propably a dev trying to make some marketing for vanguard saga of vanbois...
since lord of the rings online pre-order started last week and since its official release is in a few days there is no reason to play vanguard anymore and I highly doubt that vanguard has a overpopulation problem
lord of the rings is far better than vanguard and runs 10.000 times more stable, so please stop making commerical for dark and light's brother, since we are no idiots..
SOE and NGE-Star Wars Galalaxies: Raph Koster: "It's like dumping the girlfriend who has always been patient and loving to chase after the supermodel who probably won't love you back."
"server overpopulation" LOL propably a dev trying to make some marketing for vanguard saga of vanbois... since lord of the rings online pre-order started last week and since its official release is in a few days there is no reason to play vanguard anymore and I highly doubt that vanguard has a overpopulation problem lord of the rings is far better than vanguard and runs 10.000 times more stable, so please stop making commerical for dark and light's brother, since we are no idiots..
Hear hear!
I agree, even on the SOE forum people are asking for a server merge since the LOTR preorder came out. And to be honest it's 2007 now, customers don't have to put up with hardcore grinding and bad performance anymore to play a mmo, that type of gameplay died with the age of Anarchy Online.
"server overpopulation" LOL propably a dev trying to make some marketing for vanguard saga of vanbois...
Oh, dang! You caught me. Yes this is a Sigil developer. I'm very frustrating trying to post my "viral" messages. Every time I do some incredibly bright child on the forum catches me!
You kids are making it very hard from an honest developer to post viral messages on the server.
Last night my questing was thwarted by three large groups of players who descended on the large lizardman village near the Upside Defenses Garrison my friend and I were questing in. The village was cleaned out and we were locked in a race to lag mobs. The night before it was the same thing over near Donovan's Roost Does anyone know of any out of the way questing areas for characters in their early 20s on Qalia?
There is a server over-population problem on Vanguard servers?
Wow, I haven't noticed that on my server at all..
Im on Flroendyl, btw.
Florendyl is underpopulated.
Damn...underpopulated....you sure you play vanguard on that server? If you think it's underpopulated i don't want to hear you say a server is overpopulated...but hey! I am sure you know what you are talking about and the players i meet arent really around....must be the booze here...
"server overpopulation" LOL propably a dev trying to make some marketing for vanguard saga of vanbois... since lord of the rings online pre-order started last week and since its official release is in a few days there is no reason to play vanguard anymore and I highly doubt that vanguard has a overpopulation problem lord of the rings is far better than vanguard and runs 10.000 times more stable, so please stop making commerical for dark and light's brother, since we are no idiots..
It's obvious enough that you are an idiot with statements like that. But Hey! have fun with the rest of the kids in lord of the rings, you suit perfectly for that.
"server overpopulation" LOL propably a dev trying to make some marketing for vanguard saga of vanbois... since lord of the rings online pre-order started last week and since its official release is in a few days there is no reason to play vanguard anymore and I highly doubt that vanguard has a overpopulation problem lord of the rings is far better than vanguard and runs 10.000 times more stable, so please stop making commerical for dark and light's brother, since we are no idiots..
Hear hear!
I agree, even on the SOE forum people are asking for a server merge since the LOTR preorder came out. And to be honest it's 2007 now, customers don't have to put up with hardcore grinding and bad performance anymore to play a mmo, that type of gameplay died with the age of Anarchy Online.
Yup thousands and thousands of players left vanguard for a kiddie game. Keep dreaming though you amuse me.
"server overpopulation" LOL propably a dev trying to make some marketing for vanguard saga of vanbois... since lord of the rings online pre-order started last week and since its official release is in a few days there is no reason to play vanguard anymore and I highly doubt that vanguard has a overpopulation problem lord of the rings is far better than vanguard and runs 10.000 times more stable, so please stop making commerical for dark and light's brother, since we are no idiots..
Hear hear!
I agree, even on the SOE forum people are asking for a server merge since the LOTR preorder came out. And to be honest it's 2007 now, customers don't have to put up with hardcore grinding and bad performance anymore to play a mmo, that type of gameplay died with the age of Anarchy Online.
