Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

What did SOE stand to gain from lifting their NDA?

eeargyeeargy Member Posts: 300

Up until SOE lifted the Everquest 2 NDA, speculation was rife that they had something to hide, fuelled largely by their reputation and by disgruntled beta testers breaking the NDA to voice their concerns.

It's quite obvious by now that those concerns are very real and have been well substantiated, not just on this forum but all over the internet.

With the typical response from SOE being "It's in beta. It'll all be fixed by release", I'm left wondering what SOE stood to gain from removing the proverbial gags from the mouths of their beta testers.

Scanning these forums, it's clear that the games reputation has been hurt. A good number of reasonable, intelligent and rational people are now cautious about EQ2, and many others have simply given up on it.

Surely it would have made more sense to keep the NDA in place until retail when the nefarious issues have been resolved? (Assuming they're resolved by retail, of course)

Note: Please refrain from replying with "OMFG!!!1 WTF DO YOU NO? WOW FANBOI!!!!!!!1!!!!SHIFT11111CTRLALTDEL!!!!!11" as such posts don't come across as entirely constructive and this thread has nothing to do with WoW.

image

«13

Comments

  • dtritusdtritus Member Posts: 139

    They probably thought that enough of the beta testers were enjoying the game to post positive experiences on the web. I myself am in the beta and only play it once a week or so after the new patches just to see if it's gotten any better. I will say that they are improving it. I will also say that I don't think it's the game itself that has made the beta test unpleasant for me so far, so much as the other player in the beta. Even playing a healer it has been difficult to find groups. Many of the quests in the game require a group to complete. I find this very frustrating.

    But back to the NDA lift. I expect they believed they would get some free advertising out of it, via the beta testers hyping the game.


    EQ, xegony, Odingar - lvl 65 cleric

    Yeah, I'd do Betty....
    But I'd be thinking about Wilma.

  • raptorfalconraptorfalcon Member Posts: 126

    I'm actually one of those that gave up on it.. I figured that EQ2 doesn't bring anything really new to the genre, its just more variety of the same. Voiceovers remind me of when I played Elder Scrolls and was so annoyed by hearing the same thing for the hundredth time that turned off my speakers for the whole game.

    As of their NDA I honestly didnt even know they had lifted it.. Its obvious that most of the beta testers are EQ fanboys and will make great propaganda.. Dont think it was a great move from SOE though cause there are a lot of dissappointments as well.

    If you ask me I dont think EQ2's greatest competitor is WOW at all.. In my opinion it's Guild Wars.. no monthly fee, nothing to hide (open beta events + really loose nda), fast action with outcome REALLY based on skill instead of items carried.. Too bad Im not an alpha tester for it but at least I will get  to play it 2 days every month until release.. thats defenitely a company proud of their work.

  • HebrewBombHebrewBomb Member UncommonPosts: 520



    Originally posted by raptorfalcon

    I'm actually one of those that gave up on it.. I figured that EQ2 doesn't bring anything really new to the genre, its just more variety of the same. Voiceovers remind me of when I played Elder Scrolls and was so annoyed by hearing the same thing for the hundredth time that turned off my speakers for the whole game.
    As of their NDA I honestly didnt even know they had lifted it.. Its obvious that most of the beta testers are EQ fanboys and will make great propaganda.. Dont think it was a great move from SOE though cause there are a lot of dissappointments as well.
    If you ask me I dont think EQ2's greatest competitor is WOW at all.. In my opinion it's Guild Wars.. no monthly fee, nothing to hide (open beta events + really loose nda), fast action with outcome REALLY based on skill instead of items carried.. Too bad Im not an alpha tester for it but at least I will get  to play it 2 days every month until release.. thats defenitely a company proud of their work.



    You Sir !

    You have very well articulated my view as well.

     

  • starman999starman999 Member Posts: 1,232

    I have to agree with the original poster.

    I think SOE figured on getting some free positive press from letting the testers talk about the game. They werent expecting all the negative reviews because as usual SOE is out of touch with the people actually playing the game.

     

    ROLEPLAYERS UNITE!!!!!

    Critical thinking is a desire to seek, patience to doubt, fondness to meditate, slowness to assert, readiness to consider, carefulness to dispose and set in order; and hatred for every kind of imposture.

