Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Say Hi to the remote auction house...

12345679»

Comments

  • nikoliathnikoliath Member UncommonPosts: 1,154

    Originally posted by jimmyman99

    Originally posted by Li-Su


    Originally posted by MMO_Doubter


    Originally posted by tanoril



    So again, because no one has explained it yet, how is it different from the dude playing WoW from his laptop in an airport/mall/park/etc?   I can 'play' the AH (as well as the rest of the game) from anywhere if I have a laptop and I don't have to pay a thing for that. 

    I mean really, what is the difference?  Everyone gonna start running out and buying Iphones and Blackberry's so they can get this app and 'play' the AH even more so then they do in game?  I'm surprised you don't think the wow armory app is an advantage because it lets me look up gear even though I'm not at a 'computer'. 

     

    If there was no advantage - people would not buy it. That is basic logic.

    People buy pets and mounts.  So pets and mounts gives advantages.  So much for your logic.

    Checkmate.

    that's made my day. Thanks :)

     

    those who bemoan this are really out of touch with reality. Things can't be equal in games like this in which time = progress, unless you limit everyone to so many hours play time per day/week whatever.

  • jimmyman99jimmyman99 Member UncommonPosts: 3,221

    Originally posted by Cavall

    Originally posted by Seffren



    So basically you are saying that Blizz creates/developes extra functionality/service for a platform that didn't exist when wow was conceived and isn't allowed to ask money for that  functionality/service.

    So from now on when new technical innovations/applications occur on the market blizzard IS allowed to develop fcuntionality for it but IS NOT allowed to ask money for it.

    (Goes a bit against the whole principle of kapitalism no, even only if you look at the development costs.)

    Wouldn't this mean that this way innovation is stopped (at least by existing companies) since existing companies are not allowed to create new functionality when technical opportunities occur?

     

    I.

    The problem here is you are treating the MMO genre like "any other business." It is not. However much this company would love you to believe that, it is not. Would you pay an extra 5 dollars a month to have access to a "value added" raid? Maybe 10 to access its "heroic" mode? I sure hope not.

    These little "nickel and dime" things are merely Activision testing the waters to see if their business model works in a MMO setting. If it does, the next "Blizzard" MMO will have a cash shop from day 1 with a subscription fee. The ONLY way to prevent that from happening is to spread awareness of just how greedy it is to charge paying customers extra for content that was pretty much paid for by the subscription fees 100x over in the first place. I am sure people would accept a 1 cent increase in their monthly fee if it meant everyone had equal access to content that was instead used as a cash grab.

    Caval, you need to learn how business works dude. You are being a communist about this whole issue.

    - blizzard IS a business, WoW is their business. I do not understand how you can say it is NOT like any other business. It is not a charity, it is not a non-profit organisation, it is not a government agency. It IS business, just like any other business.

    - they are adding value and charging for it. Have they ever promised you FREE content from the moment they created WoW? Why should they make it free? If I am a business and I sold you a car, does that mean you have the right to come back year after year to get free coffee and donuts at the dealership?

    The subscription fee you are paying means you get access to the content in the BOX YOU BUY! Nowhere does it say you get access for any future content. If that were the case, then no1 would ever create expansions or even supported games. Because people like you demand that any future development comes free of charge.

    Edit: IF Bliz would take away something from the original game and started charging for it, then yeah, you would have the right to scream and shout. But they haven't. They are adding something new that they were not obliged to add and decided to charge for it. They have all the rights to do that.

    I am the type of player where I like to do everything and anything from time to time.
    image
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holodomor - pre-WW2 genocide.
    imageimage

  • jimmyman99jimmyman99 Member UncommonPosts: 3,221

    Originally posted by Aison2

    Originally posted by Seffren


    Originally posted by Aison2

    So since external means of playing are allowed and you can gain an advantage by aquiring that app,

    is it morally ok to bot now? i mean cmon its just another feature the common player wont have just like this app

    I don't think your equasion holds.

    The ah service allready exists, in other words it "is allowed".

    Bots aren't allowed (period).

     

    I.

    What are you talking about?

    forget what blizzard says, it doesn't matter here since we talk about morals and not what gives more $$ to blizz

    According to your logic: lvling already exists so it is allowed.

    Let me explain it further: this application just like botting enables you to participate in wow in a way a normal player can't, in both cases a normal player can negate the advantage by playing more

    The only difference is, bots are used to replace humans - they play the game 24/7, not a human being. You cannot level up without actually sitting by your computer and playing it. Therefore, bots are doing something that humans can't - play the game without human interaction.

