Just had to get that out of my system one more time. Sure feels good to be on the right side of history....
You mean towards a complete socialist state?
Boohoo, poor fishymage lost.
Wow.
I work for a major company, and I just recieved an email last friday that due to the elections and the upcoming tax burdens our international growth will be stiffled, and our year-end incentives will be cut.
Just had to get that out of my system one more time. Sure feels good to be on the right side of history....
You mean towards a complete socialist state?
Boohoo, poor fishymage lost.
I never lose -- I win no matter who is in the government. It's never been a particularly important part of my life, being I am a man who ensures his freedom by having a free mind and enough wealth to be free in any situation.
I didn't really have a horse in the race.
But, back to the subject at hand, rather your attempted hijack and personal attack. I was merely asking what the OP meant by "the right side of history. In that Barack Obama is the most socialistic person to ever get elected to the White House, it is logical to assume he feels the destiny of man is to live under a global socialist state.
Just had to get that out of my system one more time. Sure feels good to be on the right side of history....
You mean towards a complete socialist state?
Boohoo, poor fishymage lost.
Wow.
I work for a major company, and I just recieved an email last friday that due to the elections and the upcoming tax burdens our international growth will be stiffled, and our year-end incentives will be cut.
Boohoo indeed.
Indeed, and look at how the market is tanking. I though he was going to make it all better?
Originally posted by Lustmord Wow. I work for a major company, and I just recieved an email last friday that due to the elections and the upcoming tax burdens our international growth will be stiffled, and our year-end incentives will be cut. Boohoo indeed.
I can top you. I was visited by the ghosts of both Lenin and Stalin last night and they told me that the Obama's are going to have another baby. They are going to name him "Karl Marx Hussein Obama" and that both of their spirits are going to be reborn together in the boy. This boy will go on to rule the new Soviet Union of America that his father will spend the next 20 years(yes Barack Obama will overthrow the government and install himself as Dictator) creating just for him.
Conservatives give Obama way too much credit. By the sounds of it, they think he can transform the US into a socialist state in 8 years. Thats kinda reaching isn't it? Or...
Is he THAT brilliant that he can actually do it? Well, he did graduate #1 in his Harvard class right?
Hmm.. I guess it IS possible.
I vote for free college and healthcare! Viva Comrades!
They screwed things up so bad, that the US would elect a Black man named Barack Hussein Obama President of the US. At least Republicans can be counted on one good contribution to American History.
Well, actually he's America's first half-white president.
Wouldn't it be a laugh riot if it comes out that Obama is not actually qualified to be elected president because he's not an American citizen? I understand this issue is set to come out in the next month...
Conservatives give Obama way too much credit. By the sounds of it, they think he can transform the US into a socialist state in 8 years. Thats kinda reaching isn't it? Or... Is he THAT brilliant that he can actually do it? Well, he did graduate #1 in his Harvard class right? Hmm.. I guess it IS possible. I vote for free college and healthcare! Viva Comrades!
Ditto on the college and healthcare. IMO all state run colleges should be tuition free like they are for elementary, middle and high schools. If you want to go to a private or ivy-league college, then you pay. And as for the wealthiest and most powerful nation on the planet not having universal healthcare....well that's just unexcusable.
Just had to get that out of my system one more time. Sure feels good to be on the right side of history....
You mean towards a complete socialist state?
Boohoo, poor fishymage lost.
Wow.
I work for a major company, and I just recieved an email last friday that due to the elections and the upcoming tax burdens our international growth will be stiffled, and our year-end incentives will be cut.
Boohoo indeed.
Considering the tax plan Obama has outlined, the only reason this would occur is if the head honchos want to keep thei high salaries, so they get rid of employee incentives to offset the money they lose to taxes. The iternational growth cutting just means they are cutting the expenses incurred through import/export and other international expenditures to further offset the money being diverted from their nesteggs.
Just had to get that out of my system one more time. Sure feels good to be on the right side of history....
Ok so let me get this right because i DIDNT vote for your guy nor did i vote for the OTHER guy.Im a die hard libertarian and i vote for nothing but libertarians.
You admit you voted for BIG GOVT.This is just as bad as the socalled evil oil corporations and BIG companies that are going to be taxed to death in the bear future.Its even worse because they can change laws and take what you have WORKED for by force and at gunpoint.