  • eeargyeeargy Member Posts: 300


    Originally posted by raptorfalcon
    If you ask me I dont think EQ2's greatest competitor is WOW at all.. In my opinion it's Guild Wars..

    I couldn't agree more - there's a real sleeping giant.

    For what it offers, and with no monthly fee, Guild Wars will be a massive success. From what I've seen (E3 test) it perfectly bridges the gap between the FPS and MMORPG genres.

    image

    image

  • aeric67aeric67 Member UncommonPosts: 798

    I'm not going to defend EQ2 here, because, quite frankly, I am one of the cautious ones after hearing the reviews out there.

    But I am so sick of hearing how the next game is going to be so much better than this one. If it's not Guild Wars, it's Dark and Light or Wish or D&D Online, where lacking facts are filled in with idealizations and dreams then made out to be a superior product. Like a glorious messiah just waiting around the bend to satisfy your every MMOG desire.

    Bash EQ2 and WoW if you want, but man am I tired of hearing this...

  • ColdmeatColdmeat Member UncommonPosts: 3,409

    I'm just curious as to Rhoklaws motivation to reply to all these threads that present EQ2 in a negative light?

    Does it cause you distress to find that people don't like the game, or that they feel it is lacking in certain areas? Are you a shareholder with a financial stake in the box sales of EQ2? What's the story here? If they distress you so much, why are you reading them, let alone replying?

    And regardless of the origin of this need, calling people raving lunatics, and labeling them all WoW fans, while it might provide some entertainment, and possibly make you feel better, does nothing to bolster your side of the arguement, particularly if the person in question made a post that was more than just EQ2 sux!!!! I like pie!

    image

  • eeargyeeargy Member Posts: 300


    Originally posted by Rhoklaw
    WoW... all I can say is WoW...
    It's not enough for you to voice your opinion of EQ2 for the hundredth time on one of the 200 threads already started, that you had to start your own? Think about your thread eeargy and why you posted it and tell yourself, can I be anymore of a jealous raving lunatic. Just go post in your WoW forums and leave your unquenchable desire to piss all over SOE alone. You've done nothing, NOTHING, but beyotch in this forum and I'm actually tired of it.
    Seriously, don't come back here unless your posting something that hasn't already been discussed and has some merit to it. Otherwise you'll have my arse in WoW forum doing the same thing which is twice as counter productive. Heaven knows I got a crap load of things to slam WoW about that they seem to think makes their game better then EQ2. Fortunately enough, I got to give the game some respect cause it is a good game, but its fans sure need some serious therapy.
     
     One of many,
    Rhojan

    Thanks for your vitriolic, bitter comments. It seems the only way people can defend EQ2 is by telling those who criticize it to just go to hell.

    I have as much right as you do to post on this forum, and I made a point of requesting that people refrain from doing exactly what you've just done - trashing my opinion because I like WoW. I repeat, this has nothing to do with WoW.

    Reread this whole thread, then see who was the first to be unreasonable and fly off the handle. Then try posting again, and this time stay on topic. At your age, you should know ad hominem attacks serve only to highlight the fact that you're unable to be constructive.

    I'm not criticizing EQ2 at all - there's plenty of that elsewhere. I'm genuinely interested to hear opinions on why SOE would make such a seemingly ill-advised move, but you have nothing to bring to the table but desperate insults. Please, share your opinion instead.

    image

    image

  • VineyardVineyard Member Posts: 180
    Rhoklaw is just all hard and spanking over EQ2. Everyones dislikes, to him ,are the preverbial "Fly in the ointment"..literaly

  • eeargyeeargy Member Posts: 300


    Originally posted by Rhoklaw
    I'm curious eeargy, why do you care what SOE does. Your post history has made it so very clear you don't like EQ2 or SOE. So really, why do you post so much in this forum? I have no other reasonable conclusion but to believe your jealous and you can't help it but be part of the EQ2 community. How many posts have I made in the WoW forums? 3? 4? and how many were negative? 1?2?
    You and me eeargy, were two different people. I don't feel the need to sell one-sided or lop-sided stories about companies or games simply because I don't like them. So thats my point and if you can't figure it out, then I can't help but feel sorry for you.

    It's interesting that you should choose to invoke an argumentum ad misericordiam (or "I pity you, therefore you're wrong"), but again, all you're actually doing nothing is blindly attacking someone you've never met over the internet.