    I am the type of player where I like to do everything and anything from time to time.
    image
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holodomor - pre-WW2 genocide.
    imageimage

  • cheetoh90cheetoh90 Member Posts: 22

    Yea it's really not an advantage in anyway but if while your out and about experiencing actual life and all you can think about is how much that cotten is selling for.. jesus people is this really a neccessary application. Now we'll definately be able to tell who the WoW nerds are, "hold on I have to check whether jacksmehoff undercut my adamantite ore price on the auction house real quick". /facepalm

  • bobbadudbobbadud Member Posts: 268

    My wife and I bought a tiny little pocket PC today. 2Gb and WiFi of course. 200£. I am going to try it and install WOW , just for the AH of course. I guess I'll have an advantage over all of you. And saving 3 dollars each month too.

    Cheaper as the latest I-pods too.

    It’s embarrassing when an NPC compliments you in an MMo, the only relevant, cool and epic things come from players whispering you “Grtz, mate, we did it”. copyright Pilnkplonk

  • CeridithCeridith Member UncommonPosts: 2,980

    Originally posted by jimmyman99

    - blizzard IS a business, WoW is their business. I do not understand how you can say it is NOT like any other business. It is not a charity, it is not a non-profit organisation, it is not a government agency. It IS business, just like any other business.

    You're exactly right, Blizzard is just like any other business. Other businesses get criticized all of the time for nickel and diming for every little feature, charging far more than they're worth even. So why should Blizzard be exempt from criticism for the same behavior?

     


    Originally posted by jimmyman99

    - they are adding value and charging for it. Have they ever promised you FREE content from the moment they created WoW? Why should they make it free? If I am a business and I sold you a car, does that mean you have the right to come back year after year to get free coffee and donuts at the dealership?

     Throughout the MMO industry it's been a bit of an unspoken understanding that paying for a subscription MMO, though not entitled to free content, that some was given to players as a gesture of good faith in the hopes of keeping them interested in continuing to play. By adding additional charges for minor 'content' that would have otherwise been provided free in the past, they are diminishing good faith, which customers have every right to be unhappy about if it so bothers them.

  • pojungpojung Member Posts: 810

    Originally posted by tanoril

    Originally posted by pojung


    Originally posted by tanoril


    Originally posted by jnsereno

    It has been said many times before that World of Warcraft is consistently downfalling into its demise. Starting with the community and ending with the RMT's. Only fanboys deny this.

    Like, why the hell do we need this Mobile App? Seriously, its only a damn game, not a fucking monopoly that you must consistently keep track of at all time...

    I know it may sound a bit cliche, but MMO's and games in general are supposed to a hobby, instead of a full time activity. This App is turning one into the other which, IMHO, is a really, really bad move by Blizzard.

    That's the whole point though. You don't need the app. The same way you don't need the armory app (which doesn't cost anything). The same way you don't need the Celetial Steed or the vanity pets or the race change/server change/faction change service.

    Says who? Says you?

    'But I neeeed to have that mount it's so glittery!' 'But I neeeeeed to have this AH app I'm always getting undercut!'

    ... in the eyes of the beholder, a desire can very well be viewed as a 'need'. And you, me, or anyone else is nigh powerless to argue against a perception, not matter how flawed, of another individual. Blizzard, having introduced, and made a legacy out of, gear grinds and vanity achievements (collect 50 mounts! who 'needs' 50 mounts? no one, but I need a higher achievement score!) is surely not innocent when it comes to conditioning their playerbase.

    All this focus on 'extras' being sold at huge mark-ups, and so little focus on actually improving the game itself...

    As Jimmyman said, you're confusing desires with needs.  From a general game advancement standpoint, no you don't need any of the things I listed.  Achievements are not advancement, I don't care what anyone tells you.  Getting a fancy title doesn't mean your character can run heroic ICC.

    My point stands, you don't need the remote auction house.

    Confusing? Oh wait- reading comprehension FOR. THE. LOSS.

    Your point falls right back apart. Just like your reading comprehension. Hint: hone in on 'in the eyes of the beholder'.

