Originally posted by reavo Originally posted by J0kerr1 OK, here we go to the brainwashed liberial idiots. 1. Saddam himself thought he had WMD. He didn't let the inspectors do their job because of this. This led us, and many other countries, to beleive he had weapons. We do know he broke UN sanctions (good job of the UN holding them to those). We do know he was looking to stockpile materials. 2. Lying, I want you to prove the Bush intentiolaly lied to the public. I know you can't, because he didn't. Now I can point to another time someone lied, but we won't go there. "I will tell you once more time, I did not point to a president who lied to the nation and obstructed justice." 3. You lost the election, now quit crying and look at facts instead of your, "I hate Bush." You are children.
If liberals are so brain dead then how come they've ended being correct about the outcome of every event that Bush has gotten us into so far? This man is stupid. He has no foresight on foreign policy, has no respect for domestic law and the Constitution, and doesn't give a damn about the things that matter like our borders. I'm sorry, but I love my country and I think he is absolutely the worse President we have ever had.
And how has Bush lied? .... Bush lied about the major part of this war being over. Bush lied about the oil fields in Iraq paying for us going to war over there. Bush lied when he said we have found banned weapons. Bush: 'We Found' Banned Weapons Bush lied in his campaign when he said he was not interested in "nation building".
Do you want me to keep going, cuz I promise I can. Those are just off the top of my head. I'm sure a quick Google search will bring up plenty of his lies.
The major part of the war is over. We have removed the old regime and are setting up a new one in one of the most successful wars ever fought in history.
If Bush took oil you would be yelling. Orginally I remember the liberial machine shouting this war is for oil. They have made 180 with that one. I would like to see where he said that by the way.
They did find UN sanctioned stockpiles.
Where is this nation building thing?
Do you want me to look up all the laws Clinton broke? You are a hypocrite of the worst kind.
Originally posted by Severoth The reason given for invading Iraq in 2003 was that Saddam Hussein was actively developing WMD's circa 2003. There is still not a shred of evidence supporting this claim. The entire justification for the invasion for Iraq is still non-existant. In this discovery of chemical weapons, these were developed before Desert Storm in 1990-91. We and the enitre world knew Saddam's regime had developed chemical weapons before Desert Storm. After all, he used them in the conflict. Did the U.N. demand that he stop producing and reveal all stocks of WMD's? Yeah, they did. Did Saddam stop developing them? Right now, there's no evidence that he did try to start developing them again. Did he possibley have some undisvlosed stockpiles of corroded, aging, nearly useless weapons buried in the desert? It seems this discovery might say so. In the end though, this discovery isn't ground-breaking. It still doesn't prove that Addam was developing WMD's post Desert Storm, which was the reason given for the U.S. invasion.
Saddam and other countries around the workd beleived he had the weapons. These are the facts..no lies here.
Originally posted by Severoth The reason given for invading Iraq in 2003 was that Saddam Hussein was actively developing WMD's circa 2003. There is still not a shred of evidence supporting this claim. The entire justification for the invasion for Iraq is still non-existant. This discovery of chemical weapons was developed before Desert Storm in 1990-91. We and the enitre world knew Saddam's regime had developed chemical weapons before desert Strom. After all, he used them in the conflict. Did the U.N. demand that he stop producing and reveal all stocks of WMD's? Yeah, they did. Did Saddam stop developing them? Right now, there's no evidence that he did try to start developing them again. Did he possibley have some undisvlosed stockpiles of corroded, aging, nearly useless weapons buried in the desert? It seems this discovery might say so. In the end though, this discovery isn't ground-breaking. It still doesn't prove that Addam was developing WMD's post Desert Storm, which was the reason given for the U.S. invasion.
It's not that simple. While active production of WMD's was not found... Undeclared and 'illegal' materials, facilities, equipment were found. Duefler and Kay's report outline these findings well. These finding are things that the UN never did find, and were never declared to the UN.
Originally posted by lardmouth Sorry, if Bush lied, so did many of the more prominent democrats/liberals.
Oh, your logic is flawless, lardmouth. Bush lies, therefore Democrats have lied. Well, in general politicians lie. But when it comes to Iraq, only one side is lying.
Also, let me say this. At least when Clinton lied, no one was killed, and only Lewinsky and his family were emotionally injured. But when Bush lied, 2,500 American soldiers die (and more everyday) and tens of thousands of innocent Iraqis. I'll take Clinton's lie anyday.
Originally posted by Severoth Originally posted by lardmouth Sorry, if Bush lied, so did many of the more prominent democrats/liberals.
