Noone ever said that 2x480 uses less power than single 1080.
OTOH you less fortunate claimed "2x480=2x1080". Yeah not even close lol
Im glad you post stuff that disproves BOTH of you lol you oh so make me laugh with your poor attempts to wiggle out of your BS claims, similar like that "laserit" guy lol
Look at the AMD chart again. They are saying the dual cards are running at 50% and the Nvidia card is running at 98%. This means the dual cards are capable of doing 2x better then they are on this presentation. Which would also mean that the 480 can do what the 1080 does all by itself. Its a bunch of bullcrap. And listening to your logic then the card is capable of being overclocked 100% which is also bullcrap.
According to the chart and in your mind how do they make the AMD cards use 100% gpu?
WTF, they are showing 2x480 doing 62 FPS and 1080 doing 58 FPS, are you blind? ROFL
and 2x480 HAVE ~50% utilization at light loads.
Im not sure why do you embarass yourself further, you obviously have almost no knowledge about how GPU works (just look at your "100% power" shit posts lol)
Funny how you dont talk about GTX1080 not rendering half the details in that same AOTS as a "driver bug" though, and on a "reviewer drivers" that were unavailable to public lol
Noone ever said that 2x480 uses less power than single 1080.
OTOH you less fortunate claimed "2x480=2x1080". Yeah not even close lol
Im glad you post stuff that disproves BOTH of you lol you oh so make me laugh with your poor attempts to wiggle out of your BS claims, similar like that "laserit" guy lol
ROFL "excuse" ahahahahahah, youre talking about comedy rofl.
Accept the facts, consoles are 80+% of AAA games market. How long have you been gone lol
and here we go again "im bitter" because i dont accept crap im served and call it out.
As i said, enjoy your broken games, be sure to complain a lot next time, you certainly seem like that type lol
1. indies have games with very high end graphics. in fact some with HIGHER end graphics then AAA games so I really dont give a fuck about the game being AAA in the context of graphic benchmarking. 2. console first titles literally dial down the graphics on the PC with such clever tactics as locking the FPS at 30 or 60 for example. what other short cuts are they doing? 3. just use Arma 3 or Elite Dangerous. Perhaps Stranded Deep or The Forest if you like I can provide you a huge list but for the love of god for a PC graphics game dont benchmark a console first title that is just stupid.
1. Theres no indies games with "higher end graphics" ....
This just demostrates you have no idea whatsoever even what Arma 3 is and completely made up that its broken. You would not make such a comment if you had a clue what Arma 3 is, graphically it put EVERYTHING to shame when in its day.
nevermind, Elite Dangerous, Stranded Deep, The Forest. You really have no idea what you talking about on multiple levels
Please do not respond to me, even if I ask you a question, its rhetorical.
Noone ever said that 2x480 uses less power than single 1080.
OTOH you less fortunate claimed "2x480=2x1080". Yeah not even close lol
Im glad you post stuff that disproves BOTH of you lol you oh so make me laugh with your poor attempts to wiggle out of your BS claims, similar like that "laserit" guy lol
ROFL "excuse" ahahahahahah, youre talking about comedy rofl.
Accept the facts, consoles are 80+% of AAA games market. How long have you been gone lol
and here we go again "im bitter" because i dont accept crap im served and call it out.
As i said, enjoy your broken games, be sure to complain a lot next time, you certainly seem like that type lol
1. indies have games with very high end graphics. in fact some with HIGHER end graphics then AAA games so I really dont give a fuck about the game being AAA in the context of graphic benchmarking. 2. console first titles literally dial down the graphics on the PC with such clever tactics as locking the FPS at 30 or 60 for example. what other short cuts are they doing? 3. just use Arma 3 or Elite Dangerous. Perhaps Stranded Deep or The Forest if you like I can provide you a huge list but for the love of god for a PC graphics game dont benchmark a console first title that is just stupid.
1. Theres no indies games with "higher end graphics" ....
This just demostrates you have no idea whatsoever even what Arma 3 is and completely made up that its broken. You would not make such a comment if you had a clue what Arma 3 is, graphically it put EVERYTHING to shame when in its day.
nevermind, Elite Dangerous, Stranded Deep, The Forest. You really have no idea what you talking about on multiple levels
As i said enjoy your broken games and then be sure to complain about broken games. You get exactly what you deserve
ROFL "excuse" ahahahahahah, youre talking about comedy rofl.
Accept the facts, consoles are 80+% of AAA games market. How long have you been gone lol
and here we go again "im bitter" because i dont accept crap im served and call it out.
