Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Anybody else afraid to buy this game, since it's releasing in the shadow of SWToR?

24567

Comments

  • letsxhatletsxhat Member Posts: 156
    Originally posted by Votan

    I am more concerned they are rushing another game out the door before it is ready as they did with AO and AoC.  What they are showing you now in beta is what they want you to see.  For example in AoC the first 20-30 levels of the game or so were fantastic then the game fell apart completely.   

    Any game that offers up a "lifetime sub " screams do not buy this game at launch.

    It aint that :) If those are the biggest concerns about this game, it will be around and growing for a long time :)

     

    For one who hasn't played AO or AOC , this makes me feel warm inside.

  • SlampigSlampig Member UncommonPosts: 2,342

    I am not afraid in the least.

     

    All sorts of games are releasing "in the shadow of SWToR"...

    That Guild Wars 2 login screen knocked up my wife. Must be the second coming!

  • letsxhatletsxhat Member Posts: 156
    Originally posted by Slampig

    I am not afraid in the least.

     

    All sorts of games are releasing "in the shadow of SWToR"...

    curse you NDA!!! hahah

  • GolelornGolelorn Member RarePosts: 1,395
    Originally posted by Kyleran

    No, I'm afraid to buy TSW because it's made by Funcom. 

    Definintely holding off until post-launch to see what sort of quality they manage to deliver.

     

    Glad you said. If I would have said I statement like this they would have given me another 3 day vacation. So I won't say it, but just quote you.

  • rawfoxrawfox Member UncommonPosts: 788

    Well, after playing Funcom games for nearly 10 years now, i can say, no other company could entertain me the way, like these freaks at Funcom could.

    I am not happy with the way, the company went into a corporation over the last years, but i think compared to the global situation and how other companies play their behavior, Funcom is still well fair.

    These guys have prooven balls.

    I enjoyed AO as well as AoC more then every other game arround.

    My typ of player is served well with what they did until today and - again compared to other companies - i have some trust.

    I know Ragnar as a excellent mind when it comes to go deeper into the things and FC has many other heads like that.

    The Dreamworld engine is ultracute and can deal with uncomparable more players then these lousy SWTOR shards that stutter with 50 ppl and have a cap of 300. That allone will be a different experience in TSW.

    TSW is done by oldschoolgamers, so i hope, as they a learning their own beef since many many years.

    That is, what made Funcom some kind of a family at one point.

     

    It is only on Funcom, to proove me wrong.

    We will see soon™ ...

     

     

     

     

  • CrunkJuice2CrunkJuice2 Member Posts: 568
    Originally posted by Slampig

    I am not afraid in the least.

     

    All sorts of games are releasing "in the shadow of SWToR"...

    yeah i dont see why swtor has anything to do with other games releasing

    some companys are actually making mmos that are built with the intention of being a long lasting mmo.not just a quick cash grab that has the name star wars slapped on it

     

  • stromp45stromp45 Member UncommonPosts: 159

    OK i really tired for how everyone looks at the launch of AO and AOC  and says funcom cant put out a good game. yes i was at launch with both games and yes it was pretty bad but after a patch or 2 the game played like a champ. I still play AO and love it and cant wait til TSW comes out.

  • EletherylEletheryl Member Posts: 152
    Originally posted by simplyawful

    Yeah, I played the beta weekend. Mostly liked it, but it is, without a doubt, story oriented and not as social as some might like it to be.

    The content, being so solo-oriented and story driven seems like a recipe for disaster just like SWToR. Sure, it might be fun the first time you play it through, but.. when you can basically get all of the skills and see all of the content, where is the replay value?

    At least SWToR had rolling alts to see alternate stories going for it and the class stories were unique. This game has 3 mini starter areas until you get to the meat of the game, which is uniform for everybody, at least from what I've played.

     

     

    Maybe I'm wrong. Maybe there is a lot to do in the game with people and groups you can form to conquer challenging foes, but none of that was present in the beta in Kingsmouth, at least not to any appreciable degree.

    The whole story trend is starting to become disturbing. I like this games atmosphere and point and click elements, but ... does it really have any longevity, or will it just be a flash in the pan?

     

     

     

    Yes SWTOR is a disaster. http://www.vgchartz.com/game/31584/star-wars-the-old-republic/  2.33 Mill of copies. last week till the 12th of may was 2.32 so they just sold 10k more copies in a week, and i think that number do not include digital sales. So can someone tell me how swtor is a fail or a disaster?