Oh, your logic is flawless, lardmouth. Bush lies, therefore Democrats have lied. Well, in general politicians lie. But when it comes to Iraq, only one side is lying.
Also, let me say this. At least when Clinton lied, no one was killed, and only Lewinsky and his family were emotionally injured. But when Bush lied, 2,500 American soldiers die (and more everyday) and tens of thousands of innocent Iraqis. I'll take Clinton's lie anyday.
Bombing of Iraq, Bosnia, selling missile plans to China..Liberials don't want to hear about their darling clinton. Of course you would take Clintons lie..your too dumb to see the damage it has done. It if I explained it to you, you would say its all lies and not true..even when the facts are clear. You are a Democrat. Your are dron #478576
Originally posted by J0kerr1 Originally posted by Severoth Originally posted by lardmouth Sorry, if Bush lied, so did many of the more prominent democrats/liberals.
Oh, your logic is flawless, lardmouth. Bush lies, therefore Democrats have lied. Well, in general politicians lie. But when it comes to Iraq, only one side is lying.
Also, let me say this. At least when Clinton lied, no one was killed, and only Lewinsky and his family were emotionally injured. But when Bush lied, 2,500 American soldiers die (and more everyday) and tens of thousands of innocent Iraqis. I'll take Clinton's lie anyday.
I think what he is saying you dummy is that most of the politicians backed up going into Iraq with the intelligence we had. So if Bush believed it then they all did...when you attack Bush for beleiving it you attack all of them.
Originally posted by baff Outside of America people hate Bush because he reminds them of Hitler. They think he is the single biggest threat to world peace on the planet and is actively trying to start World War 3. On a lesser note they don't like his protectionist trade policies and they don't like his stance on the enviroment. Whatever he does inside the U.S., no one cares about at all. Do what you like in your own country.
ROFL dude are you freakin kidding me? "protectionist trade policies"? You gotta be seriously smoking something to think that GWB has protectionist trade policies. He jumps on every free trade agreement that the world wants to throw his way. Millions of Americans have been laid off from there jobs while those same compinies hire millions in China and India (making less then a livable wage). Not to mention trying to sell off our seaports to a company based in Dubai, UAE. Protectionist trade policies? Yeah freakin right.
Originally posted by baff Outside of America people hate Bush because he reminds them of Hitler. They think he is the single biggest threat to world peace on the planet and is actively trying to start World War 3. On a lesser note they don't like his protectionist trade policies and they don't like his stance on the enviroment. Whatever he does inside the U.S., no one cares about at all. Do what you like in your own country.
ROFL dude are you freakin kidding me? "protectionist trade policies"? You gotta be seriously smoking something to think that GWB has protectionist trade policies. He jumps on every free trade agreement that the world wants to throw his way. Millions of Americans have been laid off from there jobs while those same compinies hire millions in China and India (making less then a livable wage). Not to mention trying to sell off our seaports to a company based in Dubai, UAE. Protectionist trade policies? Yeah freakin right.
i know for a fact that you didn't actually read anything on any of those policies and you just parroted back what your superiors told you to say. Good drone. The mother will be happy.
Originally posted by J0kerr1 Its more center than lets say the New York Times. Treason for them. By the way..here is your list of liberial talk show hosts - Jon Stewart, Al Franken, Randi Rhodes, Kevin McDonald, Kim Miller, Marcus O'Crotty, Thom Hartmann, Ed Schultz, Howard Stern, Lynn Samuels, Peter B. Collins. Want more. There is an army of them. You don't consider Fox balanced becaue you are a far left wack job who only repeats what you have been told to say. I bet none of you have even watched more than one or any of Bills shows. You just repeat what the superiors tell you. They controll you and you are the drones. These are the pupper masters, now I want to know the come-back your superiors have told you for this.
I don't buy into the distracting argument of, "well yeah we're bad, but look at them." That doesn't fly well with me because it is nothing but an attempt to deflect responsibility. Both major political parties use this argument. And frankly, I'm willing to bet that a majority of American's (including myself) are sick of both of you.
And none of those liberal talk show hosts are on Fox News. That's what I was saying. There is no balance on Fox News. Compared to the big name neo-con hosts on Fox News there's nothing in comparison on that channel. So how can you say it's a balanced network.
And I have no puppet master. Your puppet master seems to be the two party system. I am neither a Democrat nor Conservative. I don't like either one of your parties.
Its also no surprise that when losing the Iraq front Liberials tend to go on different attacks, don't stick with the same subject and they won't notice that you are wrong. I fall for the tarp all the time. I have to learn the liberials can't be reasoned with.
