Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

The Old Days, The New Days

1356

Comments

  • ScotScot Member LegendaryPosts: 24,424
    Can I just point out I did not make this thread to discuss the Blizzard issue by stealth, so can keep of that, thanks.
  • ScotScot Member LegendaryPosts: 24,424
    Here is an idea, I am not even sure the site could do this:

    Instead of a full ban on comments, how about only letting those who are Purple and Orange comment? That's still censorship, but not as bad as the fully blown version.

    Now I know what you are going to say, the "orange guy" who got a post deleted the other day is saying that will solve it. :)

    It won't solve the problems 100% but it might be enough to keep the unacceptable posts down to an acceptable level if that makes sense.
  • cameltosiscameltosis Member LegendaryPosts: 3,847
    Scot said:
    Here is an idea, I am not even sure the site could do this:

    Instead of a full ban on comments, how about only letting those who are Purple and Orange comment? That's still censorship, but not as bad as the fully blown version.

    Now I know what you are going to say, the "orange guy" who got a post deleted the other day is saying that will solve it. :)

    It won't solve the problems 100% but it might be enough to keep the unacceptable posts down to an acceptable level if that makes sense.

    If I was going to aim at some sort of automatic sensorship, I wouldn't use member status as the criteria.


    Instead, I'd put in some logic like "if user has had any infraction in the last 6 months, don't let them post on this article"



    Not that im a fan of automatic sensorship, but I can see why its useful. what will be more interesting is if / when various governments start treating tech firms as publishers. If that happens, it will dramatically change the way people interact on the internet.
    [Deleted User]ScotKyleran
    Currently Playing: WAR RoR - Spitt rr7X Black Orc | Scrotling rr6X Squig Herder | Scabrous rr4X Shaman

  • SovrathSovrath Member LegendaryPosts: 32,936
    Scot said:
    Here is an idea, I am not even sure the site could do this:

    Instead of a full ban on comments, how about only letting those who are Purple and Orange comment? That's still censorship, but not as bad as the fully blown version.

    Now I know what you are going to say, the "orange guy" who got a post deleted the other day is saying that will solve it. :)

    It won't solve the problems 100% but it might be enough to keep the unacceptable posts down to an acceptable level if that makes sense.

    Nah, that just creates an elitism and doesn't acknowledge new people to the site who might have a viable opinion.

    Cameltosis' idea is better though I don't think it should be 6 months. Maybe two weeks or some such thing.
    [Deleted User]AlBQuirkyKyleran
    Like Skyrim? Need more content? Try my Skyrim mod "Godfred's Tomb." 

    Godfred's Tomb Trailer: https://youtu.be/-nsXGddj_4w


    Original Skyrim: https://www.nexusmods.com/skyrim/mods/109547

    Try the "Special Edition." 'Cause it's "Special." https://www.nexusmods.com/skyrimspecialedition/mods/64878/?tab=description

    Serph toze kindly has started a walk-through. https://youtu.be/UIelCK-lldo 
  • MendelMendel Member LegendaryPosts: 5,609
    Scot said:
    Here is an idea, I am not even sure the site could do this:

    Instead of a full ban on comments, how about only letting those who are Purple and Orange comment? That's still censorship, but not as bad as the fully blown version.

    Now I know what you are going to say, the "orange guy" who got a post deleted the other day is saying that will solve it. :)

    It won't solve the problems 100% but it might be enough to keep the unacceptable posts down to an acceptable level if that makes sense.

    Good idea, but that won't work in practice.

    First, every opinion is valuable.  The guy who just posted his first response *might* be the one whose idea sparks a million dollar idea of your own.  Profane and illiterate need not apply.

    Second, longevity and popularity isn't really a good basis for dividing any community.  That's exactly what the 'color' system here at MMORPG, a measure of popular participation over a long time.  Imagine if only the very oldest people could go to a nude beach.  Waitaminute... Europe.  Sorry for that image.

    Third, new people without the ability to post will never 'advance' up the color scale.  A color-segregated community division never has the opportunity to learn from new members' experiences.  It essentially becomes another gaming echo-chamber.

