This would have to be directed at every single media outlet out there now.
The review system for anything these days is completely corrupted. There are nearly no movie review sites anymore than don't bend over to major movie developers. Same goes for gaming and anything entity that exists online (including new services to various degrees).
There needs to be a global change, and I don't see it happening. We are in the information wars.
It all started with Goebbels and has been much refined since then.
But you guys should be more concerned with spin on hard news about important things IRL - especially from governments and politicians - than whether opinion pieces about entertainment media is honest opinions or not.
Talk about tempests in teapots lol.
That train has runaway already.
There is no incentive to report things in a strictly factual manner, because most folks don't want to read or hear that. There's a reason Fox News, which is almost wholly opinion and not news, is highly popular. It's not because they stick to relaying facts.
If you're not on a "team" facing down the "enemy", you're irrelevant.
It's funny how "Fox News" is always pointed at for "biased, or fake news", yet ABC, CBS, NBC, PBS, MSNBC, HNN, and almost all other national news station slant to the left. I guess those stations say what lefties want to hear, too.
The point is, there's NOT a news outlet, unless possibly a local one, that tells all sides of a story, backed with facts, and let's the reader decide. Don't JUST point to Fox News. It shows your hand
- Al
Personally the only modern MMORPG trend that annoys me is the idea that MMOs need to be designed in a way to attract people who don't actually like MMOs. Which to me makes about as much sense as someone trying to figure out a way to get vegetarians to eat at their steakhouse. - FARGIN_WAR
A good review of a game that isn't terrible will explain game mechanics well enough to simultaneously consider some readers that the game is worth looking into and other readers that they should ignore the game. If you look at a review and the only thing you take away from it is the overall score, you're doing it wrong.
If you look at a review and can't realize it is someones opinion, you're doing it wrong.
This would have to be directed at every single media outlet out there now.
The review system for anything these days is completely corrupted. There are nearly no movie review sites anymore than don't bend over to major movie developers. Same goes for gaming and anything entity that exists online (including new services to various degrees).
There needs to be a global change, and I don't see it happening. We are in the information wars.
It all started with Goebbels and has been much refined since then.
But you guys should be more concerned with spin on hard news about important things IRL - especially from governments and politicians - than whether opinion pieces about entertainment media is honest opinions or not.
Talk about tempests in teapots lol.
That train has runaway already.
There is no incentive to report things in a strictly factual manner, because most folks don't want to read or hear that. There's a reason Fox News, which is almost wholly opinion and not news, is highly popular. It's not because they stick to relaying facts.
If you're not on a "team" facing down the "enemy", you're irrelevant.
It's funny how "Fox News" is always pointed at for "biased, or fake news", yet ABC, CBS, NBC, PBS, MSNBC, HNN, and almost all other national news station slant to the left. I guess those stations say what lefties want to hear, too.
The point is, there's NOT a news outlet, unless possibly a local one, that tells all sides of a story, backed with facts, and let's the reader decide. Don't JUST point to Fox News. It shows your hand
I point at Fox because it's the most popular by viewership.
I don't "watch" news, full stop. I read news via an aggregate site.
EDIT- actually, to be specific, the only non-aggregate news site I regularly visit is The Bulwark, which is fiercely conservative, just not ignorant. Sykes, Kristol, Egger, and Last are the type of conservatives that can find compromise and avoid basing their policy positions on arguments of emotion or incredible bias.
This would have to be directed at every single media outlet out there now.
The review system for anything these days is completely corrupted. There are nearly no movie review sites anymore than don't bend over to major movie developers. Same goes for gaming and anything entity that exists online (including new services to various degrees).
There needs to be a global change, and I don't see it happening. We are in the information wars.
It all started with Goebbels and has been much refined since then.
But you guys should be more concerned with spin on hard news about important things IRL - especially from governments and politicians - than whether opinion pieces about entertainment media is honest opinions or not.
Talk about tempests in teapots lol.
That train has runaway already.
There is no incentive to report things in a strictly factual manner, because most folks don't want to read or hear that. There's a reason Fox News, which is almost wholly opinion and not news, is highly popular. It's not because they stick to relaying facts.
If you're not on a "team" facing down the "enemy", you're irrelevant.
lol frenchie you're hilarious. Like ALL the other networks are not bought and paid for propaganda spewers every bit and I'd argue much more than FOX. The socialist agenda is being pushed HARD, and I'd love to know who is paying for it. It cant be by anyone with good sense or without ulterior motives.. The only people that profit from socialism is the people that run the system.
This would have to be directed at every single media outlet out there now.
