Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

StarVault caught in apparant instance of plagiarism against CCP!! Read for yourself and decide!!

12346»

Comments

  • JowenJowen Member Posts: 326

    CCPs response:



    CCP Manifest wrote:

    We shot them (the company that makes it) this message.



    ---

    Star Vault:



    We here at CCP couldn’t help but notice that our expert wordsmithing, legal poetry and cunning turns of phrase have been emulated with sincerest flattery by your technical writing and/or legal staff. In fact, ardent fans of our EULA have surfaced, themselves noticing your homage to our work. See their assessment here: http://massively.joystiq.com/2011/11/09/mortal-online-plagiarizes-eve-onlines-terms-of-service/



    EVE Online is a notoriously dangerous universe. So we have to caution you -- in fact, we demand that you don’t follow our footsteps or use our copyrighted work. After all, internet spaceships are serious business, so probably best to keep our internet spaceship business out of your business language. Please stop using our legal agreements, and kindly remove our name from your website.



    ---

    What are people going to copy next... our spreadsheets?!


  • PicklebeastPicklebeast Member Posts: 273

    Originally posted by Jowen

    CCPs response:



    CCP Manifest wrote:

    We shot them (the company that makes it) this message.



    ---

    Star Vault:



    We here at CCP couldn’t help but notice that our expert wordsmithing, legal poetry and cunning turns of phrase have been emulated with sincerest flattery by your technical writing and/or legal staff. In fact, ardent fans of our EULA have surfaced, themselves noticing your homage to our work. See their assessment here: http://massively.joystiq.com/2011/11/09/mortal-online-plagiarizes-eve-onlines-terms-of-service/



    EVE Online is a notoriously dangerous universe. So we have to caution you -- in fact, we demand that you don’t follow our footsteps or use our copyrighted work. After all, internet spaceships are serious business, so probably best to keep our internet spaceship business out of your business language. Please stop using our legal agreements, and kindly remove our name from your website.



    ---

    What are people going to copy next... our spreadsheets?!


    LOLz-

    Great response- I guess it WAS copyright infringment...Or is CCP lying as well?

    Its like everyone is lying and picking on poor MO BUT the fanboys...They are the only ones telling the truth. The rest of us just are not "hardcore" enough- Even CCP.

  • SHOE788SHOE788 Member Posts: 700

    Originally posted by Jowen

    CCPs response:



    CCP Manifest wrote:

    We shot them (the company that makes it) this message.



    ---

    Star Vault:



    We here at CCP couldn’t help but notice that our expert wordsmithing, legal poetry and cunning turns of phrase have been emulated with sincerest flattery by your technical writing and/or legal staff. In fact, ardent fans of our EULA have surfaced, themselves noticing your homage to our work. See their assessment here: http://massively.joystiq.com/2011/11/09/mortal-online-plagiarizes-eve-onlines-terms-of-service/



    EVE Online is a notoriously dangerous universe. So we have to caution you -- in fact, we demand that you don’t follow our footsteps or use our copyrighted work. After all, internet spaceships are serious business, so probably best to keep our internet spaceship business out of your business language. Please stop using our legal agreements, and kindly remove our name from your website.



    ---

    What are people going to copy next... our spreadsheets?!


    Lol, it's funny how belittling CCP treats SV, like a gnat on a giant.

  • DomestoDomesto Member Posts: 110

    Funny to see so many people waste so much time over something so useless as a typo from a company these same people claim is dead/dying. Damn, I even wasted 30 sec of my life on this........see ya.

  • PicklebeastPicklebeast Member Posts: 273

    Originally posted by Domesto

    Funny to see so many people waste so much time over something so useless as a typo from a company these same people claim is dead/dying. Damn, I even wasted 30 sec of my life on this........see ya.

    typo and copyright infringment are two seperate issues. I would explain the diff. but it would take ANOTHER 30 seconds of my life... And the whole "wasting our valuble time posting this" strategy i s funny as you commented about...Nothing at all but a gripe about what we had been commenting on.

    But we are a FORUM, and we discuss MMO's so welcome and feel free to waste your time here with us anytime you want. =D

  • WSIMikeWSIMike Member Posts: 5,564

    Originally posted by Jimmac

    Originally posted by Picklebeast


    <>

    I am not going to argue semantics with you.

    My definition: Copying something some else wrote and attaching your name. Not to include "ghost writing", lol.

    There- I win. =)

    You are arguing about mere semantics of which the definition has been given. Personally I dont care what you call it - Its amature, unprofessional, careless and inexcusable. It (like this game) is a joke. The fact they tried to censor this and now its all over MMO news sites is just the icing on the cake and very funny- Couldnt have happened to a better company.