Originally posted by J0kerr1 Originally posted by reavo Originally posted by J0kerr1 OK, here we go to the brainwashed liberial idiots. 1. Saddam himself thought he had WMD. He didn't let the inspectors do their job because of this. This led us, and many other countries, to beleive he had weapons. We do know he broke UN sanctions (good job of the UN holding them to those). We do know he was looking to stockpile materials. 2. Lying, I want you to prove the Bush intentiolaly lied to the public. I know you can't, because he didn't. Now I can point to another time someone lied, but we won't go there. "I will tell you once more time, I did not point to a president who lied to the nation and obstructed justice." 3. You lost the election, now quit crying and look at facts instead of your, "I hate Bush." You are children.
If liberals are so brain dead then how come they've ended being correct about the outcome of every event that Bush has gotten us into so far? This man is stupid. He has no foresight on foreign policy, has no respect for domestic law and the Constitution, and doesn't give a damn about the things that matter like our borders. I'm sorry, but I love my country and I think he is absolutely the worse President we have ever had.
The major part of the war is over. We have removed the old regime and are setting up a new one in one of the most successful wars ever fought in history.
That's just funny. I'll leave what you wrote up there for everyone to read. It speaks for itself.
If Bush took oil you would be yelling. Orginally I remember the liberial machine shouting this war is for oil. They have made 180 with that one. I would like to see where he said that by the way.
No, I wouldn't be yelling. I'm yelling more that we're actually there and having to pay for it instead of spending the money on things that matter. Like improving our own schools and health system instead of someone elses! (And I'm not part of the liberal machine btw, I'm a Libertarian. So I'm immune to your two party accusations. Mwuhahahahah.)
They did find UN sanctioned stockpiles.
Old stockpiles. Stockpiles that are no good. Stockpiles that were not cited by the Bush administration for us entering this war with Iraq.
Where is this nation building thing?
Did you follow the debates during Bush's campaign. He's your president, don't you remember what he campaigned on?
Do you want me to look up all the laws Clinton broke? You are a hypocrite of the worst kind.
So you're argument is, "we're bad, but so are they." Great, way to take responsibility for wrong doings. By pointing out someone elses.
there is only one liberal on the entire station, and he's emaciated.
oreilly simply tells liberal guests to 'shut up'. sorry he yells it.
only 1/5 of people they interview are liberal
the reporters all say 'some people say' in order to interject a biased opinion (theirs) into a conversation. listen for it, they say it every single interview.
they dont question the war, and anyone who does is stigmatized as a 'radical'
since when is opposing dishonesty radical?
whenever bush 'makes a mistake' like purposely forging documents they respond by saying 'bush is coming under fire from liberal rhetoric'
whenever someone who isnt a republican warmonger likes... mcain steps out of line, they'll call it fraud and immediately step to 'kerry lied' 'clinton lied'
the millions of poor republicans who support bush, support their poor asses getting shipped to iraq to step on landmines. it's complete idiocy, and rather ironic that you love him for killing you.
--- jon stuart isnt 'liberal'. he disagrees with democrats all the time.
*john kerry flip flops- as the facts change, so does his opinion.
--people who believe in abstinence are unsurprisingly also some of the ugliest most sexually undesired people in the world.--
Originally posted by Necran My sources have informed me America has over 2000 nuclear bombs, also they invented pretty much all the chemical and biological weapons known to man, someone should really stop them if you ask me.
yes, i think we should demand "regime change" from the U.S.A, or the U.N will investigate.
Originally posted by Severoth Originally posted by lardmouth Sorry, if Bush lied, so did many of the more prominent democrats/liberals.
Oh, your logic is flawless, lardmouth. Bush lies, therefore Democrats have lied. Well, in general politicians lie. But when it comes to Iraq, only one side is lying.
Also, let me say this. At least when Clinton lied, no one was killed, and only Lewinsky and his family were emotionally injured. But when Bush lied, 2,500 American soldiers die (and more everyday) and tens of thousands of innocent Iraqis. I'll take Clinton's lie anyday.
Um, that's not my logic. I believe both parties, various intelligence agencies (foriegn, domestic), told the truth based on the best intelligence they had. So far, we haven't found munitions produced post gulf war. We have found many undeclared material breaches of cease-fire resolutions. Saddam failed far too long to allow transparent and unobstructed inspections. The onus was always on him since the cease fire.
Originally posted by reavo Originally posted by J0kerr1 Originally posted by reavo Originally posted by J0kerr1 OK, here we go to the brainwashed liberial idiots. 1. Saddam himself thought he had WMD. He didn't let the inspectors do their job because of this. This led us, and many other countries, to beleive he had weapons. We do know he broke UN sanctions (good job of the UN holding them to those). We do know he was looking to stockpile materials. 2. Lying, I want you to prove the Bush intentiolaly lied to the public. I know you can't, because he didn't. Now I can point to another time someone lied, but we won't go there. "I will tell you once more time, I did not point to a president who lied to the nation and obstructed justice." 3. You lost the election, now quit crying and look at facts instead of your, "I hate Bush." You are children.
