That article is from may 27th 2010, a lot has changed since then. Hell even the event helper has changed since their first demos.
In 2007 they wanted to make a pvp mmo, look how grossly the focus of the game has changed to cater to the masses.
I love this, you get hard evidence that you are wrong, and your response is that is an old article. Did you try and provide video proof to back up what you said or an article; nope just I am right and you’re wrong. See I can do this to, I am a god and I can walk on water, man it is fun to make stuff up without any proof!
Sorry, but everyone knows all games are subject to change, especially during development.
I can provide you hard evidence where they claimed you wouldn't be collecting crap like traditional mmos have you do too, and then they had you collecting harpy glands... things change son.
OH! OH! Please do! <333333
Manifesto... game set and match....
I'm disappointed, RobertDinh (not really). I thought you would do better than this brazen dishonesty.
Any interested parties, here is the manifesto:
There is only dialogue during the first 3:06 of the video, so it won't take up too much of your time. RobertDinh won't eat his words, but the video makes a liar out of him.
That article is from may 27th 2010, a lot has changed since then. Hell even the event helper has changed since their first demos.
In 2007 they wanted to make a pvp mmo, look how grossly the focus of the game has changed to cater to the masses.
I love this, you get hard evidence that you are wrong, and your response is that is an old article. Did you try and provide video proof to back up what you said or an article; nope just I am right and you’re wrong. See I can do this to, I am a god and I can walk on water, man it is fun to make stuff up without any proof!
Sorry, but everyone knows all games are subject to change, especially during development.
I can provide you hard evidence where they claimed you wouldn't be collecting crap like traditional mmos have you do too, and then they had you collecting harpy glands... things change son.
OH! OH! Please do! <333333
Manifesto... game set and match....
I'm disappointed, RobertDinh (not really). I thought you would do better than this brazen dishonesty.
Any interested parties, here is the manifesto:
There is only dialogue during the first 3:06 of the video, so it won't take up too much of your time. RobertDinh won't eat his words, but the video makes a liar out of him.
Manifesto has been covered. You failed to acknowledge you were beaten on that one. Try another.
Seems you failed to cover collecting wolf parts, as opposed to collecting harpy glands....
game set and match....
To be honest your coverage of the manifesto was so subjective and flawed I didn't even want to waste time addressing it.
You claim to want everyone to be well informed, but you are just a sheep in wolf's clothing.
Um whaaa? Wolf pelts were never mentioned in the maifesto. You didn't address it because you chose not to, not because it was subjective or flawed, Maybe you are mixing up your arguments in your circular logic?
That article is from may 27th 2010, a lot has changed since then. Hell even the event helper has changed since their first demos.
In 2007 they wanted to make a pvp mmo, look how grossly the focus of the game has changed to cater to the masses.
I love this, you get hard evidence that you are wrong, and your response is that is an old article. Did you try and provide video proof to back up what you said or an article; nope just I am right and you’re wrong. See I can do this to, I am a god and I can walk on water, man it is fun to make stuff up without any proof!
Sorry, but everyone knows all games are subject to change, especially during development.
I can provide you hard evidence where they claimed you wouldn't be collecting crap like traditional mmos have you do too, and then they had you collecting harpy glands... things change son.
OH! OH! Please do! <333333
Manifesto... game set and match....
I'm disappointed, RobertDinh (not really). I thought you would do better than this brazen dishonesty.
Any interested parties, here is the manifesto:
There is only dialogue during the first 3:06 of the video, so it won't take up too much of your time. RobertDinh won't eat his words, but the video makes a liar out of him.
Wolf parts, meet harpy glands.
No wolf parts in the video.
This reminds me of the video where there is severe lag, and some people claiming it didn't look laggy at all... when the screen is at like 5 fps lol.
You get manifesto proof, then you just deny it is there.... absolutely fantastic!
Surprised Robert is back to his old shenangins to be honest. He's more of a believer than an actual contributer. Ya know what, I'm just going to do what he does. Everyone here arguing against Robert, you're ALL right. In every way. Robert's wrong. FACT. Argument ended.
Robert's been spouting off the same crap that he had months ago. He's probably one of the more pathetic posters this site has. He doesn't argue because there's anything to argue about, he argues because he finds things in his own little head to argue about. He will always believe that GW2 is a failure, no matter what.
Robert, I hope you realize that you've lost this entire argument just like you lost the arguments we had 4-5 months ago. Same arguments that you have end up with the same results. Believe that you're right all want, but you're not. In any way shape or form. You're wrong. You'll always be wrong. You'll never be right. Deal with it.
Oh was I wrong that the game suffered insane lag with 50 people on screen casting?
Was I wrong that there were exclamation marks and event helpers?
Was i wrong that they tasked you to collect harpy glands?
Oh wait those are facts... and oh wait, you are in denial.
Now you are gravitating towards ad hominem personal attacks, cause you can't actually win the argument, because my facts are too strong.
Personal attacks? Lol. It's a fact that you're a horrible poster. There's no getting around it.
Ya see, you misunderstand me. You're wrong with the context in which you deliver information. That has always been your downfall just like it is here. As for me winning the argument. I won this same exact argument months ago. Everyone else is winning in this thread. You make arguments that are irrelevant to the point you're trying to make which is "GW2 is the same as other MMOs". You try to simplify it down to its core(an MMO) to make your argument an actual viable one.
Your argument will never be viable.