    So do you have an opinion on the topic of discussion or are insults your only arsenal?

    image

    image

  • sakersaker Member RarePosts: 1,458

    I agree completely with the original poster, and with this quotted poster. SoE does seem completely out of touch to me from my experience in the beta, they only have (any) ears for their fanbois who they expected to give them fantastic free pr. As usual an unfinished game (with deep systemic flaws in this case) is going to be pushed out the door to satisfy the pr men, and the money men. I was so very very hopeful about this game for a long long time before I got into the beta, and have become more and more disapointed as I've seen the game for what it is. It's very obvious to me that they were not of 1 mind as to what they wantted it to be to begin with, they've contradicted themselves many times in interviews, and the product shows this. The most obvious is how/if you can solo play the game, and is it friendly or not to the non-powergamer type. The characters are cookie-cutter, distinction is a joke. It's become a joke to see in many forums the question how many charater classes are there? 4 being the answer.... They've unfortunatley followed some basic trends, threw prettier graphics at things, and better sound and called that a major new level of gameplay, it's only cosmetics. My only hope for a real true next generation game is Vanguard.

     




    Originally posted by starman999

    I have to agree with the original poster.
    I think SOE figured on getting some free positive press from letting the testers talk about the game. They werent expecting all the negative reviews because as usual SOE is out of touch with the people actually playing the game.
     

    ROLEPLAYERS UNITE!!!!!



  • sliversliver Member Posts: 132


    Originally posted by Rhoklaw
    WoW... all I can say is WoW...
    It's not enough for you to voice your opinion of EQ2 for the hundredth time on one of the 200 threads already started, that you had to start your own? Think about your thread eeargy and why you posted it and tell yourself, can I be anymore of a jealous raving lunatic. Just go post in your WoW forums and leave your unquenchable desire to piss all over SOE alone. You've done nothing, NOTHING, but beyotch in this forum and I'm actually tired of it.
    Seriously, don't come back here unless your posting something that hasn't already been discussed and has some merit to it. Otherwise you'll have my arse in WoW forum doing the same thing which is twice as counter productive. Heaven knows I got a crap load of things to slam WoW about that they seem to think makes their game better then EQ2. Fortunately enough, I got to give the game some respect cause it is a good game, but its fans sure need some serious therapy.

    One of many,
    Rhojan


    I agree completely. why cant you guys just shut it, at least admit that it will be a pretty good game, even if its not great, and then go support whatever game it is that you want to support. Go to that forum and priase it for whatever it does better than eq2. Quit whining, im sick of it too.

  • EffectEffect Member UncommonPosts: 949

    Personally I'm not willing to listen to the different gushing reviews or bashing them. Cause like with all things, people have different taste and opinions. They always have. Some reviews I've read people complain but some of it shapes up to it isn't enough like EQLive, others people seemed to have a negative opinion of things before they even tried it. Then there are those that praise the game and try to make it out as the next best man made thing next to ducktape and the others. There has to be a middle ground and really the only way I see a person is going to get a real feel for the game is to play it themselves and I can't wait to do that.

    Also this isn't just with EQ2. I've read the official forums for WoW from time to time. It doesn't get all the praises that some would like to make people think not is it perfect either. It as well has its fair share of problem which I'm sure EQ2 will have, just as I think Guild Wars will have, Vanguard will have, etc. Was SOE hiding something, don't think so cause if they were they would have still had the NDA in place. I think they have gained a lot from lifting the NDA. First they have given all those that were looking forward to the game a real look at what things will be like, dispell any false assumptions about the game, really show how different it is and will be from EQ1. This was going to have a negative affect as well. I never doubted it that but I don't think it did more harm then good. While those expecting something else might be disappointed there are also those that thought it was going to be closer to EQ1 or something bad that might have been surprised for the better and may not be more interested in EQ2. So while they might have lost some fan interest they also might have gain fan interest at the same time.

    I wonder though, are the things that have disappointed some people, non-beta testers and even some testers based on the assumptions and expectations made by these people before the NDA dropped or based on the actual items that were said before the NDA dropped? Meaning that people might have had something completely different pictured before learning about how things actually are or before actually playing it themselves? Just wondering is all.
    _______________
    EQ2 Qeynos Guild- http://www.imperium-arcanum.com

  • eeargyeeargy Member Posts: 300


    Originally posted by sliver
    I agree completely. why cant you guys just shut it, at least admit that it will be a pretty good game, even if its not great, and then go support whatever game it is that you want to support. Go to that forum and priase it for whatever it does better than eq2. Quit whining, im sick of it too.