Yup thousands and thousands of players left vanguard for a kiddie game. Keep dreaming though you amuse me.
You do understand that the one that is dreaming is you Gin. No offense bro, but in reality gamers will always play the game which is most fun for them. In reality if people leave Vanguard for LotrO then reality tells me that they like LotrO more then Vanguard. Sure we have some gamers that pure because something runs well they will play it. But there also are gamers with different taste in games in which Vanguard offers allot of different things compared to LotrO, yes i've been in beta with lotro since december 2006 but thought febuari 2007 i stopped playing as i kinda had enough for a while of LotrO as it did not capture me for long, might jump in in a few months from now just maybe. But also seeing the development Vanguard has gone thru also been with it since last decemeber 2006 i still enjoy Vanguard because of the choices the game offers. But in all seriousness people will always play the game which is most fun to them. Why is that so increddible diffecult for some people to understand is really a mistery. Maybe i will play Vanguard another 2 months maybe another 2 year, who knows......
"server overpopulation" LOL propably a dev trying to make some marketing for vanguard saga of vanbois... since lord of the rings online pre-order started last week and since its official release is in a few days there is no reason to play vanguard anymore and I highly doubt that vanguard has a overpopulation problem lord of the rings is far better than vanguard and runs 10.000 times more stable, so please stop making commerical for dark and light's brother, since we are no idiots..
Hear hear!
I agree, even on the SOE forum people are asking for a server merge since the LOTR preorder came out. And to be honest it's 2007 now, customers don't have to put up with hardcore grinding and bad performance anymore to play a mmo, that type of gameplay died with the age of Anarchy Online.
Anarchy Online is doing fine... it's an old lady that has retained plenty of its old timers and sees plenty of them coming back for a while every now and then... one day you'll learn that a nice community is more important than flashy mickey graphics or 15 mins doable targets.
As for no reason to play Vanguard because LOTRO is going live?
Make us all a huge favor and return play smurfs online and enjoy the company of a gazillion teens (and plz post on THOSES forums!!)
"since we are no idiots"... not idiots: just different people with different interests and a huge incapacity to imagine that maybe not everybody is interested in the same stuff
Damn...underpopulated....you sure you play vanguard on that server? If you think it's underpopulated i don't want to hear you say a server is overpopulated...but hey! I am sure you know what you are talking about and the players i meet arent really around....must be the booze here...
Lol! Yes, exactly. There's nothing more comical then some sap trying to convince me not to trust my own "lying eyes."
Neither invis, horse or death occur for me when I chunk. My illusions do drop though. Also 1-2 secs of freeze when changing chunks is WAY different than a couple of mins zoning. If your mind cannot understand the difference, its beyond me to explain.
Several minutes to zone? EQ2 zones take 2-5 seconds to load for me and I don't have to "load" more when I get near things which causes more stutters, etc...
Back when EQ2 was releasead you could go do something else while a zone was loading. Especially if you didnt have a top performance pc. Nowdays after 2 years of optimazation and advance in computer technology is much better. Still tnowhere near (2-5) secs you claim. Even if you do have a comp that will load you fast, dont tell me that you dont have to wait for other people while zoning for a raid. Its bio time for us. Dont have time now, will explain to you later the difference between chunking and zoning ,their cons and pros of how I see them. But dont give me chunking as game breaking characteristic and immersion killer, when you play games with zoning which take 10 times as much time to load you from one area to the other. In my opinion its just plain stupid.
Yes EQ2 loads zones in 2-5 seconds for me. It always has loaded quickly for me. I still have the same computer that I had when I played it on release. Ram is very important with EQ2 for zone loading, I have 2gig. If your raid members only have 512mb then they are gonna wait awhile but I doubt that is any different with Vanguard. Have 512 that chunk is gonna take longer to load. Plus when you walk up to a object sometimes it still has to load again. I don't have to worry in EQ2 about having things pop up out of nowhere because they didn't load when I zoned and cause me to stutter while it does so. I would take zones any day over these "chunks" of Vanguard.
