Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Quick Links
Dean goes nuts
Koltrane
Member UncommonPosts: 1,049
Is this Howard Dean or a Pro Wrestler? Actually, pro wrestlers sound more presidential.
This is the funniest sound clip of the entire election, and it's just gotten started! I really don't want this guy anywhere near the button.
Lasciate ogne speranza, voi ch'intrate. (written on the SW:G CD)
A: 73% E: 73% S: 40% K: 13%
-----
Old timer.
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHHHA
AHAHAHAHAHHAHA
AHAHAHHAHAHAHAH
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA
that queer democratic baby killing dean finally broke down eh?
he's a queer....as with almost all democrats
*waits for flaming*
they took over my hometown...NO!
http://www.facebook.com/murtb
-=-=-=-=-
"The beauty of MMORPGS is the merging of gaming and chatrooms. EQ is really just AOL merged with a fantasy game." - billus8
Bartle: A: 93% E: 55% S:3% K: 50% Test learn what it means here.
-=-=-=-=-
Achievers realise that killers as a concept are necessary in order to make achievement meaningful and worthwhile (there being no way to "lose" the game if any fool can "win" just by plodding slowly unchallenged). -bartle
Bartle: A: 93% E: 55% S:3% K: 50% The Test. Learn what it means here.
I'm pulling for the candidate that's a Vietnam vet.. (Kerry, I think? Know him by face more than name) and hoping that if he makes it, he'll attack Bush for having deserted from '72-'73.
http://www.awolbush.com/
I'm sort of glad my father (a Vietnam vet) isn't alive to see this. He HATED Clinton (and rightfully so, I tend to think) for draft-dodging. I think he'd have absolutely snapped if he knew that the very next president after Clinton was a deserter.
____________________
-- Death to picture-sigs. --
____________________
I'd be highly skeptical about any site that buys such domain name, obviously they have a certain bias.
That aside, what does it have to do with Dean's speech?
And further off topic what does how does that effect anything about Bush's policies? Are you saying you'll vote people you hate there policies but like them? Or is it not possible for you to like someone you disagree with?
If you just disagree with them, why not something policy oriented and not personal?
-=-=-=-=-
"The beauty of MMORPGS is the merging of gaming and chatrooms. EQ is really just AOL merged with a fantasy game." - billus8
Bartle: A: 93% E: 55% S:3% K: 50% Test learn what it means here.
-=-=-=-=-
Achievers realise that killers as a concept are necessary in order to make achievement meaningful and worthwhile (there being no way to "lose" the game if any fool can "win" just by plodding slowly unchallenged). -bartle
Bartle: A: 93% E: 55% S:3% K: 50% The Test. Learn what it means here.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++
Oh my god... dont ask where i found it
A: 73% S: 66% K: 33% E: 26%
+++++++++++++++++++++++++
98% of the teenage population does or has tried smoking pot. If you're one of the 98% who has, copy & paste this in your signature.
A: 73% S: 66% K: 33% E: 26%
-----------------------
Screw ENIX
-----------------------
It's hip to be square.
____________________
-- Death to picture-sigs. --
____________________
____________________
-- Death to picture-sigs. --
____________________
http://www.411mania.com/wrestling/news/newsboard.php?news_id=8514
Howard Dean: WWE Commissioner?
Posted By Widro on 01.21.04
Mick Foley comments on Dean speach...
In today's Newsday (link here), Mick Foley comments on presidential hopeful Howard Dean's enthusiastic comments after the Iowa Caucus:
"Man, it was a little too close to a wrestling speech for my taste," said Foley. "If he had leveled with the people, saying, 'I am disappointed [and] things are going to be tough down the home stretch ... ' Instead, we got a full-fledged WWE wrestling promo and that's not what I'm looking for in my president."
"It appeared to me like he was a guy who had lost his mind, and I don't know if 'president' and 'maniacal' are supposed to be words that go hand in hand."