    If you don't like the fact that people have differing opinions coupled with a right to discuss them perhaps you should "shut it" instead. If you want to read nothing but adulation for EQ2, go to the official forums (although having said that, even those are rapidly filling up with criticism from beta testers).

    image

    image

  • EnigmaEnigma Member UncommonPosts: 11,384



    Originally posted by eeargy

    If you don't like the fact that people have differing opinions coupled with a right to discuss them perhaps you should "shut it" instead. If you want to read nothing but adulation for EQ2, go to the official forums (although having said that, even those are rapidly filling up with criticism from beta testers).




    eeargy, Effect has a point

    If you search my posts (even before I was staff) I probably made about 6 posts of why I didn't like WoW. However, if I do a search for you with keywords "eeargy" "EQ", I will get quite a few hits and the majority of them are against the game.

    Quite frankly, I have no adament opinion against you for not liking the game (doesn't matter to me as a person). However (as a moderator), you do tend to put down this game a lot. I think what people are saying is, they're sorta tired of seeing you put down the game time after time. They get the point you don't like EQ...there's no need to "rub it in" as it where.

    On a side note, Ive been in EQ beta and WoW beta and I liked both. However, the EQ2 beta bashing is largely unfounded because I sure as heck cannot find the many problems people has mentioned. The only thing I found that was bad is the lag situation in Commonlands and Antonica (sp) zones.






    Originally posted by WizGamer
    Now hear me out, its just an opinion, I don't want yours. .


    image

    People who have to create conspiracy and hate threads to further a cause lacks in intellectual comprehension of diversity.

  • eeargyeeargy Member Posts: 300


    Originally posted by En1Gma
    However, if I do a search for you with keywords "eeargy" "EQ", I will get quite a few hits and the majority of them are against the game.

    And I bet you've done it! Go on... Admit it! ::::28:: Dude, if my criticism of EQ2 strengthens peoples opinion on it, I'm glad. Surely that's what discussion forums are for. If it weakens their opinion, I'm still glad. If your opinion gets hurt by some random guy on the internet, maybe it wasn't that strong an opinion in the first place.

    Anyway I'm not here to piss people off (that's just a free bonus) and I purposely didn't bring my opinion into this particular thread because I'm genuinely interested to know what SOE were thinking when they lifted their NDA. Hell I even asked people not mention the dreaded WoW!

    image

    image

  • EnigmaEnigma Member UncommonPosts: 11,384



    Originally posted by Rhoklaw

    Actually En1gma, eeargy was an ok guy, right up until he called our gryphon a turkey.




    lol...it's a Gryphon?!?

     

    image


    Originally posted by WizGamer
    Now hear me out, its just an opinion, I don't want yours. .
    image

    People who have to create conspiracy and hate threads to further a cause lacks in intellectual comprehension of diversity.

  • eeargyeeargy Member Posts: 300


    Originally posted by Rhoklaw
    You honestly expect us to believe you give a ratz arse about anything SOE or EQ2? Your history contradicts your concerns and thats where your problem lies. Perhaps you forget your reputation preceeds you every time you post here. Of course, I could forgive you and everything would be all better, but I won't.

    Of course I don't expect anyone to believe anything - humans are usually unabashed liars - but I would suggest that a persistently recurring theme in my posts is that I'm brutally honest and pride myself on holding this ideal very highly.

    Since this topic has no hope whatsoever of getting back on topic though, there's something I need to clear up. Have you played either EQ2 or WoW?


    image
    "...who ever said during SWG beta "SOE made a game. And it was good." should be sent to "Fear factor" and fed some horse sh**." - Neochrome

    image

  • EnigmaEnigma Member UncommonPosts: 11,384



    Originally posted by eeargy

    And I bet you've done it! Go on... Admit it! ::::28::



    lol, honestly, I didn't. But it's all good.....

    ....I still can;t believe that thing Ive been riding was a gryphon.....are you guys sure?


    Originally posted by WizGamer
    Now hear me out, its just an opinion, I don't want yours. .
    image

    People who have to create conspiracy and hate threads to further a cause lacks in intellectual comprehension of diversity.

