Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

9/11 is inside work?

145791016

Comments

  • JaziaJazia Member Posts: 584


    Originally posted by Gane1
    They needed to shoot a missile at the Pentagon after the towers were already attacked? I think the attack on the towers would be reason enough.
    No military in the world would agree to attacking it's own headquarters, which is what you are suggesting. There was more than enough reason to attack terrorist groups before 9/11 happened. The government did not need to attack itself for a reason to attack terrorists.
    I assume you are refering to Iraq as an occupied country. Which is a completely seperate issue. We didn't even base the invasion on terrorism. It was based on the idea that Iraq had WMDs. If you look at the UN resolution it clearly says that an attack could be used against Iraq if they did not cooperate with inspecters. So 9/11 did not need to happen for that war.
    Afganistan serves no real strategic purpose to us. So why would we want to invade them? Those are the only two country that we are involved with right now. Of course I'm sure you have proof that we are planning attacks against the entire world by the end of the year.image

    1. Sure they need more than "enough" reasons to declare a "WAR on terror". It is just what the government need... the people like you will kill the theory of the government is behind 9/11 themselves with the "fact" that no government will attack their own milltary headquarter. I thought Hitler wouldn't burn his own govenment building either. ::::15::

    2. And yes, Iraq War is totally related to 9/11. Certainly your short memory did not remember how the medias were saying.

    "Accurate information shows Iraq has connection with the terrorists"
    "Iraq has WMD".
    "If the terrorists that are connected to Iraq get their hands on the WMD from Iraq..." etc.


    3. Oh yeah, Afganistan serves great military purpose in futher wars. Its territory is connected with China, and it will be a good spot for building military bases that can backstab China from the west if there is anything going on with Taiwan.

  • JaziaJazia Member Posts: 584


    Originally posted by Gane1


    You're joking right? There are many books and sources, many written by people in the gulag that would disagree with your ignorance.
    I'm sure sure the government bought them all off though to say what they want.image


    There is no need.

    The "evil" communists are the enemies of ALL businesses. The punblishers, newspapers, TV/Radio stations are all owned by the business. It is only natural they will help spreading the information to make communists look horrible.


    Go ahead write a book about how communists should take over all business. See if you can get any publisher to work with you at all.

  • Gane1Gane1 Member Posts: 44

    Please you say the government runs the media, but now you are using that as your only basis to back you up?

    I don't trust everything the media says either. The media works to make people scared, that is why they said they are linked to terrorism.

    The UN resolution says nothing about terrorists. This is all that America needed to go to war with them. Not an attack by a terrorist cell.

    If America went to war with China it would be a nuclear exchange. A conventional war would not go well for us against a country 4x our size. Any country would notice a buildup of troops there, so your backstabbing theory is out. We have other bases in the area that would serve the same purpose that you say Afganistan serves, so that theory goes out the window.

    Oh, and I'm pretty sure the Communist Manifesto is available just about anywhere. Not to mention a small Communist party right here in America. I'm

  • Gane1Gane1 Member Posts: 44

    Please you say the government runs the media, but now you are using that as your only basis to back you up?

    I don't trust everything the media says either. The media works to make people scared, that is why they said they are linked to terrorism.

    The UN resolution says nothing about terrorists. This is all that America needed to go to war with them. Not an attack by a terrorist cell.

    If America went to war with China it would be a nuclear exchange. A conventional war would not go well for us against a country 4x our size. Any country would notice a buildup of troops there, so your backstabbing theory is out. We have other bases in the area that would serve the same purpose that you say Afganistan serves, so that theory goes out the window.

    Oh, and I'm pretty sure the Communist Manifesto is available just about anywhere. Not to mention a small Communist party right here in America. I'm pretty

  • Gane1Gane1 Member Posts: 44

    Please you say the government runs the media, but now you are using that as your only basis to back you up?

    I don't trust everything the media says either. The media works to make people scared, that is why they said they are linked to terrorism.

