Originally posted by Kshnik Easily done. They have not mention city building, siegeing, naval combat, and large battles because they are doing character wipes daily. The folks from MMORPG Italia did not mention the above because they only played the game for a few hours; not enough time to build a ship, build a city, siege a city and have large battles.
Oh. So they could show this content to Yellowbeard during his visit. But for some reason 4 months later these things are no longer able to be seen in the game?
That makes a lot of sense.
By the way. Now that we have beta quotes and this preview. It really seems like Yellowbeard's "preview" was all propaganda. Either that, or there are so many problems with the game that they are having to redo everything that Yellowbeard saw.
"There is as yet insufficient data for a meaningful answer."
LOL More obscure uninformative , regurgitated bullshit. 1 month before launch. JOY
But dear Tenspotting isn't this exactly what you asked for? A proffessional media site similar to MMORPG.com to play the beta? I mean wasn't this what you said was the only confirmation you needed? lol please correct me if I am wrong there my friend but didn't this fill the criteria you set in place to begin with? Ah I love when you guys prove to others you aren't worth listening to. This of course was the last straw for me, since it seems to be clear to a blind man that you are simply here to troll when even the very thing you specificaly ask for is done and you see it, it isn't enough lol. Farewell my old friend time to block you lol not worth the time to type anymore you just look plain silly at this point lol.
______________________________ The Sceptics, yes they're special but we've need them to.. I guess. And if they're put more effort MMORPG.com can create a 'Team Sceptic' and send them to the Special Olympus.
Originally posted by Kshnik Easily done. They have not mention city building, siegeing, naval combat, and large battles because they are doing character wipes daily. The folks from MMORPG Italia did not mention the above because they only played the game for a few hours; not enough time to build a ship, build a city, siege a city and have large battles.
Oh. So they could show this content to Yellowbeard during his visit. But for some reason 4 months later these things are no longer able to be seen in the game?
That makes a lot of sense.
Hmm. Could it be that Yellowbeard ask to see specific stuff and the Italians asked to see something else. Since they only saw what they asked for maybe they didnt see the other stuff?
Originally posted by Kshnik Hmm. Could it be that Yellowbeard ask to see specific stuff and the Italians asked to see something else. Since they only saw what they asked for maybe they didnt see the other stuff? That does make a lot of sense.
Your unshakable faith in this game is an inspiration to us all. If only I could be that blind.
Since you can make up things to make sense for your case, I will make up things too.
Could it be that Yellowbeard never actually played the game and just saw a gameplay demo highlighting all of the anticipated features of Darkfall? The game site employees, on the other hand, actually did get to play the game and the reason that Adventurine only let them play the starting area is because this is all that is completed of the game?
That also does make a lot of sense.
"There is as yet insufficient data for a meaningful answer."
Originally posted by Kshnik Hmm. Could it be that Yellowbeard ask to see specific stuff and the Italians asked to see something else. Since they only saw what they asked for maybe they didnt see the other stuff? That does make a lot of sense.
Your unshakable faith in this game is an inspiration to us all. If only I could be that blind.
Since you can make up things to make sense for your case, I will make up things too.
Could it be that Yellowbeard never actually played the game and just saw a gameplay demo highlighting all of the anticipated features of Darkfall? The game site employees, on the other hand, actually did get to play the game and the reason that Adventurine only let them play the starting area is because this is all that is completed of the game?
That also does make a lot of sense.
Yes, it does make a lot of sense, except the end part where you invented out of nowhere the idea that they hadn't completed the rest of the game. Consider these facts:
1) The reviewers got to see the Beta
2) Tasos said the Beta is ramping up in what it tests, and the reason you didn't see quotes about sieges in the beta tester feedback is that they are not testing that yet.
3) The previous people who saw it (Yellowbeard, etc.) got to play something other than the Beta, perhaps the internal servers with all the features enabled.
It then follows that the reviewers wouldn't see sieges (for example) for a reason other than "THEY HAVEN'T EVEN BEEN IMPLEMENTED OMG", while simultaneously it makes sense that YB would have seen sieges.
Originally posted by Kshnik Hmm. Could it be that Yellowbeard ask to see specific stuff and the Italians asked to see something else. Since they only saw what they asked for maybe they didnt see the other stuff? That does make a lot of sense.
Your unshakable faith in this game is an inspiration to us all. If only I could be that blind.
