Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Star Wars: The Old Republic: E3 2010: EA Press Conference Reveals Starships and PvP

12346»

Comments

  • VirusDancerVirusDancer Member UncommonPosts: 3,649

    Originally posted by Raevanhawk

    Please please please don't do PVP like scenarios in WAR. If you have a planet or contested area, it should be exactly like DAOC. Scenarios lead to capture the flag and who can hold the ewok the longest crap.

     

    We should never not ever be a Jedi and sitting around an area with Sith or vice versa and not be able to actually attack them...Period! So if there is a planet sith vs jedi are fighting over it should be a massive area, not queue em up craptacular scenario.

    OMFG... you just gave me the best laugh that I have had in forever.

    I pictured WSG from WoW, with Sith and Jedi carrying Ewoks on their back while trying to get back to their bases...LMFAO.

    I miss the MMORPG genre. Will a developer ever make one again?

    Explorer: 87%, Killer: 67%, Achiever: 27%, Socializer: 20%

  • tanoriltanoril Member Posts: 432

    Originally posted by VirusDancer

    Originally posted by Nytakito


     

     Not everybody enjoys non-consentual pvp, and looking at sub numbers, I'd go so far as to say that most players don't enjoy non-consentual PVP.

    All open world pvp does is generate an environment of gankers.  Instanced PVP is far more enjoyable for a larger percentage of the player base, and developers ability to balance the encounters vs. what they can do with open world pvp make for more realistic encounters.  I'm sorry, but there is nothing realistic about somebody at lvl cap killing somebody repeatedly, or somebody at lvl cap 1 hitting somebody with no chance to defend because of level differences.

    The only people who complain about instanced PVP are the gankers, because the moment you put them in a balanced PVP environment, their lack of skills shines through. 

    The #1 sub game has non-consensual servers.  The #2 game is non-consensual.  The #3 game has non-conensual worlds.  The #4, #5, & #6 games also offer non-consensual.  The #7 game does not.  #8 does...

    ...so just what on Earth are you talking about?

    What games are you referrering to?  The #1 sub game (WoW) has non consensual servers but world pvp is dead, has been for a very long time.  I'm assuming one of the other games you're referring to is Eve, but yet 70% of the playerbase sits in Empire space.  Everything after that has less than 150k subs, so they don't enter the equation, because Bioware is shooting for a little higher than that. 

  • lerazaleraza Member Posts: 8
    Lol do we really want space combat or indeed any
    kind of vehicle sections in TOR??

    The games is being made by Bioware after all. They
    are very good at many things but vehicles are not their
    strong suit and never has been.

    they keep on trying though :)

    So far whenever hands on vehicle sections have been
    included the experience has been somewhere between
    really dull and mindnumbingly terrible

    Mabye this time they will actualy get it right this time but i doubt it

  • draggo69draggo69 Member Posts: 4

    I want to play this game so badly!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

    The Draggo

Sign In or Register to comment.