    So nobody wants to argue definitions and play internet lawyer. I am a damn Electrician/HVAC tech. I am not a lawyer and dont give a shit about arguing legal terms.

    This is all for the Lulz, courtesy of SV.

    I won't argue semantics either as I said I wouldn't argue over the definitions of words either. I've said multiple times it just depends on how you define it, and that if plagiarism is simply copying, then of course this is plagiarism. We both know there is more to the word than that though, and whether the real definition of plagiarism applies isn't semantics, but just simple application of a definition to a situation. The word as defined by the dictionaries above doesn't apply here though which is why no one is trying to argue that it does.

    In short, this is perfectly normal copying and nothing more, but everyone here wants to use the harsher word "plagiarism" because it makes SV sound like they did worse here than they really did and it's much easier to jump on the hateraid bandwagon than to back down.

    Dude... Arguing semantics and the definition of terms is practically all you've been doing in this thread. Who are you trying to kid here?

    You see the word "plagiarize" come up and immediately jump to the reply button to "correct" the person using it.

    You posted a definition for it in one of your earlier posts.

    Post #46 is basically you addressing the thread at large to lecture them on the use of "plagiarize".

    You mention there hadn't been mention of the word 'plagiarize' since post 50 (which happened to be one of yours)... and it's funny that you mention that. You hadn't posted anything to the thread since post 50 at all, until the word plagiarize came up again. Then you're back in action - once again - to argue the use of the word.

    Use of the word 'plagiarize' is very clearly and quite demonstrably an issue for you, as are the semantics of it. You've repeatedly made that abundantly clear throughout this thread. And that's fine. If you want to correct people on what you perceive as the misuse of a word, more power to ya. Though, for the record, the word is not misused. Plagiarism is taking the work of others and presenting it as your own, which is precisely what SV did here. They took CCP's ToS for Eve, slapped their own name on and presented it as their own.

    What you seem to be hung up on is the implications of the word rather than the word itself, which is something you apply to the word yourself. Clearly no one thinks a crime has been comitted and no one's seriously arguing that some kind of serious repercussions should follow. You're the only one who seems to be caught up on the word's implications.

    Seeing you now claim that you don't want to argue something that you've been arguing non-stop throughout this thread rings just a tad disingenuous to me.

    "If you just step away for a sec you will clearly see all the pot holes in the road,
    and the cash shop selling asphalt..."
    - Mimzel on F2P/Cash Shops

    image

  • BetelBetel Member Posts: 365

    rofl at CCP's response.

     

    Must have sucked for Henrik to get that email from the people he desperately wants to be. Ya know, actual game developers who made a working FFA PvP MMO game.

     

    Just delicious.

  • OmaliOmali MMO Business CorrespondentMember UncommonPosts: 1,177

    Originally posted by Jowen

    CCPs response:



    CCP Manifest wrote:

    We shot them (the company that makes it) this message.



    ---

    Star Vault:



    We here at CCP couldn’t help but notice that our expert wordsmithing, legal poetry and cunning turns of phrase have been emulated with sincerest flattery by your technical writing and/or legal staff. In fact, ardent fans of our EULA have surfaced, themselves noticing your homage to our work. See their assessment here: http://massively.joystiq.com/2011/11/09/mortal-online-plagiarizes-eve-onlines-terms-of-service/



    EVE Online is a notoriously dangerous universe. So we have to caution you -- in fact, we demand that you don’t follow our footsteps or use our copyrighted work. After all, internet spaceships are serious business, so probably best to keep our internet spaceship business out of your business language. Please stop using our legal agreements, and kindly remove our name from your website.



    ---

    What are people going to copy next... our spreadsheets?!


    No love for Omali.

    image

  • DLangleyDLangley Member Posts: 1,407

    Stay on topic please.

  • EzhaeEzhae Member UncommonPosts: 735

    It's not the first time it has happned in gaming industry. A year ago or so, don't really remember now, there was a simillar issue with other companies copy/pasting ToS/EULA. It seems to be pretty common practice, since the text is usually pretty much the same when it comes to actual legal talk, but shows how often those companies simply forget to at least put their own product name in due to lazyness. 

     

    Makes me wonder tho, why did they choose EVE to be the one they copied from considering how many of those are "availible" on market. 

  • deathshrouddeathshroud Member Posts: 1,366

    since there has been at least 3 companies with the exact same tos write up (copying eve) i beleive it likely to be the fault of which ever legal company was hired to write up the tos for them. Otherwise its one hell of a coincidence.

    there are 2 types of mmo, imitators and innovaters.

Sign In or Register to comment.