Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

More great resources to find out the TRUTH behind Vanguard

1235711

Comments

  • anarchyartanarchyart Member Posts: 5,378


    Originally posted by jonaku

    Originally posted by Haplos 
     Having said that, the only ones can say for sure how it's shaping up are the ones in beta now.  The problem with taking info from this group is that you will only see posts from people that are discontent as they are the only ones that will post and chance losing their spot in beta for breaking the NDA. You have to remember he has thousands testing now, so if you are getting only a few nay sayers that might indirectly be an endorcement.


    The problem is that you assume that they aren't tons of negative leaks on beta 3. But there are. Unfortunately, it's a violation of the Rules of Conduct to link to any of them from within this forum. But they are out there if you look for them. They're honestly not hard to find.

    You ignored his point. The fact is there are thousands of beta testers and I've only heard a handful of unhappy ones. If the game was so bad there would be hundreds of NDA breakers just even here on this board. There aren't, so lots of people must be enjoying their time in Vanguard beta.

    Also, beta testers are made to sign a legal contract stating that they will not violate an NDA. Believing what those people say is like buying stock in Enron.

    image
  • ManaleeshiManaleeshi Member Posts: 6


    Originally posted by jonaku

    Originally posted by Haplos 
     Having said that, the
    only ones can say for sure how it's shaping up are the ones in beta
    now.  The problem with taking info from this group is that you will
    only see posts from people that are discontent as they are the only
    ones that will post and chance losing their spot in beta for breaking
    the NDA. You have to remember he has thousands testing now, so if you
    are getting only a few nay sayers that might indirectly be an
    endorcement.


    The problem is that you assume that they aren't
    tons of negative leaks on beta 3. But there are. Unfortunately, it's a
    violation of the Rules of Conduct to link to any of them from within
    this forum. But they are out there if you look for them. They're
    honestly not hard to find.



    was hard for me :( i tried lol





    But that person has a point. Theres not a whole lot of negativity, and
    considering how many thousands of players there are... thats
    good going. But the important thing to me, is that alot of what some of
    these negative people say (ive seen some) seems very un-justified (for
    want of a better expression). Ive seen things like, "i walked for miles
    and saw no mobs! This game sux!". Well... its beta.... you probably
    walked through a none populated area!
    Theres still a few areas like that left... But they are adding stuff
    all the time. Just watch the movies. Theres people running around with a train behind them, areas of skellys, areas of undead type things. And in one movie theres some part of the world i saw with TONS of mobs. Like... enough to support several groups in just one area. Also, some of these negative
    feedbackers, im pretty convinced have never played the game at all, and
    they are just making things up. Im not sure why they would do that but
    i can think of a few reasons.. But its pretty obvious when you read
    some of things these people say.





    Also, i think alot of people dont understand this beta process. Its not
    like other games. Other games have a beta that lasts a couple of months
    and then its finished and on the shelf.... Vanguard beta is enormous.
    Its been going for about a year (i think - maybe even more) and theres still many months left. It gets
    added to in chunks too. BIG chunks. So someone might be playing
    yesterday and think, "hmm this area is kind of dead..." and then they
    log in today and think, "WOW! Look at all this stuff!".






    Originally posted by jonaku

    With all the group dependencies in Vanguard, I
    don't think Vanguard is going to be the game for you. Though it is
    theoretically possible according to the laws of physics for a person to
    solo level in Vanguard (if they're unemployed and can play 12 hours a
    day), it will not be FUN. You will be LFG'ing and attending scheduled
    meetings in order to complete quests that require a group because the
    mobs are group content. Vanbois find EQ2 to be solo friendly, so I
    believe Vanguard is going to be much, much, worse that whatever you
    experienced in EQ2.




