Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

The game is 10/10. Don't let them get you!!

145679

Comments

  • courtsdadcourtsdad Member Posts: 326
    Originally posted by CobraSolidus

    Originally posted by jaxsundane

    Originally posted by PezzBomb


    After having posted for about a month in MMORPG I have had quite a few funny experiences. Todays Age of Conan Review was another one of those, but just a minor bump in the road compared to all other madness in this forum. I will talk more about this further down in my post, but for now, back to my funny experiences here in MMORPG; I have had so much verbal abuse for posting about this game. I think AoC is a revolution in genral to the crappy looking MMO genre. I've been called a FC employee, a Shill (whatever that is), a salesman and so on. I've also read posts, from people typically with FailCom logo, like "I want to drag Einar Elingsensen out in my backyard and shoot him","I hope all FC's devs with their families go out of business and die", and so on. I have discussed with people that actually got banned, but then turned up with a new profile 30 min later and admitted it. I've had people making up weird posts in other forums like TTH about me to undermine my integrity. The worst thing though is that posts like above often can sit for days or so unmoderated, sometime even months. This is so unheard of that there have to be more behind this than just coincidense and sloppy moderator work. The 6/10 review today made me realize this more than anything.
    There are three mainpoints I want to bring up with regards to that review
    1. Jef says: "Any discussion of Age of Conan is bound to get around to its visuals, and with good reason. The game is unquestionably the best looking MMORPG to date, full of eye candy both in terms of its lush environments and the startling attention to detail given to character models and movement animations. The motions are, for the most part, fluid and life-like, a far cry from the jerky, comparatively primitive offerings of other games on the market. That said, all the sexiness comes at a hefty price, namely the steepest system requirements in the genre, and the caveat that even with a three-thousand dollar tyrannosaurus of a gaming computer, you're still going to lag like a drunken wooly mammoth and experience significant frame rate issues when attempting to engage in siege combat (or really, any combat with more than a few people on screen)." This is not correct. AoC had performance and FPS issues some time after launch (according to players that played the game from the beginning). This is not the case anymore. There are hundreds of threads on this in AoC official forums, and the concensus is performance is way up. Me myself in example started playing like +3 weeks ago, and my really boring medio Rig (only nonboring part is my GeForce 8800) runs this game on high at 30-40 FPS. I have read numerous posts where people say they run AoC on high at higher FPS than WAR. So I think good old Jef took a shortcut here and recycled some after launch common knowledge. For lag, there have been some posts as of late on lag, but this is not the type of lag you will get due to high activity in an area. This is just high latency spikes that seem to drop in every now and then for no particular reason.
    2. 6/10 is way too low for this very well made game. People keep telling me that the game I play has bugs. Well guess what I can't hardly find any. Game runs smooth as silk and I have only noticed one or two funny bugs til now (LvL 40s). Maybe I am not good enoough troubleshooter or a hopeless programmer (I think that would be to put it mildly), but this game looks bugfree to me. I am well aware of that every patch holds a ton of fixes, tweeks and changes for a reason, but I am saying these bugs are not glaring issues that will hamper the average user in any way. The game is totally fine in my opinion. When I started Age of Conan I was blown away. This game seriously holds the standard of Heavenly Sword and Lost Planet on Xbox360 for the guys that have tested those (and this is only the Dx9 version). This alone is a masterfull achievement for an MMO. When I started playing I kid you not, I went WTFOMGWTFOMG, this is the coolest shit I've ever seen *spasm* "I cut his FCKing arm off" lololol. I was shocked and I am still really amazed about how well this game is made. A mixture of the graphics themselves and the very welltimed smooth animations just absolutely fullfill all my demands on visuals. I could go on and on, but all in all i gave the game a 10/10 at start. Now after 44 levels I am thinking on giving the game perhaps a 9/10 as the crafting was not as good as it could have been. Anyway all this brings me to the conclusion that 6/10 is an outrageously low score. There is absolutely now way this game can get less than 7 or 8. Maybe it was those erronous FPS or bug remarks that contributed to the 6, but 6/10 for this game is way to hard. Just compare it to what other material available in the industry today and it should not be hard to realize that a 6 is way to hard on this game.