  • JackdogJackdog Member UncommonPosts: 6,321

    Whats the big deal anyway? Myself I am probably going to be dropping a hundred bucks and buying both. Maybe I am one of the luckier ones here financially but 50 bucks is not my life's savings or anything. Anyone who takes anyones word about anything on a internet forum is a fool. I bet I can Google up some posts where someone saw Elvis piloting a UFO through the Bermuda triangle. So if you want to be a sheep and let someone else make up for you that's fine, myself I am sick of the my dad can beat up your dad crap.

    I miss DAoC

  • eeargyeeargy Member Posts: 300


    Originally posted by Rhoklaw
    My entire history with WoW consisted of about 3 months on the official forums which came to an abrupt halt because I couldn't stand the immaturity of the community. Now your going to say something about my maturity level here, then my reply would be, can you imagine how bad it must have been on the WoW forums for me to leave then?
    As for EQ2, technically I didn't get my own beta account, but I was fortunate enough to share one. Since Im the lead crafter for our guild, I needed to get a feel of how crafting was going to work. I'll be honest and say I didn't play much with the adventure side of EQ2, but I played enough to realize what a lot of people are complaining about is a simple dislike, misunderstanding or something of that nature. I have yet to witness anything outside of lag that would be or should be considered a game breaking problem.
    Also, I preordered WoW, 2 copies in fact because it was coming out earlier then EQ2 until they also pushed their release date back. So, truthfully, I had desire to actually play WoW simply because of how much of a cool game it is. The reason I dropped it, was because I didn't want to get involved with a game thats community maturity level had hit rock bottom in all of my MMO history. I'm not saying all WoW fans, but too many have just come off as being extremely childish and the last thing I wanted was to play a game, get ganked and listen to some kid go on and on about how he roxxored my arse. Sorry eeargy, I'm too old for that kind of crap in a game, lol.

    Wow. You went a lot more in depth than I expected. Well let me say I really appreciate you taking the time to discuss this, and I totally understand your concerns about the community. The Blizzard WoW boards are full of snotty teenagers (which wouldn't really bother me, but for the fact that it reminds me I'm no longer one myself). The beta boards seem a notch or two up on the maturity ladder though but even having said that, I'm sure I'll be making full use of the /ignore feature.

    You seem like a decent guy, despite my initial impressions (sorry about the "mind of a retarded child" comment in that other thread ::::34::). I guess we can all change our opinions. ::::28::

    image
    "...who ever said during SWG beta "SOE made a game. And it was good." should be sent to "Fear factor" and fed some horse sh**." - Neochrome

    image

  • DoomsayerDoomsayer Member Posts: 344



    Originally posted by Jackdog

    Whats the big deal anyway? Myself I am probably going to be dropping a hundred bucks and buying both. Maybe I am one of the luckier ones here financially but 50 bucks is not my life's savings or anything. Anyone who takes anyones word about anything on a internet forum is a fool. I bet I can Google up some posts where someone saw Elvis piloting a UFO through the Bermuda triangle. So if you want to be a sheep and let someone else make up for you that's fine, myself I am sick of the my dad can beat up your dad crap.




    Amen!imageimageimage

    Its 50 bucks. Not a big deal. If it is, you probably shouldn't be playing games that have a monthly fee. If its cause you are young, mow a few more lawns, or work an extra shift at the McDs or where ever.

    Buy it, play it, make up your own mind. Thats true freedom! The only voice you should be listening to is your own when it comes to making the choice to play or not. Don't worry about your money going to to SOE if you are a bit concerned about them. Retail sales of this game are NOT going to make up for the investment they put into it. If everyone playes and leaves cause it sucks, then they will still be looking at a financial nightmare. If you hate SOE and would never play a game from them, then what are you doing here? Go have fun somewhere instead of feeding your hate, that can't be good for you.

    One last thing, as for not getting that "feeling" that you got from EQ1. I think the reason its so hard to capture that for any length of time in ANY MMORPG since then is because it was pretty much the first of its kind. I know Ulitma Online was out before, but they were drastically different. Small inovations are not enough to recapture that excitement. It trully requires a large change to bring back that feeling. EQ2 probably, from what I have read/heard, just didn't go that far. So don't expect that "feeling" to be there for long. I think you will be dissapointed. It's kind of like getting laid, you always remember your first, reagardless of the thousands that come after!

    Hope that last statement does't get me deleted, it's a good analogy and I think I made some good points here.