    Its not EQ2 though. They where never interested in soloers during beta
    and it scared me. And sure enough... at release there was very little
    scope for soloers. But the game went from having very little solo
    content to having way too much, and they boosted the solo exp hugely.
    They have alraedy explained to us how much solo content there will be
    in Vanguard, and theres plenty. But like EQ.... the solo content is
    just what they THINK we can handle
    The chances are, solo players will end up being able to take on some of
    the group stuff by themselves too. And like i said in my big post on
    the last page, 20% solo content in a game like early EQ would be a few
    big-ish zones. 20% solo content in Vanguard will probably be the size
    of the entire early EQ world :p




  • VengefulVengeful Member Posts: 473

    It's good to see that some things never change....

    ...some people's bad god damned attitude about just about everything.

    Nobody here has any reason to believe differently (though reason to be skeptical) that Vanguard will offer anything other than what they have broadcasted. Certainly, you can debate to what extent they will deliver...but for some people to advertise that there is some sick plot by Brad and Company to release a Hardcore game Masqurading as a Casual game in some evil ploy to take over the world and then sell it to SOE is simply....rediculous.

    I definately wouldn't suggest taking Brad's word as gospel. At least not until he starts walking on water and curing people of cancer...But I would give him the benefit of the doubt, at least until I see otherwise.

    If Brad here says we can solo, I'd believe him...he's makin' the game, right? I might not agree as to the extent that I can solo or exactly how fun I think soloing is...but I bet that if he says that I can, I can. Either way.... I suggest getting your information (strict facts) from the sourse instead of getting it second hand. You're at least aware of Brad and Co.'s agenda...they are trying to sell you something. Take what they give use it as you see fit and make your decision from there.

    image

  • jonakujonaku Member Posts: 281


    Originally posted by Manaleeshi
    Heard that SOE has the ability to change the game? Well basically when he said "False" thats all you need to hear. They have been totally up front right from the start what the deal was. When they where with MS it was some kind of 50/50 deal. So MS had a say in everything they did.... I think they came to some kind of dissagreement because they decided to part ways, but Sigil borrowed money, and paid off Microsoft's share. So Sigil ended up owning 100% of everything..... Then they decided who to go with, and chose SOE because they are the best at what Sigil need (and they know alot of the people who run SOE and their offices aren't far away etc...). So all SOE are doing is advertising the game, hosting the servers and billing and technical support (not customer support like GM's).  But rather than SOE being "in charge" of that.... they basically just bought a small share from Sigil's 100%. So they are kind of in charge of it, but Sigil have the last say in everything they do. And all they are doing is what i mentioned above..... So not only do they have a small role in it, they have nothing to do with the actual game itself - in terms of gameplay, graphics, etc.



    To the degree that you blame SOE for the demise of SWG (like I do), then you should read http://www.mmorpg.com/discussion2.cfm/thread/79948 "SOE Will Buy Sigil Eventually". The co-marketing relationship could be the prelude to SOE buying out Sigil 12 to 18 months down the road. Sigil does not deny that this is a possibility.

  • jonakujonaku Member Posts: 281


    Originally posted by anarchyart

    Originally posted by jonaku

    Originally posted by Haplos 
     Having said that, the only ones can say for sure how it's shaping up are the ones in beta now.  The problem with taking info from this group is that you will only see posts from people that are discontent as they are the only ones that will post and chance losing their spot in beta for breaking the NDA. You have to remember he has thousands testing now, so if you are getting only a few nay sayers that might indirectly be an endorcement.


    The problem is that you assume that they aren't tons of negative leaks on beta 3. But there are. Unfortunately, it's a violation of the Rules of Conduct to link to any of them from within this forum. But they are out there if you look for them. They're honestly not hard to find.

    You ignored his point. The fact is there are thousands of beta testers and I've only heard a handful of unhappy ones.


    I'm seeing more than a handful.

    We'll just have to agree to disagree on this one since it's a violation of the Rules of Conduct to link to any NDA-breaking posts about the Vanguard beta or to disclose any information from an NDA leak. As such, I can't "prove" to you with "evidence" how I am right and you are wrong in this forum.

