Home › LordBonezy2 › Comments
LordBonezy2
About
- Banned
- Username
- LordBonezy2
- Joined
- Visits
- 0
- Last Active
- -
- Roles
- Member
- Posts
- 16
- Badges
- 0
Comments
-
Originally posted by Blutmaul The Way they go is to balance around DPS and to decrease the strength of any non-dps-ability more and more and the only reason for that is pvp-balancing. This single solution will not make the game much badder but it…
-
Originally posted by fodell54 Originally posted by Pelaaja Originally posted by DrowNoble Strange that he mentioned WoW. AoC had a very stable launch, no server queues, no crashes, etc. WoW can't say the same as it had numerous problems in…
-
Originally posted by fodell54 Originally posted by fodell54 Originally posted by LordBonezy2 Originally posted by DrowNoble Sorry LordBonezy, but YOU are wrong. The OP was complaining that he was charged, since he was charged he IS in th…
-
Originally posted by DrowNoble Pretty much Lordbonezy's credibility went out the window once he admitted he's never played AoC, hates Funcom and just generally wants them to fail. This would be like me posting on the EQ1 forums about how much Eve…
-
Originally posted by DrowNoble Originally posted by LordBonezy Originally posted by DrowNoble First off, subscription fees are non-refundable. They always have been. They (probably) always will be. Says clearly in the TOS you clicked "I Ag…
-
Originally posted by Aceundor Finantcid and LordBonzey2 obiously disagrees with me and I am fine with that. My claims are these. 1) AoC as a game works very well. Technical performance, content and gameplay is up to par or above. This can be prov…
-
Sure. The game collapsed after launch because it was an empty broken shell of a product compared to what it was advertised to be. Today it has DX10 and stable performance. As far as critical improvements and implements that is it. It has a few n…
-
The 2nd quarter report should show 3 things for sure. -Subscriptions are stable, because pretty much everybody who played in Nov 08 thru Jun 09 played with stable server pops made up of some new players and die hards who like the game and dont car…
-
AOC is not an awful game. The company runing the development is. Their programmers are not very skilled and their team as a whole is not motivated and not being motivated to move the game along. Critical unaddressed issues I have with that game be…
-
Originally posted by Tanaris AoC rather needs a better developer? Definetly.
-
Originally posted by DerekGordon Alright everyone! I have cleaned up this thread quite a bit. Please stay on topic and AVOID name calling. Any form of name calling is considered flaming. This thread has some good back and forth discussions going …
-
I disagree that it is a good solid game. It has severe flaws, the least of which is stability. Depth, focus, fun, improvement on reasonable pacing, and implementation of community requested features which is non-existent. The reason the majoirty of …
-
Originally posted by GrayGhost79 Originally posted by LordBonezy2 A lot of people here are posting these wildly optimisitic illustrations of AOC, or descriptions of a game that is not broken or incomplete. The fact is if it was so, they wouldn'…
-
I dont think letting people know that Gaute is out and Morris is in, means anything or would mean anything. What Funcom has to do is scrap their original game plan for game mechanics and introduce bold new mechanics that actually work. They need t…