     
    3. I am not a RPer, but I have read some of the RP guys in AoC's forums reaction on Jefs review. They are shocked that the reviewer has not found Ctrl+Y in order to pop up the emoticon UI. The game has more emoticons than any other MMOs out there and still is it not good enough. As if sheer number was not enough the animations themself holds extraordinary quality. My point is AoC is one of the better RP games out there immersed in a fantastic atmosphere which only RPers can appreciate the full value of.
    There is absolutely no real reason for why you can give a game like AoC same score as Matrix Online as somebody pointed out in another thread. It is completely madness. This game holds higher quality that most Xbox360 games I can find on a PC with DX9 and you still can tell me, an ex-console player, with important professor tone that this game is a 6/10. This is just madness. You see your intentions are just too much out in the open. There is no way AoC can have a 6/10 score.  Where am I evetually going with this? Well, what this is building up to is that MMORPG and these type of forums that are doing business by advertising/reviewing games and also portioning out negative publisity through forum posting/moderation, is really not as objective as we want to belive. MMORPG lost all integrity in my eyes today as it starts to dawn on me why the forum is in the condition I described on top of this post. I am not saying it is all a scam, but I would not be surprised if there is more than an unhealty amount of influences to how this site is run. Am I paranoide, perhaps, but if you as a player think Blizz and Mythic with others are not intimidated by FC semisuccessfully launch of this beast of a game (Age of Conan), you are wrong. Because anyone launching a game that can offer better graphics and animations than Heavenly Sword in the package of a MMO is a major threat. If FC get AoC running, the momentum of this monster will blow a big hole in the whole industry. Blizz know it, Mythic know it and most of the other guys. They just need to pull strings and cross fingers till the point they have their AoC equivalent out.
    Finally I just like to end this by saying; Gamers out there, 6/10 is nothing but a joke. This is a 10/10 or a 9/10 (that by the way most reviewers gave up front before game launch) game. Gameenthusiasts, Don't let them get you. Age of Conan is a fabolous game just waiting for you to enter and face the consequences of real PvP (patch 3.0). 
    I'll be over in AoC forums from now posting on daily basis about why FC need to wind down the money they waste on the MMORPG forum trolls. By the way, I give you remaining AoC fans the responsibility to bump this thread forever just to keep the finger up. I am out of here, Sayonara!
    10/10 (9/10 if you love Crafting)



     

    Didn't funcom brag about selling some 750k boxes at some point conservative estimates give the game some 200k subs still which is a loss of 550k players which equates to well over half it's players leaving which for me says that said reviewer would obviously fall on the side of 550k that quit I personally think a 6/10 is a bit high but that's mainly because reviews are totally opinion based it really does not say anything concrete about the game you love it nice but please stop trying to use "facts" to "prove" why someones dislike of a product is wrong most of the mmo world hates the game I think you should be glad to have found someone reviewing the game at this point that is that nice about the games state because I see it way worse than a 6/10.



     

    Hmm.. I think OP try to convey that the current version of AoC is much much better than the AoC we saw the first couple of months. He says the game is 10/10 now, even I do not agree with that, but I think most of us can agree that AoC is up there and that it is just getting so much better by the day. The more interesting thing is how intensely FC seem to work on their game. Patch after patch with awesome material just keep slamming inn over the AoC gaming crowds. I belive FC is moving in the right direction with AoC, and that they also seem to do that at a very high pace. 10/10, NO, but if patch 4.0 wiith DX10 and other stuff hold same quality as patch 3.0, this game will soon start to taste like a 9/10.



     

    I come to this thread daily for the simple pleasure of waking up with laughter. Yes it has been at an incredible high pace as they keep taking the gaming world by storm

  • ScotScot Member LegendaryPosts: 24,478

    This is an 8 out of 10 game and I dont know a MMO that rates higher than that to my mind.

  • InzraInzra Member Posts: 679

    I agree with you on alot OP, but I don't think it deserves a 10/10, since it would imply that the game was perfect, which it isn't imo anyway. But for me it's rather close, cause the things that don't work aren't really annoying me that much. There was a bug with the volume of the ambient sounds some time back, that was rather annoying, but they fixed it, and that's about it.