Credit: Newsday.com
____________________
-- Death to picture-sigs. --
____________________
____________________
-- Death to picture-sigs. --
____________________
Negative71 let go of the hate. It's not productive nor was anything you said. Please don't say anything that you can't prove. My friend of a friend said, and links to whyIhatebush.com aren't proof. And you find real media outlets that back what you claim?
I have a saying don't believe anything unless your willing to do the footwork to findout. You always have to ask yourself what does this site/show/person ..ect have to gain. Think about it for a moment.
If you have a real policy disagreement, that might be interesting to talk about. If you want to blow hotair knock yourself out... but it makes you look bad.
I wish I could talk policy and true conversation about issues and politics, but it can't happen as long you and others like you are so willing to buy into complete irrational emotional propaganda. It would be like trying to explain to my 10 year old about quantum mechanics.
My best advise, read the Constitution, understand what the role of the president is. You be shock of just how un-informed most people are, and how silly they look saying the things they do.
Learn, think, expand. Don't belittle yourself to passing on unfounded rumors to spake fear and hate.
http://www.house.gov/Constitution/Constitution.html
-=-=-=-=-
Why do those that claim to be tolerant, are always the most untolerant?
Bartle: A: 93% E: 55% S:3% K: 50% Test learn what it means here.
-=-=-=-=-
Achievers realise that killers as a concept are necessary in order to make achievement meaningful and worthwhile (there being no way to "lose" the game if any fool can "win" just by plodding slowly unchallenged). -bartle
Bartle: A: 93% E: 55% S:3% K: 50% The Test. Learn what it means here.
____________________
-- Death to picture-sigs. --
____________________
____________________
-- Death to picture-sigs. --
____________________
You are free to believe what you wish.
But a huge dissapointment to have unfounded romors being spread. I'll take a moment to but some light onto this.
The History Channel did a full invesatgation into the Bush AWOL story. It's not true.
http://boards.historychannel.com/threadedout.jsp?forum=2174&thread=100000898
"The whole "Bush AWOL?" story has been looked into by numerous media sources, and each time, they come back saying the charge lacks truth. "
-=-=-=-=-
"The beauty of MMORPGS is the merging of gaming and chatrooms. EQ is really just AOL merged with a fantasy game." - billus8
Bartle: A: 93% E: 55% S:3% K: 50% Test learn what it means here.
-=-=-=-=-
Achievers realise that killers as a concept are necessary in order to make achievement meaningful and worthwhile (there being no way to "lose" the game if any fool can "win" just by plodding slowly unchallenged). -bartle
Bartle: A: 93% E: 55% S:3% K: 50% The Test. Learn what it means here.
Typical response from someone trying to cultivate the image you appear to be shooting for. I'm not surprised. I give it a 7.5. Points deducted for resorting to idiotic and trendy jabs like the whole "open-minded/closed-minded" thing. All that is nowadays is a way to try and make yourself look more intellectual than the person you disagree with.
I'd guess, for example, that you're even the type of person who uses insults like "Anti-Semitic" a lot, probably to make yourself look more like an enlightened person.. not even knowing what a Semite really is.
____________________
-- Death to picture-sigs. --
____________________
____________________
-- Death to picture-sigs. --
____________________
-=-=-=-=-
"Shouldn't I be on your ignore list?"
Bartle: A: 93% E: 55% S:3% K: 50% Test learn what it means here.
-=-=-=-=-
Achievers realise that killers as a concept are necessary in order to make achievement meaningful and worthwhile (there being no way to "lose" the game if any fool can "win" just by plodding slowly unchallenged). -bartle
Bartle: A: 93% E: 55% S:3% K: 50% The Test. Learn what it means here.
[Quote]
First of all, the abscence of records of attendance do not necessarily show the abscence of Bush. It can be spun that way, which is the way FJL tries to spin it. Tons of military records, including entire service records, have been lost by the military, whether it be by natural causes of nature, accidents, or just plain bad paperwork (which, the NG had the worst paperwork).
<<According to the records available from the National Guard, the period between May 1972 and May 1973 remains unaccounted for.>>
Patently false, FJL ignores evidence reported in numerous sources. The records are there.