"server overpopulation" LOL propably a dev trying to make some marketing for vanguard saga of vanbois... since lord of the rings online pre-order started last week and since its official release is in a few days there is no reason to play vanguard anymore and I highly doubt that vanguard has a overpopulation problem lord of the rings is far better than vanguard and runs 10.000 times more stable, so please stop making commerical for dark and light's brother, since we are no idiots..
Hear hear!
I agree, even on the SOE forum people are asking for a server merge since the LOTR preorder came out. And to be honest it's 2007 now, customers don't have to put up with hardcore grinding and bad performance anymore to play a mmo, that type of gameplay died with the age of Anarchy Online.
Yup thousands and thousands of players left vanguard for a kiddie game. Keep dreaming though you amuse me.
You do understand that the one that is dreaming is you Gin. No offense bro, but in reality gamers will always play the game which is most fun for them. In reality if people leave Vanguard for LotrO then reality tells me that they like LotrO more then Vanguard. Sure we have some gamers that pure because something runs well they will play it. But there also are gamers with different taste in games in which Vanguard offers allot of different things compared to LotrO, yes i've been in beta with lotro since december 2006 but thought febuari 2007 i stopped playing as i kinda had enough for a while of LotrO as it did not capture me for long, might jump in in a few months from now just maybe. But also seeing the development Vanguard has gone thru also been with it since last decemeber 2006 i still enjoy Vanguard because of the choices the game offers. But in all seriousness people will always play the game which is most fun to them. Why is that so increddible diffecult for some people to understand is really a mistery. Maybe i will play Vanguard another 2 months maybe another 2 year, who knows...... I don't believe that someone who is into vanguard loves a basic mmorpg like lotr. Sure i understand people are into that sort of games (afterall 8 mill people play that other basic mmorpg called WoW so they must have done something right). Me? I rather prefer vanguard. So i dare to say it bluntly, those who left vanguard for lotr shouldnt even have started the big boys game. But that's the fun of having different taste now isn't it.
So i dare to say it bluntly, those who left vanguard for lotr shouldnt even have started the big boys game. But that's the fun of having different taste now isn't it.
If being a "big boy" means paying to play a beta in order to help a dillusional idiot fund his vision while he can't even accurately put system requirements on the box that actually work, and blaming the rest of the world for having bad hardware when he doesn't support the latest graphics cards, then the rest of will be quite happy waiting for our balls to drop or a dev to make a game that works (whatever comes first).
So i dare to say it bluntly, those who left vanguard for lotr shouldnt even have started the big boys game. But that's the fun of having different taste now isn't it.
If being a "big boy" means paying to play a beta in order to help a dillusional idiot fund his vision while he can't even accurately put system requirements on the box that actually work, and blaming the rest of the world for having bad hardware when he doesn't support the latest graphics cards, then the rest of will be quite happy waiting for our balls to drop or a dev to make a game that works (whatever comes first). Those complaining about not being able to run the game should stick to consoles since they use crappy pc's. But hey! i heard lotr is a good game for wannabee gamers so you would fit in perfectly! Now go back to your crappy pc, loadup lotr and play with people named legooolassss, aaaaaraaagggoonnnnn. ANd have fun with the bots since the news is that harvesting bots are already going rampart!
So i dare to say it bluntly, those who left vanguard for lotr shouldnt even have started the big boys game. But that's the fun of having different taste now isn't it.
If being a "big boy" means paying to play a beta in order to help a dillusional idiot fund his vision while he can't even accurately put system requirements on the box that actually work, and blaming the rest of the world for having bad hardware when he doesn't support the latest graphics cards, then the rest of will be quite happy waiting for our balls to drop or a dev to make a game that works (whatever comes first). Those complaining about not being able to run the game should stick to consoles since they use crappy pc's. But hey! i heard lotr is a good game for wannabee gamers so you would fit in perfectly! Oh so its finally come to this. " you arent man enough to play VG" "You arent mature enough to appreciate VG" " Your Epeen is to small to play VG" ...
