/SC are liars. Plain and simple liars. Here is the most clear example that I've posted before (of course there are many other examples):



    This was taken in August 2016, but it was kept up through at least November 2016. There is zero chance that they didn't know that Squadron 42 wasn't coming out in 2016. They continued to take donations/pledges/sales through this page. We are getting close to mid way through 2018. I remember when DKLond was talking mid 2017 release. In December 2017, Erillion was talking June 2018 of Squadron 42. The amount of bullshit that is believed by the fans is unprecedented for a project of this size. It deserves to be criticized for its failing up till this point in my opinion and watching someone call everyone a troll that doesn't like their business practices is more than disingenuous, it's blind and stupid to the realities of the project.

  • KefoKefo Member EpicPosts: 4,229
    Eldurian said:
    Who cares if it is?  It's about the game.  Erillion is currently attempting to clarify, as am I, what exactly is even happening with that.  Posting it in the Pub wouldn't have been appropriate, it's not a general MMORPG topic.
    Because nobody who cares about this game cares whether they spent a bit of money to get a YouTuber to promote their content or not. There are people starving to death in the world and here we are debating if Star Citizen gave away a few free computer parts to promote their product.

    No supporters will be turned off by that. It's literally one of those situations where someone is finding any excuse to attack their favorite game they love to hate. On the troll level it's about on a par with when that one guy on the SOTA forums was like "Stop taking old people's retirement money!!!" because one of the SOTA posters said they spend retirement funds on the game.

    Nobody cares. The obvious intent is to bash Star Citizen because they want a fight.
    I’m sure the people who have been waiting months for a refund and being told they are waiting for a specialist or just have their tickets closed stating lack of communication are the ones who care that streamers are being bought new computers.

    Also poor argument. People are starving in the world and we are arguing about a video game. Yes we are because this is a video game forum about a videogame. Let’s shut down the industry because the money can be better spent feeding the world right?
  • EldurianEldurian Member EpicPosts: 2,736
    edited April 2018
    You might have a point if you had any personal investment in this game whatsoever. However you don't so the fact you're white knighting for the few idiots who expect a refund from a kickstarter instead of focusing on problems that matter does make you pretty pathetic.

    Anyone who pays into a kickstarter not realizing and that there is a chance they will be left with no money and no game is a complete tool and deserves everything they get. You should NEVER pay in expecting a refund, if I was CIG I would tell them to take it to the grey market or shove it up their ass. However I'm still fairly sure what they'll get will be a pretty fun game in a couple years. 
    rpmcmurphyBabuinix
  • rpmcmurphyrpmcmurphy Member EpicPosts: 3,502
    edited April 2018
    Eldurian said:
    You might have a point if you had any personal investment in this game whatsoever. However you don't so the fact you're white knighting for the few idiots who expect a refund from a kickstarter instead of focusing on problems that matter does make you pretty pathetic.

    Anyone who pays into a kickstarter not realizing and that there is a chance they will be left with no money and no game is a complete tool and deserves everything they get. You should NEVER pay in expecting a refund, if I was CIG I would tell them to take it to the grey market or shove it up their ass. However I'm still fairly sure what they'll get will be a pretty fun game in a couple years. 

    No no no no no. It was Chris Roberts who said people are allowed to seek a refund, does that make him an idiot for enabling your so-called idiots?

    There are also plenty of people seeking refunds who were not part of the kickstarter, people who "answered the call" and bought into the game under the impression that SQ42 would be releasing in 2015/2016/2017 or that SC was much further along based on the not-a-demo shown at any one of the numerous conventions etc.

    Consumer law in various parts of the world also allows people to seek refunds for goods not delivered in an anticpated timeframe.