[EndQuote]
This comes from your link Clever. Do they or do they not contradict themselves? First they say they're lost...then they say they're there........ So which is it? If they are in fact there why hasn't anyone seen them yet?
____________________
-- Death to picture-sigs. --
____________________
____________________
-- Death to picture-sigs. --
____________________
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F70817FD3D5D0C708CDDA80994D8404482
According the NY times they do in exist. And Bush was probably wasn't AWOL.
This is claimed to be full story, witch wasn't achived. But it does concure with what's said in the abstract.
Two Democratic senators today called on Gov. George W. Bush to release his full military record to resolve doubts raised by a newspaper about whether he reported for required drills when he was in the Air National Guard in 1972 and 1973. But a review of records by The New York Times indicated that some of those concerns may be unfounded. Documents reviewed by The Times showed that Mr. Bush served in at least 9 of the 17 months in question... On Sept. 5, 1972, Mr. Bush asked his Texas Air National Guard superiors for assignment to the 187th Tactical Recon Group in Montgomery "for the months of September, October and November." Capt. Kenneth K. Lott, chief of the personnel branch of the 187th Tactical Recon Group, told the Texas commanders that training in September had already occurred but that more training was scheduled for Oct. 7 and 8 and Nov. 4 and 5. But Mr. Bartlett said Mr. Bush did not serve on those dates because he was involved in the Senate campaign, but he made up those dates later. Colonel Turnipseed, who retired as a general, said in an interview that regulations allowed Guard members to miss duty as long as it was made up within the same quarter. Mr. Bartlett pointed to a document in Mr. Bush's military records that showed credit for four days of duty ending Nov. 29 and for eight days ending Dec. 14, 1972, and, after he moved back to Houston, on dates in January, April and May. The May dates correlated with orders sent to Mr. Bush at his Houston apartment on April 23, 1973, in which Sgt. Billy B. Lamar told Mr. Bush to report for active duty on May 1-3 and May 8-10. Another document showed that Mr. Bush served at various times from May 29, 1973, through July 30, 1973, a period of time questioned by The Globe.
-=-=-=-=-
Ever find is odd that those that claim tolerance are the most untolerant?
Bartle: A: 93% E: 55% S:3% K: 50% Test learn what it means here.
-=-=-=-=-
Achievers realise that killers as a concept are necessary in order to make achievement meaningful and worthwhile (there being no way to "lose" the game if any fool can "win" just by plodding slowly unchallenged). -bartle
Bartle: A: 93% E: 55% S:3% K: 50% The Test. Learn what it means here.
[Quote]
ABSTRACT - Democratic senators Daniel K Inouye and Bob Kerrey call on Gov George W Bush to release full military record to clear up doubts raised by Boston Globe about whether he reported for required drills while member of Air National Guard in 1972 and 1973; review by New York Times shows concerns may be unfounded; Bush spokesman says he fulfilled all military obligations or would not have received honorable discharge (M)
[EndQuote]
I'm sorry but that is NOT proof. That is just some guy blowing smoke out of his ass for all I know. Where are the OFFICIAL documents? Can't be that hard to do since I've seen a copy of Neil Bush's contract with that Chinese Company. You see that lovely word I have put in bold and highlighted. That doesn't prove squat. Try again!
According the NY times they do in exist. And Bush was probably wasn't AWOL.
This is claimed to be full story, witch wasn't achived. But it does concure with what's said in the abstract.
Documents reviewed by The Times showed that Mr. Bush served in at least 9 of the 17 months in question... On Sept. 5, 1972, Mr. Bush asked his Texas Air National Guard superiors for assignment to the 187th Tactical Recon Group in Montgomery "for the months of September, October and November." Capt. Kenneth K. Lott, chief of the personnel branch of the 187th Tactical Recon Group, told the Texas commanders that training in September had already occurred but that more training was scheduled for Oct. 7 and 8 and Nov. 4 and 5. But Mr. Bartlett said Mr. Bush did not serve on those dates because he was involved in the Senate campaign, but he made up those dates later. Colonel Turnipseed, who retired as a general, said in an interview that regulations allowed Guard members to miss duty as long as it was made up within the same quarter. Mr. Bartlett pointed to a document in Mr. Bush's military records that showed credit for four days of duty ending Nov. 29 and for eight days ending Dec. 14, 1972, and, after he moved back to Houston, on dates in January, April and May. The May dates correlated with orders sent to Mr. Bush at his Houston apartment on April 23, 1973, in which Sgt. Billy B. Lamar told Mr. Bush to report for active duty on May 1-3 and May 8-10. Another document showed that Mr. Bush served at various times from May 29, 1973, through July 30, 1973, a period of time questioned by The Globe.