    I would say it's definitely among the top 10 games, whatever those are...

    The ranking list on this site is just bull anyway, a whole bunch of unreleased games at top... so I don't value it much

  • AmazingAveryAmazingAvery Age of Conan AdvocateMember UncommonPosts: 7,188
    Originally posted by Inzra


    I agree with you on alot OP, but I don't think it deserves a 10/10, since it would imply that the game was perfect, which it isn't imo anyway. But for me it's rather close, cause the things that don't work aren't really annoying me that much. There was a bug with the volume of the ambient sounds some time back, that was rather annoying, but they fixed it, and that's about it.
    I would say it's definitely among the top 10 games, whatever those are...
    The ranking list on this site is just bull anyway, a whole bunch of unreleased games at top... so I don't value it much

     

    I think that the Hyped game marking works different that the Released game marking. What dispointing is the timing of the review and name calling of the community in the mmorpg.com one. No way is the game 10/10. Even people score it way above mmorpg.com's review and it's growing all the time - simply a reflection of more people trying and aproving, some those people who left within the first 3 months can't attest to either way.



  • rznkainrznkain Member Posts: 539
    Originally posted by PezzBomb


     
    Me myself in example started playing like +3 weeks ago,

     That right there says enough

  • InzraInzra Member Posts: 679
    Originally posted by AmazingAvery


     
    I think that the Hyped game marking works different that the Released game marking. What dispointing is the timing of the review and name calling of the community in the mmorpg.com one. No way is the game 10/10. Even people score it way above mmorpg.com's review and it's growing all the time - simply a reflection of more people trying and aproving, some those people who left within the first 3 months can't attest to either way.



     

    That might be, but they changed it so that the unreleased games that used to be halfway down the list suddenly went to the top. And I think people do compare released and unreleased games, considering what they are going to play next.

    Anyway, I don't think any game is 10/10. But the review was rather unproffesional if you ask me, obviously affected by all the negativity the game has gotten from players.

    The reason the rating is very slowly but steadily growing is that the people that join now have a much more improved AoC than at launch, that's the way I interpret it anyway. And those who join later on are probably not as hardcore as alot of the Early Access players. The game seems like it would fit casual players very well with the fast leveling. And I think more of those joining later are more casual.

    That's just my speculations though.

  • xain908xain908 Member Posts: 6

    I think AoC is a great game. I just love it. The graphics is cool. If we look at it the problems of AoC can be solved. Techincal problems can be overcome. PCs will have specs suitable for AoC after some time. If everything went well I could have imagined my barbarian wearing these items:



    Barbarian Armor Chest

    Barbarian Armor Helm

    Barbarian Armor Legs

    Critical Mass x2



    Well I guess for now it’s just a dream. *sigh*



    AoC had a “weak” foundation to start with. I hope that in time, they will recover from their loss. And people will get into playing AoC again. This is the coolest game where when you get cool items like the ones I mentioned above, you could really appreciate having high quality graphics for your game.

     

     

  • Ngeldu5tNgeldu5t Member UncommonPosts: 608

    OP,10/10? Whatever you are smoking,I want some.

    I don`t know if anyone from Funcom read this forum and if it's the case know that people love your game but they were terribly disappointed by lot of small things that make it into a big fuck up.

    From what I`ve seen watching friends playing the game(before the new patch) I 'll give the game 6/10.FC will have to do twice the work to bring back "leavers" and new players such as myself in.For this game to earn 8/10 city raiding/crafting and all end game should work as intended and marketed.

    AoC has everything to be the next big thing,so FC you can make(fix) it or break it for good.

     

    In the land of Predators,the lion does not fear the jackals...

  • WargPestWargPest Member Posts: 164
    Originally posted by Ngeldu5t


    OP,10/10? Whatever you are smoking,I want some.
    I don`t know if anyone from Funcom read this forum and if it's the case know that people love your game but they were terribly disappointed by lot of small things that make it into a big fuck up.
    From what I`ve seen watching friends playing the game(before the new patch) I 'll give the game 6/10.FC will have to do twice the work to bring back "leavers" and new players such as myself in.For this game to earn 8/10 city raiding/crafting and all end game should work as intended and marketed.
    AoC has everything to be the next big thing,so FC you can make(fix) it or break it for good.
     