    Fourth, it assumes that all unacceptable posts come from members further down the 'color' scale.  I find that not to be true at all.  We're all equal opportunity offenders, here.

    It's good that you're thinking of a solution, but one that isn't so divisive would work a bit better.



    AlBQuirkyKyleranBrainy

    Logic, my dear, merely enables one to be wrong with great authority.

  • Slapshot1188Slapshot1188 Member LegendaryPosts: 17,651
    tzervo said:
    Scot said:

    Instead of a full ban on comments, how about only letting those who are Purple and Orange comment? That's still censorship, but not as bad as the fully blown version.
    Scandal! I'm being oppressed. That's favoritism.

    Oh wait I'm purple. Good idea!  o:)
    Too lenient.  I say screw Orange and Purple.   Only those who TRULY have proven themselves as the Paragons of MMORPG (Or have enjoyed the Capt. LOL boost) should be able to post on such sensitive topics.   Let the all time- Leaderboard dictate all:  
    https://forums.mmorpg.com/activity

    [Deleted User]AlBQuirkyScot

    All time classic  MY NEW FAVORITE POST!  (Keep laying those bricks)

    "I should point out that no other company has shipped out a beta on a disc before this." - Official Mortal Online Lead Community Moderator

    Proudly wearing the Harbinger badge since Dec 23, 2017. 

    Coined the phrase "Role-Playing a Development Team" January 2018

    "Oddly Slap is the main reason I stay in these forums." - Mystichaze April 9th 2018

  • Asm0deusAsm0deus Member EpicPosts: 4,618
    tzervo said:
    Scot said:

    Instead of a full ban on comments, how about only letting those who are Purple and Orange comment? That's still censorship, but not as bad as the fully blown version.
    Scandal! I'm being oppressed. That's favoritism.

    Oh wait I'm purple. Good idea!  o:)
    Too lenient.  I say screw Orange and Purple.   Only those who TRULY have proven themselves as the Paragons of MMORPG (Or have enjoyed the Capt. LOL boost) should be able to post on such sensitive topics.   Let the all time- Leaderboard dictate all:  
    https://forums.mmorpg.com/activity


    Now if something in this forum needs to be junked its this leaderboard...lmao

    Didn't even know we had one and what a useless thing to have.......
    MendelAlBQuirkyKyleran

    Brenics ~ Just to point out I do believe Chris Roberts is going down as the man who cheated backers and took down crowdfunding for gaming.





  • nursonurso Member UncommonPosts: 327
    edited August 2021
    tzervo said:
    The issue was that Mr Jacobs refused to even post that question with a "no comment due to legal reasons" and threw his toys out the window refusing to answer all questions.
    It was really bizarre. MJ could not answer a question for legal reason. Bree said they would not publish a partial interview. MJ said he did not even want this question to appear. Bree said, to bad, every question that is not answered defaults to "refused to answer" (or something like that). MJ then puts the questions aside and Bree began her months long baiting, as cameltosis already wrote.
    [Deleted User]
  • AlBQuirkyAlBQuirky Member EpicPosts: 7,432
    Iselin said:
    How this site decides to moderate and how any employer treats their employees are not even in the same universe of egregiousness. 

    You keep telling yourself that.

    Moving on since you don't wish to even civilly discuss.
    Brainy

    - Al

    Personally the only modern MMORPG trend that annoys me is the idea that MMOs need to be designed in a way to attract people who don't actually like MMOs. Which to me makes about as much sense as someone trying to figure out a way to get vegetarians to eat at their steakhouse.
    - FARGIN_WAR


  • AlBQuirkyAlBQuirky Member EpicPosts: 7,432
    tzervo said:
    Scot said:

    Instead of a full ban on comments, how about only letting those who are Purple and Orange comment? That's still censorship, but not as bad as the fully blown version.
    Scandal! I'm being oppressed. That's favoritism.