  • RenoakuRenoaku Member EpicPosts: 3,157

    Funcom has been a failure many times we all know about it.

    AOC for example lists itself as a Sexy MMORPG with Sexy Females we all know it to keep things rated Teen here that is how it was listed and advertised even on this site with AD's.

    Yet in the actual game all the armors look UnRealistic, they cover every part of the body, they do not even look like the concept art I saw therefore I quit the game after the first month of playing Big Failure.

    AO I never really played it.

    Bloodline Champions another Failure and a Troll Game, Smite for example will take out Bloodline Champions just like LOL has the biggest and best concenpt art I know of in a MOBA.

    TSW will either pick Funcom up or it wont it depends how their management is for the game it could be a big success or a big flop.

  • pierthpierth Member UncommonPosts: 1,494

    Due to SWTOR? Not in the slightest- I didn't even buy the game (didn't care for it in beta) but despite how many are quitting the game still has several hundreds of thousands of players so someone is definitely enjoying it.

     

    As for TSW, I may buy it and play if some IRL friends decide to but no way I'll jump into another MMO solo. I also wouldn't think of playing any MMOs on release- quality of the game (client and server stability) as well as the playerbase is far better 2-4 months after release.

  • CrunkJuice2CrunkJuice2 Member Posts: 568
    Originally posted by Eletheryl
    Originally posted by simplyawful

    Yeah, I played the beta weekend. Mostly liked it, but it is, without a doubt, story oriented and not as social as some might like it to be.

    The content, being so solo-oriented and story driven seems like a recipe for disaster just like SWToR. Sure, it might be fun the first time you play it through, but.. when you can basically get all of the skills and see all of the content, where is the replay value?

    At least SWToR had rolling alts to see alternate stories going for it and the class stories were unique. This game has 3 mini starter areas until you get to the meat of the game, which is uniform for everybody, at least from what I've played.

     

     

    Maybe I'm wrong. Maybe there is a lot to do in the game with people and groups you can form to conquer challenging foes, but none of that was present in the beta in Kingsmouth, at least not to any appreciable degree.

    The whole story trend is starting to become disturbing. I like this games atmosphere and point and click elements, but ... does it really have any longevity, or will it just be a flash in the pan?

     

     

     

    Yes SWTOR is a disaster. http://www.vgchartz.com/game/31584/star-wars-the-old-republic/  2.33 Mill of copies. last week till the 12th of may was 2.32 so they just sold 10k more copies in a week, and i think that number do not include digital sales. So can someone tell me how swtor is a fail or a disaster?

    because copies sold doesnt explain why a metric ton of its servers right now are pretty dead

     

  • toddzetoddze Member UncommonPosts: 2,150
    Originally posted by Kinchyle
    Originally posted by Kyleran

    No, I'm afraid to buy TSW because it's made by Funcom. 

    Definintely holding off until post-launch to see what sort of quality they manage to deliver.

     

    Seriously?!?!?

     

    Are you just one of those Funcom haters then? Because they have one of the best track records for MMOs unless you are a hater.

     

     

    dude, um dude? You cant be serious. You have lost your mind if you belive that. AOC was barely playable at launch, missing features that was listed on the box. It was about as stable as a 18 wheeler, balanced on a pickup, balanced on a car, balanced on motercycle, balanced on hay bale, balanced on basketball, balanced on a bowling ball, balanced on softball, balanced on a football, balanced on a baseball, all balanced on a golf ball.

    It took AOC well over a year to even be somewhat enjoyable. It took AO even longer. FUncom has one of the WORST track records in the MMO genre.  They are in the gutter with SOE and cryptic.

    Waiting for:EQ-Next, ArcheAge (not so much anymore)
    Now Playing: N/A
    Worst MMO: FFXIV
    Favorite MMO: FFXI

  • girdisordergirdisorder Member UncommonPosts: 45

    most people i talk to have never heard of secret world, isnt it coming out in a couple months? they should probably advertise more...

  • NorseGodNorseGod Member EpicPosts: 2,654

    It's a different game.

    Small, niche community.

    It's not hyped up to compete with WOW.

     

    But then, I saw the EA logo.