     

    Well we all say that, but thruth is after the last patches you see more and more of these people unloading their satisfaction with this game through type 9/10 reviews. I myself is ready to give it 88/100. After DX10 and even more content, you can yourself imagine where this ends.

  • ScaredgirlScaredgirl Member Posts: 313
    Originally posted by WargPest

    Originally posted by Ngeldu5t


    OP,10/10? Whatever you are smoking,I want some.
    I don`t know if anyone from Funcom read this forum and if it's the case know that people love your game but they were terribly disappointed by lot of small things that make it into a big fuck up.
    From what I`ve seen watching friends playing the game(before the new patch) I 'll give the game 6/10.FC will have to do twice the work to bring back "leavers" and new players such as myself in.For this game to earn 8/10 city raiding/crafting and all end game should work as intended and marketed.
    AoC has everything to be the next big thing,so FC you can make(fix) it or break it for good.
     



     

    Well we all say that, but thruth is after the last patches you see more and more of these people unloading their satisfaction with this game through type 9/10 reviews. I myself is ready to give it 88/100. After DX10 and even more content, you can yourself imagine where this ends.

    Bankruptcy?

    I'll give it:

    PvE  6/10

    PvP 5/10

     

    -----------------------------
    Originally posted by Frobner
    "Massive sieges" "mounted combat" and "spellweaving" are just few words that spring to mind when I hear the word AOC.... But the word FAILURE will always top the list.

  • AmazingAveryAmazingAvery Age of Conan AdvocateMember UncommonPosts: 7,188
    Originally posted by Scaredgirl

    Originally posted by WargPest

    Originally posted by Ngeldu5t


    OP,10/10? Whatever you are smoking,I want some.
    I don`t know if anyone from Funcom read this forum and if it's the case know that people love your game but they were terribly disappointed by lot of small things that make it into a big fuck up.
    From what I`ve seen watching friends playing the game(before the new patch) I 'll give the game 6/10.FC will have to do twice the work to bring back "leavers" and new players such as myself in.For this game to earn 8/10 city raiding/crafting and all end game should work as intended and marketed.
    AoC has everything to be the next big thing,so FC you can make(fix) it or break it for good.
     



     

    Well we all say that, but thruth is after the last patches you see more and more of these people unloading their satisfaction with this game through type 9/10 reviews. I myself is ready to give it 88/100. After DX10 and even more content, you can yourself imagine where this ends.

    Bankruptcy?

    I'll give it:

    PvE  6/10

    PvP 5/10

     

    (But I last played 3 months back and have not tried the PvP Patch, new quests, new crafting recipies, built a guild city or battlekeep nor experienced Ymir's Pass Zone the largest free update since I last subbed  yet.)



     

    Fixed.



  • TransporterTransporter Member Posts: 245
    Originally posted by AmazingAvery

    Originally posted by Scaredgirl

    Originally posted by WargPest

    Originally posted by Ngeldu5t


    OP,10/10? Whatever you are smoking,I want some.
    I don`t know if anyone from Funcom read this forum and if it's the case know that people love your game but they were terribly disappointed by lot of small things that make it into a big fuck up.
    From what I`ve seen watching friends playing the game(before the new patch) I 'll give the game 6/10.FC will have to do twice the work to bring back "leavers" and new players such as myself in.For this game to earn 8/10 city raiding/crafting and all end game should work as intended and marketed.
    AoC has everything to be the next big thing,so FC you can make(fix) it or break it for good.
     



     

    Well we all say that, but thruth is after the last patches you see more and more of these people unloading their satisfaction with this game through type 9/10 reviews. I myself is ready to give it 88/100. After DX10 and even more content, you can yourself imagine where this ends.

    Bankruptcy?