    I stand by my position that in beta 3, I am finding on the Internet plenty of leaks very critical of the game.

  • VengefulVengeful Member Posts: 473


    Originally posted by jonaku

    Originally posted by Elikal

    I could go into many details, but this has been said by others. My very personal wish for Vanguard - or any MMO I pay - is this: How long does it take me to get into the fun? THAT is what WOW did good. I don't want to travel all over the world. I dont want to wait hours and days and months to find a group to finally finish my quest. What I really found annoying in EQ2 was, in the end I found myself logging into the game, I had 60+ quests but could do none of the, because no one was on the same step of those over complicated quests. Or if I had missed the day my guild did that quest, I had little chance to get it done. I know a game needs such complicated quests, but EQ2 is above level 30 or so FULL of those overcomplicated quests a small guild just can not provide. I felt EQ2 had become a job, work more than leisure, with weekly plannings and meeting, instead of just logging in and quickly finding something funny to do. THAT is what I desire of a MMO, that it leads me to the fun, not I have to seek through internet sites to FIND the fun.



    With all the group dependencies in Vanguard, I don't think Vanguard is going to be the game for you. Though it is theoretically possible according to the laws of physics for a person to solo level in Vanguard (if they're unemployed and can play 12 hours a day), it will not be FUN. You will be LFG'ing and attending scheduled meetings in order to complete quests that require a group because the mobs are group content. Vanbois find EQ2 to be solo friendly, so I believe Vanguard is going to be much, much, worse that whatever you experienced in EQ2.


    I don't see why you need to get to max level in 10 days played in order to have fun. If that happens, it would be exactly like WoW....people will get to max level and either have to raid or start over. No thanks.

    I'd rather take my time with a game and always have that next level to reach for a year or two and always have goals I'd like to accomplish in game (be it any of the spheres). All this providing that there is enough interesting content to support these play habits.

    Besides....Beta has been goin' on for around a year or so now? I thought they already had some people solo to max level by the end of Beta 2.5. Thought I read that somewhere.

    image

  • VengefulVengeful Member Posts: 473


    Originally posted by jonaku

    Originally posted by Manaleeshi
    Heard that SOE has the ability to change the game? Well basically when he said "False" thats all you need to hear. They have been totally up front right from the start what the deal was. When they where with MS it was some kind of 50/50 deal. So MS had a say in everything they did.... I think they came to some kind of dissagreement because they decided to part ways, but Sigil borrowed money, and paid off Microsoft's share. So Sigil ended up owning 100% of everything..... Then they decided who to go with, and chose SOE because they are the best at what Sigil need (and they know alot of the people who run SOE and their offices aren't far away etc...). So all SOE are doing is advertising the game, hosting the servers and billing and technical support (not customer support like GM's).  But rather than SOE being "in charge" of that.... they basically just bought a small share from Sigil's 100%. So they are kind of in charge of it, but Sigil have the last say in everything they do. And all they are doing is what i mentioned above..... So not only do they have a small role in it, they have nothing to do with the actual game itself - in terms of gameplay, graphics, etc.


    To the degree that you blame SOE for the demise of SWG (like I do), then you should read http://www.mmorpg.com/discussion2.cfm/thread/79948 "SOE Will Buy Sigil Eventually". The co-marketing relationship could be the prelude to SOE buying out Sigil 12 to 18 months down the road. Sigil does not deny that this is a possibility.


    Similar to how one might not deny that it is possible for green pigs to fly, beings that there are no green pigs.

    image

  • ManaleeshiManaleeshi Member Posts: 6


    Originally posted by jonaku

    To the degree that you blame SOE for the demise of SWG (like I do), then you should read http://www.mmorpg.com/discussion2.cfm/thread/79948 "SOE
    Will Buy Sigil Eventually". The co-marketing relationship could be the
    prelude to SOE buying out Sigil 12 to 18 months down the road. Sigil
    does not deny that this is a possibility.