If liberals are so brain dead then how come they've ended being correct about the outcome of every event that Bush has gotten us into so far? This man is stupid. He has no foresight on foreign policy, has no respect for domestic law and the Constitution, and doesn't give a damn about the things that matter like our borders. I'm sorry, but I love my country and I think he is absolutely the worse President we have ever had.
The major part of the war is over. We have removed the old regime and are setting up a new one in one of the most successful wars ever fought in history.
That's just funny. I'll leave what you wrote up there for everyone to read. It speaks for itself.
If Bush took oil you would be yelling. Orginally I remember the liberial machine shouting this war is for oil. They have made 180 with that one. I would like to see where he said that by the way.
No, I wouldn't be yelling. I'm yelling more that we're actually there and having to pay for it instead of spending the money on things that matter. Like improving our own schools and health system instead of someone elses! (And I'm not part of the liberal machine btw, I'm a Libertarian. So I'm immune to your two party accusations. Mwuhahahahah.)
They did find UN sanctioned stockpiles.
Old stockpiles. Stockpiles that are no good. Stockpiles that were not cited by the Bush administration for us entering this war with Iraq.
Where is this nation building thing?
Did you follow the debates during Bush's campaign. He's your president, don't you remember what he campaigned on?
Do you want me to look up all the laws Clinton broke? You are a hypocrite of the worst kind.
So you're argument is, "we're bad, but so are they." Great, way to take responsibility for wrong doings. By pointing out someone elses.
Way to say nothing and try to defend yourself. You are a pathetic worm.
Originally posted by J0kerr1 Its also no surprise that when losing the Iraq front Liberials tend to go on different attacks, don't stick with the same subject and they won't notice that you are wrong. I fall for the tarp all the time. I have to learn the liberials can't be reasoned with.
Well, then why don't you try reasoning with a Libertarian for a change? Or are you too scared to do it like your two party buddies are during every debate at election time? They know we'd wipe the floor with them.
And this Libertarian doesn't buy your "we're bad, but so are they" argument. I'm all for getting both of you two parties the hell out of Washington. You're both destroying this nation.
Originally posted by J0kerr1 Originally posted by reavo Originally posted by J0kerr1 Originally posted by reavo Originally posted by J0kerr1 OK, here we go to the brainwashed liberial idiots. 1. Saddam himself thought he had WMD. He didn't let the inspectors do their job because of this. This led us, and many other countries, to beleive he had weapons. We do know he broke UN sanctions (good job of the UN holding them to those). We do know he was looking to stockpile materials. 2. Lying, I want you to prove the Bush intentiolaly lied to the public. I know you can't, because he didn't. Now I can point to another time someone lied, but we won't go there. "I will tell you once more time, I did not point to a president who lied to the nation and obstructed justice." 3. You lost the election, now quit crying and look at facts instead of your, "I hate Bush." You are children.
If liberals are so brain dead then how come they've ended being correct about the outcome of every event that Bush has gotten us into so far? This man is stupid. He has no foresight on foreign policy, has no respect for domestic law and the Constitution, and doesn't give a damn about the things that matter like our borders. I'm sorry, but I love my country and I think he is absolutely the worse President we have ever had.
The major part of the war is over. We have removed the old regime and are setting up a new one in one of the most successful wars ever fought in history.
That's just funny. I'll leave what you wrote up there for everyone to read. It speaks for itself.
If Bush took oil you would be yelling. Orginally I remember the liberial machine shouting this war is for oil. They have made 180 with that one. I would like to see where he said that by the way.
No, I wouldn't be yelling. I'm yelling more that we're actually there and having to pay for it instead of spending the money on things that matter. Like improving our own schools and health system instead of someone elses! (And I'm not part of the liberal machine btw, I'm a Libertarian. So I'm immune to your two party accusations. Mwuhahahahah.)
They did find UN sanctioned stockpiles.
Old stockpiles. Stockpiles that are no good. Stockpiles that were not cited by the Bush administration for us entering this war with Iraq.
Where is this nation building thing?
Did you follow the debates during Bush's campaign. He's your president, don't you remember what he campaigned on?
Do you want me to look up all the laws Clinton broke? You are a hypocrite of the worst kind.
So you're argument is, "we're bad, but so are they." Great, way to take responsibility for wrong doings. By pointing out someone elses.