    I'll give it:

    PvE  6/10

    PvP 5/10

     

    (But I last played 3 months back and have not tried the PvP Patch, new quests, new crafting recipies, built a guild city or battlekeep nor experienced Ymir's Pass Zone the largest free update since I last subbed  yet.)



     

    Fixed.



     

    Have you guys noticed that some of these notorious 50 hate posts pr day profiles only post in the weeks (like on work days). I am not mentioning any particluar names, but since I am posting here I guess you kind of can imagine who I am talking about. Just pay attention, monday morning it's all back to work, trolling that forum.

  • arkady09arkady09 Member Posts: 245

    Ive noticed that anyone posting positive stuff about AOC can pretty much attack anyone they wish - break the rules and not be actioned on for it. 

    Ive also noticed that people posting the truth about the quality level to be found in AOC is pretty much a target for the slightest rule infraction and eventually banned.

     

    Its how it is.... Nice to be a fanboi, was that your point?

    image

  • TransporterTransporter Member Posts: 245
    Originally posted by arkady09


    Ive noticed that anyone posting positive stuff about AOC can pretty much attack anyone they wish - break the rules and not be actioned on for it. 
    Ive also noticed that people posting the truth about the quality level to be found in AOC is pretty much a target for the slightest rule infraction and eventually banned.
     
    Its how it is.... Nice to be a fanboi, was that your point?



     

    What is your point? If you read the forum rules you would know that "excessive negative posting is regarded as trolling". I think 50 I hate this or that posts pr day fall well within "excessive negative posting". You see the point is, that a forum should represent every forum members voice, not just the voice of a nutjob spewing out something like hundreds of posts pr day (counting all profiles). That's why trolls are constantly getting banned, because they don't respect this fundamental though as well as the forum rules.

  • arkady09arkady09 Member Posts: 245
    Originally posted by Transporter

    Originally posted by arkady09


    Ive noticed that anyone posting positive stuff about AOC can pretty much attack anyone they wish - break the rules and not be actioned on for it. 
    Ive also noticed that people posting the truth about the quality level to be found in AOC is pretty much a target for the slightest rule infraction and eventually banned.
     
    Its how it is.... Nice to be a fanboi, was that your point?



     

    What is your point? If you read the forum rules you would know that "excessive negative posting is regarded as trolling". I think 50 I hate this or that posts pr day fall well within "excessive negative posting". You see the point is, that a forum should represent every forum members voice, not just the voice of a nutjob spewing out something like hundreds of posts pr day (counting all profiles). That's why trolls are constantly getting banned, because they don't respect this fundamental though as well as the forum rules.



     

    Im not a nutjob. Im telling it the way I see it.  Im not negative posting, unless you consider telling the truth about the game to be trolling. Lets get real eh?

    I know what the rules say.  I have to wonder how new players can consider a forum like to be a good source of information if the general trend of the site is to ban anyone not painting the games as rosey and perfect.  I mean?

    image

  • TransporterTransporter Member Posts: 245
    Originally posted by arkady09

    Originally posted by Transporter

    Originally posted by arkady09


    Ive noticed that anyone posting positive stuff about AOC can pretty much attack anyone they wish - break the rules and not be actioned on for it. 
    Ive also noticed that people posting the truth about the quality level to be found in AOC is pretty much a target for the slightest rule infraction and eventually banned.
     
    Its how it is.... Nice to be a fanboi, was that your point?



     

    What is your point? If you read the forum rules you would know that "excessive negative posting is regarded as trolling". I think 50 I hate this or that posts pr day fall well within "excessive negative posting". You see the point is, that a forum should represent every forum members voice, not just the voice of a nutjob spewing out something like hundreds of posts pr day (counting all profiles). That's why trolls are constantly getting banned, because they don't respect this fundamental though as well as the forum rules.



     

    Im not a nutjob. Im telling it the way I see it.  Im not negative posting, unless you consider telling the truth about the game to be trolling. Lets get real eh?



     

    First of all I did not call you a nutjob. Second, I did not label you as a negative poster? I don't understand how you came to this unless you feel that I talk about you, when I refer to some of the hyperposters above .