    Oh wait I'm purple. Good idea!  o:)
    Too lenient.  I say screw Orange and Purple.   Only those who TRULY have proven themselves as the Paragons of MMORPG (Or have enjoyed the Capt. LOL boost) should be able to post on such sensitive topics.   Let the all time- Leaderboard dictate all:  
    https://forums.mmorpg.com/activity


    I think they helped me get to Purple :lol:

    I'll have to recuse myself on the basis on not "virtue-signalling" at all :)
    Brainy

    - Al

    Personally the only modern MMORPG trend that annoys me is the idea that MMOs need to be designed in a way to attract people who don't actually like MMOs. Which to me makes about as much sense as someone trying to figure out a way to get vegetarians to eat at their steakhouse.
    - FARGIN_WAR


  • ScotScot Member LegendaryPosts: 24,424
    edited August 2021
    Sovrath said:
    Scot said:
    Here is an idea, I am not even sure the site could do this:

    Instead of a full ban on comments, how about only letting those who are Purple and Orange comment? That's still censorship, but not as bad as the fully blown version.

    Now I know what you are going to say, the "orange guy" who got a post deleted the other day is saying that will solve it. :)

    It won't solve the problems 100% but it might be enough to keep the unacceptable posts down to an acceptable level if that makes sense.

    Nah, that just creates an elitism and doesn't acknowledge new people to the site who might have a viable opinion.

    Cameltosis' idea is better though I don't think it should be 6 months. Maybe two weeks or some such thing.
    I have already moved on, this is a much better way. It would require the board to be able to automatically flag those who had a temporary ban, warning or deleted post (yes me!) and then allow some articles to be flagged not for "offenders". Not sure how easy that would be to do mind you.

    Only issue with it, what happens once the temporary suspension of posting rights on the designated threads expires? So you can't post on those threads straight away, but you can two weeks (or whatever) later once you are off the "naughty list"? This might require those threads getting locked at the two week point after publishing just to stop that, which I would be fine with.
    AlBQuirky
  • ScotScot Member LegendaryPosts: 24,424
    edited August 2021
    tzervo said:
    Scot said:

    Instead of a full ban on comments, how about only letting those who are Purple and Orange comment? That's still censorship, but not as bad as the fully blown version.
    Scandal! I'm being oppressed. That's favoritism.

    Oh wait I'm purple. Good idea!  o:)
    Too lenient.  I say screw Orange and Purple.   Only those who TRULY have proven themselves as the Paragons of MMORPG (Or have enjoyed the Capt. LOL boost) should be able to post on such sensitive topics.   Let the all time- Leaderboard dictate all:  
    https://forums.mmorpg.com/activity

    I did not even realise we had a leader board, Suzie showing how to engage with a community in a way that I am not sure you would see in any gaming forum these days? I notice even though I am beating the cat currently, he is top cat in the all time rating. :)
    AlBQuirky
  • KyleranKyleran Member LegendaryPosts: 44,057
    Asm0deus said:
    tzervo said:
    Scot said:

    Instead of a full ban on comments, how about only letting those who are Purple and Orange comment? That's still censorship, but not as bad as the fully blown version.
    Scandal! I'm being oppressed. That's favoritism.

    Oh wait I'm purple. Good idea!  o:)
    Too lenient.  I say screw Orange and Purple.   Only those who TRULY have proven themselves as the Paragons of MMORPG (Or have enjoyed the Capt. LOL boost) should be able to post on such sensitive topics.   Let the all time- Leaderboard dictate all:  
    https://forums.mmorpg.com/activity


    Now if something in this forum needs to be junked its this leaderboard...lmao

    Didn't even know we had one and what a useless thing to have.......
    Says the guy whose not on it.  

    Looks like I'm having a slow week though, better up my game.


    IselinScotAlBQuirky

    "True friends stab you in the front." | Oscar Wilde 

    "I need to finish" - Christian Wolff: The Accountant

    Just trying to live long enough to play a new, released MMORPG, playing New Worlds atm

    Fools find no pleasure in understanding but delight in airing their own opinions. Pvbs 18:2, NIV

    Don't just play games, inhabit virtual worlds™

    "This is the most intelligent, well qualified and articulate response to a post I have ever seen on these forums. It's a shame most people here won't have the attention span to read past the second line." - Anon






  • Slapshot1188Slapshot1188 Member LegendaryPosts: 17,651
    Kyleran said:
    Asm0deus said:
    tzervo said:
    Scot said:

    Instead of a full ban on comments, how about only letting those who are Purple and Orange comment? That's still censorship, but not as bad as the fully blown version.
    Scandal! I'm being oppressed. That's favoritism.