Way to say nothing and try to defend yourself. You are a pathetic worm. And you are making personal attacks because you have no defense.
Originally posted by reavo Originally posted by J0kerr1 Its also no surprise that when losing the Iraq front Liberials tend to go on different attacks, don't stick with the same subject and they won't notice that you are wrong. I fall for the tarp all the time. I have to learn the liberials can't be reasoned with.
Well, then why don't you try reasoning with a Libertarian for a change? Or are you too scared to do it like your two party buddies are during every debate at election time? They know we'd wipe the floor with them.
And this Libertarian doesn't buy your "we're bad, but so are they" argument. I'm all for getting both of you two parties the hell out of Washington. You're both destroying this nation.
Heres the other defence when you have nothing better to say. Everyone is bad.
Originally posted by Necran My sources have informed me America has over 2000 nuclear bombs, also they invented pretty much all the chemical and biological weapons known to man, someone should really stop them if you ask me.
yes, i think we should demand "regime change" from the U.S.A, or the U.N will investigate.
We have removed the old regime and are setting up a new one in one of the most successful wars ever fought in history.
Oh my...
Originally posted by lardmouth Originally posted by Meon Originally posted by Necran My sources have informed me America has over 2000 nuclear bombs, also they invented pretty much all the chemical and biological weapons known to man, someone should really stop them if you ask me.
yes, i think we should demand "regime change" from the U.S.A, or the U.N will investigate.
I think we should demand regime change of the UN.
Isn't that kinda the same? Since USA is one of the major 6 in the UN.
i think alot of people choose the democratic party, simply because it's the best of the two.
i dont have any love for politicians, but really i think thats the difference between the majority of
democrats and the majority of republicans.
republicans trust their government.
i dont.
if it wasnt for a territorial conquestitorial capitalist war ever 5 years- nam, gulf, iraq, nicaragua, cuba, etc...
i think most liberals percieve republicans as being simply uneducated.
i dont believe in the democratic party, or in a 'just war'. there's no such thing. anyone who believes it hasnt spent enough time reading books, or doesnt know how to read.
--people who believe in abstinence are unsurprisingly also some of the ugliest most sexually undesired people in the world.--
Comments
If liberals are so brain dead then how come they've ended being correct about the outcome of every event that Bush has gotten us into so far? This man is stupid. He has no foresight on foreign policy, has no respect for domestic law and the Constitution, and doesn't give a damn about the things that matter like our borders. I'm sorry, but I love my country and I think he is absolutely the worse President we have ever had.
And how has Bush lied? ....
Bush lied about the major part of this war being over.
Bush lied about the oil fields in Iraq paying for us going to war over there.
Bush lied when he said we have found banned weapons. Bush: 'We Found' Banned Weapons
Bush lied in his campaign when he said he was not interested in "nation building".
Do you want me to keep going, cuz I promise I can. Those are just off the top of my head. I'm sure a quick Google search will bring up plenty of his lies.
The major part of the war is over. We have removed the old regime and are setting up a new one in one of the most successful wars ever fought in history.
If Bush took oil you would be yelling. Orginally I remember the liberial machine shouting this war is for oil. They have made 180 with that one. I would like to see where he said that by the way.
They did find UN sanctioned stockpiles.
Where is this nation building thing?
Do you want me to look up all the laws Clinton broke? You are a hypocrite of the worst kind.
It's not that simple. While active production of WMD's was not found... Undeclared and 'illegal' materials, facilities, equipment were found. Duefler and Kay's report outline these findings well. These finding are things that the UN never did find, and were never declared to the UN.
http://www.cia.gov/cia/public_affairs/speeches/2003/david_kay_10022003.html
http://www.cia.gov/cia/reports/iraq_wmd_2004/chap1.html
Oh, your logic is flawless, lardmouth. Bush lies, therefore Democrats have lied. Well, in general politicians lie. But when it comes to Iraq, only one side is lying.
Also, let me say this. At least when Clinton lied, no one was killed, and only Lewinsky and his family were emotionally injured. But when Bush lied, 2,500 American soldiers die (and more everyday) and tens of thousands of innocent Iraqis. I'll take Clinton's lie anyday.
Oh, your logic is flawless, lardmouth. Bush lies, therefore Democrats have lied. Well, in general politicians lie. But when it comes to Iraq, only one side is lying.
Also, let me say this. At least when Clinton lied, no one was killed, and only Lewinsky and his family were emotionally injured. But when Bush lied, 2,500 American soldiers die (and more everyday) and tens of thousands of innocent Iraqis. I'll take Clinton's lie anyday.