    And for your rightous quest for the truth, i think it would be healthy for you to recalibrate that truth a bit. I have read some of your posts and they are certainly not reflecting what I considder to be the truth about AoC today. Also be aware of that people think it's strange that you find the motivation to hang around in this forum several hours pr. day to tell the "truth" about AoC, several months after you quit (You quit before patch 2.0 if I remember right). We all wonder where is this rather special interest coming from?

     

  • DouhkDouhk Member Posts: 1,019
    Originally posted by arkady09


    Ive noticed that anyone posting positive stuff about AOC can pretty much attack anyone they wish - break the rules and not be actioned on for it. 
    Ive also noticed that people posting the truth about the quality level to be found in AOC is pretty much a target for the slightest rule infraction and eventually banned.
     
    Its how it is.... Nice to be a fanboi, was that your point?



     

    This is the most ironic post I have ever seen, and from my observations, completely the opposite. If you can't tell, people defending this game are certainly outnumbered by those that hate it; and in more cases than none, haters of this game are far, FAR more agressive and personal (why people get personal within a video game forum is just downright pathetic if you ask me) in their attacks. If what you say was the case, their certainly wouldn't be as much horrid publicity spread about this game on this site, whether it is deserving of it (the "truth" you speak of) or not. That should be evidence enough that people wanting to see the game die are gaining some sort of ground... which in a way is rather sad in and among itself, as none of what this has any impact whatsoever on this game's success. It's all simply become personal attacks on people over whether or not they are an optimist or pessimist for the game's survival. The forums on these sites have basically lost all grounds on having logical discussion and a believable spread of valid information, which is basically all a forum is for.

    What amazes me more than anything is that the reasons people hate this game such as false advertisement, lack of fulfillment of promises, etc., is being regurgitated in a new essense by those same trolls. Changing sentences, giving false data in hopes of spreading untrue info of the game, filling unspoken words into people's mouths. Am I the only one who sees the irony?

    image If only SW:TOR could be this epic...

  • BearShammyBearShammy Member Posts: 240

    So to talk about the topic of the post. Who's more off, JediJeff or Pezz? Funny enough I kind of feel Pezz, mindless as he seem, to be closer to the right grade of AoC than Jeff, who's supposed to be a professional reviewer. Comments?

  • ScaredgirlScaredgirl Member Posts: 313
    Originally posted by Transporter


    Have you guys noticed that some of these notorious 50 hate posts pr day profiles only post in the weeks (like on work days). I am not mentioning any particluar names, but since I am posting here I guess you kind of can imagine who I am talking about. Just pay attention, monday morning it's all back to work, trolling that forum.

     

    Maybe it could be that these people have a LIFE and they like to spend their weekends doing something other than posting on these forums 24/7

    -----------------------------
    Originally posted by Frobner
    "Massive sieges" "mounted combat" and "spellweaving" are just few words that spring to mind when I hear the word AOC.... But the word FAILURE will always top the list.

  • ScaredgirlScaredgirl Member Posts: 313
    Originally posted by AmazingAvery



    Bankruptcy?

    I'll give it:
    PvE  6/10

    PvP 5/10

     
    (But I last played 3 months back and have not tried the PvP Patch, new quests, new crafting recipies, built a guild city or battlekeep nor experienced Ymir's Pass Zone the largest free update since I last subbed  yet.)

     

    Fixed.

     

    Why do you keep telling these lies about me? I have told you I still play AoC using my friends accout. I have done ALL these things you say here.

    Can't you just except the fact that most people just don't like Age of Conan?

    90% of original player base quit AoC. Doesn't this tell you something? You think they all quit because of some broken quests? No. They quit because they thought the game sucked.

    -----------------------------
    Originally posted by Frobner
    "Massive sieges" "mounted combat" and "spellweaving" are just few words that spring to mind when I hear the word AOC.... But the word FAILURE will always top the list.