    Oh wait I'm purple. Good idea!  o:)
    Too lenient.  I say screw Orange and Purple.   Only those who TRULY have proven themselves as the Paragons of MMORPG (Or have enjoyed the Capt. LOL boost) should be able to post on such sensitive topics.   Let the all time- Leaderboard dictate all:  
    https://forums.mmorpg.com/activity


    Now if something in this forum needs to be junked its this leaderboard...lmao

    Didn't even know we had one and what a useless thing to have.......
    Says the guy whose not on it.  

    Looks like I'm having a slow week though, better up my game.


    I was going to give you a reaction but realized that would help you on the Leaderboard.  Cannot have that.  You might get the best offers from the next company.

    [Deleted User]AlBQuirkyKyleran

    All time classic  MY NEW FAVORITE POST!  (Keep laying those bricks)

    "I should point out that no other company has shipped out a beta on a disc before this." - Official Mortal Online Lead Community Moderator

    Proudly wearing the Harbinger badge since Dec 23, 2017. 

    Coined the phrase "Role-Playing a Development Team" January 2018

    "Oddly Slap is the main reason I stay in these forums." - Mystichaze April 9th 2018

  • KnightFalzKnightFalz Member EpicPosts: 4,583
    kitarad said:
    Yeah well even as they are hooked up to a ventilator and having difficulty breathing they are insisting it is the flu. There is nothing you can do to dissuade a person from their beliefs short of them dying from it.

    There is a thread of reasoning to that belief. Influenza can lead to pneumonia which in extreme cases can lead to the need for a ventilator. Combined with an obstinate disbelief in the threat of Covid-19 I can see it being convincing.
    AlBQuirky
  • KnightFalzKnightFalz Member EpicPosts: 4,583
    Scot said:
    I would ask posters to try to make sure a thread about censorship is not censored. A calm post keeps everyone calm. :)

    But I don't have enough irony in my diet.
    [Deleted User]ScotcheyaneKyleranAlBQuirky
  • lahnmirlahnmir Member LegendaryPosts: 5,053
    Scot said:
    I would ask posters to try to make sure a thread about censorship is not censored. A calm post keeps everyone calm. :)

    But I don't have enough irony in my diet.
    I’ve read that a nice glass of white whine during dinner can fix that.

    /Cheers,
    Lahnmir
    [Deleted User]KyleranAlBQuirky
    'the only way he could nail it any better is if he used a cross.'

    Kyleran on yours sincerely 


    'But there are many. You can play them entirely solo, and even offline. Also, you are wrong by default.'

    Ikcin in response to yours sincerely debating whether or not single-player offline MMOs exist...



    'This does not apply just to ED but SC or any other game. What they will get is Rebirth/X4, likely prettier but equally underwhelming and pointless. 

    It is incredibly difficult to design some meaningfull leg content that would fit a space ship game - simply because it is not a leg game.

    It is just huge resource waste....'

    Gdemami absolutely not being an armchair developer

  • ScotScot Member LegendaryPosts: 24,424
    MikeB said:
    Iselin said:
    There's a crowd here that either doesn't have a normal outlet to discuss their far right politics or they do and still want to constantly inject it into topics here because... I really don't know... so I'll just go with "reasons."

    Frankly IMO, It's about time those articles got locked because a large portion of the crowd here don't deserve the opportunity to spew their hateful bile every fucking day on every fucking thread.

    We're all tired of it, too. And we're going to be unceremoniously ejecting these people from the forums. If your aim is to be posting "woke" this or "SJW" that here (or worse) then you're gonna have a bad time. Let me state  in no uncertain terms that these people are not at all welcome on our forums. I'm sure you've seen some regulars around here that may have previously skirted the line issued bans over the last week or two. Those bans are permanent.