    Eldurian said:
    You should NEVER pay in expecting a refund
    I buy everything with the knowledge that I can expect a refund, it's why there has been so much effort to protect customer's rights online. The only time I would not expect a refund is shady second hand car dealers or goods traded in the pub and things of that nature.
    Kefo
  • KefoKefo Member EpicPosts: 4,229
    Eldurian said:
    You might have a point if you had any personal investment in this game whatsoever. However you don't so the fact you're white knighting for the few idiots who expect a refund from a kickstarter instead of focusing on problems that matter does make you pretty pathetic.

    Anyone who pays into a kickstarter not realizing and that there is a chance they will be left with no money and no game is a complete tool and deserves everything they get. You should NEVER pay in expecting a refund, if I was CIG I would tell them to take it to the grey market or shove it up their ass. However I'm still fairly sure what they'll get will be a pretty fun game in a couple years. 

    No no no no no. It was Chris Roberts who said people are allowed to seek a refund, does that make him an idiot for enabling your so-called idiots?

    There are also plenty of people seeking refunds who were not part of the kickstarter, people who "answered the call" and bought into the game under the impression that SQ42 would be releasing in 2015/2016/2017 or that SC was much further along based on the not-a-demo shown at any one of the numerous conventions etc.

    Consumer law in various parts of the world also allows people to seek refunds for goods not delivered in an anticpated timeframe.

    Eldurian said:
    You should NEVER pay in expecting a refund
    I buy everything with the knowledge that I can expect a refund, it's why there has been so much effort to protect customer's rights online. The only time I would not expect a refund is shady second hand car dealers or goods traded in the pub and things of that nature.
    It’s easier to ignore that consumer protection laws exist and call everyone an idiot who wants a refund for goods not delivered then to admit that perhaps your entire argument is on shaky ground
  • DurzaxDurzax Member UncommonPosts: 87
    I bash (criticise) Star Citizen (or more appropriately, RSI) because they lie about things in order to entice people to contribute money. It appears that some people take things that are said about a video game extremely personally. It gets to the point when people start embarrassing themselves by trying to play the victim and acting like they have to fight back on behalf of a game or game company. But really, the way I see it at least is that CiG/RSI/SC are liars. Plain and simple liars. Here is the most clear example that I've posted before (of course there are many other examples):



    This was taken in August 2016, but it was kept up through at least November 2016. There is zero chance that they didn't know that Squadron 42 wasn't coming out in 2016. They continued to take donations/pledges/sales through this page. We are getting close to mid way through 2018. I remember when DKLond was talking mid 2017 release. In December 2017, Erillion was talking June 2018 of Squadron 42. The amount of bullshit that is believed by the fans is unprecedented for a project of this size. It deserves to be criticized for its failing up till this point in my opinion and watching someone call everyone a troll that doesn't like their business practices is more than disingenuous, it's blind and stupid to the realities of the project.

    RSI agrees to use its good faith business efforts to deliver to you the pledge items and the game on or before the "({ESTIMATED DELIVERY DATE})" communicated to you on the website.
    However, YOU ACKNOWLEDGE AND AGREE THAT DELIVERY AS OF SUCH DATE IS !!!! "({NOT})"!!!! A FIRM PROMISE AND MAY BE EXTENDED BY RSI SINCE UNFORESEEN EVENTS MAY EXTEND THE DEVELOPMENT AND/OR PRODUCTION TIME.


    The first paragraph of the ToS.
    All that impulse bought and did not heed this are at fault not CIG.

    Leave it to ravenous, impatient, impulsive "gamers" to spend irresponsibly, and then turn around and blame any one but themselves.

    This same song and dance has played out ever since kickstarter and crowdfunding has been around.