    That is exactly right, and we're not saying NO to save WoW, because it is already a lost cause. We are saying NO to dissuade the next group of greedy suits who decide to emulate Blizzard and Cryptic, etc.
    We can prevent some of the future games from spewing this crap, but the sooner we start saying no, the better the results will be.
    So - Stand up, pull up your pants, and walk away.
    - MMO_Doubter

  • CavallCavall Member Posts: 272

    Originally posted by Ceridith

    Originally posted by jimmyman99



    - blizzard IS a business, WoW is their business. I do not understand how you can say it is NOT like any other business. It is not a charity, it is not a non-profit organisation, it is not a government agency. It IS business, just like any other business.

    You're exactly right, Blizzard is just like any other business. Other businesses get criticized all of the time for nickel and diming for every little feature, charging far more than they're worth even. So why should Blizzard be exempt from criticism for the same behavior?

     


    Originally posted by jimmyman99



    - they are adding value and charging for it. Have they ever promised you FREE content from the moment they created WoW? Why should they make it free? If I am a business and I sold you a car, does that mean you have the right to come back year after year to get free coffee and donuts at the dealership?

     Throughout the MMO industry it's been a bit of an unspoken understanding that paying for a subscription MMO, though not entitled to free content, that some was given to players as a gesture of good faith in the hopes of keeping them interested in continuing to play. By adding additional charges for minor 'content' that would have otherwise been provided free in the past, they are diminishing good faith, which customers have every right to be unhappy about if it so bothers them.

    Oh, that explains it, Jimmy here never played a MMO other than WOW <.<

    I apologize for assuming (yes, I know what assuming does) that he had prior experience with the industry, and hope to refrain from making the same mistake in the future.

    Thanks for explaining it in terms that the general populance of the warcraft community can understand ;)

    image

  • EvilGeekEvilGeek Member UncommonPosts: 1,258

    Buy in to the greed and you create more, if you want to keep increasing the cost of gaming keep supporting moves like this and you will have your way. Have fun being exploited!

    image
  • cheetoh90cheetoh90 Member Posts: 22

    Originally posted by EvilGeek

    Buy in to the greed and you create more, if you want to keep increasing the cost of gaming keep supporting moves like this and you will have your way. Have fun being exploited!

    Completely true. I feel that this is a greedy move. And sure it's true that this is simply a business trying to make profit but when a multi billion dollar corporation like blizzard tries to rake in more money via ANOTHER monthly subscription from it's already subscribed customers, it's nothing more than greed. If anything this application should be entirely free. When I fork out my 15 dollars for that month of WoW I want to feel that my 15 dollars provided me equal service to every other subscribed customer. This is a minor thing and there really is no "advantage" given to a player by purchasing this service but it's the principal alone. Every customer should pay ONE flat fee and in return receive equal service. It used to be this way but now Blizzards devs need more lambo's in their garage.

  • nariusseldonnariusseldon Member EpicPosts: 27,775

     Throughout the MMO industry it's been a bit of an unspoken understanding that paying for a subscription MMO, though not entitled to free content, that some was given to players as a gesture of good faith in the hopes of keeping them interested in continuing to play. By adding additional charges for minor 'content' that would have otherwise been provided free in the past, they are diminishing good faith, which customers have every right to be unhappy about if it so bothers them.

    That is poor argument. No one says this AH has to be inclulded in the "some was given to players as a gesture of good faith".

    TOC is free.

    ICC is free.

    Ruby Sanctum is going to be free.

    Sounds like there are plenty of "free content, that some was given to players as a gesture of good faith".

  • tanoriltanoril Member Posts: 432

    Originally posted by pojung

    Originally posted by tanoril


    Originally posted by pojung


    Originally posted by tanoril


    Originally posted by jnsereno

    It has been said many times before that World of Warcraft is consistently downfalling into its demise. Starting with the community and ending with the RMT's. Only fanboys deny this.

    Like, why the hell do we need this Mobile App? Seriously, its only a damn game, not a fucking monopoly that you must consistently keep track of at all time...

    I know it may sound a bit cliche, but MMO's and games in general are supposed to a hobby, instead of a full time activity. This App is turning one into the other which, IMHO, is a really, really bad move by Blizzard.

    That's the whole point though. You don't need the app. The same way you don't need the armory app (which doesn't cost anything). The same way you don't need the Celetial Steed or the vanity pets or the race change/server change/faction change service.

    Says who? Says you?

    'But I neeeed to have that mount it's so glittery!' 'But I neeeeeed to have this AH app I'm always getting undercut!'

