Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Quick Links
911 Conspiracy Theories About to be Jammed!!
This discussion has been closed.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Comments
I would say to them, however, that the video is piss-poor, and should not, and cannot be relied upon.
Cartman has a big fat ass!
Cartman has a big fat ass!
If you claim that it's not a plane, because it's to small, it's certainly not a missile.My assumptions are that the explosion is 50-80 m away from the camera. That means if it's a missile 50-80 m away from the camera, it's one hell of a thick missile. Or if it is a missile we see on that video that missile must pass the camera under 10-15 m away, but it explodes 50-80 m away from it? How is that possible? It makes a giant inflight turn? I don't think so.
A cruise missle has that kind of size. Don't stuck your mind on tiny air to air missles.
The rest part of your post does not even make any sense.
I was editing my post while you replied. So take a look at it again. It can't be a missile, not even a cruise missile. It just get's totally wrong with the scale. And if it's a cruise missile, why has noone reported a cruise missile launching from military bases or submarines? Or reported something like flying through the air?
I guess you haven't seen the missles that require to be carried by huge trucks, and only 1 missle per truck.
Lets first assume the pentagon video is not fake,
The size of the flying object in the video is something like only 1 floor high. It was definately not a 757 which should be 3~4 floors high. On the other hand, a cruise missle DOES have that kind of size.
And if you actually saw the damage on the building right after the hit, it was a small round hole. The damage looked a lot bigger AFTER the fire made one more floor collapsed. No way a 3~4 floor high 757 with huge wings can disappeared into that one round hole. Again, a cruise missle can!
No wonder how we look at it, if the wings of the 757 got into the building along with the plane, we should have seen the marks of the wings on the wall. If the wings were no match for the wall, then we should see the wings on the ground outside the building somewhere. There was no marks from wings, nor wings exist anywhere. Not to mention the tiny single engine they found, it was as high as half of a human. NO WAY it was the 757's engine. And yes, "NO WAY" was said by the manufacturer when that single engine was shown to them. Then again, a cruise missle has that kind of engine size.
Also that single tiny engine they found is pretty much the only thing left of the so called 757. Ask yourself this, which plane crash did not have a fire? And which plane crash had everything burned into nothing afterwards?
Maybe you are confused, I'll answer for you. Every plane crash had a huge fire because of the fuel, and the fire will last as long as there is still fuel left. And more important, every single plane crash had the clear left over of a plane. In most cases, you can tell that was a plane afterwards.
Did you read my other post? A Boeing 757 would be 3 floors high with the landing gear out standing on the ground. Overall height: 13.56 m. In the video we are talking about a plane hitting the ground and crashing into a building. That means that you can removie landing gear and other things except the main body from the heigh calculation. It's the height of the fuselage that is important here. The fuselage is certainly not 3-4 floors high
Regarding the crash site. It's hard for any of us the make any proper judgement on this. We weren't there and we have only seen images from either the goverment or the conspiracy folks. I doubt that any of either sides are correct. Also there are no images from inside the Pentagon, maybe there could have been wreckage inside the building?
But I'm not so sure if we should have seen the wings. Since it's the wings that carry all the fuel. That means that when the fuel explodes, it's fair to assume that they would be taking the most damage.
"Fear not death; for the sooner we die, the longer shall we be immortal."
1. Lets assume the missle was fired from the ground level(it can be fired from a bomber in the air too!)
I don't think it is hard to ship a cruise missle INSIDE a truck, then hide it somewhere until secretly launch from a hiden place. DC isn't a crowd place even in many parts of the downtown. Never mind if they launch from a farm or anywhere there is nobody.
Well like I said, it can be launched from a bomber if they want to.
btw, the range of cruise missle allow it to be fired from hundreds miles away.
"no reports of missle being fired"? I am sure if the government did not tell you, you wouldn't even know there were nuclear weapon tests.
2. Now you claim the plane hit the ground first then crashed into Pentagon. So why there wasn't any mark on the ground? It was perfectly fine. And you said other stuff were gone execpt the main part crashed into the Pentagon. Then shouldn't they be on the ground in front of the Pentagon? Where were they? Someone ate them? How in the hell that tiny half man tall 2~3 feet single engine is 757's HUGE engine? 757 has 2 huge engines the size of 9 feet.