Since you can make up things to make sense for your case, I will make up things too.
Could it be that Yellowbeard never actually played the game and just saw a gameplay demo highlighting all of the anticipated features of Darkfall? The game site employees, on the other hand, actually did get to play the game and the reason that Adventurine only let them play the starting area is because this is all that is completed of the game?
That also does make a lot of sense.
Unshakeable faith. No unshakeable faith here, my belief is the game will be a cross between shadowbane and mount and blade and wont be ready until at least Q2 2009.
Please show me where I made things up.
Yes it could be Yellowbeard never actually played the game and just saw a gameplay demo highlighting all of the anticipated features of the game. However when he posted on Forumfall and was answering questions for a few days did you ask him the question? Yes, the game site employees could have only played in the starting area because this is all that is completed.
Think I'm entitled to ask one simple question since we naysayers have been browbeat into submission by some of you fanbois. Please answer this simple question if you can. Why was it necessary for 2 Italians to travel to the Aventurine offices to experience this beta? Sorry, it's something that just makes no sense to me. Humor me if you will for a second. This is an MMO. Most of you people are waiting for the open beta invitation. All of you guys have repeatedly stated that this game will be a digital download. Certainly, you will probably have to download the client, patch and login to the server from wherever you live. I don't think all of you will travel to Greece everytime you need to logon, so that's probably a pretty good assumption. Anyway... Why didn't the 2 italians simply download the game client and login to this MMO? I mean. aren't ALL the other beta testers loging in from wherever they happen to reside? Or, is everyone sitting in the AV office beta testing this game? Just curious?
I think you need a tinfoil hat to be honest.
Well why shouldnt they go there and see for themself that the game exist first hand? And the quality of it. Cant it be fun to meet the developers and same time have some nice Greek food?
Answer me that pls?
OMG!
Is there absolutely NOTHING about this project you question?
I believe I asked a perfectly valid, non-troll question. Why was that question such a problem for you?
Quite frankly your response was what I expected. You are NO better than some of the worst trolls that reside here. You think you are, but you are just like them.
LOL.
The difference btw me and the trolls is that i tell the truth. Nothing but the truth and have been doing just that all along.
Wether you choose to believe me is your call.
Questions like the one you asked is tinfoil quality as i see it.
You speak the truth?
Well, in the future you may prove to be correct, but so far you haven't been right about anything you've ever said or predicted regarding Darkfall.
I've followed your posts for quite some time and all I see is blind fanboism, nothing more.
And calling this game the GREATEST MMO of all time! You believe that's the truth also? Perhaps you should put on the tinfoil hat my friend. You have NEVER seen nor even PLAYED this game, yet you proclaim it the GREATEST game of all time.
Yep... That makes perfect sense. LOL!
Well you can call it a gutfeeling i have. I dont care. I played games longer then most on this website and i honestly think i can see what is good and what is not by now.
Darkfall will be one of the best games ever released cause you know why i think like that? Its cause the developers of Darkfall burns for the game, guys like CLaus burns for the game and i honor him for it. Most talk about Tasos but dont forget developers like Claus Grovdal that was one of the guys that started this mission. I will never forget one of his quotes that went like this "<Claus|Dev> if we can recreate just a little of that first magic in UO with darkfall, my life has been worthwhile.". That quote speak of passion and with passion you come along way.
We can continue this discussion after game is released and i wont be that hard on you, i promise.
Well you can call it a gutfeeling i have. I dont care. I played games longer then most on this website and i honestly think i can see what is good and what is not by now.
Aragon would you be referring to the two years you spent playing WoW before you started following Darkfall or perhapes another game?
Well you can call it a gutfeeling i have. I dont care. I played games longer then most on this website and i honestly think i can see what is good and what is not by now.
Aragon would you be referring to the two years you spent playing WoW before you started following Darkfall or perhapes another game?
Well you can call it a gutfeeling i have. I dont care. I played games longer then most on this website and i honestly think i can see what is good and what is not by now.
Aragon would you be referring to the two years you spent playing WoW before you started following Darkfall or perhapes another game?
Wow so bitter....
No bitterness, just interested in what games Aragon has played other then WoW for 2 years that he thinks qualifies him to make statements like this.