As i said, enjoy your broken games, be sure to complain a lot next time, you certainly seem like that type lol
1. indies have games with very high end graphics. in fact some with HIGHER end graphics then AAA games so I really dont give a fuck about the game being AAA in the context of graphic benchmarking. 2. console first titles literally dial down the graphics on the PC with such clever tactics as locking the FPS at 30 or 60 for example. what other short cuts are they doing? 3. just use Arma 3 or Elite Dangerous. Perhaps Stranded Deep or The Forest if you like I can provide you a huge list but for the love of god for a PC graphics game dont benchmark a console first title that is just stupid.
1. Theres no indies games with "higher end graphics" ....
This just demostrates you have no idea whatsoever even what Arma 3 is and completely made up that its broken. You would not make such a comment if you had a clue what Arma 3 is, graphically it put EVERYTHING to shame when in its day.
nevermind, Elite Dangerous, Stranded Deep, The Forest. You really have no idea what you talking about on multiple levels
As i said enjoy your broken games and then be sure to complain about broken games. You get exactly what you deserve
you dont even know what Arma 3 is which is clear from your comments regarding graphics.
Please stop replying to me its not going to be healthy for either of us, I will try to do the same or I might just add you to my ignore list
Please do not respond to me, even if I ask you a question, its rhetorical.
Noone ever said that 2x480 uses less power than single 1080.
OTOH you less fortunate claimed "2x480=2x1080". Yeah not even close lol
Im glad you post stuff that disproves BOTH of you lol you oh so make me laugh with your poor attempts to wiggle out of your BS claims, similar like that "laserit" guy lol
ROFL "excuse" ahahahahahah, youre talking about comedy rofl.
Accept the facts, consoles are 80+% of AAA games market. How long have you been gone lol
and here we go again "im bitter" because i dont accept crap im served and call it out.
As i said, enjoy your broken games, be sure to complain a lot next time, you certainly seem like that type lol
1. indies have games with very high end graphics. in fact some with HIGHER end graphics then AAA games so I really dont give a fuck about the game being AAA in the context of graphic benchmarking. 2. console first titles literally dial down the graphics on the PC with such clever tactics as locking the FPS at 30 or 60 for example. what other short cuts are they doing? 3. just use Arma 3 or Elite Dangerous. Perhaps Stranded Deep or The Forest if you like I can provide you a huge list but for the love of god for a PC graphics game dont benchmark a console first title that is just stupid.
1. Theres no indies games with "higher end graphics" ....
This just demostrates you have no idea whatsoever even what Arma 3 is and completely made up that its broken. You would not make such a comment if you had a clue what Arma 3 is, graphically it put EVERYTHING to shame when in its day.
nevermind, Elite Dangerous, Stranded Deep, The Forest. You really have no idea what you talking about on multiple levels
As i said enjoy your broken games and then be sure to complain about broken games. You get exactly what you deserve
you dont even know what Arma 3 is which is clear from your comments regarding graphics.
Please stop replying to me its not going to be healthy for either of us, I will try to do the same or I might just add you to my ignore list
It has been over 3 years and game is still broken. Keep hoping it get fixed some day rofl
They would like to put it on consoles, but its too broken and consoles have some minimal standards rofl Even that scam "No Mans Sky" managed to fall between cracks, and ARMA cant LOL
like I said, you do not know what Arma 3 is given your statements on graphics so you would have no idea if its broken or not. which its not and its even more prooven by the fact that we have done this exchange about 1000 times and you still refuse to mention HOW its broken. so lets recap.
1. you think the graphics of Arma 3 are not at or above AAA standards 2. you say its broken as many times as a broken record but never mention 'how' 3. its not realistic to think you know anything about Arma 3 when you think its graphics are not of AAA standards or higher and never bother to suggest HOW Arma 3 is broken unless of course you are just trying to play it on a shitty computer thinkings its RimWorld
Please do not respond to me, even if I ask you a question, its rhetorical.
1. never rmentioned ARMA grpahics, but it snot anythign special or to write home about 2. you should have looked into it by now, but as usual, youre too lazy to actually do or learn anything 3. you like to repeat your BS a lot rofl
1. never rmentioned ARMA grpahics, but it snot anythign special or to write home about 2. you should have looked into it by now, but as usual, youre too lazy to actually do or learn anything 3. you like to repeat your BS a lot rofl
I literally gave Arma 3, The Forset, Stranded Deep as examples of indie games that were at the level of higher of AAA titles and you literally within about 2 replys later said that there are not any indie titles with greater than AAA graphics.
Arama 3 has graphics ABOVE AAA standards for its time.
welcome to my ignore list
Please do not respond to me, even if I ask you a question, its rhetorical.