    To talk about games without the censorship, check out https://www.reddit.com/r/MMORPG/
  • NorseGodNorseGod Member EpicPosts: 2,654
    Originally posted by girdisorder

    most people i talk to have never heard of secret world, isnt it coming out in a couple months? they should probably advertise more...

    Actually, this might seem silly, but back when I was following it. We kinda made sure that the general masses didn't know about it.

    In fact, when I saw the first post about it here, I had a "oh no" feeling.

    To talk about games without the censorship, check out https://www.reddit.com/r/MMORPG/
  • PsychowPsychow Member Posts: 1,784
    Originally posted by girdisorder

    most people i talk to have never heard of secret world, isnt it coming out in a couple months? they should probably advertise more...

     

    Then it wouldn't be a secret, now would it? :-D

  • dougmysticeydougmysticey Member Posts: 1,176

    There was not way to vote -NO, one has nothing to do with the other, so I dod not vote.

    That said, people are right to say that previous Funcom releases had poor launches but not many are quick to point out the they turned these games around completely and made them good, and that they are both (AO and AOC) still live.

    TSW seems to be in better shape that AOC was at launch, as per the last beta weekend, so it should have a cleaner launch than AOC did for sure.

    Anyway, I liked AOC and played it for well over a year. I plan on playing TSW as well.

    image

  • letsxhatletsxhat Member Posts: 156
    Originally posted by NorseGod
    Originally posted by girdisorder

    most people i talk to have never heard of secret world, isnt it coming out in a couple months? they should probably advertise more...

    Actually, this might seem silly, but back when I was following it. We kinda made sure than the general masses didn't know about it.

    In fact, when I saw the first post about it here, I had a "oh no" feeling.

    This right here. I did report a TSW thread I saw on a WoW fansite a few months ago, hoping mods would lock it lol.

  • ElsaboltsElsabolts Member RarePosts: 3,476

    I personeley will never buy another Funcom game because of there track record. One should look at it.

    image

    " Life Liberty and the Pursuit of Those Who  Would Threaten It "
                                            MAGA
  • ShakyMoShakyMo Member CommonPosts: 7,207
    No
    Both games have that story element (additionaly does gw2)

    But the gameplay in tsw is less stale, its not a 2nd rate "world of cthulhucraft" like say swtor is a badly done "spacewow".

    What it does better than swtor
    More exploration in pve
    Less instanced
    Way way less corridory
    Not hub based
    Most quests you phone in, and generally less time sink walking about in general
    Personal preference but story us you're a " cog in the machine" rather than "the chosen one"
    World is way more alive with ambient sounds and graphics and proper day / right cycle
    Freedom to build your own deck
    Freedom to change your deck anytime out of combat
    Better underlying combat system than your typical wow/swtor/rift although needs more impacting animation
    Easier grouping as anyone can switch decks to fill any role.
    Much better csrs
    No kill stealing, everyone who hits a named mob gets the credit for quests
    More involved crafting, and crafting as a needed thing to tailor your gear to different decks
    3 sided pvp
    Much better thought out endgame pvp (although needs more of it)
    Rock hard dungeons
    Different quest types like investigations and sabotage missions.
    Less stilled / better writing imo
    Equally great music with a nice way it intensifies when you're in danger
    Better graphics overall (bar some animations)
    Better performance with large groups of players
    Less cpu bound
  • tarestares Member Posts: 381
    Originally posted by ShakyMo
    No
    Both games have that story element (additionaly does gw2)

    But the gameplay in tsw is less stale, its not a 2nd rate "world of cthulhucraft" like say swtor is a badly done "spacewow".