    To bad, forced internet vacations have yet to take effect.
    Eldurian
  • KefoKefo Member EpicPosts: 4,229
    Durzax said:
    I bash (criticise) Star Citizen (or more appropriately, RSI) because they lie about things in order to entice people to contribute money. It appears that some people take things that are said about a video game extremely personally. It gets to the point when people start embarrassing themselves by trying to play the victim and acting like they have to fight back on behalf of a game or game company. But really, the way I see it at least is that CiG/RSI/SC are liars. Plain and simple liars. Here is the most clear example that I've posted before (of course there are many other examples):



    This was taken in August 2016, but it was kept up through at least November 2016. There is zero chance that they didn't know that Squadron 42 wasn't coming out in 2016. They continued to take donations/pledges/sales through this page. We are getting close to mid way through 2018. I remember when DKLond was talking mid 2017 release. In December 2017, Erillion was talking June 2018 of Squadron 42. The amount of bullshit that is believed by the fans is unprecedented for a project of this size. It deserves to be criticized for its failing up till this point in my opinion and watching someone call everyone a troll that doesn't like their business practices is more than disingenuous, it's blind and stupid to the realities of the project.

    RSI agrees to use its good faith business efforts to deliver to you the pledge items and the game on or before the "({ESTIMATED DELIVERY DATE})" communicated to you on the website.
    However, YOU ACKNOWLEDGE AND AGREE THAT DELIVERY AS OF SUCH DATE IS !!!! "({NOT})"!!!! A FIRM PROMISE AND MAY BE EXTENDED BY RSI SINCE UNFORESEEN EVENTS MAY EXTEND THE DEVELOPMENT AND/OR PRODUCTION TIME.


    The first paragraph of the ToS.
    All that impulse bought and did not heed this are at fault not CIG.

    Leave it to ravenous, impatient, impulsive "gamers" to spend irresponsibly, and then turn around and blame any one but themselves.

    This same song and dance has played out ever since kickstarter and crowdfunding has been around.

    To bad, forced internet vacations have yet to take effect.
    Some extension is fine in most gamers minds. A few years is pushing it especially if it hasn’t moved out of the testing stage it’s in. Pushing half a decade or more with no end in sight I think people are entitled to a refund without any questions asked.
  • PhaserlightPhaserlight Member EpicPosts: 3,078
    Kefo said:
    Durzax said:
    I bash (criticise) Star Citizen (or more appropriately, RSI) because they lie about things in order to entice people to contribute money. It appears that some people take things that are said about a video game extremely personally. It gets to the point when people start embarrassing themselves by trying to play the victim and acting like they have to fight back on behalf of a game or game company. But really, the way I see it at least is that CiG/RSI/SC are liars. Plain and simple liars. Here is the most clear example that I've posted before (of course there are many other examples):



    This was taken in August 2016, but it was kept up through at least November 2016. There is zero chance that they didn't know that Squadron 42 wasn't coming out in 2016. They continued to take donations/pledges/sales through this page. We are getting close to mid way through 2018. I remember when DKLond was talking mid 2017 release. In December 2017, Erillion was talking June 2018 of Squadron 42. The amount of bullshit that is believed by the fans is unprecedented for a project of this size. It deserves to be criticized for its failing up till this point in my opinion and watching someone call everyone a troll that doesn't like their business practices is more than disingenuous, it's blind and stupid to the realities of the project.

    RSI agrees to use its good faith business efforts to deliver to you the pledge items and the game on or before the "({ESTIMATED DELIVERY DATE})" communicated to you on the website.
    However, YOU ACKNOWLEDGE AND AGREE THAT DELIVERY AS OF SUCH DATE IS !!!! "({NOT})"!!!! A FIRM PROMISE AND MAY BE EXTENDED BY RSI SINCE UNFORESEEN EVENTS MAY EXTEND THE DEVELOPMENT AND/OR PRODUCTION TIME.


    The first paragraph of the ToS.
    All that impulse bought and did not heed this are at fault not CIG.

    Leave it to ravenous, impatient, impulsive "gamers" to spend irresponsibly, and then turn around and blame any one but themselves.

    This same song and dance has played out ever since kickstarter and crowdfunding has been around.

