Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

FFXIV Official Benchmark

13468915

Comments

  • RemyVorenderRemyVorender Member RarePosts: 4,006

    I'm not gonna get too freaked out by how low my rig ran the benchmark (2200 on low, 1800 on high), because if I can run AoC and Aion on just about max settings, I think I'll be fine.

     

    AMD dual core 2.7ghz

    4gigs of ram

    ATI 4850 1gig card

    Western Digital Caviar Black 640GB HD

     

    My PC is fine!

    *deletes the benchmark from his system*

    There! That'll show'em who's boss! image

    Joined 2004 - I can't believe I've been a MMORPG.com member for 20 years! Get off my lawn!

  • Shadow1990Shadow1990 Member Posts: 22

    HIGH :  4809  :D

    load : 17303ms

    Specs:

    XFX 5870 @ 900/1300 + Diamon 5870 @ 900/1300 + EVGA 9800GT ( for PhysX)

    Q9550 @ 3.72

    3x2gb ddr3 1600

    Foxconn BlackOps x48 mobo

    600gb hdd ...7200rpm >_>

     

    Now here are a few problems I have with this benchmark :

    a) I had to turn of my 9800GT, because it seems that starting from Just Cause 2 Nvidia games will try to use GeFroce cards in them EVEN if they're not connected to the monitor 0_o.

    b) WHY does it run in WINDOW mode ???  such a trick to lower the scores >_<

    c) WHERE is crossfire support ? my second card didn't kick in at all. Hopefully we'll get it in the full release

     

    P.S. ordered my collectors edition today at amazon W00000T

  • jowy68jowy68 Member Posts: 2

    You guys should stop the "panic mode" 

    I was in the Alpha phase and now in the Beta of FFXIV

    and the Benchmark is **** for now

    I dont even meet system requirement for LOW, and i've been playing in the Alpha without too much problems (benchmark gives me 950 score on LOW lol)

    just gets harder on crowded areas, but still very playable, so for those that gets 2.5k on High, i wouldnt be worried at all

     

    oh and by personal experience with the game, FFXIV is more GPU dependant than CPU dependant (my CPU is the part that doesnt meet low requirements, a simple Geforce 9500 GT 1024mb was more than enough to run the game on LOW)

     

    A low priced HD 5770 (no need crossfire) will run the HIGH pretty good 

  • shane242shane242 Member UncommonPosts: 95

    The score dont seem much diffrent low or high for me.

    High Score: 4524

    Low Score: 4894

    Load Time: 22,883

    --

    Spec

    CPU: 2core duo Q6600 2.4ghz (@3.33ghz)

    GPU: ATI 5850 (@ 1000/1200)

    RAM: 4GB DDR2 800mhz (@900mhz)

    HDR: 200gb 10,000rpm raptor (OS and Games)

    OS: Win7 64bit

    Duel monitor setup both running at 1920x1200

    ~Shane242

  • 7fireeye77fireeye7 Member Posts: 38

    Originally posted by Genleo

    Wow guys I got



    Score: 692 LOL



    Load Time : 21032



    I guess im not playing this game, and that's kinda bad considering I thought I had an alright rig.



    I have a Nvidia 8600GTS

    Intel core duo E650 @233Ghz

    6 Gigs of Ram.



    Whats holding me back?? if i can't play this game its going to alienate a lot of people and hold back subscriptions.

    Your graphics card, as long as you upgrade to an nVidia 8800, 9800, 250 + or the ATI equavalent you should be able to play

    image
    image

  • KhrymsonKhrymson Member UncommonPosts: 3,090

    I've got a spare 8800 GTS 640mb EVGA GPU if anyone is interested in it...would be willing to part with it for say $70.  I used it for about a year then upgraded to the GTX 275, and its still in perfect working condition, and has been packaged away in its box for the past year.

  • lampolampo Member UncommonPosts: 33

    Scored in the 1800's on low when the benchmark came out with a phenom ii x2 @ 3.1 ghz.  I just unlocked this thing to a quad core and now my score is 3472.  Did they update this benchmark or was i just seeing the increased performance?

  • NeVeRLiFtNeVeRLiFt Member UncommonPosts: 380

    image

     

    scored 3114 with my i7 920 @ 3.8ghz and gtx 285 videocard





     

    Played: MCO - EQ/EQ2 - WoW - VG - WAR - AoC - LoTRO - DDO - GW/GW2 - Eve - Rift - FE - TSW - TSO - WS - ESO - AA - BD
    Playing: Sims 3 & 4, Diablo3 and PoE
    Waiting on: Lost Ark
    Who's going to make a Cyberpunk MMO?

  • heartlessheartless Member UncommonPosts: 4,993

    Originally posted by Professor78

    Originally posted by Merlinen

    Did some more testing, with the GFX at stock speed (it is stock OC'd to GPU@900 and mem@1300).

    Here i did bump up my CPU to 4567Mhz and i did gain almost 5%. High res = 5229

    http://img94.imageshack.us/img94/9027/ffxivtest2.jpg

    And here i did pull it back to 3200Mhz and did't lose that much. High res = 4979

    http://img412.imageshack.us/img412/6514/ffxivtest3.jpg

    Nice test, was wondering why my score of 4880 was alot lower than yours, so the demo at least is very CPU dependant. I only run my 920 at stock speeds, so I guess if the game stays the same, its time to release some of its power. :)

    it's not CPU dependent. Or rather the CPU is not the main force driving it. The GPU is. I'm running the benchmark on an i7 920 stock clock CPU with 4GB of DDR3 RAM and a 9800 GT video card and I'm getting somewhere around a 1700 score.