Bombing of Iraq, Bosnia, selling missile plans to China..Liberials don't want to hear about their darling clinton. Of course you would take Clintons lie..your too dumb to see the damage it has done. It if I explained it to you, you would say its all lies and not true..even when the facts are clear. You are a Democrat. Your are dron #478576
Oh, your logic is flawless, lardmouth. Bush lies, therefore Democrats have lied. Well, in general politicians lie. But when it comes to Iraq, only one side is lying.
Also, let me say this. At least when Clinton lied, no one was killed, and only Lewinsky and his family were emotionally injured. But when Bush lied, 2,500 American soldiers die (and more everyday) and tens of thousands of innocent Iraqis. I'll take Clinton's lie anyday.
I think what he is saying you dummy is that most of the politicians backed up going into Iraq with the intelligence we had. So if Bush believed it then they all did...when you attack Bush for beleiving it you attack all of them.
ROFL dude are you freakin kidding me? "protectionist trade policies"? You gotta be seriously smoking something to think that GWB has protectionist trade policies. He jumps on every free trade agreement that the world wants to throw his way. Millions of Americans have been laid off from there jobs while those same compinies hire millions in China and India (making less then a livable wage). Not to mention trying to sell off our seaports to a company based in Dubai, UAE. Protectionist trade policies? Yeah freakin right.
ROFL dude are you freakin kidding me? "protectionist trade policies"? You gotta be seriously smoking something to think that GWB has protectionist trade policies. He jumps on every free trade agreement that the world wants to throw his way. Millions of Americans have been laid off from there jobs while those same compinies hire millions in China and India (making less then a livable wage). Not to mention trying to sell off our seaports to a company based in Dubai, UAE. Protectionist trade policies? Yeah freakin right.
i know for a fact that you didn't actually read anything on any of those policies and you just parroted back what your superiors told you to say. Good drone. The mother will be happy.
And none of those liberal talk show hosts are on Fox News. That's what I was saying. There is no balance on Fox News. Compared to the big name neo-con hosts on Fox News there's nothing in comparison on that channel. So how can you say it's a balanced network.
And I have no puppet master. Your puppet master seems to be the two party system. I am neither a Democrat nor Conservative. I don't like either one of your parties.
That's your argument? We're bad, but so are they?
That's why it's time for a third party that listens to Americans and has our best interests in mind.
bush falsified documents and started a war.
nobody disagrees with this, thus i'd like to know when he'll be tried for genocide
--people who believe in abstinence are unsurprisingly also some of the ugliest most sexually undesired people in the world.--
If liberals are so brain dead then how come they've ended being correct about the outcome of every event that Bush has gotten us into so far? This man is stupid. He has no foresight on foreign policy, has no respect for domestic law and the Constitution, and doesn't give a damn about the things that matter like our borders. I'm sorry, but I love my country and I think he is absolutely the worse President we have ever had.
And how has Bush lied? ....
Bush lied about the major part of this war being over.
Bush lied about the oil fields in Iraq paying for us going to war over there.
Bush lied when he said we have found banned weapons. Bush: 'We Found' Banned Weapons
Bush lied in his campaign when he said he was not interested in "nation building".
Do you want me to keep going, cuz I promise I can. Those are just off the top of my head. I'm sure a quick Google search will bring up plenty of his lies.
The major part of the war is over. We have removed the old regime and are setting up a new one in one of the most successful wars ever fought in history.
That's just funny. I'll leave what you wrote up there for everyone to read. It speaks for itself.
If Bush took oil you would be yelling. Orginally I remember the liberial machine shouting this war is for oil. They have made 180 with that one. I would like to see where he said that by the way.
No, I wouldn't be yelling. I'm yelling more that we're actually there and having to pay for it instead of spending the money on things that matter. Like improving our own schools and health system instead of someone elses! (And I'm not part of the liberal machine btw, I'm a Libertarian. So I'm immune to your two party accusations. Mwuhahahahah.)
They did find UN sanctioned stockpiles.
Old stockpiles. Stockpiles that are no good. Stockpiles that were not cited by the Bush administration for us entering this war with Iraq.
Where is this nation building thing?
Did you follow the debates during Bush's campaign. He's your president, don't you remember what he campaigned on?
Do you want me to look up all the laws Clinton broke? You are a hypocrite of the worst kind.
So you're argument is, "we're bad, but so are they." Great, way to take responsibility for wrong doings. By pointing out someone elses.