    Yes they do :) Theres a recent Brad quote saying they will never sell
    to Sigil and we "Have his word on it". He isn't going to break his word
    over something important like that to a community of hundreds of
    thousands of people.. :)

    p.s. I'll look for the quote


    Originally posted by jonaku

    I'm seeing more than a handful.

    We'll just have to agree to disagree on this one since it's a violation of the Rules of Conduct to link to any NDA-breaking posts about the Vanguard beta or to disclose any information from an NDA leak. As such, I can't "prove" to you with "evidence" how I am right and you are wrong in this forum.

    I stand by my position that in beta 3, I am finding on the Internet plenty of leaks very critical of the game.




    Could you send some to me by PM? Its not that i dont believe you, but i would really like to see some, and ive tried searching myself and couldnt find much at all :(
  • jonakujonaku Member Posts: 281


    Originally posted by Manaleeshi

    Originally posted by jonaku

    To the degree that you blame SOE for the demise of SWG (like I do), then you should read http://www.mmorpg.com/discussion2.cfm/thread/79948 "SOE Will Buy Sigil Eventually". The co-marketing relationship could be the prelude to SOE buying out Sigil 12 to 18 months down the road. Sigil does not deny that this is a possibility.



    Yes they do :) Theres a recent Brad quote saying they will never sell to Sigil and we "Have his word on it". He isn't going to break his word over something important like that to a community of hundreds of thousands of people.. :)

    p.s. I'll look for the quote

    =====================================

    Please provide the quote on that. I think you will find that you have misinterpreted/misrecollected the actual quote. He may have given his word that in the co-marketing relationship Sigil will have final dev say, but in the case of a buy-out, his word is meaningless since SOE will legally own Sigil's IP.

  • AmatheAmathe Member LegendaryPosts: 7,630

    I appreciate that Brad responded to my post and provided some information, but I feel it has proved my point. Of course, two people can look at the same set of facts and form different opinions, and that is to be expected.

    Brad's initial post began by making some statements that were carefully couched in superlatives and absolutes (see underlining below).

    If you parse words then certainly everything he said was true,  because for those statements to be untrue you would pretty much have to ban solo and casual players from the game outright. Obviously no one believes they would do that and no one has ever contended that you can't play the game at all as a solo or casual player.

    The question becomes, if you take those qualifiers out, what would be a fair representation of the solo and casual experience in Vanguard? Read what he wrote. Read what Dink wrote (and quoted) in a related thread. Read between the lines too. If you are a solo or casual player and, after reading his explanation of solo and casual play, you think you will ever be anything other than a weak, gimped, third class citizen in his world (or if you are ok with that), then by golly buy the game!

    I am not interested in hating on Brad or Sigil or for that matter turning people away from their game, but I am speaking out when I see them trying to lure casuals and soloers in (after years of allowing people to crap all over them on their official boards) based on the misleading notion that Vanguard has been designed for their enjoyment, because it isn't. 



    Originally posted by Aradune

    Heard that the game is only hard core?  False.
    Heard that you need to play tons of hours or be part of an uber guild?  False
    Heard that you can't solo or play casually?  False
    Heard that the best items are only available via raids?  False.
    Heard that SOE has the ability to change the game? False (they co-publish, market with approval and host -- that's about it).
    Heard that the game only looks like EQ2 +?  False

    Heard that the game is only hard core?  False.

    Heard that you need to play tons of hours or be part of an uber guild?  False

    Heard that you can't solo or play casually?  False

    Heard that the best items are only available via raids?  False.

    Heard that SOE has the ability to change the game? False (they co-publish, market with approval and host -- that's about it).