    The UN resolution says nothing about terrorists. This is all that America needed to go to war with them. Not an attack by a terrorist cell.

    If America went to war with China it would be a nuclear exchange. A conventional war would not go well for us against a country 4x our size. Any country would notice a buildup of troops there, so your backstabbing theory is out. We have other bases in the area that would serve the same purpose that you say Afganistan serves, so that theory goes out the window.

    Oh, and I'm pretty sure the Communist Manifesto is available just about anywhere. Not to mention a small Communist party right here in America. I'm pretty sure

  • Gane1Gane1 Member Posts: 44

    Please you say the government runs the media, but now you are using that as your only basis to back you up?

    I don't trust everything the media says either. The media works to make people scared, that is why they said they are linked to terrorism.

    The UN resolution says nothing about terrorists. This is all that America needed to go to war with them. Not an attack by a terrorist cell.

    If America went to war with China it would be a nuclear exchange. A conventional war would not go well for us against a country 4x our size. Any country would notice a buildup of troops there, so your backstabbing theory is out. We have other bases in the area that would serve the same purpose that you say Afganistan serves, so that theory goes out the window.

    Oh, and I'm pretty sure the Communist Manifesto is available just about anywhere. Not to mention a small Communist party right here in America. I'm pretty sure that

  • Gane1Gane1 Member Posts: 44

    Please you say the government runs the media, but now you are using that as your only basis to back you up?

    I don't trust everything the media says either. The media works to make people scared, that is why they said they are linked to terrorism.

    The UN resolution says nothing about terrorists. This is all that America needed to go to war with them. Not an attack by a terrorist cell.

    If America went to war with China it would be a nuclear exchange. A conventional war would not go well for us against a country 4x our size. Any country would notice a buildup of troops there, so your backstabbing theory is out. We have other bases in the area that would serve the same purpose that you say Afganistan serves, so that theory goes out the window.

    Oh, and I'm pretty sure the Communist Manifesto is available just about anywhere. Not to mention a small Communist party right here in America. I'm pretty sure that it's

  • Gane1Gane1 Member Posts: 44

    Please you say the government runs the media, but now you are using that as your only basis to back you up?

    I don't trust everything the media says either. The media works to make people scared, that is why they said they are linked to terrorism.

    The UN resolution says nothing about terrorists. This is all that America needed to go to war with them. Not an attack by a terrorist cell.

    If America went to war with China it would be a nuclear exchange. A conventional war would not go well for us against a country 4x our size. Any country would notice a buildup of troops there, so your backstabbing theory is out. We have other bases in the area that would serve the same purpose that you say Afganistan serves, so that theory goes out the window.

    Oh, and I'm pretty sure the Communist Manifesto is available just about anywhere. Not to mention a small Communist party right here in America. I'm pretty sure that it's obvious

  • Gane1Gane1 Member Posts: 44

    Please you say the government runs the media, but now you are using that as your only basis to back you up?

    I don't trust everything the media says either. The media works to make people scared, that is why they said they are linked to terrorism.

    The UN resolution says nothing about terrorists. This is all that America needed to go to war with them. Not an attack by a terrorist cell.

    If America went to war with China it would be a nuclear exchange. A conventional war would not go well for us against a country 4x our size. Any country would notice a buildup of troops there, so your backstabbing theory is out. We have other bases in the area that would serve the same purpose that you say Afganistan serves, so that theory goes out the window.

    Oh, and I'm pretty sure the Communist Manifesto is available just about anywhere. Not to mention a small Communist party right here in America. I'm pretty sure that it's obvious communism

  • Gane1Gane1 Member Posts: 44

    Please you say the government runs the media, but now you are using that as your only basis to back you up?

    I don't trust everything the media says either. The media works to make people scared, that is why they said they are linked to terrorism.

    The UN resolution says nothing about terrorists. This is all that America needed to go to war with them. Not an attack by a terrorist cell.

