Originally posted by PnHobbit
Speaking of jobs, don't ever try to get one translating to English. Your ideas are as garbled as your English speaking.
Ohh that line unsualy comes on the end when out of arguments, first time here though!
And d…
Originally posted by Sparre
Are we playing the same game here?
Of cause we are, but only one of us i a cheerleader!
I know your mission is to defend WWIIOL for better and for worse, but even you can't deny that the playerbase deminished hea…
Originally posted by WDYWTK
Are you even playing the game? The numbers of players seems up. Green tags everywhere.
Jupp i am!
But i got the oposit conclusion, it's empty out there.
US primetime is like one hotspot at eurotime 2 years ago …
WWIIOL is a game in desperate need of more players after doing a bunch of stupid desitions this must be the final nail in the coffen.
It becomes more and more clear that captain behind the rodder want it crash totaly. Could be tactical reasons wit…
Well, rats have promized to fix the problem due to complaints about low framerate/lag. So even if you don't experience lag it's a problem well known and recognised by CRS rats....
You belong to the few that actually like AO's. The massive playerescape that we now see the result of came directly after implementing this system. It tock away the freedom of choice for the individual player. All of a sudden we had to follow some …
I belive WWIIOL under the control of CRS is doomed unless they make 180 degree turn. But a game as WWIIOL that in it's ground fondation is brilliant and has no comparement out there will survive one way or the other.
What we all know today is that…
At 1.15 WWIIOL would have beaten BF2 with a lightyear. Eventhough it has crached major with the last patches i'll put my neck out and say it still whips BF2 ass pretty good.
WWIIOL is a first person game in much wider aspect then BF2.
If you hav…
The game needs, "THE RIGHT PROGRESS."
Yeah, that's maby a more correct line.
And yes on the other thing as well: Half year ago it was catastrofical, but that doesn't make it sufficient now. The "let go thing" is pure of economical reasons due…
"How do you create a marginally successful niche game?" "Take a hugely successful game and give it to CRS to run."
You hit the nail on the head Kadesh!
Haha, na it's not that!
I got banned when i spoke my mind so im just ironic for a bit!
My opinion about the latest patch still goes. There are isolated things in this game that's good real good, as it always has been. But the system that control…
Yeah i guess i have been a bit to bashing! There are people who likes WWIIOL as it is now no doubt about that.
I'm gonna give this game time to evole, and sometime in the future it will be appealing to me again.
At least that's what i hope!
Well rats are poor in the aspect of answering questions. Mostly they are telling their own story to any question. Who doesnt remember the lebelion. Besides some few everyone was revolting against that new rifle with the blocked sight.
It was so ea…
What my feelings are on 1.18 you can see on my banner For me it was the patch when the game lost very much appeal.
But the truth is this:
Even if i really dislike the turns this game has taken, WWIIOL has no contenders among all other "warsim" …
Originally posted by Sparre
You can be sure CRS is listening.
But I am grateful they don't bother with the bollocks you spreads all over this forum.
Why would they bader listening to us when they prowen earlier that the voice of playerbase is…
Originally posted by hazmats
I've never noticed CRS not listening to people.
I and the masses noticed 1.16!
We noticed at 1.17!
We noticed at 1.18!
We noticed at 1.19!
We are towards 1.20 and them bastages at CRS still dont listen!
Originally posted by drewjw
It is completely unique. Massive map, realistic equipement, big co-operative teams in 100% PvP combined armes combat.
I have not heard about any other combat sim on the same scale... and I'm doing a lot of research ri…