    If reading this has you worried, well, you probably should be. This isn't a slippery slope to censorship or anything. We don't care if you hate or love X or Y game, developer, or what have you. This isn't even about your garden variety trolling, lapses of judgment we all have posting on forums from time to time, or even just skeptical or cynical views some people have on all sorts of topics. It's about the inability for some people to show basic human decency and empathy. We simply have no room for those people here. I don't think I can be any more clear on this.

    As for the broader issue, feel free to create your own threads on the Blizzard topics, but editorial doesn't want those comments opened given the tenor of the forums and until that changes, certain articles will have their comments disabled at their discretion. We're absolutely open to revisiting this in the future if things change around here.

    I've been here for 10+ years. You all know me and the space I've tried to give you over the years, but this is an issue that we have to get under control. The stuff we're seeing, particularly over the last few years, is disgusting both to me and to everyone who works here and we're just done with it.
    It is good to have some feedback Mike as to why this change has happened, the only thing that concerns me about what you have said is should not posters have been given a temporary ban before they got a permanent one, but then maybe they have? I do have a "can we bring them round" attitude but I appreciate it is not me having to wade though the detritus of posts we sometimes get. I say sometimes, I think on the whole we have a good community.

    It is fair that we can open our own open threads on the issue, I am sure some posters will run with that. The topics with no comments usually do not interest me enough to do that, though I will comment myself.

    Finally we have known you a long time, that does engender trust and I am sure you are acting in good faith. Thanks for putting up with us all these years. :)
    AlBQuirky
  • cheyanecheyane Member LegendaryPosts: 9,404
    I think many of them have been banned before and I personally recall them being banned before. In the past they had a 3 strikes rule where you get banned a certain number of times then it becomes permanent but they removed that. So I suppose some of them may be a little surprised that this time it is permanent.

    I think that the site has the right to regulate what is happening here. I honestly am tired of seeing the same rhetoric and catch phrases being used and hate spewed in many sites I go to. Don't even let me get started on youtube comments. Even my poor uploads have not escaped them.
     
    I also think that it is purely disingenuous to complain it is egregious when they know perfectly well what they were doing.
    IselinKyleranAlBQuirky
    Garrus Signature
  • ScotScot Member LegendaryPosts: 24,424
    cheyane said:
    I think many of them have been banned before and I personally recall them being banned before. In the past they had a 3 strikes rule where you get banned a certain number of times then it becomes permanent but they removed that. So I suppose some of them may be a little surprised that this time it is permanent.

    I think that the site has the right to regulate what is happening here. I honestly am tired of seeing the same rhetoric and catch phrases being used and hate spewed in many sites I go to. Don't even let me get started on youtube comments. Even my poor uploads have not escaped them.
     
    I also think that it is purely disingenuous to complain it is egregious when they know perfectly well what they were doing.
    I think it is very likely they were banned multiple times before, but just making sure that they still get a second chance, or indeed third. To me though Cheyane, rhetoric and catch phrases are used by all sides as is swearing. In fact it the swearing that bothers me the most as it shows you have lost your ability to rationally debate.
    AlBQuirky
  • IselinIselin Member LegendaryPosts: 18,719
    edited August 2021
    tzervo said:
    Scot said:
    I think it is very likely they were banned multiple times before, but just making sure that they still get a second chance, or indeed third.
    Not all of them and this is what worries me. I was surprised for example to see Amaranthar get banned. I found myself constantly arguing against him and being at odds with him but never in a non-civil way. He never struck me as hateful, lacking human decency or non-empathic. Others too.

    And I have seen many posts being deleted recently. I understand the site's need to keep things under control but I am concerned about censorship and/or overcompensation and I personally don't like it.
    Did you see the post that triggered his ban?

    Here I'll link it for you: https://forums.mmorpg.com/discussion/494925/walkouts-equity-and-wokeness#latest

    Maybe you don't consider the use of "woke" and "SJW" as offensive and I wouldn't blame you if you don't because its widespread use on the internet as well as the unchecked use of it here for months or even years probably has desensitized many to the ironic insult that it is.