    If America went to war with China it would be a nuclear exchange. A conventional war would not go well for us against a country 4x our size. Any country would notice a buildup of troops there, so your backstabbing theory is out. We have other bases in the area that would serve the same purpose that you say Afganistan serves, so that theory goes out the window.

    Oh, and I'm pretty sure the Communist Manifesto is available just about anywhere. Not to mention a small Communist party right here in America. I'm pretty sure that it's obvious communism fails,

  • Gane1Gane1 Member Posts: 44

    Please you say the government runs the media, but now you are using that as your only basis to back you up?

    I don't trust everything the media says either. The media works to make people scared, that is why they said they are linked to terrorism.

    The UN resolution says nothing about terrorists. This is all that America needed to go to war with them. Not an attack by a terrorist cell.

    If America went to war with China it would be a nuclear exchange. A conventional war would not go well for us against a country 4x our size. Any country would notice a buildup of troops there, so your backstabbing theory is out. We have other bases in the area that would serve the same purpose that you say Afganistan serves, so that theory goes out the window.

    Oh, and I'm pretty sure the Communist Manifesto is available just about anywhere. Not to mention a small Communist party right here in America. I'm pretty sure that it's obvious communism fails, unless

  • Gane1Gane1 Member Posts: 44

    Please you say the government runs the media, but now you are using that as your only basis to back you up?

    I don't trust everything the media says either. The media works to make people scared, that is why they said they are linked to terrorism.

    The UN resolution says nothing about terrorists. This is all that America needed to go to war with them. Not an attack by a terrorist cell.

    If America went to war with China it would be a nuclear exchange. A conventional war would not go well for us against a country 4x our size. Any country would notice a buildup of troops there, so your backstabbing theory is out. We have other bases in the area that would serve the same purpose that you say Afganistan serves, so that theory goes out the window.

    Oh, and I'm pretty sure the Communist Manifesto is available just about anywhere. Not to mention a small Communist party right here in America. I'm pretty sure that it's obvious communism fails, unless of course you still believe t

  • Gane1Gane1 Member Posts: 44

    Please you say the government runs the media, but now you are using that as your only basis to back you up?

    I don't trust everything the media says either. The media works to make people scared, that is why they said they are linked to terrorism.

    The UN resolution says nothing about terrorists. This is all that America needed to go to war with them. Not an attack by a terrorist cell.

    If America went to war with China it would be a nuclear exchange. A conventional war would not go well for us against a country 4x our size. Any country would notice a buildup of troops there, so your backstabbing theory is out. We have other bases in the area that would serve the same purpose that you say Afganistan serves, so that theory goes out the window.

    Oh, and I'm pretty sure the Communist Manifesto is available just about anywhere. Not to mention a small Communist party right here in America. I'm pretty sure that it's obvious communism fails, unless of

  • Gane1Gane1 Member Posts: 44

    Please you say the government runs the media, but now you are using that as your only basis to back you up?

    I don't trust everything the media says either. The media works to make people scared, that is why they said they are linked to terrorism.

    The UN resolution says nothing about terrorists. This is all that America needed to go to war with them. Not an attack by a terrorist cell.

    If America went to war with China it would be a nuclear exchange. A conventional war would not go well for us against a country 4x our size. Any country would notice a buildup of troops there, so your backstabbing theory is out. We have other bases in the area that would serve the same purpose that you say Afganistan serves, so that theory goes out the window.

    Oh, and I'm pretty sure the Communist Manifesto is available just about anywhere. Not to mention a small Communist party right here in America. I'm pretty sure that it's obvious communism fails, unless of course

  • Gane1Gane1 Member Posts: 44

    Please you say the government runs the media, but now you are using that as your only basis to back you up?

    I don't trust everything the media says either. The media works to make people scared, that is why they said they are linked to terrorism.

    The UN resolution says nothing about terrorists. This is all that America needed to go to war with them. Not an attack by a terrorist cell.