GW2 is an MMO. That's your pathetic argument. Seriously. That's what it always has been. You try to cover it up but it doesn't work with me because my personality is quite similar to yours. The only difference is that I don't lose arguments because I know what I'm talking about. Threads like these are your stomping grounds. That's why you started defending the OP anyway, because it gives you a chance to start making stupid points. I've got you down to a tee because you're predictable and so are your arguments. You want me to win this argument? Here, let me point you to the numerous posts replying to you. Game, set, and match.
Um I don't think so... I doubt they would delay it until next fall it'll be very end of 2011 or the First Quarter of 2012, delaying it that long would not be good for the game. Considering we only need one more class and dungeons reveals they could easily start open beta testing this year.
Note: Not trying to troll or anything just my opinion, and if I'm wrong with anything I would like to be corrected! Just saying a year and half is WAAAYYY to long I don't think Anet would do that. Also I'd like to note that I respect you as a poster very much and you seem very informed about Guild Wars 2.
Manifesto has been covered. You failed to acknowledge you were beaten on that one. Try another.
Seems you failed to cover collecting wolf parts, as opposed to collecting harpy glands....
game set and match....
To be honest your coverage of the manifesto was so subjective and flawed I didn't even want to waste time addressing it.
You claim to want everyone to be well informed, but you are just a sheep in wolf's clothing.
I assure you MY coverage of the manifesto wasn't subjective and flawed, which, btw, you also never responded to.
Can you link for us please where they said there would be no collections?
Also, can you link a laggy Shatterer video? Can you link anything that backs up anything you're saying?
You're really grasping here. Nobody is buying what you're selling.
"Gamers will no longer buy the argument that every MMO requires a subscription fee to offset server and bandwidth costs. It's not true you know it, and they know it."-Jeff Strain, co-founder of ArenaNet, 2007
Surprised Robert is back to his old shenangins to be honest. He's more of a believer than an actual contributer. Ya know what, I'm just going to do what he does. Everyone here arguing against Robert, you're ALL right. In every way. Robert's wrong. FACT. Argument ended.
Robert's been spouting off the same crap that he had months ago. He's probably one of the more pathetic posters this site has. He doesn't argue because there's anything to argue about, he argues because he finds things in his own little head to argue about. He will always believe that GW2 is a failure, no matter what.
Robert, I hope you realize that you've lost this entire argument just like you lost the arguments we had 4-5 months ago. Same arguments that you have end up with the same results. Believe that you're right all want, but you're not. In any way shape or form. You're wrong. You'll always be wrong. You'll never be right. Deal with it.
Oh was I wrong that the game suffered insane lag with 50 people on screen casting?
Was I wrong that there were exclamation marks and event helpers?
Was i wrong that they tasked you to collect harpy glands?
Oh wait those are facts... and oh wait, you are in denial.
Now you are gravitating towards ad hominem personal attacks, cause you can't actually win the argument, because my facts are too strong.
Personal attacks? Lol. It's a fact that you're a horrible poster. There's no getting around it.
Ya see, you misunderstand me. You're wrong with the context in which you deliver information. That has always been your downfall just like it is here. As for me winning the argument. I won this same exact argument months ago. Everyone else is winning in this thread. You make arguments that are irrelevant to the point you're trying to make which is "GW2 is the same as other MMOs". You try to simplify it down to its core(an MMO) to make your argument an actual viable one.
Your argument will never be viable.
GW2 is an MMO. That's your pathetic argument. Seriously. That's what it always has been. You try to cover it up but it doesn't work with me because my personality is quite similar to yours. The only difference is that I don't lose arguments because I know what I'm talking about. Threads like these are your stomping grounds. That's why you started defending the OP anyway, because it gives you a chance to start making stupid points. I've got you down to a tee because you're predictable and so are your arguments. You want me to win this argument? Here, let me point you to the numerous posts replying to you. Game, set, and match.
You keep feeling special Robert. Stay losing.
Can you please actually construct a rational argument, the personal attacks are so boring to me, and the misconstruing of what i've said and biased assumptions.
Do you actually have anything of substance? Or is this all you can muster up in your existence?
You get manifesto proof, then you just deny it is there.... absolutely fantastic!
Originally posted by someforumguy
Originally posted by FlawSGI
@32 sec mark manifesto claims they are making a game that defies existing conventions. Well that needs no explination since most of the game mechanics are different than todays typical MMO. DE over quest grind, lack of a tank healer mechanic, etc. there are numerouse ones if you cared to look. The part that follows about checking out GW2 is opinion.
@40secs Mike O'brien says they take what we love about GW1 and puts it into a persistent world that's got more active combat and a branching personal story line. You gonna argue the world is persistent and there are story lines? He also says there is a new event system to get people to play together. That is there and whether it gets people to play together is up to the players and open to interpretation. They did however put the system in there. Also he stated still no subscription fees. yeah it's there as well.
@53 secs Daniel Dociu says the game is going for a painterly illistrated asthetic. I can see that in their art style. He says everything feels hand crafted and they treat the art like a character. Opinion but still it's in there.
@1:10 Colin Johansen says the art is visually stuning and never seen before. Yup. Then says the same about combat. I already commented on that.
@1:20 Colin expalins what you do in the typical MMO and what he feels about the rest of the game. He says they don't want to make players grind. I'd say they have delivered there.
@1:37 Colins states they want to change the way they people view combat combat. Done.
@1:40 Ree Soesbee says the MMO structure have lost the ability to make the player feel like a hero because everyone is doing the same thing around you. the boss you killed respawns 10 mins later. It doesn't care that we are there. Her idea of what the MMO is missing no claim there.