    What it does better than swtor
    More exploration in pve
    Kingsmouth is small and developers state there are only 8 zones.
    Less instanced  Less choice, all instances were due to choice paths.
    Way way less corridory Did you make it to hoth? or Ilum or the penal colony belvis?
    Not hub based Yes it is, 90% of quest are from hubs and just like SWTOR 10% are from other areas. maybe 80/20 for both.
    Most quests you phone in, and generally less time sink walking about in general Still have to run back to the hub to pick up another quest.
    Personal preference but story us you're a " cog in the machine" rather than "the chosen one" SWTOR had 8 diffrent stories, and each had a choice with morality so good or evil while I  guess no choice or control would make you feel like a cog in TSW.
    World is way more alive with ambient sounds and graphics and proper day / right cycle Both about the same, lots of zombies standing around in the middle of a field in both,
    Freedom to build your own deck
    Freedom to change your deck anytime out of combat
    Better underlying combat system than your typical wow/swtor/rift although needs more impacting animation Funcom needs to outsource combat systems, there is no QA or semblance of balance in TSW skills.
    Easier grouping as anyone can switch decks to fill any role.  WoW and SWTOR have tons of tank classes yet few tanks.
    Much better csrs Civil Service retirement? Customer service was aweful in age of conan and they will use same guys.
    No kill stealing, everyone who hits a named mob gets the credit for quests. Who gets the loot? One thing I like about tera is can kill any KSer, one thing I hated about SWTOR is factions were kept seperate.
    More involved crafting, and crafting as a needed thing to tailor your gear to different decks
    3 sided pvp
    Much better thought out endgame pvp (although needs more of it) Nah SWTOR's endgame PvP was fine, it just had few rewards.  PvPers won't play TSW much anyway due to no PvP server so anything they put in will be used less.  In SWTOR I can find a warzone within a minute on my dead server.  PvP players enjoy matches.
    Rock hard dungeons  Doubt media playing random toons is any indication of difficulty.
    Different quest types like investigations and sabotage missions.  SWTOR had diffrent stuff but at the same time both have mostly the same fillers.
    Less stilled / better writing imo Bioware's writters are top tier, it is why they have so many top hits.  Story's were loved by most players in SWTOR, many people played to make alts to get another one or another faction.  Imperial agentwas the best story imo because it gave the developers more freedom.
    Equally great music with a nice way it intensifies when you're in danger
    Better graphics overall (bar some animations) SWTOR graphics were tight.
    Better performance with large groups of players This is impossible, same engine as age of conan uses, which doesn't work with large groups of players.  Maybe the same, in Ilum I was 30 FPS with 100+ players in Ilum nut SWTOR's engine is just as bad.
    Less cpu bound

     

  • CrunkJuice2CrunkJuice2 Member Posts: 568
    Originally posted by dontadow

    t/his game won't do better than SWTOR, it doesn't have the same market appeal, and the game play isn't innovative enough to attract new gamers.  

    SWTOR will be fine, EA is not afraid to trim down staff and make their profit.  Thus keeping the game going with what they have. 

    you say swtor is fine when a couple months from now it has barely any population and no pvpers

    cuz thats pretty much the direction the game is headed

     

     

  • jmcdermottukjmcdermottuk Member RarePosts: 1,571
    Originally posted by Kyleran

    No, I'm afraid to buy TSW because it's made by Funcom. 

    Definintely holding off until post-launch to see what sort of quality they manage to deliver.

     

    This. SW:TOR bears no relevance for me when it comes to TSW. The fact that Funcom's track record for MMO launches is possibly the worst ever seen is the reason I will be avoiding TSW until at least 3 months after release.

  • stragen001stragen001 Member UncommonPosts: 1,720
    Originally posted by jmcdermottuk
    Originally posted by Kyleran

    No, I'm afraid to buy TSW because it's made by Funcom. 

    Definintely holding off until post-launch to see what sort of quality they manage to deliver.

     

    This. SW:TOR bears no relevance for me when it comes to TSW. The fact that Funcom's track record for MMO launches is possibly the worst ever seen is the reason I will be avoiding TSW until at least 3 months after release.

    Yep,

    This too.

    Funcom make great MMO's.........eventually, but they are terrible at launches. 

    Cluck Cluck, Gibber Gibber, My Old Mans A Mushroom

  • WizardryWizardry Member LegendaryPosts: 19,332

    To be honest this game has had me all over and on both sides of the fence.Some days i feel like i want to play it ,others i feel like it is a bad design for a game.then i think hmmmm it is at least different,does have soem cool graphics and effects,maybe it deserves at least a try.

    I was or am suppose to receive an email about the last beta test weekend,i hope i have not missed it as i will not buy any game anymore without at least testing it for one hour.

    I don't need days/weeks to trest any game,i have seen pretty mcuh every design ever made,i just need to see the basics from the start of creating a character to the start of combat and the UI and i will be sold or running away fast.

    Never forget 3 mile Island and never trust a government official or company spokesman.

Sign In or Register to comment.