Yes, it does make a lot of sense, except the end part where you invented out of nowhere the idea that they hadn't completed the rest of the game. Consider these facts: 1) The reviewers got to see the Beta I agree with you there. 2) Tasos said the Beta is ramping up in what it tests, and the reason you didn't see quotes about sieges in the beta tester feedback is that they are not testing that yet. That's your theory. It's a good one. I really hope it's true. My theory is that sieges are not in the game because the mechanics are not finished. 3) The previous people who saw it (Yellowbeard, etc.) got to play something other than the Beta, perhaps the internal servers with all the features enabled. Because Yellowbeard did not report the problems that are listed in the beta quotes, I reserve my original hypothesis that he did not actually play the game. It then follows that the reviewers wouldn't see sieges (for example) for a reason other than "THEY HAVEN'T EVEN BEEN IMPLEMENTED OMG", while simultaneously it makes sense that YB would have seen sieges. What part of this escaped you? Indeed.
"There is as yet insufficient data for a meaningful answer."
Well you can call it a gutfeeling i have. I dont care. I played games longer then most on this website and i honestly think i can see what is good and what is not by now.
Aragon would you be referring to the two years you spent playing WoW before you started following Darkfall or perhapes another game?
ROFL thats amusing mate. I played UO from beta. And you know im +50 years old so i played games since Commodore times. Even before that to be honest. I started in the gambling halls before any console was out. The guild im in B@D was most likely the best ever PvP guild in the history of UO. A bit cocky you might think, aye, but we fought the best guilds of UO both on Europe side and NA side and won. And UO is the most hardcore PvP MMORPG we seen up til today. Lets hope Darkfall bring that down.
Just out of curiosity, what is your trackrecord of game playing since you called me out?
I have all experience needed to make predictions and i will love to discuss this in a month with you. You might be in a state then to take in some new information i hope. As it is now youre a blindfolded troll of the game Darkfall. Think abit broader, what can the game industry of MMORPG games benefit from games like Darkfall on a success? My answer is alot.
But as i said let us have a discussion on experience and who was right when we have some actual facit on it ok? And id love to share abit of my experience with you then, you just have to ask.
Yes, it does make a lot of sense, except the end part where you invented out of nowhere the idea that they hadn't completed the rest of the game. Consider these facts: 1) The reviewers got to see the Beta I agree with you there. 2) Tasos said the Beta is ramping up in what it tests, and the reason you didn't see quotes about sieges in the beta tester feedback is that they are not testing that yet. That's your theory. It's a good one. I really hope it's true. My theory is that sieges are not in the game because the mechanics are not finished. 3) The previous people who saw it (Yellowbeard, etc.) got to play something other than the Beta, perhaps the internal servers with all the features enabled. Because Yellowbeard did not report the problems that are listed in the beta quotes, I reserve my original hypothesis that he did not actually play the game. It then follows that the reviewers wouldn't see sieges (for example) for a reason other than "THEY HAVEN'T EVEN BEEN IMPLEMENTED OMG", while simultaneously it makes sense that YB would have seen sieges. What part of this escaped you? Indeed.
You realise the 17min in game footage vid we saw earlier this year had siege's in it right? Including the siege weapons and the ship battles. That is the build the internal testers have been playing which is what Yellow beard got to play.
Yes, it does make a lot of sense, except the end part where you invented out of nowhere the idea that they hadn't completed the rest of the game. Consider these facts: 1) The reviewers got to see the Beta I agree with you there. 2) Tasos said the Beta is ramping up in what it tests, and the reason you didn't see quotes about sieges in the beta tester feedback is that they are not testing that yet. That's your theory. It's a good one. I really hope it's true. My theory is that sieges are not in the game because the mechanics are not finished. 3) The previous people who saw it (Yellowbeard, etc.) got to play something other than the Beta, perhaps the internal servers with all the features enabled. Because Yellowbeard did not report the problems that are listed in the beta quotes, I reserve my original hypothesis that he did not actually play the game. It then follows that the reviewers wouldn't see sieges (for example) for a reason other than "THEY HAVEN'T EVEN BEEN IMPLEMENTED OMG", while simultaneously it makes sense that YB would have seen sieges. What part of this escaped you? Indeed.
No, that is not my theory. It is what Tasos said in the recent Beta update. Unless you claim he is just flat out lying, then this is to be taken as true. If you want to get into the realm of BUT THEY'RE LYING, then discussion is futile.