@1:58 Colin says you'll get quest text saying one thing that isn't even happening. He says they don't think that's ok. His opinion. He then says in GW2 you'll actually see the centaurs running towards the village and knocking down walls. This is said while a video is showing it actually happening. Also the DE's have been shown int he demos to be doing exactly what is said to be happening. Delivered.
@2:09 Ree says they do not want to build the same MMO that everyone else is building. This is what they want and once again not a claim, although it goes without saying this is exactly what is being done. She goes on to say that in GW2 it is your world and your story. She then says you affect it in a very permanent way. While this could have been taken out of text since it was concerning your personal story, Anet and others here have explained the lack of actual permanent changes to the game in detail. They didn't promise the DE's would change the actual world forever and have said such.
@2:19 Colin says that cause and affect takes place. A single event or decision by a player cascades out in a chain of events. Anet has explained that some DE's are started by the adventure type who stumble apon an item and can make a decision from there that can start an event. While I personally haven't seen this take place, I won't say it is something Anet claims to have and in the game and it won't be there. Based on the DE's and what we know and have seen there is zero reason to lie or go back on this concept.
@2:25 Ree says you are meeting new people. Once again up to the player what to do with these encounters but it is an MMO. She then says you rescue a village that will stay rescued and even have NPC's remember you. Another tidbit I haven't seen for my own eyes but this is not such a hard idea to grasp or doubt. other games have NPC's that remember you. the part about the village staying rescued goes back to permanent world changes. i took that comment as once the DE is completed as a successful rescue there wont be anymore of the baddies that were taking over just wandering around the field outside picking daisies.
@2:31 Ree says the most important thing in any game should be the player and they have built a game for them. Her opinion and not a claim while the part about having built the game for them is open to your interpretation.
The next 4mins and 61 seconds was them showing videos of the game. I don't see what you see. hell you caught me on a day where I feel like actually bothering to bite so there ya go. Now you tell me where they failed to deliver on what they said In the manifesto.
Um I don't think so... I doubt they would delay it until next fall it'll be very end of 2011 or the First Quarter of 2012, delaying it that long would not be good for the game. Considering we only need one more class and dungeons reveals they could easily start open beta testing this year.
Note: Not trying to troll or anything just my opinion, and if I'm wrong with anything I would like to be corrected! Just saying a year and half is WAAAYYY to long I don't think Anet would do that. Also I'd like to note that I respect you as a poster very much and you seem very informed about Guild Wars 2.
From last August when the encounter he's talking about, it will be about a year and a half until release. All our best indications say early 2012.
"Gamers will no longer buy the argument that every MMO requires a subscription fee to offset server and bandwidth costs. It's not true you know it, and they know it."-Jeff Strain, co-founder of ArenaNet, 2007
Basically yes! The Dynamic Event is just another name for generic MMO-quests?So what? Really, there were several of us who figured that was the case when they first announced dynamic events. They are essentially GW's version of daily quests. The difference has only ever been that they can't "fail" and that each event leads to a different one and that they can alter the world depending on what happens. In the end, will dynamic events turn Tyria into a fantasy world simulator? Of course not, that would take an army of designers like 20 years to make.
The only difference Anet is trying to make is that the events respond to you. Ree Soesbee states it directly "The boss you killed respawns 10 minutes later. It doesn't care that I'm there." You kill the invading army and take out their base and then they aren't invading anymore. In other MMOs you get a quest to kill 30 of them and place fire on the buildings in their base, but 10 seconds later the fire is out and the army is still attacking. However, the quest text still tells you "thank you for stopping the army", even though the world does not reflect that at all. THAT is what Anet is combating with dynamic events, nothing else. And to prevent quest kill competition and get random people to play together with minimal effort.
If you feel "bad" about this quest( Collecting Harpi in any way, read the following piece to get yourself in a good mood:
"Some events are triggered by players, and are almost Easter-eggy. There’s one where if players kill the deer in the forest then one of the predators who are used to feeding on
the deer will come out and attack one of the villages. That’s not going to happen unless players are active in the area. Just by the actions, or the times of day, whether it’s day, whether it’s night, whether players were defeated at certain events… there’s lots of things which can happen in an area. Our game is really pretty dense with content. That’s the key. Things constantly changing. A world that feels like it’s alive. You never know what’s around the next corner. That way we can help the game not static, not fall into the particular rhythm."
~The only opinion that matters is your own.Everything else is just advice,~
Manifesto has been covered. You failed to acknowledge you were beaten on that one. Try another.
Seems you failed to cover collecting wolf parts, as opposed to collecting harpy glands....
game set and match....
To be honest your coverage of the manifesto was so subjective and flawed I didn't even want to waste time addressing it.
You claim to want everyone to be well informed, but you are just a sheep in wolf's clothing.
I assure you MY coverage of the manifesto wasn't subjective and flawed, which, btw, you also never responded to.
Can you link for us please where they said there would be no collections?
Also, can you link a laggy Shatterer video? Can you link anything that backs up anything you're saying?
You're really grasping here. Nobody is buying what you're selling.
I assure you that it was. But that's the diff between unbiased mmo followers and biased ones. Unbiased ones go by facts, biased ones deny the existence of exclamation marks, event helpers, server lag, harpy glands, and manifesto statements.
Basically yes! The Dynamic Event is just another name for generic MMO-quests?So what? Really, there were several of us who figured that was the case when they first announced dynamic events. They are essentially GW's version of daily quests. The difference has only ever been that they can't "fail" and that each event leads to a different one and that they can alter the world depending on what happens. In the end, will dynamic events turn Tyria into a fantasy world simulator? Of course not, that would take an army of designers like 20 years to make.