1. never rmentioned ARMA grpahics, but it snot anythign special or to write home about 2. you should have looked into it by now, but as usual, youre too lazy to actually do or learn anything 3. you like to repeat your BS a lot rofl
I literally gave Arma 3, The Forset, Stranded Deep as examples of indie games that were at the level of higher of AAA titles and you literally within about 2 replys later said that there are not any indie titles with greater than AAA graphics.
Arama 3 has graphics ABOVE AAA standards for its time.
welcome to my ignore list
No it wasnt ROFL. ANd on top of THAT its techically broken game that hasnt been fixed after 3 years. "Power" of indie games lol
gald i dont have to watch your BS any more
this is the game you claim "has better grafix than AAA titles...in 2014. hurr durr"
Malabooga is all messed up. Doesn't realize that AMD claiming their 2x480's were running at 50%. Doesn't even realize that this claim is utterly impossible given the fact that EVERYONE who has tested the 2x480's haven't found them capable of beating the 1080. And they are using 2x the power consumption.
Please MR Malabooga show us a benchmark from the 2x480's running at 100% so I can be blown away.
Ahahah, 2 completely clueless ........ trying to communicate.
Guess what: there is AotS benchamrk database and guess which is on the top vs 1080: 2x 480. Oced even beat stock 1200$ Titan XP. And further guess what - ive already posted screenshots of that.
and you continue to embarass yourself just proving that you have NO clue what youre talking about whatsoever with every new post and that youre just spreading NVidias BS PR
THATS messed up little troll lol
the question is: are you natural or paid by NVidia. i refuse to believe someone can be THAT dumb lol
Ahahah, 2 completely clueless ........ trying to communicate.
Guess what: there is AotS benchamrk database and guess which is on the top: 2x 480. Oced even beat stock 1200$ Titan XP. And further guess what - ive already posted screenshots of that.
and you continue to embarass yourself just proving that you have NO clue what youre talking about whatsoever with every new post and that youre just spreading NVidias BS PR
THATS messed up little troll lol
the question is: are you natural or paid by NVidia. i refuse to believe someone can be THAT dumb lol
Yea I guess none of these people know what they are talking about either. Even though they actually tried it.
ive been trying to raise awereness of poor mGPU support in games, but with people like you and that "sean" character as customers now know why noone bothers with releasing non broken games and fixing them, let alone good mGPU support. You deserve everything you get.
Now link where AMD showed ANY of those games ANYWHERE except AotS since that was your lie about AMD. Aots has decent scaling (70-75%). But youve shown you dont even have a clue what scaling is.
You just lie and lie and lie, continuing your BS even when proven youre just full of BS lol
a true NVidia sponsored troll.
It has nicely been shown that it beats 1080 with 75+% scaling and at 100% scaling it actually competes with Titan and not 1080. Thats makes 2x480 FACTUALLY faster than 1080. its just your very limited comprehension capacity thats an issue here (or much more likely deliberately spreading NVidias BS PR and deceiving people like they usually do) lol
Now link where AMD showed ANY of those games ANYWHERE except AotS since that was your lie about AMD. Aots has decent scaling (70-75%). But youve shown you dont even have a clue what scaling is.
You just lie and lie and lie, continuing your BS even when proven youre just full of BS lol
a true NVidia sponsored troll.
The problem you are having is this. Just because AMD didn't showcase it doesn't mean its not true. We are looking at several examples of different graphics cards. And for some reason the only examples you are willing to accept are those released by AMD directly. The card should speak for itself. Noone has been able to get these cards to do what you think they can do. Yet even though the reviewers do not work for Nvidia nor are the benchmarks from Nvidia you are somehow thinking they have hacked everyone's computers to say they are superior. Get real man this is very silly at this point. What matters is how the cards work in your computer not the ones at AMD headquarters.
I got "my" results DIRECTLY from AotS official benchmark database dumbo. Another proof you have absolutely NO clue whatsoever what youre talking about lol
And thats whats nice about having official benchamek databse: it makes it hard for NVidia BS PR champons like you to spread crap you continually spread lol
Comments
You are true NVidia shill, glad you proved that rofl
and 2x480 HAVE ~50% utilization at light loads.
Im not sure why do you embarass yourself further, you obviously have almost no knowledge about how GPU works (just look at your "100% power" shit posts lol)
Funny how you dont talk about GTX1080 not rendering half the details in that same AOTS as a "driver bug" though, and on a "reviewer drivers" that were unavailable to public lol
That usually means the product is gathering cobwebs on the shelf.
Please show me where I "BSed about Fury X being 600+$."
"You are true NVidia shill, glad you proved that rofl"
Fuck I almost pee pee'd my pants hearing that from you.
"Be water my friend" - Bruce Lee
Please do not respond to me, even if I ask you a question, its rhetorical.