FOX NEWS- why it's not 'fair and balanced'
there is only one liberal on the entire station, and he's emaciated.
oreilly simply tells liberal guests to 'shut up'. sorry he yells it.
only 1/5 of people they interview are liberal
the reporters all say 'some people say' in order to interject a biased opinion (theirs) into a conversation. listen for it, they say it every single interview.
they dont question the war, and anyone who does is stigmatized as a 'radical'
since when is opposing dishonesty radical?
whenever bush 'makes a mistake' like purposely forging documents they respond by saying 'bush is coming under fire from liberal rhetoric'
whenever someone who isnt a republican warmonger likes... mcain steps out of line, they'll call it fraud and immediately step to 'kerry lied' 'clinton lied'
the millions of poor republicans who support bush, support their poor asses getting shipped to iraq to step on landmines. it's complete idiocy, and rather ironic that you love him for killing you.
--- jon stuart isnt 'liberal'. he disagrees with democrats all the time.
*john kerry flip flops- as the facts change, so does his opinion.
--people who believe in abstinence are unsurprisingly also some of the ugliest most sexually undesired people in the world.--
yes, i think we should demand "regime change" from the U.S.A, or the U.N will investigate.
Oh, your logic is flawless, lardmouth. Bush lies, therefore Democrats have lied. Well, in general politicians lie. But when it comes to Iraq, only one side is lying.
Also, let me say this. At least when Clinton lied, no one was killed, and only Lewinsky and his family were emotionally injured. But when Bush lied, 2,500 American soldiers die (and more everyday) and tens of thousands of innocent Iraqis. I'll take Clinton's lie anyday.
Um, that's not my logic. I believe both parties, various intelligence agencies (foriegn, domestic), told the truth based on the best intelligence they had. So far, we haven't found munitions produced post gulf war. We have found many undeclared material breaches of cease-fire resolutions. Saddam failed far too long to allow transparent and unobstructed inspections. The onus was always on him since the cease fire.
If liberals are so brain dead then how come they've ended being correct about the outcome of every event that Bush has gotten us into so far? This man is stupid. He has no foresight on foreign policy, has no respect for domestic law and the Constitution, and doesn't give a damn about the things that matter like our borders. I'm sorry, but I love my country and I think he is absolutely the worse President we have ever had.
And how has Bush lied? ....
Bush lied about the major part of this war being over.
Bush lied about the oil fields in Iraq paying for us going to war over there.
Bush lied when he said we have found banned weapons. Bush: 'We Found' Banned Weapons
Bush lied in his campaign when he said he was not interested in "nation building".
Do you want me to keep going, cuz I promise I can. Those are just off the top of my head. I'm sure a quick Google search will bring up plenty of his lies.
The major part of the war is over. We have removed the old regime and are setting up a new one in one of the most successful wars ever fought in history.
That's just funny. I'll leave what you wrote up there for everyone to read. It speaks for itself.
If Bush took oil you would be yelling. Orginally I remember the liberial machine shouting this war is for oil. They have made 180 with that one. I would like to see where he said that by the way.
No, I wouldn't be yelling. I'm yelling more that we're actually there and having to pay for it instead of spending the money on things that matter. Like improving our own schools and health system instead of someone elses! (And I'm not part of the liberal machine btw, I'm a Libertarian. So I'm immune to your two party accusations. Mwuhahahahah.)
They did find UN sanctioned stockpiles.
Old stockpiles. Stockpiles that are no good. Stockpiles that were not cited by the Bush administration for us entering this war with Iraq.
Where is this nation building thing?
Did you follow the debates during Bush's campaign. He's your president, don't you remember what he campaigned on?
Do you want me to look up all the laws Clinton broke? You are a hypocrite of the worst kind.
So you're argument is, "we're bad, but so are they." Great, way to take responsibility for wrong doings. By pointing out someone elses.
The major part of the war is over. We have removed the old regime and are setting up a new one in one of the most successful wars ever fought in history.
That's just funny. I'll leave what you wrote up there for everyone to read. It speaks for itself.
If Bush took oil you would be yelling. Orginally I remember the liberial machine shouting this war is for oil. They have made 180 with that one. I would like to see where he said that by the way.
No, I wouldn't be yelling. I'm yelling more that we're actually there and having to pay for it instead of spending the money on things that matter. Like improving our own schools and health system instead of someone elses! (And I'm not part of the liberal machine btw, I'm a Libertarian. So I'm immune to your two party accusations. Mwuhahahahah.)
They did find UN sanctioned stockpiles.
Old stockpiles. Stockpiles that are no good. Stockpiles that were not cited by the Bush administration for us entering this war with Iraq.
Where is this nation building thing?
Did you follow the debates during Bush's campaign. He's your president, don't you remember what he campaigned on?
Do you want me to look up all the laws Clinton broke? You are a hypocrite of the worst kind.