The only difference Anet is trying to make is that the events respond to you. Ree Soesbee states it directly "The boss you killed respawns 10 minutes later. It doesn't care that I'm there." You kill the invading army and take out their base and then they aren't invading anymore. In other MMOs you get a quest to kill 30 of them and place fire on the buildings in their base, but 10 seconds later the fire is out and the army is still attacking. However, the quest text still tells you "thank you for stopping the army", even though the world does not reflect that at all. THAT is what Anet is combating with dynamic events, nothing else. And to prevent quest kill competition and get random people to play together with minimal effort.
If you feel "bad" about this quest( Collecting Harpi in any way, read the following piece to get yourself in a good mood:
"Some events are triggered by players, and are almost Easter-eggy. There’s one where if players kill the deer in the forest then one of the predators who are used to feeding on
the deer will come out and attack one of the villages. That’s not going to happen unless players are active in the area. Just by the actions, or the times of day, whether it’s day, whether it’s night, whether players were defeated at certain events… there’s lots of things which can happen in an area. Our game is really pretty dense with content. That’s the key. Things constantly changing. A world that feels like it’s alive. You never know what’s around the next corner. That way we can help the game not static, not fall into the particular rhythm."
Yes several of us figured that to be the case, and then a plethora of gw2 fans don't understand that and are claiming gw2 is groundbreaking and revolutionary.... zzzzzz
It's sorta like how trion worlds took rift's soul system, which is basically like a talent tree system without initial base class abilities, and claimed it to be ground breaking.
Um I don't think so... I doubt they would delay it until next fall it'll be very end of 2011 or the First Quarter of 2012, delaying it that long would not be good for the game. Considering we only need one more class and dungeons reveals they could easily start open beta testing this year.
Note: Not trying to troll or anything just my opinion, and if I'm wrong with anything I would like to be corrected! Just saying a year and half is WAAAYYY to long I don't think Anet would do that. Also I'd like to note that I respect you as a poster very much and you seem very informed about Guild Wars 2.
From last August when the encounter he's talking about, it will be about a year and a half until release. All our best indications say early 2012.
Ah okay wasn't sure what he was talking about I thought you meant next fall lol!
Manifesto has been covered. You failed to acknowledge you were beaten on that one. Try another.
Seems you failed to cover collecting wolf parts, as opposed to collecting harpy glands....
game set and match....
To be honest your coverage of the manifesto was so subjective and flawed I didn't even want to waste time addressing it.
You claim to want everyone to be well informed, but you are just a sheep in wolf's clothing.
Im glad you chose to be honest in saying that backing up your claim is a waste of time. Im in awe how you managed to elevate your baseless claim (which seems to slowly change over the course of this thread) about the manifesto into a hard fact (even though its only recognised by you..meh, details). Simply by repeating it again and again. And when you demand proof! and statements being backed up by evidence!, and when they are handed to you, you simply dismiss as meaningless opinions. Brilliant!
Disruptive as always, but nevertheless brilliant. You convinced me anyway. Well, you convinced me that you can troll any thread into oblivion simply by spinning almost every single post untill others become sick and tired of you.
Surprised Robert is back to his old shenangins to be honest. He's more of a believer than an actual contributer. Ya know what, I'm just going to do what he does. Everyone here arguing against Robert, you're ALL right. In every way. Robert's wrong. FACT. Argument ended.
Robert's been spouting off the same crap that he had months ago. He's probably one of the more pathetic posters this site has. He doesn't argue because there's anything to argue about, he argues because he finds things in his own little head to argue about. He will always believe that GW2 is a failure, no matter what.
Robert, I hope you realize that you've lost this entire argument just like you lost the arguments we had 4-5 months ago. Same arguments that you have end up with the same results. Believe that you're right all want, but you're not. In any way shape or form. You're wrong. You'll always be wrong. You'll never be right. Deal with it.
Oh was I wrong that the game suffered insane lag with 50 people on screen casting?
Was I wrong that there were exclamation marks and event helpers?
Was i wrong that they tasked you to collect harpy glands?
Oh wait those are facts... and oh wait, you are in denial.
Now you are gravitating towards ad hominem personal attacks, cause you can't actually win the argument, because my facts are too strong.
Personal attacks? Lol. It's a fact that you're a horrible poster. There's no getting around it.
Ya see, you misunderstand me. You're wrong with the context in which you deliver information. That has always been your downfall just like it is here. As for me winning the argument. I won this same exact argument months ago. Everyone else is winning in this thread. You make arguments that are irrelevant to the point you're trying to make which is "GW2 is the same as other MMOs". You try to simplify it down to its core(an MMO) to make your argument an actual viable one.
Your argument will never be viable.
GW2 is an MMO. That's your pathetic argument. Seriously. That's what it always has been. You try to cover it up but it doesn't work with me because my personality is quite similar to yours. The only difference is that I don't lose arguments because I know what I'm talking about. Threads like these are your stomping grounds. That's why you started defending the OP anyway, because it gives you a chance to start making stupid points. I've got you down to a tee because you're predictable and so are your arguments. You want me to win this argument? Here, let me point you to the numerous posts replying to you. Game, set, and match.
You keep feeling special Robert. Stay losing.
Can you please actually construct a rational argument, the personal attacks are so boring to me, and the misconstruing of what i've said and biased assumptions.
Do you actually have anything of substance? Or is this all you can muster up in your existence?
My argument is completely rational. More rational than yours that's for sure. You have nothing of substance as proven by your posts themselves. You muster up the same crap you have for the past year ever since the GW2 manifesto trailer came out.