Please do not respond to me
ALL Fury Xes are SAME reference design, thanks for proving you have NO clue what youre talking about.
And you posted some shit links showing oudated prices, you want me to post you 1500$ GTX1080 links huh shill? Or 1000+$ 1070?
By each new post you show how clueless you are, and that youre just a NVidia shill, your obssesion goes waaaaaaaay beyond fanboi.
Please stop replying to me its not going to be healthy for either of us, I will try to do the same or I might just add you to my ignore list
Please do not respond to me, even if I ask you a question, its rhetorical.
Please do not respond to me
All I did was go to http://www.newegg.com and searched for "R9 Fury X"
http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&DEPA=0&Order=BESTMATCH&Description=R9+Fury+X&ignorear=0&N=-1&isNodeId=1
When I go to http://www.newegg.com and search for "GTX 1080" I get this
http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&DEPA=0&Order=BESTMATCH&Description=gtx+1080&ignorear=0&N=-1&isNodeId=1
"Be water my friend" - Bruce Lee
Too bad it backfired SO badly and now you even continue to shit post rofl
You even got "insightful" from that "Gdemani" character ahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahah THATS how bad your post was lol
They would like to put it on consoles, but its too broken and consoles have some minimal standards rofl Even that scam "No Mans Sky" managed to fall between cracks, and ARMA cant LOL
@awesomeindiegames ROFL
You should play some "No Mans Sky"...thats right up yur alley...and BE SURE to pay full 60$ price for it rofl
Thers a HUGE reason why vast majority of people stay away from indie games.
1. you think the graphics of Arma 3 are not at or above AAA standards
2. you say its broken as many times as a broken record but never mention 'how'
3. its not realistic to think you know anything about Arma 3 when you think its graphics are not of AAA standards or higher and never bother to suggest HOW Arma 3 is broken unless of course you are just trying to play it on a shitty computer thinkings its RimWorld
Please do not respond to me, even if I ask you a question, its rhetorical.
Please do not respond to me
2. you should have looked into it by now, but as usual, youre too lazy to actually do or learn anything
3. you like to repeat your BS a lot rofl
Arama 3 has graphics ABOVE AAA standards for its time.
welcome to my ignore list
Please do not respond to me, even if I ask you a question, its rhetorical.
Please do not respond to me
So you are full of shit then.
"Be water my friend" - Bruce Lee
gald i dont have to watch your BS any more
this is the game you claim "has better grafix than AAA titles...in 2014. hurr durr"
man, if i got a penny for every BS you say...
Peace Out
"Be water my friend" - Bruce Lee
Please MR Malabooga show us a benchmark from the 2x480's running at 100% so I can be blown away.
Guess what: there is AotS benchamrk database and guess which is on the top vs 1080: 2x 480. Oced even beat stock 1200$ Titan XP. And further guess what - ive already posted screenshots of that.
and you continue to embarass yourself just proving that you have NO clue what youre talking about whatsoever with every new post and that youre just spreading NVidias BS PR
THATS messed up little troll lol
the question is: are you natural or paid by NVidia. i refuse to believe someone can be THAT dumb lol
http://www.gamersnexus.net/guides/2507-crossfire-rx-480-benchmark-vs-1070-and-1080-power-temperatures-fps?showall=1
https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/AMD/RX_480_CrossFire/3.html
http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2016/07/amd-rx-480-crossfire-vs-nvidia-gtx-1080-ashes/
http://www.hardwareunboxed.com/rx-480-crossfire-performance-gtx-1070-killer/
http://imgur.com/a/lFtIE
Even your tweaktown who somehow makes AMD much better then any other website says they are fairly equal.
http://www.tweaktown.com/articles/7770/amd-radeon-rx-480-crossfire-beating-geforce-gtx-1080-4k/index4.html
ive been trying to raise awereness of poor mGPU support in games, but with people like you and that "sean" character as customers now know why noone bothers with releasing non broken games and fixing them, let alone good mGPU support. You deserve everything you get.
Now link where AMD showed ANY of those games ANYWHERE except AotS since that was your lie about AMD. Aots has decent scaling (70-75%). But youve shown you dont even have a clue what scaling is.
You just lie and lie and lie, continuing your BS even when proven youre just full of BS lol
a true NVidia sponsored troll.
It has nicely been shown that it beats 1080 with 75+% scaling and at 100% scaling it actually competes with Titan and not 1080. Thats makes 2x480 FACTUALLY faster than 1080. its just your very limited comprehension capacity thats an issue here (or much more likely deliberately spreading NVidias BS PR and deceiving people like they usually do) lol
And thats whats nice about having official benchamek databse: it makes it hard for NVidia BS PR champons like you to spread crap you continually spread lol