    But some people do consider those terms offensive as political hate terms.

    The hateful comment major infraction language on this site has always included political beliefs in their criteria:

    • Hateful content includes, but is not limited to, discriminating comments about: race, ethnicity (what country someone is from), religion, age, gender, sexuality, socioeconomic status and political beliefs. MMORPG.com holds complete and total discretion to decide what is hateful.

    Even if you disagree with the hateful content reason for a ban, just WTF was the purpose of even creating that thread in a gaming forum? If nothing else its intent and content were 100% political with zero relevance to games or gaming.

    [Deleted User][Deleted User]AlBQuirkyFrodoFragins
    "Social media gives legions of idiots the right to speak when they once only spoke at a bar after a glass of wine, without harming the community ... but now they have the same right to speak as a Nobel Prize winner. It's the invasion of the idiots”

    ― Umberto Eco

    “Microtransactions? In a single player role-playing game? Are you nuts?” 
    ― CD PROJEKT RED

  • Slapshot1188Slapshot1188 Member LegendaryPosts: 17,651
    Iselin said:
    tzervo said:
    Scot said:
    I think it is very likely they were banned multiple times before, but just making sure that they still get a second chance, or indeed third.
    Not all of them and this is what worries me. I was surprised for example to see Amaranthar get banned. I found myself constantly arguing against him and being at odds with him but never in a non-civil way. He never struck me as hateful, lacking human decency or non-empathic. Others too.

    And I have seen many posts being deleted recently. I understand the site's need to keep things under control but I am concerned about censorship and/or overcompensation and I personally don't like it.
    Did you see the post that triggered his ban?

    Here I'll link it for you: https://forums.mmorpg.com/discussion/494925/walkouts-equity-and-wokeness#latest

    Maybe you don't consider the use of "woke" and "SJW" as offensive and I wouldn't blame you if you don't because its widespread use on the internet as well as the unchecked use of it here for months or even years probably has desensitized many to the ironic insult that it is.

    But some people do consider those terms offensive as political hate terms.

    The hateful comment major infraction language on this site has always included political beliefs in their criteria:

    • Hateful content includes, but is not limited to, discriminating comments about: race, ethnicity (what country someone is from), religion, age, gender, sexuality, socioeconomic status and political beliefs. MMORPG.com holds complete and total discretion to decide what is hateful.

    Even if you disagree with the hateful content reason for a ban, just WTF was the purpose of even creating that thread in a gaming forum? If nothing else its intent and content were 100% political with zero relevance to games or gaming.

    Sure I kind of agree, but right now I can go find countless incidents of people being called "Boomer" or "old people", "Grandpa",  "Karen"...

    You may not see those terms as hateful or offensive but they fall into the very same paragraph you quote.  All I ask for is consistency and balance.  If we can stop ALL that crap I think we will be better off.


    AlBQuirky

    All time classic  MY NEW FAVORITE POST!  (Keep laying those bricks)

    "I should point out that no other company has shipped out a beta on a disc before this." - Official Mortal Online Lead Community Moderator

    Proudly wearing the Harbinger badge since Dec 23, 2017. 

    Coined the phrase "Role-Playing a Development Team" January 2018

    "Oddly Slap is the main reason I stay in these forums." - Mystichaze April 9th 2018

  • KyleranKyleran Member LegendaryPosts: 44,057
    Scot said:
    cheyane said:
    I think many of them have been banned before and I personally recall them being banned before. In the past they had a 3 strikes rule where you get banned a certain number of times then it becomes permanent but they removed that. So I suppose some of them may be a little surprised that this time it is permanent.

    I think that the site has the right to regulate what is happening here. I honestly am tired of seeing the same rhetoric and catch phrases being used and hate spewed in many sites I go to. Don't even let me get started on youtube comments. Even my poor uploads have not escaped them.
     