    Heard that the game only looks like EQ2 +?  False

    EQ1, EQ2, SWG, SWTOR, GW, GW2 CoH, CoV, FFXI, WoW, CO, War,TSW and a slew of free trials and beta tests

  • ManaleeshiManaleeshi Member Posts: 6

    SOE do NOT own the IP. Thats the whole point. Sigil own it all. The only thing SOE have is a PART ownership of the publishing rights. They are "co-publisher" and as such only have something to do with marketing, distribution of the boxes, hosting the servers etc. And its not even full control over that... as a CO-publisher, Sigil still have a say in all that.

    But in reguards to the actual game, and its gameplay. Sigil has 100% ownership and control.

    So he aint going to put himself in the
    same position all over again by selling to SOE :P He has his own game
    development company now, and a killer game to start with. He is going
    to be holding on to this no matter what. 


    As for the quotes, im still looking for the new one, but heres the old one:



    Originally Posted by Brad McQuaid - CEO, Sigil Games Online




    SOE is not buying Sigil. Sigil remains Sigil.


    I left SOE years ago because I wasn't in a position to be hands on making games anymore. That's why Sigil was founded.


    Selling out would put me back in the same place I was before: not
    making games. Making MMOGs makes me happy. I love Vanguard and intend
    to see the game through, long past launch. We have so much planned for
    the game after launch -- I've hinted at much of it.


    Why would I do anything to jeoprodize what I have now? This new deal
    now even gives us (which includes me) even MORE authority and autonomy.
    This makes me even happier.


    Seriously, think about what you are saying -- it doesn't make sense and it doesn't fit my track record and personality.





    I'll find the other quote and post it, but in the meantime, anyone concerned about SOE, should read this:


    http://www.vanguardsoh.com/forums/showthread.php?t=51405


    It explains everything, and should calm any fears about that.
  • nexus42nexus42 Member Posts: 288
    Aren't you going to have to own a killer rig to play Vanguard though? What would be the configuration of a machine that could play V:SOH today and make you drool at the video goodness? Are they going the EQ2 launch route and making the specs unreachable with current technology?

    ...Pika

  • VengefulVengeful Member Posts: 473


    Originally posted by jonaku

    Originally posted by Manaleeshi

    Originally posted by jonaku

    To the degree that you blame SOE for the demise of SWG (like I do), then you should read http://www.mmorpg.com/discussion2.cfm/thread/79948 "SOE Will Buy Sigil Eventually". The co-marketing relationship could be the prelude to SOE buying out Sigil 12 to 18 months down the road. Sigil does not deny that this is a possibility.



    Yes they do :) Theres a recent Brad quote saying they will never sell to Sigil and we "Have his word on it". He isn't going to break his word over something important like that to a community of hundreds of thousands of people.. :)

    p.s. I'll look for the quote

    =====================================

    Please provide the quote on that. I think you will find that you have misinterpreted/misrecollected the actual quote. He may have given his word that in the co-marketing relationship Sigil will have final dev say, but in the case of a buy-out, his word is meaningless since SOE will legally own Sigil's IP.


    Most recent...

    http://www.vanguardsoh.com/forums/showthread.php?t=71458&page=3

    image

  • VengefulVengeful Member Posts: 473


    Originally posted by nexus42
    Aren't you going to have to own a killer rig to play Vanguard though? What would be the configuration of a machine that could play V:SOH today and make you drool at the video goodness? Are they going the EQ2 launch route and making the specs unreachable with current technology?


    Latest hints:

    Unofficially, a 2.8, 1 gig, and an x800 or x850 (or nvidia equvalent) would be good.

    Unofficially, a 3.0, 2 gigs, and an x1800 or higher (or nvidia equivalent) plus pci-express and a fast FSB would be the high mark.




    Not at all unreasonable. I've got a two year old Rig that could run it on Low/Med Low settings I'm guessing. Right now, you could build a new system that would run the high mark for around $1000 if you shop smart. Simple upgrades are much cheaper if you have a newish machine already.

    image

  • ManaleeshiManaleeshi Member Posts: 6


    Originally posted by nexus42
    Aren't you going to have to own a killer rig to play Vanguard
    though? What would be the configuration of a machine that could play
    V:SOH today and make you drool at the video goodness? Are
    they going the EQ2 launch route and making the specs unreachable with
    current technology?