Im sorry but this was a vote of idiocy.Either way both parties just stupid.
Remember this term:BIG GOVT.Now take a look at this:LINKAGE
All ive got to say is YOU 1st lead the way.This gives me plenty of time to hide my dough.BTW required reading right here folks:LINKAGE
Like i said all you people who voted for this "change" you 1st i like my cash right where it is,with me.Go ahead and help whomever you want just stay out of my bank accounts.
With all of the funding, Obama was MEANT to win. Anybody who had predicted he would have lost given they had a television set probably believes in unicorns.
This is a sequence of characters intended to produce some profound mental effect, but it has failed.
Conservatives give Obama way too much credit. By the sounds of it, they think he can transform the US into a socialist state in 8 years. Thats kinda reaching isn't it? Or... Is he THAT brilliant that he can actually do it? Well, he did graduate #1 in his Harvard class right? Hmm.. I guess it IS possible. I vote for free college and healthcare! Viva Comrades!
Want to see what a socialist state gets ya?
Take a look at Cuba as the worst case scenario and then China.China "Lets" its people practice capitalism BUT there is no freedom of religion no questioning authority and no traveling without permission.
BTW Cuba is stuck in the 50's and blames its woes on the US while socialist europeans vacation there.
Your guy better do his job because i dont want to hear 1 person who voted for change bitching about income tax going up.
With all of the funding, Obama was MEANT to win. Anybody who had predicted he would have lost given they had a television set probably believes in unicorns.
Obama can thank Palin for my vote. McCain vs. Obama was pretty much a lost cause for me deciding between two evils. Palin broke the tie.
With all of the funding, Obama was MEANT to win. Anybody who had predicted he would have lost given they had a television set probably believes in unicorns.
Obama can thank Palin for my vote. McCain vs. Obama was pretty much a lost cause for me deciding between two evils. Palin broke the tie.
Cuba and China were both Communist countries. Or did something change when I wasn't looking?
I think the countries like Sweden, France, Canada etc.. are more closer to socialism (democratic socialism) than what you mentioned.
And all those countries look just fine to me economically. And the people look FAR happier and healthier and better educated across the population, as opposed to the US.. where we have education in the affluent areas good, in the cornpone towns and big cities.. bad. Not so fair.
Dont think you want to be using Cuba as a socialist model. I think youre wrong. China either but now that you mentioned China..
Don't they own an awful lot of our paper?
And don't throw religion in this: if you start on that.. those crazy Right wing Republican nutjobs like former jailed Chuck Colsen and company (of Nixon Watergate fame) would kick all the muslims and gays out of the US. I consider myself a Christian and I dont believe half of what they say belongs in a political arena.
As the Bible says, we are to be IN this world, not OF it. So keep religion out of government. But now that you mention THAT..
If Jesus were alive hed probably be a socialist. But definitely NOT a capitalist to "capitalize" on others money.
Ok, last time I checked history books Optical... Cuba and China were both Communist countries. Or did something change when I wasn't looking? I think the countries like Sweden, France, Canada etc.. are more closer to socialism (democratic socialism) than what you mentioned. And all those countries look just fine to me economically. And the people look FAR happier and healthier and better educated across the population, as opposed to the US.. where we have education in the affluent areas good, in the cornpone towns and big cities.. bad. Not so fair. Dont think you want to be using Cuba as a socialist model. I think youre wrong. China either but now that you mentioned China.. Don't they own an awful lot of our paper? And don't throw religion in this: if you start on that.. those crazy Right wing Republican nutjobs like former jailed Chuck Colsen and company (of Nixon Watergate fame) would kick all the muslims and gays out of the US. I consider myself a Christian and I dont believe half of what they say belongs in a political arena. As the Bible says, we are to be IN this world, not OF it. So keep religion out of government. But now that you mention THAT.. If Jesus were alive hed probably be a socialist. But definitely NOT a capitalist to "capitalize" on others money.
Communism IS socialism, of a more pure form than the welfare state socialism of Sweden and France. Those and Canada are MIXED ECONOMIES.
The communist countries are the most pure socialist ones, and as such, they fail in the most spectacular way. the mixed economies, lie ours, all fail at different rates and degrees. Generally, the most market oriented ones do the best. Ours used to be the most market oriented one, and we used to blow everyone away.