The review system for anything these days is completely corrupted. There are nearly no movie review sites anymore than don't bend over to major movie developers. Same goes for gaming and anything entity that exists online (including new services to various degrees).
There needs to be a global change, and I don't see it happening. We are in the information wars.
It all started with Goebbels and has been much refined since then.
But you guys should be more concerned with spin on hard news about important things IRL - especially from governments and politicians - than whether opinion pieces about entertainment media is honest opinions or not.
Talk about tempests in teapots lol.
That train has runaway already.
There is no incentive to report things in a strictly factual manner, because most folks don't want to read or hear that. There's a reason Fox News, which is almost wholly opinion and not news, is highly popular. It's not because they stick to relaying facts.
If you're not on a "team" facing down the "enemy", you're irrelevant.
lol frenchie you're hilarious. Like ALL the other networks are not bought and paid for propaganda spewers every bit and I'd argue much more than FOX. The socialist agenda is being pushed HARD, and I'd love to know who is paying for it. It cant be by anyone with good sense or without ulterior motives.. The only people that profit from socialism is the people that run the system.
You're out in left field. Return to reality.
I've already addressed why I used the example, literally in last post before yours.
This would have to be directed at every single media outlet out there now.
The review system for anything these days is completely corrupted. There are nearly no movie review sites anymore than don't bend over to major movie developers. Same goes for gaming and anything entity that exists online (including new services to various degrees).
There needs to be a global change, and I don't see it happening. We are in the information wars.
It all started with Goebbels and has been much refined since then.
But you guys should be more concerned with spin on hard news about important things IRL - especially from governments and politicians - than whether opinion pieces about entertainment media is honest opinions or not.
Talk about tempests in teapots lol.
That train has runaway already.
There is no incentive to report things in a strictly factual manner, because most folks don't want to read or hear that. There's a reason Fox News, which is almost wholly opinion and not news, is highly popular. It's not because they stick to relaying facts.
If you're not on a "team" facing down the "enemy", you're irrelevant.
It's funny how "Fox News" is always pointed at for "biased, or fake news", yet ABC, CBS, NBC, PBS, MSNBC, HNN, and almost all other national news station slant to the left. I guess those stations say what lefties want to hear, too.
The point is, there's NOT a news outlet, unless possibly a local one, that tells all sides of a story, backed with facts, and let's the reader decide. Don't JUST point to Fox News. It shows your hand
I point at Fox because it's the most popular by viewership.
I don't "watch" news, full stop. I read news via an aggregate site.
EDIT- actually, to be specific, the only non-aggregate news site I regularly visit is The Bulwark, which is fiercely conservative, just not ignorant. Sykes, Kristol, Egger, and Last are the type of conservatives that can find compromise and avoid basing their policy positions on arguments of emotion or incredible bias.
Fox News is also the leftist "go to non-news" example. Are you sure it's the
most popular? That sounds like the socialists have their work cut out
for them
I read as little news as possible in this current sensationalizing society where everything is the best or the worst, never in the middle. I can no longer watch ESPN where they search everything to make some stat sound awesome. "He got more points in the game in a 5 minute span on Wednesdays with a full moon... ever."
I also read/listen to very few reviews. No popular reviewer plays games I want to play. That handful of games would not keep them in business. Reviewers, by their nature, need to be "gamers", as in play everything to hit the digital shelves. I'm not a gamer, just some guy who enjoys very specific types of games
PS: This is a personal thing for me. I'm tired of socialists, leftists, social justice advocates making their points in nearly any conversation. It's getting worse than Evangelical Christians and their way of swinging almost any conversation to their religion, and their religion alone. I've decided I've had enough and if someone tries to insert their political leanings (though seeing right wing or Libertarian leanings is comparatively quite rare), I'm going to comment.
- Al
Personally the only modern MMORPG trend that annoys me is the idea that MMOs need to be designed in a way to attract people who don't actually like MMOs. Which to me makes about as much sense as someone trying to figure out a way to get vegetarians to eat at their steakhouse. - FARGIN_WAR
This would have to be directed at every single media outlet out there now.
The review system for anything these days is completely corrupted. There are nearly no movie review sites anymore than don't bend over to major movie developers. Same goes for gaming and anything entity that exists online (including new services to various degrees).
There needs to be a global change, and I don't see it happening. We are in the information wars.
It all started with Goebbels and has been much refined since then.
But you guys should be more concerned with spin on hard news about important things IRL - especially from governments and politicians - than whether opinion pieces about entertainment media is honest opinions or not.
Talk about tempests in teapots lol.
That train has runaway already.
There is no incentive to report things in a strictly factual manner, because most folks don't want to read or hear that. There's a reason Fox News, which is almost wholly opinion and not news, is highly popular. It's not because they stick to relaying facts.