  • AzrileAzrile Member Posts: 2,582
    Originally posted by Transporter

    Originally posted by AmazingAvery

    Originally posted by Scaredgirl

    Originally posted by WargPest

    Originally posted by Ngeldu5t


    OP,10/10? Whatever you are smoking,I want some.
    I don`t know if anyone from Funcom read this forum and if it's the case know that people love your game but they were terribly disappointed by lot of small things that make it into a big fuck up.
    From what I`ve seen watching friends playing the game(before the new patch) I 'll give the game 6/10.FC will have to do twice the work to bring back "leavers" and new players such as myself in.For this game to earn 8/10 city raiding/crafting and all end game should work as intended and marketed.
    AoC has everything to be the next big thing,so FC you can make(fix) it or break it for good.
     



     

    Well we all say that, but thruth is after the last patches you see more and more of these people unloading their satisfaction with this game through type 9/10 reviews. I myself is ready to give it 88/100. After DX10 and even more content, you can yourself imagine where this ends.

    Bankruptcy?

    I'll give it:

    PvE  6/10

    PvP 5/10

     

    (But I last played 3 months back and have not tried the PvP Patch, new quests, new crafting recipies, built a guild city or battlekeep nor experienced Ymir's Pass Zone the largest free update since I last subbed  yet.)



     

    Fixed.



     

    Have you guys noticed that some of these notorious 50 hate posts pr day profiles only post in the weeks (like on work days). I am not mentioning any particluar names, but since I am posting here I guess you kind of can imagine who I am talking about. Just pay attention, monday morning it's all back to work, trolling that forum.



     

    Um.. you do realize that most of us can post from work?  On the weekends and at night when I'm home, I do other things.   I enjoy forum pvping from work though :)

    Here is another 'have you noticed'.   Have you guys noticed that everyone that really defends this game is from Norway?   

  • AmazingAveryAmazingAvery Age of Conan AdvocateMember UncommonPosts: 7,188
    Originally posted by Scaredgirl

    Originally posted by AmazingAvery



    Bankruptcy?

    I'll give it:
    PvE  6/10

    PvP 5/10

     
    (But I last played 3 months back and have not tried the PvP Patch, new quests, new crafting recipies, built a guild city or battlekeep nor experienced Ymir's Pass Zone the largest free update since I last subbed  yet.)

     

    Fixed.

     

    Why do you keep telling these lies about me? I have told you I still play AoC using my friends accout. I have done ALL these things you say here.

    Can't you just except the fact that most people just don't like Age of Conan?

    90% of original player base quit AoC. Doesn't this tell you something? You think they all quit because of some broken quests? No. They quit because they thought the game sucked.



     

    And you can keep putting your hands together and praying you're right. You still have to post to convince yourself. You already told us that you played your friends account for 1 day for a couple hours at lvl 40 - you have no idea about the keeps / raids, etc in current form, and skip all the direct normal questions I have asked before. Might be best you moved on it's not healthy. You see at the end of the day we have seen this here on these forums over the past 18 months - guess what? Those that play the game are still here, over the 90% that quit and post to cause nuisance.. they realised it's not healthy and moved on - its been 6 months already. You can cling to your 90% figure all you like but you can never prove it as fact.



  • SilenciumSilencium Member Posts: 86

    I thinke AoC is on a second wind these days. This weekend was definitely pumping with lots more activity that other weekends.

  • arkady09arkady09 Member Posts: 245
    Originally posted by AmazingAvery

    Originally posted by Scaredgirl

    Originally posted by AmazingAvery



    Bankruptcy?

    I'll give it:
    PvE  6/10

    PvP 5/10

     
    (But I last played 3 months back and have not tried the PvP Patch, new quests, new crafting recipies, built a guild city or battlekeep nor experienced Ymir's Pass Zone the largest free update since I last subbed  yet.)

     

    Fixed.

     

    Why do you keep telling these lies about me? I have told you I still play AoC using my friends accout. I have done ALL these things you say here.

    Can't you just except the fact that most people just don't like Age of Conan?

    90% of original player base quit AoC. Doesn't this tell you something? You think they all quit because of some broken quests? No. They quit because they thought the game sucked.