The past few decades we have embraced more and more socialism, and, of course, as one would predict, we have beend oing worse. the "socialist" countries you have mentioned have been moving away from socilaism and towards more market-oriented style, which is becoming more pronounced with the EU.
Thus, they are starting to do better. History is moving towards freedom, away from socialism. WE are moving in the wrong direction, and that is the wrong direction the new President wants to take us in.
Ok, last time I checked history books Optical... Cuba and China were both Communist countries. Or did something change when I wasn't looking?
Apparently you haven't looked at China in a while...
China is a fascinating combination of communism and what communists refer to as "state capitalism." They try and mimic capitalism within a communist framework. It is far better than communism, but in inherently unstable and will lead to either freedom and markets, or collapse back into communism. We'll see how it turns out.
Comments
You mean towards a complete socialist state?
fishermage.blogspot.com
You mean towards a complete socialist state?
Boohoo, poor fishymage lost.
Wow.
I work for a major company, and I just recieved an email last friday that due to the elections and the upcoming tax burdens our international growth will be stiffled, and our year-end incentives will be cut.
Boohoo indeed.
You mean towards a complete socialist state?
Boohoo, poor fishymage lost.
I never lose -- I win no matter who is in the government. It's never been a particularly important part of my life, being I am a man who ensures his freedom by having a free mind and enough wealth to be free in any situation.
I didn't really have a horse in the race.
But, back to the subject at hand, rather your attempted hijack and personal attack. I was merely asking what the OP meant by "the right side of history. In that Barack Obama is the most socialistic person to ever get elected to the White House, it is logical to assume he feels the destiny of man is to live under a global socialist state.
fishermage.blogspot.com
You mean towards a complete socialist state?
Boohoo, poor fishymage lost.
Wow.
I work for a major company, and I just recieved an email last friday that due to the elections and the upcoming tax burdens our international growth will be stiffled, and our year-end incentives will be cut.
Boohoo indeed.
Indeed, and look at how the market is tanking. I though he was going to make it all better?
Not seeing the magic yet.
fishermage.blogspot.com
I can top you. I was visited by the ghosts of both Lenin and Stalin last night and they told me that the Obama's are going to have another baby. They are going to name him "Karl Marx Hussein Obama" and that both of their spirits are going to be reborn together in the boy. This boy will go on to rule the new Soviet Union of America that his father will spend the next 20 years(yes Barack Obama will overthrow the government and install himself as Dictator) creating just for him.
You must work for a collection agency.
I like yours better.
Conservatives give Obama way too much credit. By the sounds of it, they think he can transform the US into a socialist state in 8 years. Thats kinda reaching isn't it? Or...
Is he THAT brilliant that he can actually do it? Well, he did graduate #1 in his Harvard class right?
Hmm.. I guess it IS possible.
I vote for free college and healthcare! Viva Comrades!
"TO MICHAEL!"
why do you say that?
Don't worry about the old Buzz McKillingtons. Keep partying!
Oh, and I'd like to give a shout out to the man who officially started the US down the democratic-socialist path. Thanks W!
As a funny comedian once said, Republicans did something no Democrat could ever do..
They screwed things up so bad, that the US would elect a Black man named Barack Hussein Obama President of the US.
At least Republicans can be counted on one good contribution to American History.
"TO MICHAEL!"
Well, actually he's America's first half-white president.
I'm an optimist. The glass is half full.
haha.. thats good Lust.
But history will say, First AFRICAN american president, as would Barack himself.
And I doubt hes America's first half white president. I vote for DNA testing. Let's dig up Reagan and dust him off!
"TO MICHAEL!"
Wouldn't it be a laugh riot if it comes out that Obama is not actually qualified to be elected president because he's not an American citizen? I understand this issue is set to come out in the next month...
Ditto on the college and healthcare. IMO all state run colleges should be tuition free like they are for elementary, middle and high schools. If you want to go to a private or ivy-league college, then you pay. And as for the wealthiest and most powerful nation on the planet not having universal healthcare....well that's just unexcusable.
Viva la' Revolution!! LOL
You mean towards a complete socialist state?
Boohoo, poor fishymage lost.
Wow.
I work for a major company, and I just recieved an email last friday that due to the elections and the upcoming tax burdens our international growth will be stiffled, and our year-end incentives will be cut.
