OzHawkeye

Comments

• The problem with Stormshades post is, I believe, as I mentioned on the STO forums themselves, the sad fact that all the other attributes he listed for other development companies are far more important to the success of an MMO than the relatively tr…

  in Oops: StormShade Inserts Foot In Mouth Comment by OzHawkeye January 2011
• Originally posted by Dinendae    I was talking about this in my last couple of posts in the Fantastic Game thread in these STO forums. I firmly believe that what Bioware is doing for SW:TOR is how a Star Trek MMO should have been made. You have all …

  in Is a good Star Trek MMO possible? Comment by OzHawkeye January 2011
• Originally posted by Loke666 I remember discussing this with people before STOs release. I said no but it is probably possible. I think however such a game would be for Trekkies only. You can't make it with one player controlling a ship himself, t…

  in Is a good Star Trek MMO possible? Comment by OzHawkeye January 2011
• The game just isn't that great is all. That's why.   I won't say it's as unremittingly bad as some here do, but it's certainly a "mediocre" MMO, and for us Star Trek fans (30+ years now myself as well), that's hugely disappointing.

  in Why Is It...I love Star Trek...I love MMOs...but dislike this game? Comment by OzHawkeye January 2011
• There remains essentially no non-combat missions in STO still. There's the Fed Diplomatic Corp, but you'll be Vice Admiral a long time before you've ground enough rep with them to get anything from them by way of non-combat missions.

  in Current non-combat activities? Comment by OzHawkeye January 2011
• It's steadily, but slowly, improving.   Launch: Awful. Terrible. Half-finished.   Now: Mediocore, repetitive, two-thirds finished.

  in How is it now? Comment by OzHawkeye January 2011
• Originally posted by Angelbound I have yet to read a review that actually explains what they do not like in the game except lack of content which is not even much of an issue anymore, there is plenty of content for any new players, and its suppose t…

  in I think people are to hard on star trek online Comment by OzHawkeye January 2011
• Originally posted by DoomsDay01 Originally posted by OzHawkeye Hmmm, angry reply that one.   All that he was pointing out, was that a game - any game - with a larger subscriber base, and hence larger revenues, will, all else being equal, …

  in Fantastic Game Comment by OzHawkeye January 2011
• Originally posted by Sevenwind Best Launch of 2010: Star Trek Online Best PvP in a 2010 MMO: Star Trek Online Best Capacity for Roleplaying in a 2010 MMO: Star Trek Online Biggest Surprise Hit of 2010: Star Trek Online Overall Best New MMO o…

  in Way to go STO! Massively's 2010 awards. Comment by OzHawkeye January 2011
• Originally posted by DoomsDay01 Originally posted by raistalin69 actually if a studio is not making money, they do not put money into content (ie STO, the exception being the c-store which is a cash grab). so from a gamers perspective, if you…

  in Fantastic Game Comment by OzHawkeye December 2010
• Originally posted by raistalin69 actually if a studio is not making money, they do not put money into content (ie STO, the exception being the c-store which is a cash grab). so from a gamers perspective, if you want a game to improve, people playing…

  in Fantastic Game Comment by OzHawkeye December 2010
• This is definitely NOT a fantastic game - and I say that as a lifelong Trekkie, Lifetime subscriber to Star Trek Online, and as someone who fervently hopes that it will one day merit the title of this thread. There's three fundamental flaws to the…

  in Fantastic Game Comment by OzHawkeye December 2010