    Everything born must die. All that is, will come to ruin. This is the essence of Doom. So sayeth the Doomsayer.

    ________________________________

    Everything born must die. All that is, will come to ruin. This is the essence of Doom. So sayeth the Doomsayer.

  • MegaWolfMegaWolf Member Posts: 425


    Originally posted by eeargy
    Originally posted by Rhoklaw
    My entire history with WoW consisted of about 3 months on the official forums which came to an abrupt halt because I couldn't stand the immaturity of the community. Now your going to say something about my maturity level here, then my reply would be, can you imagine how bad it must have been on the WoW forums for me to leave then?
    As for EQ2, technically I didn't get my own beta account, but I was fortunate enough to share one. Since Im the lead crafter for our guild, I needed to get a feel of how crafting was going to work. I'll be honest and say I didn't play much with the adventure side of EQ2, but I played enough to realize what a lot of people are complaining about is a simple dislike, misunderstanding or something of that nature. I have yet to witness anything outside of lag that would be or should be considered a game breaking problem.
    Also, I preordered WoW, 2 copies in fact because it was coming out earlier then EQ2 until they also pushed their release date back. So, truthfully, I had desire to actually play WoW simply because of how much of a cool game it is. The reason I dropped it, was because I didn't want to get involved with a game thats community maturity level had hit rock bottom in all of my MMO history. I'm not saying all WoW fans, but too many have just come off as being extremely childish and the last thing I wanted was to play a game, get ganked and listen to some kid go on and on about how he roxxored my arse. Sorry eeargy, I'm too old for that kind of crap in a game, lol.

    Wow. You went a lot more in depth than I expected. Well let me say I really appreciate you taking the time to discuss this, and I totally understand your concerns about the community. The Blizzard WoW boards are full of snotty teenagers (which wouldn't really bother me, but for the fact that it reminds me I'm no longer one myself). The beta boards seem a notch or two up on the maturity ladder though but even having said that, I'm sure I'll be making full use of the /ignore feature.

    You seem like a decent guy, despite my initial impressions (sorry about the "mind of a retarded child" comment in that other thread ::::34::). I guess we can all change our opinions. ::::28::

    image
    "...who ever said during SWG beta "SOE made a game. And it was good." should be sent to "Fear factor" and fed some horse sh**." - Neochrome


    THAT IS WHAT I LIKE TO SEE!!! Admiting that you were wrong about someone is a great feature indeed.


    Similar to what Rhoklaw said. The big factor in why i am not playing WoW is because of the comunity. But it is not because i think WoW will have a lot of kids, it is because fy favorite MMO and my longest played MMO is EverQuest. And playing the stress test in WoW showed me that people are different there. I like playing with the people that i played with in EQ. Its that attitude i like. And honestly, if EQ2 is not as good as it is right now where i am in the game i will most likley go back to EQ live. I like the people in the game and right now in Beta most of the applicants have played EQ live so its fun.

    image

    Playing: Vanguard SoH
    Played: EQ, Planetside, SWG, WoW, EQ2

  • JackdogJackdog Member UncommonPosts: 6,321
     
    I should be the one thanking the WoW communityy, after a lot of thought I just canceled my pre order of WoW. Why? you ask. Because some people posting over here from the WoW community have shown me the type of people I should expect to see playing WoW. WoW may very well be a good game, however I think I shall pass because MMORPG's are ultimately are no better than the community that inhabits them.

    I miss DAoC

  • eeargyeeargy Member Posts: 300


    Originally posted by Jackdog
     
    I should be the one thanking the WoW communityy, after a lot of thought I just canceled my pre order of WoW. Why? you ask. Because some people posting over here from the WoW community have shown me the type of people I should expect to see playing WoW. WoW may very well be a good game, however I think I shall pass because MMORPG's are ultimately are no better than the community that inhabits them.

    Not an incredibly smart move, as you know as much about the people you'll meet in EQ2 or WoW or any other game as anyone else does. ie: Nothing at all.

    There'll be all kinds of people in the WoW community, and there'll be all kinds of people in the EQ2 community. This is a given. Both games aim for the broadest demographic possible, and so they'll both attract all kinds of people. The only factor that will actually matter will be which one you personally enjoy playing more (because of the actual game design) and if you haven't tried one of them, you could be missing out.

    image

    image

Sign In or Register to comment.