    That didnt happen like EQ2. They have the ability to keep upgrading it
    though. Its on Unreal Engine 2 modified to 2.5. So they can upgrade to
    Unreal Engine 3 when they are ready :D Its going to look insanely good
    then.. But at the moment it looks awesome but it also works on a
    current PC if you spend enough. Brad recorded a movie on his PC and it
    was at max settings, and the PC wasn't that extreme.


    It works on a mediocre P4 or less, with 512mb ram and a junky graphics card
    But to get it looking awesome you will have to have better. The only
    requirements we know so far, are WinXP (or better) and a graphics card
    with version 2.0 shaders.


    Some of the movies where recorded on a PC similar to this: AMD64 4200,
    2gig of RAM, Geforce 7800GTX. And it looked REALLY good on that. It
    wasn't too far from maximum settings too :) Thats a pretty average PC
    nowdays, although the 2gig is maybe a bit above average. And some where
    recorded on a similar PC but with a P4 3gig. By the time the game is
    released though, all this stuff is going to be bargain equipment so we
    can pick it up for a great price. Or get something even better and run
    the game on maximum everything :)


    P.S.

    Thanks for posting that quote. There was actually another one i was thinking of, but still havnt found it yet. That quote you quoted is good though. I think that, combined with the FAQ should be enough to calm anyones fears of Sigil losing control. Its just not gunna happen.


  • AnofalyeAnofalye Member, Newbie CommonPosts: 7,433


    Originally posted by waterchan

    Originally posted by Anofalye

    It is a mistake, however it is a mistake I would be ready to cope with, crafting/tradeskilling.  Maybe they will make it interesting, if not, I can "bear it", since my love for grouping is just that big.



    How is providing crafting as an altermate means of end-game advancement a mistake?

    If crafting in Vanguard stays true to its FAQ, I think it will be quite interesting.



    Simply because, if all you want to do is solo/group, then why enforce crafting on such a player?  I can cope with it, bear it, will I like it?  I doubt it, I never did in the past, the only reason I will craft in any game is for the edges it gave in grouping or soloing, because these are the 2 gameplays I enjoy.  Enforcing other gameplays is always a mistake, yet I can cope with some...I won't cope with other such as PvP or Raiding.  And now that peoples KNOW what raiding is (which wasn't the case back with EQ), most won't cope with raiding either.

    - "If I understand you well, you are telling me until next time. " - Ren

  • ManaleeshiManaleeshi Member Posts: 6
    dont worry, im not interested in crafting but there will still be plenty to do, high level or otherwise.

  • matraquematraque Member Posts: 1,431


    Originally posted by anarchyart

    Originally posted by Amathe
    Yet their recent PR push now refers to Vanguard as the "WoW killer" .

    Show me ONE advertisement paid for by Sigil that says this and not only will I not ever come back to this site but I will quit playing Video games forever. If you can't, admit that you're just bored and trolling because once your mount got stuck in the PoK and you've never forgiven SOE.

    PC Gamer no 152 :

    IN-DEPTH PREVIEW :
    VANGUARD
    The world's first true WoW Killer ?


    they don't state if it's a WoW killer, they try to find out.

    eqnext.wikia.com

  • AraduneAradune Sigil Games CEOMember RarePosts: 294


    Originally posted by matraque

    Originally posted by anarchyart

    Originally posted by Amathe
    Yet their recent PR push now refers to Vanguard as the "WoW killer" .

    Show me ONE advertisement paid for by Sigil that says this and not only will I not ever come back to this site but I will quit playing Video games forever. If you can't, admit that you're just bored and trolling because once your mount got stuck in the PoK and you've never forgiven SOE.