    If America went to war with China it would be a nuclear exchange. A conventional war would not go well for us against a country 4x our size. Any country would notice a buildup of troops there, so your backstabbing theory is out. We have other bases in the area that would serve the same purpose that you say Afganistan serves, so that theory goes out the window.

    Oh, and I'm pretty sure the Communist Manifesto is available just about anywhere. Not to mention a small Communist party right here in America. I'm pretty sure that it's obvious communism fails, unless of course you

  • Gane1Gane1 Member Posts: 44

    Please you say the government runs the media, but now you are using that as your only basis to back you up?

    I don't trust everything the media says either. The media works to make people scared, that is why they said they are linked to terrorism.

    The UN resolution says nothing about terrorists. This is all that America needed to go to war with them. Not an attack by a terrorist cell.

    If America went to war with China it would be a nuclear exchange. A conventional war would not go well for us against a country 4x our size. Any country would notice a buildup of troops there, so your backstabbing theory is out. We have other bases in the area that would serve the same purpose that you say Afganistan serves, so that theory goes out the window.

    Oh, and I'm pretty sure the Communist Manifesto is available just about anywhere. Not to mention a small Communist party right here in America. I'm pretty sure that it's obvious communism fails, unless of course you still

  • Gane1Gane1 Member Posts: 44

    Please you say the government runs the media, but now you are using that as your only basis to back you up?

    I don't trust everything the media says either. The media works to make people scared, that is why they said they are linked to terrorism.

    The UN resolution says nothing about terrorists. This is all that America needed to go to war with them. Not an attack by a terrorist cell.

    If America went to war with China it would be a nuclear exchange. A conventional war would not go well for us against a country 4x our size. Any country would notice a buildup of troops there, so your backstabbing theory is out. We have other bases in the area that would serve the same purpose that you say Afganistan serves, so that theory goes out the window.

    Oh, and I'm pretty sure the Communist Manifesto is available just about anywhere. Not to mention a small Communist party right here in America. I'm pretty sure that it's obvious communism fails, unless of course you still believe tat

  • Gane1Gane1 Member Posts: 44

    Please you say the government runs the media, but now you are using that as your only basis to back you up?

    I don't trust everything the media says either. The media works to make people scared, that is why they said they are linked to terrorism.

    The UN resolution says nothing about terrorists. This is all that America needed to go to war with them. Not an attack by a terrorist cell.

    If America went to war with China it would be a nuclear exchange. A conventional war would not go well for us against a country 4x our size. Any country would notice a buildup of troops there, so your backstabbing theory is out. We have other bases in the area that would serve the same purpose that you say Afganistan serves, so that theory goes out the window.

    Oh, and I'm pretty sure the Communist Manifesto is available just about anywhere. Not to mention a small Communist party right here in America. I'm pretty sure that it's obvious communism fails, unless of course you still believe tat the Soviet

  • Gane1Gane1 Member Posts: 44

    Please you say the government runs the media, but now you are using that as your only basis to back you up?

    I don't trust everything the media says either. The media works to make people scared, that is why they said they are linked to terrorism.

    The UN resolution says nothing about terrorists. This is all that America needed to go to war with them. Not an attack by a terrorist cell.

    If America went to war with China it would be a nuclear exchange. A conventional war would not go well for us against a country 4x our size. Any country would notice a buildup of troops there, so your backstabbing theory is out. We have other bases in the area that would serve the same purpose that you say Afganistan serves, so that theory goes out the window.

    Oh, and I'm pretty sure the Communist Manifesto is available just about anywhere. Not to mention a small Communist party right here in America. I'm pretty sure that it's obvious communism fails, unless of course you still believe tat the

  • Gane1Gane1 Member Posts: 44

    Please you say the government runs the media, but now you are using that as your only basis to back you up?

    I don't trust everything the media says either. The media works to make people scared, that is why they said they are linked to terrorism.

    The UN resolution says nothing about terrorists. This is all that America needed to go to war with them. Not an attack by a terrorist cell.