What I'm saying isn't rational to you because you refuse to believe it. But that doesn't make it any less the truth. By the way, I'm not personally attacking you. I'm actually attacking the way you post which is laughably awful. Saying that you're bored(of contexts that aren't actually there in the first place) doesn't help you. It just makes your posts look more laughable.
Surprised Robert is back to his old shenangins to be honest. He's more of a believer than an actual contributer. Ya know what, I'm just going to do what he does. Everyone here arguing against Robert, you're ALL right. In every way. Robert's wrong. FACT. Argument ended.
Robert's been spouting off the same crap that he had months ago. He's probably one of the more pathetic posters this site has. He doesn't argue because there's anything to argue about, he argues because he finds things in his own little head to argue about. He will always believe that GW2 is a failure, no matter what.
Robert, I hope you realize that you've lost this entire argument just like you lost the arguments we had 4-5 months ago. Same arguments that you have end up with the same results. Believe that you're right all want, but you're not. In any way shape or form. You're wrong. You'll always be wrong. You'll never be right. Deal with it.
Oh was I wrong that the game suffered insane lag with 50 people on screen casting?
Was I wrong that there were exclamation marks and event helpers?
Was i wrong that they tasked you to collect harpy glands?
Oh wait those are facts... and oh wait, you are in denial.
Now you are gravitating towards ad hominem personal attacks, cause you can't actually win the argument, because my facts are too strong.
Personal attacks? Lol. It's a fact that you're a horrible poster. There's no getting around it.
Ya see, you misunderstand me. You're wrong with the context in which you deliver information. That has always been your downfall just like it is here. As for me winning the argument. I won this same exact argument months ago. Everyone else is winning in this thread. You make arguments that are irrelevant to the point you're trying to make which is "GW2 is the same as other MMOs". You try to simplify it down to its core(an MMO) to make your argument an actual viable one.
Your argument will never be viable.
GW2 is an MMO. That's your pathetic argument. Seriously. That's what it always has been. You try to cover it up but it doesn't work with me because my personality is quite similar to yours. The only difference is that I don't lose arguments because I know what I'm talking about. Threads like these are your stomping grounds. That's why you started defending the OP anyway, because it gives you a chance to start making stupid points. I've got you down to a tee because you're predictable and so are your arguments. You want me to win this argument? Here, let me point you to the numerous posts replying to you. Game, set, and match.
You keep feeling special Robert. Stay losing.
Can you please actually construct a rational argument, the personal attacks are so boring to me, and the misconstruing of what i've said and biased assumptions.
Do you actually have anything of substance? Or is this all you can muster up in your existence?
My argument is completely rational. More rational than yours that's for sure. You have nothing of substance as proven by your posts themselves. You muster up the same crap you have for the past year ever since the GW2 manifesto trailer came out.
What I'm saying isn't rational to you because you refuse to believe it. But that doesn't make it any less the truth. By the way, I'm not personally attacking you. I'm actually attacking the way you post which is laughably awful. Saying that you're bored(of contexts that aren't actually there in the first place) doesn't help you. It just makes your posts look more laughable.
What you are saying isn't rational because you are resorting to personal attacks because someone has completely destroyed your level of thinking.
Sorry, anytime you resort to personal attacks you've already lost, it is the sign of a defeated poster, because it is basically admitting you can't outmaneuver someone argumentatively.
Let's see 24 pages of posts. RobertDinh calls us all biased fools and we feed him his self worth. Really folks stop feeding the troll! Set him to block and please move on otherwise there will be multiple threads of nothing BUT this foolishness. @Robert, we get it we are blinded by the hype! That apparently makes us suck. There you win. How about leaving now?
Manifesto has been covered. You failed to acknowledge you were beaten on that one. Try another.
Seems you failed to cover collecting wolf parts, as opposed to collecting harpy glands....
game set and match....
To be honest your coverage of the manifesto was so subjective and flawed I didn't even want to waste time addressing it.
You claim to want everyone to be well informed, but you are just a sheep in wolf's clothing.
Im glad you chose to be honest in saying that backing up your claim is a waste of time. Im in awe how you managed to elevate your baseless claim (which seems to slowly change over the course of this thread) about the manifesto into a hard fact (even though its only recognised by you..meh, details). Simply by repeating it again and again. And when you demand proof! and statements being backed up by evidence!, and when they are handed to you, you simply dismiss as meaningless opinions. Brilliant!
Disruptive as always, but nevertheless brilliant. You convinced me anyway. Well, you convinced me that you can troll any thread into oblivion simply by spinning almost every single post untill others become sick and tired of you.
I wish I could say I was spinning the facts that there are exclamation marks, event helpers, server lag, and harpy gland collection quests. I WISH that wasn't true for gw2.
Surprised Robert is back to his old shenangins to be honest. He's more of a believer than an actual contributer. Ya know what, I'm just going to do what he does. Everyone here arguing against Robert, you're ALL right. In every way. Robert's wrong. FACT. Argument ended.
Robert's been spouting off the same crap that he had months ago. He's probably one of the more pathetic posters this site has. He doesn't argue because there's anything to argue about, he argues because he finds things in his own little head to argue about. He will always believe that GW2 is a failure, no matter what.
Robert, I hope you realize that you've lost this entire argument just like you lost the arguments we had 4-5 months ago. Same arguments that you have end up with the same results. Believe that you're right all want, but you're not. In any way shape or form. You're wrong. You'll always be wrong. You'll never be right. Deal with it.
Oh was I wrong that the game suffered insane lag with 50 people on screen casting?