If you're not on a "team" facing down the "enemy", you're irrelevant.
It's funny how "Fox News" is always pointed at for "biased, or fake news", yet ABC, CBS, NBC, PBS, MSNBC, HNN, and almost all other national news station slant to the left. I guess those stations say what lefties want to hear, too.
The point is, there's NOT a news outlet, unless possibly a local one, that tells all sides of a story, backed with facts, and let's the reader decide. Don't JUST point to Fox News. It shows your hand
I point at Fox because it's the most popular by viewership.
I don't "watch" news, full stop. I read news via an aggregate site.
EDIT- actually, to be specific, the only non-aggregate news site I regularly visit is The Bulwark, which is fiercely conservative, just not ignorant. Sykes, Kristol, Egger, and Last are the type of conservatives that can find compromise and avoid basing their policy positions on arguments of emotion or incredible bias.
Fox News is also the leftist "go to non-news" example. Are you sure it's the
most popular? That sounds like the socialists have their work cut out
for them
I read as little news as possible in this current sensationalizing society where everything is the best or the worst, never in the middle. I can no longer watch ESPN where they search everything to make some stat sound awesome. "He got more points in the game in a 5 minute span on Wednesdays with a full moon... ever."
I also read/listen to very few reviews. No popular reviewer plays games I want to play. That handful of games would not keep them in business. Reviewers, by their nature, need to be "gamers", as in play everything to hit the digital shelves. I'm not a gamer, just some guy who enjoys very specific types of games
PS: This is a personal thing for me. I'm tired of socialists, leftists, social justice advocates making their points in nearly any conversation. It's getting worse than Evangelical Christians and their way of swinging almost any conversation to their religion, and their religion alone. I've decided I've had enough and if someone tries to insert their political leanings (though seeing right wing or Libertarian leanings is comparatively quite rare), I'm going to comment.
It is, by millions. Considering my original point was how many fall into the trap of getting their information solely from a cable news source, citing the most popular seems natural.
Those claiming socialism here in America aren't even using the term correctly, as what they advocate isn't socialism, but the social democracy akin to the countries of Scandinavia- the so-called "Nordic model." They're confused as to what they're even for, but that doesn't stop them from calling themselves socialists. The irony is that the right-wing population sees them as socialists, they seem themselves as socialists, but they land far short of being true socialists.
Asserting that seeing right-wing leaning comments is comparatively rare seems to indicate to me you're not actually looking with an unbiased eye- there are roughly as many at least, and my personal political commentary here on this site comes usually as a response to such comments (feel free to check my post history on that one), not as an invitation of such a discussion. I just don't shy away from it. You'll notice the original post you quoted used very general terms, other than citing the most popular cable news channel, to communicate the point that this two-party system has begun poisoning the well, so to speak. I feel the two parties have outgrown their usefulness to the American people.
Say what you want as long as you indicate it's a comment being paid for. Because all I need is the middle of a 10 minute muted youtube video to decide if I want to buy a game or not regaurdless of what anyone else has to say about it.
This would have to be directed at every single media outlet out there now.
The review system for anything these days is completely corrupted. There are nearly no movie review sites anymore than don't bend over to major movie developers. Same goes for gaming and anything entity that exists online (including new services to various degrees).
There needs to be a global change, and I don't see it happening. We are in the information wars.
It all started with Goebbels and has been much refined since then.
But you guys should be more concerned with spin on hard news about important things IRL - especially from governments and politicians - than whether opinion pieces about entertainment media is honest opinions or not.
Talk about tempests in teapots lol.
That train has runaway already.
There is no incentive to report things in a strictly factual manner, because most folks don't want to read or hear that. There's a reason Fox News, which is almost wholly opinion and not news, is highly popular. It's not because they stick to relaying facts.
If you're not on a "team" facing down the "enemy", you're irrelevant.
It's funny how "Fox News" is always pointed at for "biased, or fake news", yet ABC, CBS, NBC, PBS, MSNBC, HNN, and almost all other national news station slant to the left. I guess those stations say what lefties want to hear, too.
The point is, there's NOT a news outlet, unless possibly a local one, that tells all sides of a story, backed with facts, and let's the reader decide. Don't JUST point to Fox News. It shows your hand
I point at Fox because it's the most popular by viewership.
I don't "watch" news, full stop. I read news via an aggregate site.
EDIT- actually, to be specific, the only non-aggregate news site I regularly visit is The Bulwark, which is fiercely conservative, just not ignorant. Sykes, Kristol, Egger, and Last are the type of conservatives that can find compromise and avoid basing their policy positions on arguments of emotion or incredible bias.