     

    And you can keep putting your hands together and praying you're right. You still have to post to convince yourself. You already told us that you played your friends account for 1 day for a couple hours at lvl 40 - you have no idea about the keeps / raids, etc in current form, and skip all the direct normal questions I have asked before. Might be best you moved on it's not healthy. You see at the end of the day we have seen this here on these forums over the past 18 months - guess what? Those that play the game are still here, over the 90% that quit and post to cause nuisance.. they realised it's not healthy and moved on - its been 6 months already. You can cling to your 90% figure all you like but you can never prove it as fact.



     

    Why can we never prove it as fact? Because Funcom shutup tighter than a drum about this issue when the game went over the cliff.  This game is dead - they posted sub numbers and then abruptly ceased this practice, citing company policy.  It wasnt policy in the 2nd quarter report when they were trying to use the propped up number to bolster support for the game.  Now they know if they release numbers they have to explain what they mean and they wont be good. So they opt not to release them....

    We would LOVE to see some current numbers from funcom.  Blizzard does this pretty regularly.  Aside from the falsehood funcom employees try to spread on their forums, blizzards numbers are not people served.  The numbers they release are number currently playing in their first month, number of people paying with game cards, and number of people with current paid up accounts via CC, pay pal and other various payment methods. 

    So Avery if Funcom is right and AoC is on the rebound, why not post sub number? WOW does it? What could possibly be the reason that Funcom DID in the Q2 report, and now says they dont because of company policy?

     

    image

  • CobraSolidusCobraSolidus Member Posts: 369
    Originally posted by arkady09

    Originally posted by AmazingAvery

    Originally posted by Scaredgirl

    Originally posted by AmazingAvery



    Bankruptcy?

    I'll give it:
    PvE  6/10

    PvP 5/10

     
    (But I last played 3 months back and have not tried the PvP Patch, new quests, new crafting recipies, built a guild city or battlekeep nor experienced Ymir's Pass Zone the largest free update since I last subbed  yet.)

     

    Fixed.

     

    Why do you keep telling these lies about me? I have told you I still play AoC using my friends accout. I have done ALL these things you say here.

    Can't you just except the fact that most people just don't like Age of Conan?

    90% of original player base quit AoC. Doesn't this tell you something? You think they all quit because of some broken quests? No. They quit because they thought the game sucked.



     

    And you can keep putting your hands together and praying you're right. You still have to post to convince yourself. You already told us that you played your friends account for 1 day for a couple hours at lvl 40 - you have no idea about the keeps / raids, etc in current form, and skip all the direct normal questions I have asked before. Might be best you moved on it's not healthy. You see at the end of the day we have seen this here on these forums over the past 18 months - guess what? Those that play the game are still here, over the 90% that quit and post to cause nuisance.. they realised it's not healthy and moved on - its been 6 months already. You can cling to your 90% figure all you like but you can never prove it as fact.



     

    Why can we never prove it as fact? Because Funcom shutup tighter than a drum about this issue when the game went over the cliff.  This game is dead - they posted sub numbers and then abruptly ceased this practice, citing company policy.  It wasnt policy in the 2nd quarter report when they were trying to use the propped up number to bolster support for the game.  Now they know if they release numbers they have to explain what they mean and they wont be good. So they opt not to release them....

    We would LOVE to see some current numbers from funcom.  Blizzard does this pretty regularly.  Aside from the falsehood funcom employees try to spread on their forums, blizzards numbers are not people served.  The numbers they release are number currently playing in their first month, number of people paying with game cards, and number of people with current paid up accounts via CC, pay pal and other various payment methods. 

    So Avery if Funcom is right and AoC is on the rebound, why not post sub number? WOW does it? What could possibly be the reason that Funcom DID in the Q2 report, and now says they dont because of company policy?

     



     

    I think this has been spoon fed to you before. Expected revenue in Q4 is 8-10 Mill USD. 1 year ago Operating revenue was like 0.5 Mill USD making AoC responsible alone for 7.5-9.5 Mill USD in Q4 this year. I showed it on a pocket calculator to you before (just look it up if you already forgot it) that this equivalents to at least 150 000 to 200 000 AoC players. After all nobody will give the money in charity to FC. They have to make them from subs. If this is still not good enough for you, I guess you just have to play WoW that aledgedly have 12 Mill subs. Let me remind you of that not all people agree with that number either.

This discussion has been closed.