Desperation stinks. This sort of reverse physiological Viral marketing is pathetic.
Damn...underpopulated....you sure you play vanguard on that server? If you think it's underpopulated i don't want to hear you say a server is overpopulated...but hey! I am sure you know what you are talking about and the players i meet arent really around....must be the booze here...
Lol! Yes, exactly. There's nothing more comical then some sap trying to convince me not to trust my own "lying eyes." Yup my lying eyes yesterday told me that a dungeon was to full to have good fun.....all those imaginary players....tsk tsk Sigil uses imaginary players to get the game filled up with people...florendyl is so empty.....the next guy stating that florendyl is empty should get a slap in the face for lying out of his ass.
So i dare to say it bluntly, those who left vanguard for lotr shouldnt even have started the big boys game. But that's the fun of having different taste now isn't it.
If being a "big boy" means paying to play a beta in order to help a dillusional idiot fund his vision while he can't even accurately put system requirements on the box that actually work, and blaming the rest of the world for having bad hardware when he doesn't support the latest graphics cards, then the rest of will be quite happy waiting for our balls to drop or a dev to make a game that works (whatever comes first).
Don't always believe the system requirements what publishers would print (gamers should know better by know). I really do not think any of the below games can truly be enjoy'd or even played decent at those spec requirements.
And that notion about "help a dillusional idiot fund his vision while he can't even accurately put system requirements on the box that actually work "sorry to say but really makes no sense at all. Really why that disrespectfull, you are not the one that has spend 30mill. you sure act like it. No offence bro but seriously check other games if Vanguard isn't fun for you.
Oblivion Minimum System Requirements:
Windows XP, Windows 2000, Windows XP 64-bit
512MB System RAM
2 Ghz Intel Pentium 4 or equivalent processor
128MB Direct3D compatible video card
and DirectX 9.0 compatible driver;
8x DVD-ROM drive
4.6 GB free hard disk space
DirectX 9.0c (included)
DirectX 8.1 compatible sound card
Keyboard, Mouse
Quake 4 Minimum System Requirements
English version of Windows 2000/XP
Pentium 4 2.0 GHz or Athlon XP 2000+ Processor
512MB RAM
8x speed CD-ROM drive and latest drivers
2.8GB uncompressed hard-drive space, plus 400MB for Windows swap file
100% DirectX 9.0c compatible 16-bit sound card and latest drivers
100% Windows 2000/XP compatible mouse, keyboard and latest drivers
DirectX 9.0c included
3D Hardware Accelerator Card required
100% DirectX 9.0c compatible 64MB
Hardware Accelerated video card and the latest drivers
S.T.A.L.K.E.R. Minimum System Requirements:
Microsoft® Windows® XP (Service Pack 2)/Microsoft® Windows® 2000 SP4 * Intel Pentium 4 2 Ghz/AMD XP 2200+ * 512 MB RAM * 10 GB available hard drive space * 128 MB DirectX® 9c compatible card/ nVIDIA® GeForce(tm) 5700/ATI Radeon® 9600 * DirectX® 9 compatible sound card * LAN/ Internet connection with Cable/DSL speeds for multiplayer * Keyboard, Mouse. RECOMMENDED SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS: Intel Core 2 Duo E6400/AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+ * 1 GB RAM or better * 256 MB DirectX® 9c compatible card/ nVIDIA® GeForce(tm) 7900/ ATI Radeon® X1850.
Everquest II Minimum System Requirements:
Operating System: Windows 98/2000/ME/XP
Processor: 1GHz
RAM: 512 MB
Video Card: DirectX 9 compatible. Pixel shader and vertex shader compatible hardware with 64 MB of texture memory
Sound Card: DirectSound
I really do not think that what a game tells on the box as being min.specs really do not let those games play well. LOL at EQ2
So i dare to say it bluntly, those who left vanguard for lotr shouldnt even have started the big boys game. But that's the fun of having different taste now isn't it.