    On the low setting, I've gotten about 3068 score.

    I believe that the official benchmark doesn't even utilize more than 1 core because, at most, it has used about 25% of my CPU and about 50% of my RAM.

    image

  • lampolampo Member UncommonPosts: 33

    It definitely uses more than 1 core, at any given time during the benchmark all 4 cores were under load. Sometimes as high as 75%.

  • LienhartLienhart Member UncommonPosts: 662

    Score: 4038

    Geek stuff:

    i7 920 OC @ 4.0ghz

    Gfx card: 5850 OCed (forgot to what, I flashed the BIOs a long time ago)

    12 GB RAM @ (forgot speed and timings).

    I will probably throw in another 5850 if I have enough cash. Dunno if this game supports 2 GPUs though.

     

    Guess I'll see you guys online =D

     

    Oh, obviously, this was on high.

    I live to go faster...or die trying.
  • XzenXzen Member UncommonPosts: 2,607

    Rig: Quad CPU Q9650 @ 3ghz , 4GB DDR3 ram, and two GeForce GTX 295

     

    Benchmark Score: Low 3780 High 2352

     

    Guess it's time to put in an i7?

  • heartlessheartless Member UncommonPosts: 4,993

    Originally posted by lampo

    It definitely uses more than 1 core, at any given time during the benchmark all 4 cores were under load. Sometimes as high as 75%.

    Maybe I have a different benchmark tool then because when I have it running, I'm showing my CPU at 26% use at the highest.

    image

  • Loke666Loke666 Member EpicPosts: 21,441

    Hmpf, 4346 on low, 3925 on high.

    ATI Phenomenah II 3,2 ghz x6, 8gb DDR3 1600, 480 GTX and W7 64 bits.

    I will do some optimization but it seems like it isn't using all the 6 cores. I will try to tweak out some more of it.

    Seems like I will be able to run it ok but I was hoping for more, can max AoC in Dx 10. And the GFX cards fans doesn't even start to run fast on low (it does on high).

  • BaldurBaldur Member Posts: 56

    I had no idea this was out! Just downloaded it, and ran both low and high.

    Q9650 o/c @ 4ghz, 4 gigs ram, ATI 5870 (stock)

    High: 4869 (load time: 15101)

    Low: 5980 (load time: 13884)

  • elockeelocke Member UncommonPosts: 4,335

    I figure, I'll play the game for 6 months on my PC. See how it handles through that time. If it is below my expectations, then I will gladly go pick up the PS3 copy when it launches and boom, happy gamer and less money spent on a PC I had built 3 years ago that I've upgraded everything except the processor.

    I just don't want to upgrade it anymore. Might as well start saving for a new PC within the next 2 years if anything, for me personally.

  • jowy68jowy68 Member Posts: 2

    Its true that for those QQing, u could just wait for the PS3 release and buy a PS3, will come up cheaper than building a new comp, if you need to buy more than the GPU

  • alakramalakram Member UncommonPosts: 2,301

    Originally posted by spankybus

    Scored 3705 on the Hi-Res test

     

    Scored 3963 on the Low-Res test

    Load time 16762 MS

     

    i7 2.8 GHZ OC to 3.6

    12 Gig DDR3 Ram

    ATI 5970 2 gigs of ram

    SSD for game drive

     

    --------------------

     

    I have a pretty badass PC if I do say so myself....and they say the best score is over 8000?! wth do you have to have to score that high??!! hahahahaha

     

    BTW the benchmark is BEAUTIFUL!! 

    Only that is enought for me to not trust the benchmark, but anyway im curious, gonna run it.



  • lensig24lensig24 Member Posts: 12

    Just downloaded the benchmark and here are my score

    High Res - 1474

    Low Res - 2559



    loading time - 12180ms

     

    My rig is:

     

    Q6600 - 2.4Ghz

    4GB 800 Mhz RAM

    9800GT 1GB

    Win7 64bit

     

    Probably gonna play this on low then I'll move to high settings once I upgrade my rig.

  • BademBadem Member Posts: 830

    My rig is similar and came out with same results, i am nto convinced its totally accurate since it eats everything else I play without barely breaking a sweat,

    worse case just got another 9800 and SLI it

  • lensig24lensig24 Member Posts: 12

    Yeah but I'm gonna build a new rig next year. I do think that the benchmark may have the settings on high for both the High Res and Low Res test.  Anyways pretty good graphics even on the Low Res test definitely worth my money

     

  • 2500 on high with

    i7 920 - OC'd to 3.6ghz

    GTX 260 - 216 core

    6 gigs of tri-chan ram.

    I'm not entirely convinced by this benchmark to be honest with you guys. 

  • HyanmenHyanmen Member UncommonPosts: 5,357

    Originally posted by xTwiSteDx

    2500 on high with

    i7 920 - OC'd to 3.6ghz

    GTX 260 - 216 core

    6 gigs of tri-chan ram.

    I'm not entirely convinced by this benchmark to be honest with you guys. 

    Your score sounds about right.

    Using LOL is like saying "my argument sucks but I still want to disagree".
  • ArmaniDemonArmaniDemon Member Posts: 133

    Just to confirm this benchmark's GPU relaince, I just upgraded my 9800gt to an HD5850; saw my score shoot up from 1780 to 3881 on high. Looks breathtakingly gorgeous now as well.

  • ThomasN7ThomasN7 87.18.7.148Member CommonPosts: 6,690

    High - 2605

    Low 4624

     

    Intel Core i5 750(2.66GHz) Quadcore

    8 gig memory

    Nvidia GTX465 1GB

    30
Sign In or Register to comment.