Was I wrong that there were exclamation marks and event helpers?
Was i wrong that they tasked you to collect harpy glands?
Oh wait those are facts... and oh wait, you are in denial.
Now you are gravitating towards ad hominem personal attacks, cause you can't actually win the argument, because my facts are too strong.
Personal attacks? Lol. It's a fact that you're a horrible poster. There's no getting around it.
Ya see, you misunderstand me. You're wrong with the context in which you deliver information. That has always been your downfall just like it is here. As for me winning the argument. I won this same exact argument months ago. Everyone else is winning in this thread. You make arguments that are irrelevant to the point you're trying to make which is "GW2 is the same as other MMOs". You try to simplify it down to its core(an MMO) to make your argument an actual viable one.
Your argument will never be viable.
GW2 is an MMO. That's your pathetic argument. Seriously. That's what it always has been. You try to cover it up but it doesn't work with me because my personality is quite similar to yours. The only difference is that I don't lose arguments because I know what I'm talking about. Threads like these are your stomping grounds. That's why you started defending the OP anyway, because it gives you a chance to start making stupid points. I've got you down to a tee because you're predictable and so are your arguments. You want me to win this argument? Here, let me point you to the numerous posts replying to you. Game, set, and match.
You keep feeling special Robert. Stay losing.
Can you please actually construct a rational argument, the personal attacks are so boring to me, and the misconstruing of what i've said and biased assumptions.
Do you actually have anything of substance? Or is this all you can muster up in your existence?
My argument is completely rational. More rational than yours that's for sure. You have nothing of substance as proven by your posts themselves. You muster up the same crap you have for the past year ever since the GW2 manifesto trailer came out.
What I'm saying isn't rational to you because you refuse to believe it. But that doesn't make it any less the truth. By the way, I'm not personally attacking you. I'm actually attacking the way you post which is laughably awful. Saying that you're bored(of contexts that aren't actually there in the first place) doesn't help you. It just makes your posts look more laughable.
What you are saying isn't rational because you are resorting to personal attacks because someone has completely destroyed your level of thinking.
Sorry, anytime you resort to personal attacks you've already lost, it is the sign of a defeated poster, because it is basically admitting you can't outmaneuver someone argumentatively.
I'm not personally attacking you. Lol. Fact. I'm attacking your way of posting. Oh wait, do you take what I say about your posts personally? Well that just proves your weak minded right there. Thanks for clarifying Robert.
It's only a personal attack if you're offended. Which I never attempted to offend you, but if it did, well that's your own fault.
Let's see 24 pages of posts. RobertDinh calls us all biased fools and we feed him his self worth. Really folks stop feeding the troll! Set him to block and please move on otherwise there will be multiple threads of nothing BUT this foolishness. @Robert, we get it we are blinded by the hype! That apparently makes us suck. There you win. How about leaving now?
Please leave the personal attacks out of this, whether directed at me or yourself.
Surprised Robert is back to his old shenangins to be honest. He's more of a believer than an actual contributer. Ya know what, I'm just going to do what he does. Everyone here arguing against Robert, you're ALL right. In every way. Robert's wrong. FACT. Argument ended.
Robert's been spouting off the same crap that he had months ago. He's probably one of the more pathetic posters this site has. He doesn't argue because there's anything to argue about, he argues because he finds things in his own little head to argue about. He will always believe that GW2 is a failure, no matter what.
Robert, I hope you realize that you've lost this entire argument just like you lost the arguments we had 4-5 months ago. Same arguments that you have end up with the same results. Believe that you're right all want, but you're not. In any way shape or form. You're wrong. You'll always be wrong. You'll never be right. Deal with it.
Oh was I wrong that the game suffered insane lag with 50 people on screen casting?
Was I wrong that there were exclamation marks and event helpers?
Was i wrong that they tasked you to collect harpy glands?
Oh wait those are facts... and oh wait, you are in denial.
Now you are gravitating towards ad hominem personal attacks, cause you can't actually win the argument, because my facts are too strong.
Personal attacks? Lol. It's a fact that you're a horrible poster. There's no getting around it.
Ya see, you misunderstand me. You're wrong with the context in which you deliver information. That has always been your downfall just like it is here. As for me winning the argument. I won this same exact argument months ago. Everyone else is winning in this thread. You make arguments that are irrelevant to the point you're trying to make which is "GW2 is the same as other MMOs". You try to simplify it down to its core(an MMO) to make your argument an actual viable one.
Your argument will never be viable.
GW2 is an MMO. That's your pathetic argument. Seriously. That's what it always has been. You try to cover it up but it doesn't work with me because my personality is quite similar to yours. The only difference is that I don't lose arguments because I know what I'm talking about. Threads like these are your stomping grounds. That's why you started defending the OP anyway, because it gives you a chance to start making stupid points. I've got you down to a tee because you're predictable and so are your arguments. You want me to win this argument? Here, let me point you to the numerous posts replying to you. Game, set, and match.
You keep feeling special Robert. Stay losing.
Can you please actually construct a rational argument, the personal attacks are so boring to me, and the misconstruing of what i've said and biased assumptions.
Do you actually have anything of substance? Or is this all you can muster up in your existence?
My argument is completely rational. More rational than yours that's for sure. You have nothing of substance as proven by your posts themselves. You muster up the same crap you have for the past year ever since the GW2 manifesto trailer came out.
What I'm saying isn't rational to you because you refuse to believe it. But that doesn't make it any less the truth. By the way, I'm not personally attacking you. I'm actually attacking the way you post which is laughably awful. Saying that you're bored(of contexts that aren't actually there in the first place) doesn't help you. It just makes your posts look more laughable.