    I also think that it is purely disingenuous to complain it is egregious when they know perfectly well what they were doing.
    I think it is very likely they were banned multiple times before, but just making sure that they still get a second chance, or indeed third. To me though Cheyane, rhetoric and catch phrases are used by all sides as is swearing. In fact it the swearing that bothers me the most as it shows you have lost your ability to rationally debate.
    WTF?

    ;)
    AlBQuirky

    "True friends stab you in the front." | Oscar Wilde 

    "I need to finish" - Christian Wolff: The Accountant

    Just trying to live long enough to play a new, released MMORPG, playing New Worlds atm

    Fools find no pleasure in understanding but delight in airing their own opinions. Pvbs 18:2, NIV

    Don't just play games, inhabit virtual worlds™

    "This is the most intelligent, well qualified and articulate response to a post I have ever seen on these forums. It's a shame most people here won't have the attention span to read past the second line." - Anon






  • ScotScot Member LegendaryPosts: 24,424
    edited August 2021
    Iselin said:
    tzervo said:
    Scot said:
    I think it is very likely they were banned multiple times before, but just making sure that they still get a second chance, or indeed third.
    Not all of them and this is what worries me. I was surprised for example to see Amaranthar get banned. I found myself constantly arguing against him and being at odds with him but never in a non-civil way. He never struck me as hateful, lacking human decency or non-empathic. Others too.

    And I have seen many posts being deleted recently. I understand the site's need to keep things under control but I am concerned about censorship and/or overcompensation and I personally don't like it.
    Did you see the post that triggered his ban?

    Here I'll link it for you: https://forums.mmorpg.com/discussion/494925/walkouts-equity-and-wokeness#latest

    Maybe you don't consider the use of "woke" and "SJW" as offensive and I wouldn't blame you if you don't because its widespread use on the internet as well as the unchecked use of it here for months or even years probably has desensitized many to the ironic insult that it is.

    But some people do consider those terms offensive as political hate terms.

    The hateful comment major infraction language on this site has always included political beliefs in their criteria:

    • Hateful content includes, but is not limited to, discriminating comments about: race, ethnicity (what country someone is from), religion, age, gender, sexuality, socioeconomic status and political beliefs. MMORPG.com holds complete and total discretion to decide what is hateful.

    Even if you disagree with the hateful content reason for a ban, just WTF was the purpose of even creating that thread in a gaming forum? If nothing else its intent and content were 100% political with zero relevance to games or gaming.

    Sure I kind of agree, but right now I can go find countless incidents of people being called "Boomer" or "old people", "Grandpa",  "Karen"...

    You may not see those terms as hateful or offensive but they fall into the very same paragraph you quote.  All I ask for is consistency and balance.  If we can stop ALL that crap I think we will be better off.
    Some posters here think this is about one side, those comments are used by all. Another one all sides use is "get informed, inform yourself" and so on; basically you are an idiot, go do some reading.

    A lot of this seems to me down to a checklist of "fashionably" offensive things. So not everything is seen in the same light, for example I and many others have been told in various ways we are too old for gaming, its all rose tinted and so on. But because ageism is not as important as other "isms and ists" I doubt anyone would get banned for that nor do I think they should be, that's why I see a level of "fashionable" outrage here, which changes over time.

    I am not entirely sure what Amaranthar was getting getting at in that thread, but I can see how it could be regarded as offensive. Was it offensive enough for a ban, I have to say I am not sure but on the balance some sanction had to be made. I presume it is a temporary ban, I have never seen him say such things before. But like I mentioned earlier I am not looking out for these things maybe he did and I missed it.

    What I would say to Zegaloth is are words as outrageous as physical acts? Indeed to me  saying something someone can hear that is a racial slur is far more physical than the internet. What I am getting at is should all such issues be dealt with equally? I can see the argument for that, but it does seem to me that there is a reason why in law we give those convicted variable sentences, not every offence is the same.

    It strikes me having posted, that those who are "fed up to the teeth" may see what some of us are saying as "excuses". I would not want anyone to think I am excusing them from what they have said, they still need sanction, it is just what sanction is applicable?
    KyleranAlBQuirky
  • The user and all related content has been deleted.
This discussion has been closed.