YB stated unequivocally that he played the game, and killed various players (i.e. devs) in the game. So your hypothesis is that he was lying and his review was faked? Or that he only saw a demo, then invented parts about how he had played it (when he actually didn't), and then answered 20+ pages of questions in the related threads about his experiences in the game, by making shit up?
Yes, it does make a lot of sense, except the end part where you invented out of nowhere the idea that they hadn't completed the rest of the game. Consider these facts: 1) The reviewers got to see the Beta I agree with you there. 2) Tasos said the Beta is ramping up in what it tests, and the reason you didn't see quotes about sieges in the beta tester feedback is that they are not testing that yet. That's your theory. It's a good one. I really hope it's true. My theory is that sieges are not in the game because the mechanics are not finished. 3) The previous people who saw it (Yellowbeard, etc.) got to play something other than the Beta, perhaps the internal servers with all the features enabled. Because Yellowbeard did not report the problems that are listed in the beta quotes, I reserve my original hypothesis that he did not actually play the game. It then follows that the reviewers wouldn't see sieges (for example) for a reason other than "THEY HAVEN'T EVEN BEEN IMPLEMENTED OMG", while simultaneously it makes sense that YB would have seen sieges. What part of this escaped you? Indeed.
No, that is not my theory. It is what Tasos said in the recent Beta update. Unless you claim he is just flat out lying, then this is to be taken as true. If you want to get into the realm of BUT THEY'RE LYING, then discussion is futile.
YB stated unequivocally that he played the game, and killed various players (i.e. devs) in the game. So your hypothesis is that he was lying and his review was faked? Or that he only saw a demo, then invented parts about how he had played it (when he actually didn't), and then answered 20+ pages of questions in the related threads about his experiences in the game, by making shit up?
Give me a few days and I can make up more than 20+ pages worth of material. Probably do it in a day if I had the time. Regardless, this MMO needs to come out so people will quit stating its vaporware and we can move on. Then we can start downplaying this MMO, because let's face it, every MMO after it launches will get downplayed regardless if its good or not. I can see the threads now, and its going to be bad. People just can't give up and move on. This seems to be a movement brought on when World of Waarcraft launched and has only gotten worse. I guess I could tell everyone here to move on, but they wouldn't listen. Its like they are relentless on making thier opinon seem so factual. And if someone contradicts you, OMG! I understand these boards are used because we have the freedom to. I just loved the times when forums were more of a source for information and less of a source of bitchassness(sorry been watching making the band way to much, dam gf). Oh well, comon DF, lets get this stuff rolling.
Yes, it does make a lot of sense, except the end part where you invented out of nowhere the idea that they hadn't completed the rest of the game. Consider these facts: 1) The reviewers got to see the Beta I agree with you there. 2) Tasos said the Beta is ramping up in what it tests, and the reason you didn't see quotes about sieges in the beta tester feedback is that they are not testing that yet. That's your theory. It's a good one. I really hope it's true. My theory is that sieges are not in the game because the mechanics are not finished. 3) The previous people who saw it (Yellowbeard, etc.) got to play something other than the Beta, perhaps the internal servers with all the features enabled. Because Yellowbeard did not report the problems that are listed in the beta quotes, I reserve my original hypothesis that he did not actually play the game. It then follows that the reviewers wouldn't see sieges (for example) for a reason other than "THEY HAVEN'T EVEN BEEN IMPLEMENTED OMG", while simultaneously it makes sense that YB would have seen sieges. What part of this escaped you? Indeed.
No, that is not my theory. It is what Tasos said in the recent Beta update. Unless you claim he is just flat out lying, then this is to be taken as true. If you want to get into the realm of BUT THEY'RE LYING, then discussion is futile.
YB stated unequivocally that he played the game, and killed various players (i.e. devs) in the game. So your hypothesis is that he was lying and his review was faked? Or that he only saw a demo, then invented parts about how he had played it (when he actually didn't), and then answered 20+ pages of questions in the related threads about his experiences in the game, by making shit up?
Some people wont believe until they are actually playing the game. A few of those will have still have such hatred for the game that even than they will find every little fault.
However the opposite is true. Some people have had belief in this game for along time without real proof. A few of these will hold onto that belief even if they play the game and its not what was stated.