    ... in the eyes of the beholder, a desire can very well be viewed as a 'need'. And you, me, or anyone else is nigh powerless to argue against a perception, not matter how flawed, of another individual. Blizzard, having introduced, and made a legacy out of, gear grinds and vanity achievements (collect 50 mounts! who 'needs' 50 mounts? no one, but I need a higher achievement score!) is surely not innocent when it comes to conditioning their playerbase.

    All this focus on 'extras' being sold at huge mark-ups, and so little focus on actually improving the game itself...

    As Jimmyman said, you're confusing desires with needs.  From a general game advancement standpoint, no you don't need any of the things I listed.  Achievements are not advancement, I don't care what anyone tells you.  Getting a fancy title doesn't mean your character can run heroic ICC.

    My point stands, you don't need the remote auction house.

    Confusing? Oh wait- reading comprehension FOR. THE. LOSS.

    Your point falls right back apart. Just like your reading comprehension. Hint: hone in on 'in the eyes of the beholder'.

    I think you need reading comprehension.  I said from a 'general game advancement' standpoint.  What is the goal of WoW from a general game advancement standpoint?  What is the point of any MMO?   You think people subscribe to WoW (or any MMO) so they can see how many vanity pets they can get? 

    You're character is not determined by how far he/she has advanced in the game by how many pets they have. 

    Where is the need for the remote AH that you didn't have before?

  • GTwanderGTwander Member UncommonPosts: 6,035

    Originally posted by nariusseldon

     Throughout the MMO industry it's been a bit of an unspoken understanding that paying for a subscription MMO, though not entitled to free content, that some was given to players as a gesture of good faith in the hopes of keeping them interested in continuing to play. By adding additional charges for minor 'content' that would have otherwise been provided free in the past, they are diminishing good faith, which customers have every right to be unhappy about if it so bothers them.

    This would make sense, but only if phone services and apps have been historically free of charge.

    It's hardly 'minor content' that should become gratis.

    Writer / Musician / Game Designer

    Now Playing: Skyrim, Wurm Online, Tropico 4
    Waiting On: GW2, TSW, Archeage, The Rapture

  • CavallCavall Member Posts: 272

    Originally posted by GTwander

    Originally posted by nariusseldon

     Throughout the MMO industry it's been a bit of an unspoken understanding that paying for a subscription MMO, though not entitled to free content, that some was given to players as a gesture of good faith in the hopes of keeping them interested in continuing to play. By adding additional charges for minor 'content' that would have otherwise been provided free in the past, they are diminishing good faith, which customers have every right to be unhappy about if it so bothers them.

    This would make sense, but only if phone services and apps have been historically free of charge.

    It's hardly 'minor content' that should become gratis.

    You sort of missed the difference between an app made by a third party and then put on the app store and content developed by the same company as a game. If you haven't noticed, there's many free apps that are made by apple for the iphone, or for similar things. I don't see people being charged to use ITunes from their mobile device (other than buying a song, but thats copyright related) rather than their mac or PC. They pay a monthly fee, they bought an Iphone, they expect to get ITunes and various other apple apps without paying a monthly fee higher than their mobile device bill.

    Also, we have the right to be unhappy with being exploited as a customer base if we want. This isn't China, its not north Korea, and it sure as heck isn't Nazi Germany.

    image

  • bobbadudbobbadud Member Posts: 268

    Originally posted by Cavall

    Also, we have the right to be unhappy with being exploited as a customer base if we want. This isn't China, its not north Korea, and it sure as heck isn't Nazi Germany.

    ???

    I think at this point a mod should be called in to close the thread. This is about the opportunity to play the AH on a "new portable platform" free or paid. You choose.

    The discussion as of now is devoid of any further decent arguments.

    It’s embarrassing when an NPC compliments you in an MMo, the only relevant, cool and epic things come from players whispering you “Grtz, mate, we did it”. copyright Pilnkplonk

  • nariusseldonnariusseldon Member EpicPosts: 27,775

    Originally posted by Cavall

    Also, we have the right to be unhappy with being exploited as a customer base if we want. This isn't China, its not north Korea, and it sure as heck isn't Nazi Germany.

    ?? i am sure you have the "right' to be unhappy too in Nazi Germany. In fact, most of the PoWs were pretty unhappy, were they?

     

  • ChirugaiChirugai Member UncommonPosts: 304

    This topic is going nowhere fast.  Locked due to personal attacks and political debate.

    Fortune favours the bold.

This discussion has been closed.