    If America went to war with China it would be a nuclear exchange. A conventional war would not go well for us against a country 4x our size. Any country would notice a buildup of troops there, so your backstabbing theory is out. We have other bases in the area that would serve the same purpose that you say Afganistan serves, so that theory goes out the window.

    Oh, and I'm pretty sure the Communist Manifesto is available just about anywhere. Not to mention a small Communist party right here in America. I'm pretty sure that it's obvious communism fails, unless of course you still believe tat the Soviet Union

  • Gane1Gane1 Member Posts: 44

    Please you say the government runs the media, but now you are using that as your only basis to back you up?

    I don't trust everything the media says either. The media works to make people scared, that is why they said they are linked to terrorism.

    The UN resolution says nothing about terrorists. This is all that America needed to go to war with them. Not an attack by a terrorist cell.

    If America went to war with China it would be a nuclear exchange. A conventional war would not go well for us against a country 4x our size. Any country would notice a buildup of troops there, so your backstabbing theory is out. We have other bases in the area that would serve the same purpose that you say Afganistan serves, so that theory goes out the window.

    Oh, and I'm pretty sure the Communist Manifesto is available just about anywhere. Not to mention a small Communist party right here in America. I'm pretty sure that it's obvious communism fails, unless of course you still believe tat the Soviet Union exists, or is

  • Gane1Gane1 Member Posts: 44

    Please you say the government runs the media, but now you are using that as your only basis to back you up?

    I don't trust everything the media says either. The media works to make people scared, that is why they said they are linked to terrorism.

    The UN resolution says nothing about terrorists. This is all that America needed to go to war with them. Not an attack by a terrorist cell.

    If America went to war with China it would be a nuclear exchange. A conventional war would not go well for us against a country 4x our size. Any country would notice a buildup of troops there, so your backstabbing theory is out. We have other bases in the area that would serve the same purpose that you say Afganistan serves, so that theory goes out the window.

    Oh, and I'm pretty sure the Communist Manifesto is available just about anywhere. Not to mention a small Communist party right here in America. I'm pretty sure that it's obvious communism fails, unless of course you still believe tat the Soviet Union exists, or is that

  • Gane1Gane1 Member Posts: 44

    Please you say the government runs the media, but now you are using that as your only basis to back you up?

    I don't trust everything the media says either. The media works to make people scared, that is why they said they are linked to terrorism.

    The UN resolution says nothing about terrorists. This is all that America needed to go to war with them. Not an attack by a terrorist cell.

    If America went to war with China it would be a nuclear exchange. A conventional war would not go well for us against a country 4x our size. Any country would notice a buildup of troops there, so your backstabbing theory is out. We have other bases in the area that would serve the same purpose that you say Afganistan serves, so that theory goes out the window.

    Oh, and I'm pretty sure the Communist Manifesto is available just about anywhere. Not to mention a small Communist party right here in America. I'm pretty sure that it's obvious communism fails, unless of course you still believe tat the Soviet Union exists, or is that a

  • Gane1Gane1 Member Posts: 44

    Please you say the government runs the media, but now you are using that as your only basis to back you up?

    I don't trust everything the media says either. The media works to make people scared, that is why they said they are linked to terrorism.

    The UN resolution says nothing about terrorists. This is all that America needed to go to war with them. Not an attack by a terrorist cell.

    If America went to war with China it would be a nuclear exchange. A conventional war would not go well for us against a country 4x our size. Any country would notice a buildup of troops there, so your backstabbing theory is out. We have other bases in the area that would serve the same purpose that you say Afganistan serves, so that theory goes out the window.

    Oh, and I'm pretty sure the Communist Manifesto is available just about anywhere. Not to mention a small Communist party right here in America. I'm pretty sure that it's obvious communism fails, unless of course you still believe tat the Soviet Union exists, or is that a lie

  • Gane1Gane1 Member Posts: 44
    Well I'm done posting until this site can fix the backspace button posting for me.
Sign In or Register to comment.