Graphic and animation preferences aside, I like the idea of an Elder Scrolls style combat system and interface. It's what I've always wanted in a game including loot system (if you see the NPC using it, he'll have it on him when you loot the corpse. Good thing I haven't followed this game else I might be like others on this forum (fanbois and trolls alike). If It lives up to most of what it boasts, it might be worth a go.
And remmber, the evidence of abscence is not the abcsence of evidence, it pays to form an opinion after you have something tangible to base it on.
Comments
Oh. So they could show this content to Yellowbeard during his visit. But for some reason 4 months later these things are no longer able to be seen in the game?
That makes a lot of sense.
By the way. Now that we have beta quotes and this preview. It really seems like Yellowbeard's "preview" was all propaganda. Either that, or there are so many problems with the game that they are having to redo everything that Yellowbeard saw.
"There is as yet insufficient data for a meaningful answer."
But dear Tenspotting isn't this exactly what you asked for? A proffessional media site similar to MMORPG.com to play the beta? I mean wasn't this what you said was the only confirmation you needed? lol please correct me if I am wrong there my friend but didn't this fill the criteria you set in place to begin with? Ah I love when you guys prove to others you aren't worth listening to. This of course was the last straw for me, since it seems to be clear to a blind man that you are simply here to troll when even the very thing you specificaly ask for is done and you see it, it isn't enough lol. Farewell my old friend time to block you lol not worth the time to type anymore you just look plain silly at this point lol.
Yep that's all the trolls have left to say , regurgitated crap .
This thread turned out to be.. weird?
______________________________
The Sceptics, yes they're special but we've need them to.. I guess.
And if they're put more effort MMORPG.com can create a 'Team Sceptic'
and send them to the Special Olympus.
No. This is total bullshit.
Where are the VIDEOS? the SCREENSHOTS? The in depth review of what they played?
Oh look.. there's goblins... and the sounds are good.
What the fuck? Is that all they can come up with for a game that supposedly has 10x the features that WoW has and is launching next month?
Oh. So they could show this content to Yellowbeard during his visit. But for some reason 4 months later these things are no longer able to be seen in the game?
That makes a lot of sense.
Hmm. Could it be that Yellowbeard ask to see specific stuff and the Italians asked to see something else. Since they only saw what they asked for maybe they didnt see the other stuff?
That does make a lot of sense.
No. This is total bullshit.
Where are the VIDEOS? the SCREENSHOTS? The in depth review of what they played?
Oh look.. there's goblins... and the sounds are good.
What the fuck? Is that all they can come up with for a game that supposedly has 10x the featutres that WoW has and is launhing next month?
So angry!
...or not.
maybe...
maybe not
No. This is total bullshit.
Where are the VIDEOS? the SCREENSHOTS? The in depth review of what they played?
Oh look.. there's goblins... and the sounds are good.
What the fuck? Is that all they can come up with for a game that supposedly has 10x the featutres that WoW has and is launhing next month?
And just maybe the Italians stated they have more stuff to show and plan on showing it later?
Where are the screenshots? There are new screenshots on MMORPG Italias site and more forthcoming.
Where are the Videos? I believe they stated they will be providing a video at a later date?
Your unshakable faith in this game is an inspiration to us all. If only I could be that blind.
Since you can make up things to make sense for your case, I will make up things too.
Could it be that Yellowbeard never actually played the game and just saw a gameplay demo highlighting all of the anticipated features of Darkfall? The game site employees, on the other hand, actually did get to play the game and the reason that Adventurine only let them play the starting area is because this is all that is completed of the game?
That also does make a lot of sense.
"There is as yet insufficient data for a meaningful answer."
Your unshakable faith in this game is an inspiration to us all. If only I could be that blind.
Since you can make up things to make sense for your case, I will make up things too.
Could it be that Yellowbeard never actually played the game and just saw a gameplay demo highlighting all of the anticipated features of Darkfall? The game site employees, on the other hand, actually did get to play the game and the reason that Adventurine only let them play the starting area is because this is all that is completed of the game?
That also does make a lot of sense.
Yes, it does make a lot of sense, except the end part where you invented out of nowhere the idea that they hadn't completed the rest of the game. Consider these facts:
1) The reviewers got to see the Beta
2) Tasos said the Beta is ramping up in what it tests, and the reason you didn't see quotes about sieges in the beta tester feedback is that they are not testing that yet.