    To bad, forced internet vacations have yet to take effect.
    Some extension is fine in most gamers minds. A few years is pushing it especially if it hasn’t moved out of the testing stage it’s in. Pushing half a decade or more with no end in sight I think people are entitled to a refund without any questions asked.
    I actually have more sympathy for CIG than the backers, which isn't saying much.  Roberts wanted to make the BDSSE after being out of the industry for a decade, bringing all his Wing Commander experience and Hollywood sensibilities to the table never mind the details.  Now here they are in 2018, making procedural fried eggs and under lawsuit.

    I witnessed this insane herd movement over the net in '13-'14 of 'let's make this too big to fail'; you'd see signatures like "I trust Chris Roberts" and people posting stuff like "don't underestimate the power of faith".

    You reap what you sow.
    MadFrenchie

    "The simple is the seal of the true and beauty is the splendor of truth" -Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar
    Authored 139 missions in Vendetta Online and 6 tracks in Distance

  • ErillionErillion Member EpicPosts: 10,328
     making procedural fried eggs
    That this video was published on 1st April did not make you think twice about this ?


    Have fun
  • PhaserlightPhaserlight Member EpicPosts: 3,078
    Erillion said:
     making procedural fried eggs
    That this video was published on 1st April did not make you think twice about this ?


    Have fun
    Goodness, I certainly hope that's true. 

    "The simple is the seal of the true and beauty is the splendor of truth" -Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar
    Authored 139 missions in Vendetta Online and 6 tracks in Distance

  • ErillionErillion Member EpicPosts: 10,328
    Erillion said:
     making procedural fried eggs
    That this video was published on 1st April did not make you think twice about this ?


    Have fun
    Goodness, I certainly hope that's true. 
    If you want photorealistic food, go play Final (Food Court errrmm....) Fantasy. That includes hunting for the necessary recipes.


    Have fun
  • EldurianEldurian Member EpicPosts: 2,736
    Phaserlight is a content developer for an ancient space sim so success for this game would pretty much spell doom for his baby Vendetta Online. However if you are seriously considering Vendetta Online I would urge you to check this out:

    https://discoverygc.com/forums/index.php

    Better game, more active community, and you can acquire downloads of it for free these days. 

    Now back on the subject of Star Citizen.

    "It was Chris Roberts who said people are allowed to seek a refund, does that make him an idiot for enabling your so-called idiots?"

    The man is human, and that seems like a stupid decision to me. As was pointed out he said in the TOS that delays can happen. 

    If they want their money back they can hawk that crap to other players like any intelligent crowdfunding backer would do. If I was able to hawk my Pathfinder Online packages at full price after the disaster that game called early release I can't imagine you wouldn't be able to hawk your SC ships. Especially when I've been able to hawk a few for 4 times what I paid for them.
  • rpmcmurphyrpmcmurphy Member EpicPosts: 3,502
    edited April 2018
    Eldurian said:
    Phaserlight is a content developer for an ancient space sim so success for this game would pretty much spell doom for his baby Vendetta Online. However if you are seriously considering Vendetta Online I would urge you to check this out:

    https://discoverygc.com/forums/index.php

    Better game, more active community, and you can acquire downloads of it for free these days. 

    Now back on the subject of Star Citizen.

    "It was Chris Roberts who said people are allowed to seek a refund, does that make him an idiot for enabling your so-called idiots?"

    The man is human, and that seems like a stupid decision to me. As was pointed out he said in the TOS that delays can happen. 

    If they want their money back they can hawk that crap to other players like any intelligent crowdfunding backer would do. If I was able to hawk my Pathfinder Online packages at full price after the disaster that game called early release I can't imagine you wouldn't be able to hawk your SC ships. Especially when I've been able to hawk a few for 4 times what I paid for them.
    If he said it then it's prefectly fair for people to seek it. What you or I would do is irrelevant, for the record I wouldn't seek a refund for a kickstarter pledge but I can understand why people are.

    A large part of seeking a refund from CIG is to show their displeasure in the progress and/or management of the game, there's no need to use some third party market.

    If your Amazon purchase wasn't up to scratch would you sell it on EBay instead of getting a refund from Amazon? I know I wouldn't.
This discussion has been closed.