    PC Gamer no 152 :

    IN-DEPTH PREVIEW :
    VANGUARD
    The world's first true WoW Killer ?


    they don't state if it's a WoW killer, they try to find out.


    Yep.  And for absolute clarity, that is not an ad placed by us, but text placed by them on their cover and then they do their own preview of the game inside the mag.

    --

    --------------------------------------------------------------
    Brad McQuaid
    CCO, Visionary Realms, Inc.
    www.pantheonmmo.com
    --------------------------------------------------------------

  • anarchyartanarchyart Member Posts: 5,378


    Originally posted by jonaku
    I'm seeing more than a handful.
    We'll just have to agree to disagree on this one since it's a violation of the Rules of Conduct to link to any NDA-breaking posts about the Vanguard beta or to disclose any information from an NDA leak. As such, I can't "prove" to you with "evidence" how I am right and you are wrong in this forum.
    I stand by my position that in beta 3, I am finding on the Internet plenty of leaks very critical of the game.


    K. Let's say you see thousands of NDA breakers, just for arguements sake. Don't ignore my point that people who break the NDA are breaking their word, so why should anyone trust a single thing they say? They agreed to a legally binding contract not to reveal anything about the beta and then break this agreement. Logic dictates not to trust them as far as you can shotput them.

    image
  • anarchyartanarchyart Member Posts: 5,378


    Originally posted by Aradune

    Originally posted by matraque
    PC Gamer no 152 :

    IN-DEPTH PREVIEW :
    VANGUARD
    The world's first true WoW Killer ?


    they don't state if it's a WoW killer, they try to find out.


    Yep.  And for absolute clarity, that is not an ad placed by us, but text placed by them on their cover and then they do their own preview of the game inside the mag.



    Exactly, and why did they do this? It's a magazine! They want to sell copies and stir up discussion. And then some intertroll tells people this is part of the Sigil PR campaign. UGH!

    image
  • baphametbaphamet Member RarePosts: 3,311


    Originally posted by jonaku

    Originally posted by Manaleeshi
    Originally posted by jonakuTo the degree that you blame SOE for the demise of SWG (like I do), then you should read http://www.mmorpg.com/discussion2.cfm/thread/79948 "SOE Will Buy Sigil Eventually". The co-marketing relationship could be the prelude to SOE buying out Sigil 12 to 18 months down the road. Sigil does not deny that this is a possibility.Yes they do :) Theres a recent Brad quote saying they will never sell to Sigil and we "Have his word on it". He isn't going to break his word over something important like that to a community of hundreds of thousands of people.. :)p.s. I'll look for the quote=====================================Please provide the quote on that. I think you will find that you have misinterpreted/misrecollected the actual quote. He may have given his word that in the co-marketing relationship Sigil will have final dev say, but in the case of a buy-out, his word is meaningless since SOE will legally own Sigil's IP.

    jonaku, ofcource sigil isn't going to deny that someday they might sell the company. just because they don't rule out that possibility doesn't mean that they are going to be selling to soe.

    for all we know Microsoft could buy the company, why do you automatically assume that it would have to be soe? and why do you automatically assume that just because soe is co-publishing vanguard then that automatically increases the chances of sigil being bought by soe?

    why did we not hear all of you anti-soe lunatics complain about this before the soe/vanguard announcement? any company can possibly be buying sigil in the future, not just soe.

    and while we are at it, jonaku why don't you provide me with a link from any of the other big successful mmog companies where they guarantee they will never sell their company?

    don't post a mythic link, they already sold to EA.... why don't you go complain about that to? ::::12::

  • jonakujonaku Member Posts: 281


    Originally posted by anarchyart

    Originally posted by jonaku
    I'm seeing more than a handful.
    We'll just have to agree to disagree on this one since it's a violation of the Rules of Conduct to link to any NDA-breaking posts about the Vanguard beta or to disclose any information from an NDA leak. As such, I can't "prove" to you with "evidence" how I am right and you are wrong in this forum.
    I stand by my position that in beta 3, I am finding on the Internet plenty of leaks very critical of the game.