If being a "big boy" means paying to play a beta in order to help a dillusional idiot fund his vision while he can't even accurately put system requirements on the box that actually work, and blaming the rest of the world for having bad hardware when he doesn't support the latest graphics cards, then the rest of will be quite happy waiting for our balls to drop or a dev to make a game that works (whatever comes first). Those complaining about not being able to run the game should stick to consoles since they use crappy pc's. But hey! i heard lotr is a good game for wannabee gamers so you would fit in perfectly! Oh so its finally come to this. " you arent man enough to play VG" "You arent mature enough to appreciate VG" " Your Epeen is to small to play VG" ...
Desperation stinks. This sort of reverse physiological Viral marketing is pathetic. The only thing that stinks on this forum is trolls like you lying their asses off to look smart. IDesperation? Not needed here vanguard is fine and doing well but that's something the vg haters will deny. Keep it coming kid, you amuse me.
So i dare to say it bluntly, those who left vanguard for lotr shouldnt even have started the big boys game. But that's the fun of having different taste now isn't it.
If being a "big boy" means paying to play a beta in order to help a dillusional idiot fund his vision while he can't even accurately put system requirements on the box that actually work, and blaming the rest of the world for having bad hardware when he doesn't support the latest graphics cards, then the rest of will be quite happy waiting for our balls to drop or a dev to make a game that works (whatever comes first).
Don't always believe the system requirements what publishers would print (gamers should know better by know). I really do not think any of the below games can truly be enjoy'd or even played decent at those spec requirements.
I really do not think that what a game tells on the box as being min.specs really do not let those games play well. LOL at EQ2
People who buy a game while only looking at the min-specs are pc noobs. But they do amuse me...daily
A large majority of members of this board nowadays are freeloaders who go from beta to beta to F2P to Trials, ad infinitum. No surprise they leave VG once its time to sub up and join the next new free offering.
A large majority of members of this board nowadays are freeloaders who go from beta to beta to F2P to Trials, ad infinitum. No surprise they leave VG once its time to sub up and join the next new free offering.
Thats very true. too bad Vanguard didnt have what it takes to make these people WANT to Stick around..
Originally posted by dimmit77 Originally posted by fulmanfu yes he is. its just a bit under 50k subbed at the moment.
No I am not. I base this number from an official statement from one of the people in sigil. Where do YOUbase your number? Intuition? Divine inspiration? The force? A little green man came down and told you?
odd, because the last they have said (brad himself) was that they were approaching 200k sales, pretty popular post of his. meaning less than that. well over half have left or never went past the free month, as has also been leaked. you do the math. so who/where did you read they have 200k+ subs? would love to see that one
Comments
"server overpopulation"
LOL
propably a dev trying to make some marketing for vanguard saga of vanbois...
since lord of the rings online pre-order started last week and since its official release is in a few days there is no reason to play vanguard anymore and I highly doubt that vanguard has a overpopulation problem
lord of the rings is far better than vanguard and runs 10.000 times more stable, so please stop making commerical for dark and light's brother, since we are no idiots..
SOE and NGE-Star Wars Galalaxies:
Raph Koster: "It's like dumping the girlfriend who has always been patient and loving to chase after the supermodel who probably won't love you back."
Hear hear!
I agree, even on the SOE forum people are asking for a server merge since the LOTR preorder came out. And to be honest it's 2007 now, customers don't have to put up with hardcore grinding and bad performance anymore to play a mmo, that type of gameplay died with the age of Anarchy Online.
Oh, dang! You caught me. Yes this is a Sigil developer. I'm very frustrating trying to post my "viral" messages. Every time I do some incredibly bright child on the forum catches me!
You kids are making it very hard from an honest developer to post viral messages on the server.
You are just too smart!
Wow, I haven't noticed that on my server at all..
Im on Flroendyl, btw.
Florendyl is underpopulated.
Damn...underpopulated....you sure you play vanguard on that server? If you think it's underpopulated i don't want to hear you say a server is overpopulated...but hey! I am sure you know what you are talking about and the players i meet arent really around....must be the booze here...
Hear hear!