What you are saying isn't rational because you are resorting to personal attacks because someone has completely destroyed your level of thinking.
Sorry, anytime you resort to personal attacks you've already lost, it is the sign of a defeated poster, because it is basically admitting you can't outmaneuver someone argumentatively.
I'm not personally attacking you. Lol. Fact. I'm attacking your way of posting. Oh wait, do you take what I say about your posts personally? Well that just proves your weak minded right there. Thanks for clarifying Robert.
Wait is my way of posting weakminded or is that a personal attack, this is all very confusing to me. Jk you are boring me with your personal attacks.
And no it isn't just a personal attack if you offend someone, an attack can be an attack whether it works or not.
Manifesto has been covered. You failed to acknowledge you were beaten on that one. Try another.
Seems you failed to cover collecting wolf parts, as opposed to collecting harpy glands....
game set and match....
To be honest your coverage of the manifesto was so subjective and flawed I didn't even want to waste time addressing it.
You claim to want everyone to be well informed, but you are just a sheep in wolf's clothing.
Im glad you chose to be honest in saying that backing up your claim is a waste of time. Im in awe how you managed to elevate your baseless claim (which seems to slowly change over the course of this thread) about the manifesto into a hard fact (even though its only recognised by you..meh, details). Simply by repeating it again and again. And when you demand proof! and statements being backed up by evidence!, and when they are handed to you, you simply dismiss as meaningless opinions. Brilliant!
Disruptive as always, but nevertheless brilliant. You convinced me anyway. Well, you convinced me that you can troll any thread into oblivion simply by spinning almost every single post untill others become sick and tired of you.
I wish I could say I was spinning the facts that there are exclamation marks, event helpers, server lag, and harpy gland collection quests. I WISH that wasn't true for gw2.
Speaking of exclamation marks, I'm still waiting for you to provide proof that they are in game.
Manifesto has been covered. You failed to acknowledge you were beaten on that one. Try another.
Seems you failed to cover collecting wolf parts, as opposed to collecting harpy glands....
game set and match....
To be honest your coverage of the manifesto was so subjective and flawed I didn't even want to waste time addressing it.
You claim to want everyone to be well informed, but you are just a sheep in wolf's clothing.
Im glad you chose to be honest in saying that backing up your claim is a waste of time. Im in awe how you managed to elevate your baseless claim (which seems to slowly change over the course of this thread) about the manifesto into a hard fact (even though its only recognised by you..meh, details). Simply by repeating it again and again. And when you demand proof! and statements being backed up by evidence!, and when they are handed to you, you simply dismiss as meaningless opinions. Brilliant!
Disruptive as always, but nevertheless brilliant. You convinced me anyway. Well, you convinced me that you can troll any thread into oblivion simply by spinning almost every single post untill others become sick and tired of you.
I wish I could say I was spinning the facts that there are exclamation marks, event helpers, server lag, and harpy gland collection quests. I WISH that wasn't true for gw2.
I would never claim you are spinning the facts. To be able to do that you first need to know what the facts are. I would never accuse you of such a thing!
Comments
Wolf parts, meet harpy glands.
No wolf parts in the video.
Um whaaa? Wolf pelts were never mentioned in the maifesto. You didn't address it because you chose not to, not because it was subjective or flawed, Maybe you are mixing up your arguments in your circular logic?
RIP Jimmy "The Rev" Sullivan and Paul Gray.
This reminds me of the video where there is severe lag, and some people claiming it didn't look laggy at all... when the screen is at like 5 fps lol.
You get manifesto proof, then you just deny it is there.... absolutely fantastic!
Personal attacks? Lol. It's a fact that you're a horrible poster. There's no getting around it.
Ya see, you misunderstand me. You're wrong with the context in which you deliver information. That has always been your downfall just like it is here. As for me winning the argument. I won this same exact argument months ago. Everyone else is winning in this thread. You make arguments that are irrelevant to the point you're trying to make which is "GW2 is the same as other MMOs". You try to simplify it down to its core(an MMO) to make your argument an actual viable one.
Your argument will never be viable.
GW2 is an MMO. That's your pathetic argument. Seriously. That's what it always has been. You try to cover it up but it doesn't work with me because my personality is quite similar to yours. The only difference is that I don't lose arguments because I know what I'm talking about. Threads like these are your stomping grounds. That's why you started defending the OP anyway, because it gives you a chance to start making stupid points. I've got you down to a tee because you're predictable and so are your arguments. You want me to win this argument? Here, let me point you to the numerous posts replying to you. Game, set, and match.
You keep feeling special Robert. Stay losing.
Um I don't think so... I doubt they would delay it until next fall it'll be very end of 2011 or the First Quarter of 2012, delaying it that long would not be good for the game. Considering we only need one more class and dungeons reveals they could easily start open beta testing this year.
Note: Not trying to troll or anything just my opinion, and if I'm wrong with anything I would like to be corrected! Just saying a year and half is WAAAYYY to long I don't think Anet would do that. Also I'd like to note that I respect you as a poster very much and you seem very informed about Guild Wars 2.
I assure you MY coverage of the manifesto wasn't subjective and flawed, which, btw, you also never responded to.
Can you link for us please where they said there would be no collections?
Also, can you link a laggy Shatterer video? Can you link anything that backs up anything you're saying?
You're really grasping here. Nobody is buying what you're selling.