    K. Let's say you see thousands of NDA breakers, just for arguements sake. Don't ignore my point that people who break the NDA are breaking their word, so why should anyone trust a single thing they say? They agreed to a legally binding contract not to reveal anything about the beta and then break this agreement. Logic dictates not to trust them as far as you can shotput them.

    It was thanks to the NDA breakers of late beta D&L and Mourning that people were thankfully scared away from those 2 disastrous flops. People broke NDA on WOW to say how awesome it was. Yes, it's illegal to break NDA, but let's not be reductionist and assume a black & white world in which all crimes are equally demented. Yes, they broke NDA, but that doesn't mean they're scum of the earth pedophiles who pathologically lie about everything.
  • jonakujonaku Member Posts: 281


    Originally posted by Vengeful

    Originally posted by jonaku

    Originally posted by Manaleeshi

    Originally posted by jonaku

    To the degree that you blame SOE for the demise of SWG (like I do), then you should read http://www.mmorpg.com/discussion2.cfm/thread/79948 "SOE Will Buy Sigil Eventually". The co-marketing relationship could be the prelude to SOE buying out Sigil 12 to 18 months down the road. Sigil does not deny that this is a possibility.



    Yes they do :) Theres a recent Brad quote saying they will never sell to Sigil and we "Have his word on it". He isn't going to break his word over something important like that to a community of hundreds of thousands of people.. :)

    p.s. I'll look for the quote

    =====================================

    Please provide the quote on that. I think you will find that you have misinterpreted/misrecollected the actual quote. He may have given his word that in the co-marketing relationship Sigil will have final dev say, but in the case of a buy-out, his word is meaningless since SOE will legally own Sigil's IP.


    Most recent...

    http://www.vanguardsoh.com/forums/showthread.php?t=71458&page=3


    Vengeful's quote in no way addresses the issue. All it does is describe how responsibilities are split between SOE and Sigil.

    In this thread http://www.vanguardsoh.com/forums/showthread.php?t=51136, Jon Grande, the VP of Business Development, has twice said that it is possible that SOE may someday acquire Sigil. He says it's unlikely to happen, but he is very careful to explicitly say that is a possibility... twice.

    If SOE buys out Sigil, then people like Grande could probably retire as millionaires from this one transaction. The fact is that McQuaid has called Smedley one of his best friends. Many times, before an M&A happens, 2 companies will engage in a strategic partnership so that high level executives from both sides will get to know each other and develop trust before a full on acquisition happens.

    See http://www.mmorpg.com/discussion2.cfm/thread/79948 for more information.


  • baphametbaphamet Member RarePosts: 3,311

    [quote]Originally posted by jonaku

    Vengeful's quote in no way addresses the issue. All it does is describe how responsibilities are split between SOE and Sigil.
    In this thread http://www.vanguardsoh.com/forums/showthread.php?t=51136, Jon Grande, the VP of Business Development, has twice said that it is possible that SOE may someday acquire Sigil. He says it's unlikely to happen, but he is very careful to explicitly say that is a possibility... twice.
    If SOE buys out Sigil, then people like Grande could probably retire as millionaires from this one transaction. The fact is that McQuaid has called Smedley one of his best friends. Many times, before an M&A happens, 2 companies will engage in a strategic partnership so that high level executives from both sides will get to know each other and develop trust before a full on acquisition happens.
    See [url=http://www.mmorpg.com/discussion2.cfm/thread/79948] for more information.
    [/quote]

    yes its a possibility jonaku, just like it is possible that someday you might give up on your ant-soe crusade, however unlikely but it could happen. ::::18::

    this is a busniess....do you really expect them to guarantee you that they will never sell their company? you are not being realistic, not only do you want the game to be catered just for you....but you want them to guarantee you that they will never sell their company, a company and a game they created not you....how selfish is that?

This discussion has been closed.