Boohoo indeed.
Considering the tax plan Obama has outlined, the only reason this would occur is if the head honchos want to keep thei high salaries, so they get rid of employee incentives to offset the money they lose to taxes. The iternational growth cutting just means they are cutting the expenses incurred through import/export and other international expenditures to further offset the money being diverted from their nesteggs.
Ok so let me get this right because i DIDNT vote for your guy nor did i vote for the OTHER guy.Im a die hard libertarian and i vote for nothing but libertarians.
You admit you voted for BIG GOVT.This is just as bad as the socalled evil oil corporations and BIG companies that are going to be taxed to death in the bear future.Its even worse because they can change laws and take what you have WORKED for by force and at gunpoint.
Im sorry but this was a vote of idiocy.Either way both parties just stupid.
Remember this term:BIG GOVT.Now take a look at this:LINKAGE
All ive got to say is YOU 1st lead the way.This gives me plenty of time to hide my dough.BTW required reading right here folks:LINKAGE
Like i said all you people who voted for this "change" you 1st i like my cash right where it is,with me.Go ahead and help whomever you want just stay out of my bank accounts.
What is your physical limit?
With all of the funding, Obama was MEANT to win. Anybody who had predicted he would have lost given they had a television set probably believes in unicorns.
This is a sequence of characters intended to produce some profound mental effect, but it has failed.
Want to see what a socialist state gets ya?
Take a look at Cuba as the worst case scenario and then China.China "Lets" its people practice capitalism BUT there is no freedom of religion no questioning authority and no traveling without permission.
BTW Cuba is stuck in the 50's and blames its woes on the US while socialist europeans vacation there.
Your guy better do his job because i dont want to hear 1 person who voted for change bitching about income tax going up.
What is your physical limit?
Obama can thank Palin for my vote. McCain vs. Obama was pretty much a lost cause for me deciding between two evils. Palin broke the tie.
Obama can thank Palin for my vote. McCain vs. Obama was pretty much a lost cause for me deciding between two evils. Palin broke the tie.
Palin was by far the best of the four.
fishermage.blogspot.com
Ok, last time I checked history books Optical...
Cuba and China were both Communist countries. Or did something change when I wasn't looking?
I think the countries like Sweden, France, Canada etc.. are more closer to socialism (democratic socialism) than what you mentioned.
And all those countries look just fine to me economically. And the people look FAR happier and healthier and better educated across the population, as opposed to the US.. where we have education in the affluent areas good, in the cornpone towns and big cities.. bad. Not so fair.
Dont think you want to be using Cuba as a socialist model. I think youre wrong. China either but now that you mentioned China..
Don't they own an awful lot of our paper?
And don't throw religion in this: if you start on that.. those crazy Right wing Republican nutjobs like former jailed Chuck Colsen and company (of Nixon Watergate fame) would kick all the muslims and gays out of the US. I consider myself a Christian and I dont believe half of what they say belongs in a political arena.
As the Bible says, we are to be IN this world, not OF it. So keep religion out of government. But now that you mention THAT..
If Jesus were alive hed probably be a socialist. But definitely NOT a capitalist to "capitalize" on others money.
"TO MICHAEL!"
Apparently you haven't looked at China in a while...
Communism IS socialism, of a more pure form than the welfare state socialism of Sweden and France. Those and Canada are MIXED ECONOMIES.
The communist countries are the most pure socialist ones, and as such, they fail in the most spectacular way. the mixed economies, lie ours, all fail at different rates and degrees. Generally, the most market oriented ones do the best. Ours used to be the most market oriented one, and we used to blow everyone away.
The past few decades we have embraced more and more socialism, and, of course, as one would predict, we have beend oing worse. the "socialist" countries you have mentioned have been moving away from socilaism and towards more market-oriented style, which is becoming more pronounced with the EU.
Thus, they are starting to do better. History is moving towards freedom, away from socialism. WE are moving in the wrong direction, and that is the wrong direction the new President wants to take us in.
fishermage.blogspot.com
Apparently you haven't looked at China in a while...
China is a fascinating combination of communism and what communists refer to as "state capitalism." They try and mimic capitalism within a communist framework. It is far better than communism, but in inherently unstable and will lead to either freedom and markets, or collapse back into communism. We'll see how it turns out.
fishermage.blogspot.com