3) The previous people who saw it (Yellowbeard, etc.) got to play something other than the Beta, perhaps the internal servers with all the features enabled.
It then follows that the reviewers wouldn't see sieges (for example) for a reason other than "THEY HAVEN'T EVEN BEEN IMPLEMENTED OMG", while simultaneously it makes sense that YB would have seen sieges.
What part of this escaped you?
...or not.
Your unshakable faith in this game is an inspiration to us all. If only I could be that blind.
Since you can make up things to make sense for your case, I will make up things too.
Could it be that Yellowbeard never actually played the game and just saw a gameplay demo highlighting all of the anticipated features of Darkfall? The game site employees, on the other hand, actually did get to play the game and the reason that Adventurine only let them play the starting area is because this is all that is completed of the game?
That also does make a lot of sense.
Unshakeable faith. No unshakeable faith here, my belief is the game will be a cross between shadowbane and mount and blade and wont be ready until at least Q2 2009.
Please show me where I made things up.
Yes it could be Yellowbeard never actually played the game and just saw a gameplay demo highlighting all of the anticipated features of the game. However when he posted on Forumfall and was answering questions for a few days did you ask him the question? Yes, the game site employees could have only played in the starting area because this is all that is completed.
Time will tell on all of this.
No. This is total bullshit.
Where are the VIDEOS? the SCREENSHOTS? The in depth review of what they played?
Oh look.. there's goblins... and the sounds are good.
What the fuck? Is that all they can come up with for a game that supposedly has 10x the features that WoW has and is launching next month?
Where are the screenshots?
Cmon you are slipping man...you have to pimp your troll game man. So many are giving up with the latest info out now, you are their last hope!
---sig---
Click this for lulz: http://www.mmorpg.com/discussion2.cfm/thread/173737/page/6
I think you need a tinfoil hat to be honest.
Well why shouldnt they go there and see for themself that the game exist first hand? And the quality of it. Cant it be fun to meet the developers and same time have some nice Greek food?
Answer me that pls?
OMG!
Is there absolutely NOTHING about this project you question?
I believe I asked a perfectly valid, non-troll question. Why was that question such a problem for you?
Quite frankly your response was what I expected. You are NO better than some of the worst trolls that reside here. You think you are, but you are just like them.
LOL.
The difference btw me and the trolls is that i tell the truth. Nothing but the truth and have been doing just that all along.
Wether you choose to believe me is your call.
Questions like the one you asked is tinfoil quality as i see it.
You speak the truth?
Well, in the future you may prove to be correct, but so far you haven't been right about anything you've ever said or predicted regarding Darkfall.
I've followed your posts for quite some time and all I see is blind fanboism, nothing more.
And calling this game the GREATEST MMO of all time! You believe that's the truth also? Perhaps you should put on the tinfoil hat my friend. You have NEVER seen nor even PLAYED this game, yet you proclaim it the GREATEST game of all time.
Yep... That makes perfect sense. LOL!
Well you can call it a gutfeeling i have. I dont care. I played games longer then most on this website and i honestly think i can see what is good and what is not by now.
Darkfall will be one of the best games ever released cause you know why i think like that? Its cause the developers of Darkfall burns for the game, guys like CLaus burns for the game and i honor him for it. Most talk about Tasos but dont forget developers like Claus Grovdal that was one of the guys that started this mission. I will never forget one of his quotes that went like this "<Claus|Dev> if we can recreate just a little of that first magic in UO with darkfall, my life has been worthwhile.". That quote speak of passion and with passion you come along way.
We can continue this discussion after game is released and i wont be that hard on you, i promise.
Aragon would you be referring to the two years you spent playing WoW before you started following Darkfall or perhapes another game?
Aragon would you be referring to the two years you spent playing WoW before you started following Darkfall or perhapes another game?
Wow so bitter....
---sig---
Click this for lulz: http://www.mmorpg.com/discussion2.cfm/thread/173737/page/6
Aragon would you be referring to the two years you spent playing WoW before you started following Darkfall or perhapes another game?
Wow so bitter....
No bitterness, just interested in what games Aragon has played other then WoW for 2 years that he thinks qualifies him to make statements like this.
"There is as yet insufficient data for a meaningful answer."
Aragon would you be referring to the two years you spent playing WoW before you started following Darkfall or perhapes another game?