I agree, even on the SOE forum people are asking for a server merge since the LOTR preorder came out. And to be honest it's 2007 now, customers don't have to put up with hardcore grinding and bad performance anymore to play a mmo, that type of gameplay died with the age of Anarchy Online.
Yup thousands and thousands of players left vanguard for a kiddie game. Keep dreaming though you amuse me.Hear hear!
I agree, even on the SOE forum people are asking for a server merge since the LOTR preorder came out. And to be honest it's 2007 now, customers don't have to put up with hardcore grinding and bad performance anymore to play a mmo, that type of gameplay died with the age of Anarchy Online.
Yup thousands and thousands of players left vanguard for a kiddie game. Keep dreaming though you amuse me.You do understand that the one that is dreaming is you Gin. No offense bro, but in reality gamers will always play the game which is most fun for them. In reality if people leave Vanguard for LotrO then reality tells me that they like LotrO more then Vanguard. Sure we have some gamers that pure because something runs well they will play it. But there also are gamers with different taste in games in which Vanguard offers allot of different things compared to LotrO, yes i've been in beta with lotro since december 2006 but thought febuari 2007 i stopped playing as i kinda had enough for a while of LotrO as it did not capture me for long, might jump in in a few months from now just maybe. But also seeing the development Vanguard has gone thru also been with it since last decemeber 2006 i still enjoy Vanguard because of the choices the game offers. But in all seriousness people will always play the game which is most fun to them. Why is that so increddible diffecult for some people to understand is really a mistery. Maybe i will play Vanguard another 2 months maybe another 2 year, who knows......
Hear hear!
I agree, even on the SOE forum people are asking for a server merge since the LOTR preorder came out. And to be honest it's 2007 now, customers don't have to put up with hardcore grinding and bad performance anymore to play a mmo, that type of gameplay died with the age of Anarchy Online.
Anarchy Online is doing fine... it's an old lady that has retained plenty of its old timers and sees plenty of them coming back for a while every now and then... one day you'll learn that a nice community is more important than flashy mickey graphics or 15 mins doable targets.
As for no reason to play Vanguard because LOTRO is going live?
Make us all a huge favor and return play smurfs online and enjoy the company of a gazillion teens (and plz post on THOSES forums!!)
"since we are no idiots"... not idiots: just different people with different interests and a huge incapacity to imagine that maybe not everybody is interested in the same stuff
Back when EQ2 was releasead you could go do something else while a zone was loading. Especially if you didnt have a top performance pc. Nowdays after 2 years of optimazation and advance in computer technology is much better. Still tnowhere near (2-5) secs you claim. Even if you do have a comp that will load you fast, dont tell me that you dont have to wait for other people while zoning for a raid. Its bio time for us. Dont have time now, will explain to you later the difference between chunking and zoning ,their cons and pros of how I see them. But dont give me chunking as game breaking characteristic and immersion killer, when you play games with zoning which take 10 times as much time to load you from one area to the other. In my opinion its just plain stupid.
Yes EQ2 loads zones in 2-5 seconds for me. It always has loaded quickly for me. I still have the same computer that I had when I played it on release. Ram is very important with EQ2 for zone loading, I have 2gig. If your raid members only have 512mb then they are gonna wait awhile but I doubt that is any different with Vanguard. Have 512 that chunk is gonna take longer to load. Plus when you walk up to a object sometimes it still has to load again. I don't have to worry in EQ2 about having things pop up out of nowhere because they didn't load when I zoned and cause me to stutter while it does so. I would take zones any day over these "chunks" of Vanguard.
(P.S. Yes I know your not a real dev)
Hear hear!
I agree, even on the SOE forum people are asking for a server merge since the LOTR preorder came out. And to be honest it's 2007 now, customers don't have to put up with hardcore grinding and bad performance anymore to play a mmo, that type of gameplay died with the age of Anarchy Online.