So Where did you get this little bit of info? It's not on the link you provided...as far as I can see. We can go around and around with this clever. Until I SEE OFFICIAL documents I won't believe a damn thing. And before you even start I voted for this jackass.
He's in over his head, dear. Note how, when confronted with awareness of his favored routine, he quietly shuts it down and begins the more passive crap like changing sigs every post. Whining about the /ignore comment, then some typoed babble about tolerance and "untolerance", whatever that is. (when did anyone in this thread claim to be tolerant, is what I wonder..? Pulling things out of his arse now, in desperation?)
I'm sure once we go to bed in a few, he'll spend a few hours trying to regroup and come up with new tactics to save face. Yes, Keyboard_Commando and his Ever-Changing-Sig will live to troll another day.
EDIT: Note that he's using his "major media outlets". These are the same "major media outlets" that are usually trashed by many other "conservatives" as just being the "liberal media".. but when it comes time to stick up for their brain-dead leader, even if they want to lock him up for other things, ("treasonous" immigration policies, anyone?) that "liberal media" suddenly becomes very convenient and insightful. What I'd guess to be closer to the truth is that they should be called the "corporate media".. a media that realizes who butters their bread.
____________________
-- Death to picture-sigs. --
____________________
____________________
-- Death to picture-sigs. --
____________________
True enough, I posted the full article witch I found elsewhere (you can argue it's validity), but it's not worth 3 bucks to me, to buy it and repost it. If the NY Times had proof Bush was AWOL they certainly would have said so. Witch they didn't as you can read the full article yourself.
If you want to believe Bush was AWOL, you can. He was absent for a couple month, with apparently he made up later as stated by the NG guidelines. He was "honorably discharged" they don't do that for people that walk away from there posts. (plus he was a volunteer)
But this is a side point, it was 0% to do with America's domestic policies. Or Howard Dean, witch was the topic of this post.
-=-=-=-=-
Freespeach is easy to support when we all agree, the true test is when someone says something you disagree with.
Bartle: A: 93% E: 55% S:3% K: 50% Test learn what it means here.
-=-=-=-=-
Achievers realise that killers as a concept are necessary in order to make achievement meaningful and worthwhile (there being no way to "lose" the game if any fool can "win" just by plodding slowly unchallenged). -bartle
Bartle: A: 93% E: 55% S:3% K: 50% The Test. Learn what it means here.
Of course the son of a high US political official wouldn't be "DIShonorably Discharged" now would he? That wouldn't look good come campaign time. Whoops. Also I completely distrust any news/media source. Even though the "liberal media" is mainly owned and controlled by republicans.
I won't even go into other things you said...I'm too tired.
Of course the son of a high US political official wouldn't be "DIShonorably Discharged" now would he? That wouldn't look good come campaign time. Whoops. Also I completely distrust any news/media source. Even though the "liberal media" is mainly owned and controlled by republicans.
I won't even go into other things you said...I'm too tired.
Where do you get your news?
-=-=-=-=-
Ever find is odd that those that claim tolerance are the most untolerant?
Bartle: A: 93% E: 55% S:3% K: 50% Test learn what it means here.
-=-=-=-=-
Achievers realise that killers as a concept are necessary in order to make achievement meaningful and worthwhile (there being no way to "lose" the game if any fool can "win" just by plodding slowly unchallenged). -bartle
Bartle: A: 93% E: 55% S:3% K: 50% The Test. Learn what it means here.