Fox News is also the leftist "go to non-news" example. Are you sure it's the
most popular? That sounds like the socialists have their work cut out
for them
I read as little news as possible in this current sensationalizing society where everything is the best or the worst, never in the middle. I can no longer watch ESPN where they search everything to make some stat sound awesome. "He got more points in the game in a 5 minute span on Wednesdays with a full moon... ever."
I also read/listen to very few reviews. No popular reviewer plays games I want to play. That handful of games would not keep them in business. Reviewers, by their nature, need to be "gamers", as in play everything to hit the digital shelves. I'm not a gamer, just some guy who enjoys very specific types of games
PS: This is a personal thing for me. I'm tired of socialists, leftists, social justice advocates making their points in nearly any conversation. It's getting worse than Evangelical Christians and their way of swinging almost any conversation to their religion, and their religion alone. I've decided I've had enough and if someone tries to insert their political leanings (though seeing right wing or Libertarian leanings is comparatively quite rare), I'm going to comment.
In the United States, most television networks that cover politics are on the left. Fox News is the lone exception that is on the right. That's the key thing that makes it an outlier, and is also the primary reason why it is more popular than CNN or MSNBC and has been for decades.
If you want a television news source on the left, there is a lot of competition, so a given network only gets a small slice of that pie. If you want a television news source on the right, Fox News is it. And if you want to be informed, you'll need to check news sources from both sides--though not necessarily on TV as opposed to other media.
Comments
The point is, there's NOT a news outlet, unless possibly a local one, that tells all sides of a story, backed with facts, and let's the reader decide. Don't JUST point to Fox News. It shows your hand
- Al
Personally the only modern MMORPG trend that annoys me is the idea that MMOs need to be designed in a way to attract people who don't actually like MMOs. Which to me makes about as much sense as someone trying to figure out a way to get vegetarians to eat at their steakhouse.- FARGIN_WAR
I don't "watch" news, full stop. I read news via an aggregate site.
EDIT- actually, to be specific, the only non-aggregate news site I regularly visit is The Bulwark, which is fiercely conservative, just not ignorant. Sykes, Kristol, Egger, and Last are the type of conservatives that can find compromise and avoid basing their policy positions on arguments of emotion or incredible bias.
I've already addressed why I used the example, literally in last post before yours.
I read as little news as possible in this current sensationalizing society where everything is the best or the worst, never in the middle. I can no longer watch ESPN where they search everything to make some stat sound awesome. "He got more points in the game in a 5 minute span on Wednesdays with a full moon... ever."
I also read/listen to very few reviews. No popular reviewer plays games I want to play. That handful of games would not keep them in business. Reviewers, by their nature, need to be "gamers", as in play everything to hit the digital shelves. I'm not a gamer, just some guy who enjoys very specific types of games
PS: This is a personal thing for me. I'm tired of socialists, leftists, social justice advocates making their points in nearly any conversation. It's getting worse than Evangelical Christians and their way of swinging almost any conversation to their religion, and their religion alone. I've decided I've had enough and if someone tries to insert their political leanings (though seeing right wing or Libertarian leanings is comparatively quite rare), I'm going to comment.
- Al
Personally the only modern MMORPG trend that annoys me is the idea that MMOs need to be designed in a way to attract people who don't actually like MMOs. Which to me makes about as much sense as someone trying to figure out a way to get vegetarians to eat at their steakhouse.- FARGIN_WAR
Those claiming socialism here in America aren't even using the term correctly, as what they advocate isn't socialism, but the social democracy akin to the countries of Scandinavia- the so-called "Nordic model." They're confused as to what they're even for, but that doesn't stop them from calling themselves socialists. The irony is that the right-wing population sees them as socialists, they seem themselves as socialists, but they land far short of being true socialists.
Asserting that seeing right-wing leaning comments is comparatively rare seems to indicate to me you're not actually looking with an unbiased eye- there are roughly as many at least, and my personal political commentary here on this site comes usually as a response to such comments (feel free to check my post history on that one), not as an invitation of such a discussion. I just don't shy away from it. You'll notice the original post you quoted used very general terms, other than citing the most popular cable news channel, to communicate the point that this two-party system has begun poisoning the well, so to speak. I feel the two parties have outgrown their usefulness to the American people.
This isn't a signature, you just think it is.
If you want a television news source on the left, there is a lot of competition, so a given network only gets a small slice of that pie. If you want a television news source on the right, Fox News is it. And if you want to be informed, you'll need to check news sources from both sides--though not necessarily on TV as opposed to other media.
"Be water my friend" - Bruce Lee