Yup thousands and thousands of players left vanguard for a kiddie game. Keep dreaming though you amuse me.You do understand that the one that is dreaming is you Gin. No offense bro, but in reality gamers will always play the game which is most fun for them. In reality if people leave Vanguard for LotrO then reality tells me that they like LotrO more then Vanguard. Sure we have some gamers that pure because something runs well they will play it. But there also are gamers with different taste in games in which Vanguard offers allot of different things compared to LotrO, yes i've been in beta with lotro since december 2006 but thought febuari 2007 i stopped playing as i kinda had enough for a while of LotrO as it did not capture me for long, might jump in in a few months from now just maybe. But also seeing the development Vanguard has gone thru also been with it since last decemeber 2006 i still enjoy Vanguard because of the choices the game offers. But in all seriousness people will always play the game which is most fun to them. Why is that so increddible diffecult for some people to understand is really a mistery. Maybe i will play Vanguard another 2 months maybe another 2 year, who knows......
TwitchTV Partnered Streamer
MMORPG.com Spotlight Blog Writer
Co-Leader of Inquisition
Youtube Channel
Desperation stinks. This sort of reverse physiological Viral marketing is pathetic.
Don't always believe the system requirements what publishers would print (gamers should know better by know). I really do not think any of the below games can truly be enjoy'd or even played decent at those spec requirements.
And that notion about "help a dillusional idiot fund his vision while he can't even accurately put system requirements on the box that actually work " sorry to say but really makes no sense at all. Really why that disrespectfull, you are not the one that has spend 30mill. you sure act like it. No offence bro but seriously check other games if Vanguard isn't fun for you.
Oblivion Minimum System Requirements:
Quake 4 Minimum System Requirements
English version of Windows 2000/XP
Pentium 4 2.0 GHz or Athlon XP 2000+ Processor
512MB RAM
8x speed CD-ROM drive and latest drivers
2.8GB uncompressed hard-drive space, plus 400MB for Windows swap file
100% DirectX 9.0c compatible 16-bit sound card and latest drivers
100% Windows 2000/XP compatible mouse, keyboard and latest drivers
DirectX 9.0c included
3D Hardware Accelerator Card required
100% DirectX 9.0c compatible 64MB
Hardware Accelerated video card and the latest drivers
S.T.A.L.K.E.R. Minimum System Requirements:
Microsoft® Windows® XP (Service Pack 2)/Microsoft® Windows® 2000 SP4 * Intel Pentium 4 2 Ghz/AMD XP 2200+ * 512 MB RAM * 10 GB available hard drive space * 128 MB DirectX® 9c compatible card/ nVIDIA® GeForce(tm) 5700/ATI Radeon® 9600 * DirectX® 9 compatible sound card * LAN/ Internet connection with Cable/DSL speeds for multiplayer * Keyboard, Mouse. RECOMMENDED SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS: Intel Core 2 Duo E6400/AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+ * 1 GB RAM or better * 256 MB DirectX® 9c compatible card/ nVIDIA® GeForce(tm) 7900/ ATI Radeon® X1850.
Everquest II Minimum System Requirements:
I really do not think that what a game tells on the box as being min.specs really do not let those games play well. LOL at EQ2
Desperation stinks. This sort of reverse physiological Viral marketing is pathetic. The only thing that stinks on this forum is trolls like you lying their asses off to look smart. IDesperation? Not needed here vanguard is fine and doing well but that's something the vg haters will deny. Keep it coming kid, you amuse me.
Don't always believe the system requirements what publishers would print (gamers should know better by know). I really do not think any of the below games can truly be enjoy'd or even played decent at those spec requirements.
I really do not think that what a game tells on the box as being min.specs really do not let those games play well. LOL at EQ2
People who buy a game while only looking at the min-specs are pc noobs. But they do amuse me...daily
No I am not. I base this number from an official statement from one of the people in sigil. Where do YOUbase your number? Intuition? Divine inspiration? The force? A little green man came down and told you?
odd, because the last they have said (brad himself) was that they were approaching 200k sales, pretty popular post of his. meaning less than that. well over half have left or never went past the free month, as has also been leaked. you do the math. so who/where did you read they have 200k+ subs? would love to see that one