Compare the size of the real 757's engineS to the single tiny engine found at the Pentagon in the video of "Flight 77"
http://www.hugequestions.com/
Jazia.
I don't think you would be able to launch it from a truck near Pentagon. Just look at a couple of pictures of cruise missiles lauching.
http://www.designation-systems.net/dusrm/ugm-109.jpg
http://static.howstuffworks.com/gif/cruise-missile-launch-water.jpg
http://www.defense-update.com/images/brahMos9-11.jpg
You wouldn't be able to launch anything like that from within a city. With noone noticing. So if it was a missile it must have come from further away. Why has noone seen it travel through the air? Why has no airtraffic control snapped up something of that? Why have no other planes reported something on their radar?
Also like you see on the pictures. The missiles are launched straight into the air. They also hit from high above, not along the ground. I have never heard about cruise missiles launched from aircrafts, nor seen any pictures.
If you look at the crash site pictures. It looks like there is no grass anywhere near the crash site. I'm not sure about this, but I got the impression there where building work going on around the Pentagon at that time. Like laying new pavement or something like that. Making a new parking spot etc.
http://www.defenselink.mil/photos/Sep2001/010914-F-8006R-002.jpg
http://www.defence.gov.au/news/armynews/editions/1036/images/US.jpg
http://www.hollandsentinel.com/images/090802/Pentagon2.jpg
So there could have been signs of the plane in the sand. Also the plane doesn't have to touch the ground before it hits the building.
Who said it has to be launched NEAR Pentagon?
Last time I checked, they did not drive the truck to in front of the targets in Iraq in order to launch the cruise missles. ALL cruise missles were launched from hundreds miles away! And they always fly parallel to the ground level at VERT low height, which is why they are SO HARD to be detected!!!
hide it somewhere until secretly launch from a hiden place. DC isn't a
crowd place even in many parts of the downtown."
For a cruise missile everything within DC would be near pentagon. Cruise missiles are controlled by computers and they are in no way able to navigate along the ground. They wouldn't know where buildings etc are. So they hit from above. I'm not talking about 90 degress from above, but certainly not along the ground. If a missile hit the building I would have assumed it would have come in a 50-60 degree angle into the security camera movie.
You claim it was fired NEAR Pentagon by saying nobody there saw it was fired. So I gave you the possibilty that it can be done too. THen you say it is a bad idea to be fired near Pentagon, so I gave you a fact the range of the cruise missles are hundreds miles!
I don't think you get it. We are still in the same circle over and over.
Yes you can control the cruise missles from a fair distance. And yes there were people claim saw 2 military planes in the air before the hit. So either way, they can be controlled from pretty far away, or being controlled by one of those 2 military planes that were spotted near Pentagon before the hit.
I have always said the range of cruise missiles are hundreds of miles. I never posted anything that would say otherwise.
lol "compressor". Shouldn't the compressor has the same size of how tall the engine is? Don't you see it was the full size of a damaged engine? It wasn't broken into pieces, nor it would shrink like cooked meat. a 757's engine would be 9 feet tall. So the compressor of it is just that big to fit it. If by any chance that small tiny 3-foot engine was only a part of the 757 engine, it shouldn't even be round any more...So you are saying a 3-foot compressor is used in a 9-foot engine and fit perfectly.
There was a photo of 2 men standing in front of a small tiny engine. Can't find it else where atm, but Just check out the videos in this link again under flight 77
http://www.hugequestions.com/
I found a wheel of half foot high, it must be from a HUGE truck. because "it is not THE wheel, its a part of it....."
....
that thing whatever you call it, it obivously show the size of whatever engine it was in. It was NOT broken in the way that you can't tell the shape of it. It was WHOLE!
I found a wheel of half foot high, it must be from a HUGE truck. because "it is not THE wheel, its a part of it....."
....
that thing whatever you call it, it obivously show the size of whatever engine it was in. It was NOT broken in the way that you can't tell the shape of it. It was WHOLE!
rofl? What? Truck wheel? Have you even looked at the pdf link? K, I'm off to work. I hope some others will take a look at the part photos while I'm gone.