"Gamers will no longer buy the argument that every MMO requires a subscription fee to offset server and bandwidth costs. It's not true you know it, and they know it." -Jeff Strain, co-founder of ArenaNet, 2007
Can you please actually construct a rational argument, the personal attacks are so boring to me, and the misconstruing of what i've said and biased assumptions.
Do you actually have anything of substance? Or is this all you can muster up in your existence?
Just wow. I am afraid to say any more than has been for fear of moderator intervention again. umm yeah. Kinda like arguing with a wall.
RIP Jimmy "The Rev" Sullivan and Paul Gray.
Originally posted by someforumguy
From last August when the encounter he's talking about, it will be about a year and a half until release. All our best indications say early 2012.
"Gamers will no longer buy the argument that every MMO requires a subscription fee to offset server and bandwidth costs. It's not true you know it, and they know it." -Jeff Strain, co-founder of ArenaNet, 2007
Basically yes! The Dynamic Event is just another name for generic MMO-quests?So what? Really, there were several of us who figured that was the case when they first announced dynamic events. They are essentially GW's version of daily quests. The difference has only ever been that they can't "fail" and that each event leads to a different one and that they can alter the world depending on what happens. In the end, will dynamic events turn Tyria into a fantasy world simulator? Of course not, that would take an army of designers like 20 years to make.
The only difference Anet is trying to make is that the events respond to you. Ree Soesbee states it directly "The boss you killed respawns 10 minutes later. It doesn't care that I'm there." You kill the invading army and take out their base and then they aren't invading anymore. In other MMOs you get a quest to kill 30 of them and place fire on the buildings in their base, but 10 seconds later the fire is out and the army is still attacking. However, the quest text still tells you "thank you for stopping the army", even though the world does not reflect that at all. THAT is what Anet is combating with dynamic events, nothing else. And to prevent quest kill competition and get random people to play together with minimal effort.
If you feel "bad" about this quest( Collecting Harpi in any way, read the following piece to get yourself in a good mood:
"Some events are triggered by players, and are almost Easter-eggy. There’s one where if players kill the deer in the forest then one of the predators who are used to feeding on
the deer will come out and attack one of the villages. That’s not going to happen unless players are active in the area. Just by the actions, or the times of day, whether it’s day, whether it’s night, whether players were defeated at certain events… there’s lots of things which can happen in an area. Our game is really pretty dense with content. That’s the key. Things constantly changing. A world that feels like it’s alive. You never know what’s around the next corner. That way we can help the game not static, not fall into the particular rhythm."
~The only opinion that matters is your own.Everything else is just advice,~
I assure you that it was. But that's the diff between unbiased mmo followers and biased ones. Unbiased ones go by facts, biased ones deny the existence of exclamation marks, event helpers, server lag, harpy glands, and manifesto statements.
Yes several of us figured that to be the case, and then a plethora of gw2 fans don't understand that and are claiming gw2 is groundbreaking and revolutionary.... zzzzzz
It's sorta like how trion worlds took rift's soul system, which is basically like a talent tree system without initial base class abilities, and claimed it to be ground breaking.
Ah okay wasn't sure what he was talking about I thought you meant next fall lol!
Im glad you chose to be honest in saying that backing up your claim is a waste of time. Im in awe how you managed to elevate your baseless claim (which seems to slowly change over the course of this thread) about the manifesto into a hard fact (even though its only recognised by you..meh, details). Simply by repeating it again and again. And when you demand proof! and statements being backed up by evidence!, and when they are handed to you, you simply dismiss as meaningless opinions. Brilliant!
Disruptive as always, but nevertheless brilliant. You convinced me anyway. Well, you convinced me that you can troll any thread into oblivion simply by spinning almost every single post untill others become sick and tired of you.
My argument is completely rational. More rational than yours that's for sure. You have nothing of substance as proven by your posts themselves. You muster up the same crap you have for the past year ever since the GW2 manifesto trailer came out.
What I'm saying isn't rational to you because you refuse to believe it. But that doesn't make it any less the truth. By the way, I'm not personally attacking you. I'm actually attacking the way you post which is laughably awful. Saying that you're bored(of contexts that aren't actually there in the first place) doesn't help you. It just makes your posts look more laughable.
What you are saying isn't rational because you are resorting to personal attacks because someone has completely destroyed your level of thinking.
Sorry, anytime you resort to personal attacks you've already lost, it is the sign of a defeated poster, because it is basically admitting you can't outmaneuver someone argumentatively.
Let's see 24 pages of posts. RobertDinh calls us all biased fools and we feed him his self worth. Really folks stop feeding the troll! Set him to block and please move on otherwise there will be multiple threads of nothing BUT this foolishness. @Robert, we get it we are blinded by the hype! That apparently makes us suck. There you win. How about leaving now?
I wish I could say I was spinning the facts that there are exclamation marks, event helpers, server lag, and harpy gland collection quests. I WISH that wasn't true for gw2.
I'm not personally attacking you. Lol. Fact. I'm attacking your way of posting. Oh wait, do you take what I say about your posts personally? Well that just proves your weak minded right there. Thanks for clarifying Robert.
It's only a personal attack if you're offended. Which I never attempted to offend you, but if it did, well that's your own fault.
Please leave the personal attacks out of this, whether directed at me or yourself.
Wait is my way of posting weakminded or is that a personal attack, this is all very confusing to me. Jk you are boring me with your personal attacks.
And no it isn't just a personal attack if you offend someone, an attack can be an attack whether it works or not.
Speaking of exclamation marks, I'm still waiting for you to provide proof that they are in game.
I would never claim you are spinning the facts. To be able to do that you first need to know what the facts are. I would never accuse you of such a thing!