ROFL thats amusing mate. I played UO from beta. And you know im +50 years old so i played games since Commodore times. Even before that to be honest. I started in the gambling halls before any console was out. The guild im in B@D was most likely the best ever PvP guild in the history of UO. A bit cocky you might think, aye, but we fought the best guilds of UO both on Europe side and NA side and won. And UO is the most hardcore PvP MMORPG we seen up til today. Lets hope Darkfall bring that down.
Just out of curiosity, what is your trackrecord of game playing since you called me out?
I have all experience needed to make predictions and i will love to discuss this in a month with you. You might be in a state then to take in some new information i hope. As it is now youre a blindfolded troll of the game Darkfall. Think abit broader, what can the game industry of MMORPG games benefit from games like Darkfall on a success? My answer is alot.
But as i said let us have a discussion on experience and who was right when we have some actual facit on it ok? And id love to share abit of my experience with you then, you just have to ask.
You realise the 17min in game footage vid we saw earlier this year had siege's in it right? Including the siege weapons and the ship battles. That is the build the internal testers have been playing which is what Yellow beard got to play.
No, that is not my theory. It is what Tasos said in the recent Beta update. Unless you claim he is just flat out lying, then this is to be taken as true. If you want to get into the realm of BUT THEY'RE LYING, then discussion is futile.
YB stated unequivocally that he played the game, and killed various players (i.e. devs) in the game. So your hypothesis is that he was lying and his review was faked? Or that he only saw a demo, then invented parts about how he had played it (when he actually didn't), and then answered 20+ pages of questions in the related threads about his experiences in the game, by making shit up?
...or not.
No, that is not my theory. It is what Tasos said in the recent Beta update. Unless you claim he is just flat out lying, then this is to be taken as true. If you want to get into the realm of BUT THEY'RE LYING, then discussion is futile.
YB stated unequivocally that he played the game, and killed various players (i.e. devs) in the game. So your hypothesis is that he was lying and his review was faked? Or that he only saw a demo, then invented parts about how he had played it (when he actually didn't), and then answered 20+ pages of questions in the related threads about his experiences in the game, by making shit up?
Give me a few days and I can make up more than 20+ pages worth of material. Probably do it in a day if I had the time. Regardless, this MMO needs to come out so people will quit stating its vaporware and we can move on. Then we can start downplaying this MMO, because let's face it, every MMO after it launches will get downplayed regardless if its good or not. I can see the threads now, and its going to be bad. People just can't give up and move on. This seems to be a movement brought on when World of Waarcraft launched and has only gotten worse. I guess I could tell everyone here to move on, but they wouldn't listen. Its like they are relentless on making thier opinon seem so factual. And if someone contradicts you, OMG! I understand these boards are used because we have the freedom to. I just loved the times when forums were more of a source for information and less of a source of bitchassness(sorry been watching making the band way to much, dam gf). Oh well, comon DF, lets get this stuff rolling.
No, that is not my theory. It is what Tasos said in the recent Beta update. Unless you claim he is just flat out lying, then this is to be taken as true. If you want to get into the realm of BUT THEY'RE LYING, then discussion is futile.
YB stated unequivocally that he played the game, and killed various players (i.e. devs) in the game. So your hypothesis is that he was lying and his review was faked? Or that he only saw a demo, then invented parts about how he had played it (when he actually didn't), and then answered 20+ pages of questions in the related threads about his experiences in the game, by making shit up?
Some people wont believe until they are actually playing the game. A few of those will have still have such hatred for the game that even than they will find every little fault.
However the opposite is true. Some people have had belief in this game for along time without real proof. A few of these will hold onto that belief even if they play the game and its not what was stated.
Graphic and animation preferences aside, I like the idea of an Elder Scrolls style combat system and interface. It's what I've always wanted in a game including loot system (if you see the NPC using it, he'll have it on him when you loot the corpse. Good thing I haven't followed this game else I might be like others on this forum (fanbois and trolls alike). If It lives up to most of what it boasts, it might be worth a go.
And remmber, the evidence of abscence is not the abcsence of evidence, it pays to form an opinion after you have something tangible to base it on.
uhm.. yeah what ever bakes your bacon then.. you are truly pathetic.
Go play the carebear games you like.
Or fill out my sig.
Good luck in life, you pathetic little troll
*****************************
I have nothing clever to say.