So you're argument is, "we're bad, but so are they." Great, way to take responsibility for wrong doings. By pointing out someone elses.
Way to say nothing and try to defend yourself. You are a pathetic worm.
And this Libertarian doesn't buy your "we're bad, but so are they" argument. I'm all for getting both of you two parties the hell out of Washington. You're both destroying this nation.
If liberals are so brain dead then how come they've ended being correct about the outcome of every event that Bush has gotten us into so far? This man is stupid. He has no foresight on foreign policy, has no respect for domestic law and the Constitution, and doesn't give a damn about the things that matter like our borders. I'm sorry, but I love my country and I think he is absolutely the worse President we have ever had.
And how has Bush lied? ....
Bush lied about the major part of this war being over.
Bush lied about the oil fields in Iraq paying for us going to war over there.
Bush lied when he said we have found banned weapons. Bush: 'We Found' Banned Weapons
Bush lied in his campaign when he said he was not interested in "nation building".
Do you want me to keep going, cuz I promise I can. Those are just off the top of my head. I'm sure a quick Google search will bring up plenty of his lies.
The major part of the war is over. We have removed the old regime and are setting up a new one in one of the most successful wars ever fought in history.
That's just funny. I'll leave what you wrote up there for everyone to read. It speaks for itself.
If Bush took oil you would be yelling. Orginally I remember the liberial machine shouting this war is for oil. They have made 180 with that one. I would like to see where he said that by the way.
No, I wouldn't be yelling. I'm yelling more that we're actually there and having to pay for it instead of spending the money on things that matter. Like improving our own schools and health system instead of someone elses! (And I'm not part of the liberal machine btw, I'm a Libertarian. So I'm immune to your two party accusations. Mwuhahahahah.)
They did find UN sanctioned stockpiles.
Old stockpiles. Stockpiles that are no good. Stockpiles that were not cited by the Bush administration for us entering this war with Iraq.
Where is this nation building thing?
Did you follow the debates during Bush's campaign. He's your president, don't you remember what he campaigned on?
Do you want me to look up all the laws Clinton broke? You are a hypocrite of the worst kind.
So you're argument is, "we're bad, but so are they." Great, way to take responsibility for wrong doings. By pointing out someone elses.
The major part of the war is over. We have removed the old regime and are setting up a new one in one of the most successful wars ever fought in history.
That's just funny. I'll leave what you wrote up there for everyone to read. It speaks for itself.
If Bush took oil you would be yelling. Orginally I remember the liberial machine shouting this war is for oil. They have made 180 with that one. I would like to see where he said that by the way.
No, I wouldn't be yelling. I'm yelling more that we're actually there and having to pay for it instead of spending the money on things that matter. Like improving our own schools and health system instead of someone elses! (And I'm not part of the liberal machine btw, I'm a Libertarian. So I'm immune to your two party accusations. Mwuhahahahah.)
They did find UN sanctioned stockpiles.
Old stockpiles. Stockpiles that are no good. Stockpiles that were not cited by the Bush administration for us entering this war with Iraq.
Where is this nation building thing?
Did you follow the debates during Bush's campaign. He's your president, don't you remember what he campaigned on?
Do you want me to look up all the laws Clinton broke? You are a hypocrite of the worst kind.
So you're argument is, "we're bad, but so are they." Great, way to take responsibility for wrong doings. By pointing out someone elses.
Way to say nothing and try to defend yourself. You are a pathetic worm.
And you are making personal attacks because you have no defense.
Who has the high road now?
And this Libertarian doesn't buy your "we're bad, but so are they" argument. I'm all for getting both of you two parties the hell out of Washington. You're both destroying this nation.
Heres the other defence when you have nothing better to say. Everyone is bad.
yes, i think we should demand "regime change" from the U.S.A, or the U.N will investigate.
I think we should demand regime change of the UN.
yes, i think we should demand "regime change" from the U.S.A, or the U.N will investigate.
I think we should demand regime change of the UN.
Isn't that kinda the same?
i think alot of people choose the democratic party, simply because it's the best of the two.
i dont have any love for politicians, but really i think thats the difference between the majority of
democrats and the majority of republicans.
republicans trust their government.
i dont.
if it wasnt for a territorial conquestitorial capitalist war ever 5 years- nam, gulf, iraq, nicaragua, cuba, etc...
i think most liberals percieve republicans as being simply uneducated.
i dont believe in the democratic party, or in a 'just war'. there's no such thing. anyone who believes it hasnt spent enough time reading books, or doesnt know how to read.
--people who believe in abstinence are unsurprisingly also some of the ugliest most sexually undesired people in the world.--