Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Tab Targeting why the hate?

eccotoneccoton Member UncommonPosts: 1,340
It seems I am one of the few who still prefers tab targeting. Let me get this out of the way whether you believe me or not. I am really good at action combat in mmos like Tera! I am extremely fast and accurate with action combat and FPSers so that is not an issue. I am proficient in both keyboards and controllers. I do enjoy combat action but not in my big open world mmos.

What I find is that I will at times put long sessions into mmos. I will play for hours at a time. I will admit I have put 8 to 12 hours into sessions without much of a break accept for bio breaks. on an occasion I enjoy doing that and getting lost in the game world. I really appreciate good action combat. I think Tera is one of the best, C9 does it really well, and I give credit to Vindictus. These game do give a visceral feel to combat that is satisfying.

What I hear in the game reporting world is tab targeting should be dead and that no mmo should have it any more. That tab targeting is antiquated and the tone is those of us who like it just don't get it. The main reason I prefer tab targeting in mmos is the sheer amount of time I can put in a session. The wear and tear of even 4+ hours of action combat can cause real issues with hands and arms. I was starting to develop carpal tunnel syndrome while playing Tera. I recently was playing Black Desert Online and the carpal tunnel began to return. So  while I hope action combat is a choice and gets better I also hope developers of future big scale open world mmos (if there will be anymore) will consider a tab targeting or a hybrid combat system over a pure action combat. My muscles and joints can not take it and I hope to be playing mmos for the rest of my life. While I still got the moves my joints and muscle just can not take it during a long play session with action combat.     
«13456

Comments

  • AntiquatedAntiquated Member RarePosts: 1,415

    why the hate?

    Wow used it.

  • xpowderxxpowderx Member UncommonPosts: 2,078
    In Tera I use a bot. It auto locks the target I want.  So my abilities always hit.  No aim necessary.  Just like tab targeting.  Now only if I could get that same prog for Doom!! I would not die so much ;-D
  • IdiNahuiPidarIdiNahuiPidar Member UncommonPosts: 16
    Old
    Boring
    Gives huge advantage to those who use Scripts like in wow for example
  • xpowderxxpowderx Member UncommonPosts: 2,078
    Old
    Boring
    Gives huge advantage to those who use Scripts like in wow for example
    Not boring, have a friend who ran 6 shaman in pvp.  All on the same keyboard.  Definitely fun to watch.  X-boxxing is not boring!
  • DKLondDKLond Member RarePosts: 2,273
    I don't hate tab targeting, but I do think it's a bit antiquated.

    That's because of why it originally came about, which I believe was due to the limited bandwidth available to the average user in the mid-late 90s. Dial-up was still a thing back then, and you couldn't realistically expect a truly dynamic movement and combat system to sync between client and server with that kind of technology, especially not when all players need to be updated when in close proximity.

    Now, with that said - I don't see a reason that tab targeting couldn't work if it's combined with an interesting combat system. It all depends on what kind of game you're trying to make - and especially if you intend to focus on immersive, visceral combat or tactical, cerebral combat. Anything in between could also be the case, of course.

    To me, it's like that other ancient discussion of real-time versus turn-based combat. I don't know why some people must have one over the other.

    In my world, it's all about implementation.
  • xpowderxxpowderx Member UncommonPosts: 2,078
    DKLond said:
    I don't hate tab targeting, but I do think it's a bit antiquated.

    That's because of why it originally came about, which I believe was due to the limited bandwidth available to the average user in the mid-late 90s. Dial-up was still a thing back then, and you couldn't realistically expect a truly dynamic movement and combat system to sync between client and server with that kind of technology, especially not when all players need to be updated when in close proximity.

    Now, with that said - I don't see a reason that tab targeting couldn't work if it's combined with an interesting combat system. It all depends on what kind of game you're trying to make - and especially if you intend to focus on immersive, visceral combat or tactical, cerebral combat. Anything in between could also be the case, of course.

    To me, it's like that other ancient discussion of real-time versus turn-based combat. I don't know why some people must have one over the other.

    In my world, it's all about implementation.
    Just play a AOE class.  Then you do not have to worry about tab targeting at all!
  • eccotoneccoton Member UncommonPosts: 1,340
    Old
    Boring
    Gives huge advantage to those who use Scripts like in wow for example

    I play WoW and Rift currently as my main mmos both tab targeting. Rift throws in a bit of needed avoidance movement to spice tab targeting up a bit but hardly action combat. I really enjoy watching the particle effects in both games during combat. In a raid on a high end system it can be quite a light show which I do not find boring. Visually I can enjoy the combat more with tab targeting but I lose out on the visceral nature of action combat so it is a trade off. For the sake of my stamina for long play sessions I prefer the visual feat of a great light show over the feel of action combat. Now this is predicated on great art style to offer me the visual feast so the tab targeting does not get "boring". Well I will admit I also enjoy great old school JRPGs.  
  • H0urg1assH0urg1ass Member EpicPosts: 2,380
    edited May 2016
    I like a hybrid form of targeting.

    I want to be able to run up to a group of enemies and start using my sword and never have to tab target if I don't want to.

    I want to be able to tab to a target to find out special information about what the target's health is, who he's targeting... ect, but I don't want it to be a condition of being able to attack that target.

    Pretty damn simple really.  With this system, you make both groups happy.


  • eccotoneccoton Member UncommonPosts: 1,340
    H0urg1ass said:
    I like a hybrid form of targeting.

    I want to be able to run up to a group of enemies and start using my sword and never have to tab target if I don't want to.

    I want to be able to tab to a target to find out special information about what the target's health is, who he's targeting... ect, but I don't want it to be a condition of being able to attack that target.

    Pretty damn simple really.  With this system, you make both groups happy.



    Rift is a bit like that.
  • BloodaxesBloodaxes Member EpicPosts: 4,662
    Many like feeling engaged in combat and action combat does that best.

    It makes you feel like you are fighting because you can control their movement at will. In tab targeted games it's much simpler. You just have a bunch of abilities to choose from and the game automatically locks on the target. I don't feel as engaged as say fighting a boss in tera or dark souls for example.

    Obviously this is my opinion.

  • H0urg1assH0urg1ass Member EpicPosts: 2,380
    eccoton said:
    H0urg1ass said:
    I like a hybrid form of targeting.

    I want to be able to run up to a group of enemies and start using my sword and never have to tab target if I don't want to.

    I want to be able to tab to a target to find out special information about what the target's health is, who he's targeting... ect, but I don't want it to be a condition of being able to attack that target.

    Pretty damn simple really.  With this system, you make both groups happy.



    Rift is a bit like that.
    Age of Conan is exactly like that.

    I took a look at Rift a couple of years ago, but then a few people told me that there were so many abilities for each class that scripting/macroing was a necessity.  I really didn't feel like getting that involved at the time, so I didn't download it.
  • YashaXYashaX Member EpicPosts: 3,100
    I get more pain in my wrists from tab targeting games because you have to constantly hold down the right mouse button to look around.
    ....
  • DKLondDKLond Member RarePosts: 2,273
    H0urg1ass said:
    eccoton said:
    H0urg1ass said:
    I like a hybrid form of targeting.

    I want to be able to run up to a group of enemies and start using my sword and never have to tab target if I don't want to.

    I want to be able to tab to a target to find out special information about what the target's health is, who he's targeting... ect, but I don't want it to be a condition of being able to attack that target.

    Pretty damn simple really.  With this system, you make both groups happy.



    Rift is a bit like that.
    Age of Conan is exactly like that.

    I took a look at Rift a couple of years ago, but then a few people told me that there were so many abilities for each class that scripting/macroing was a necessity.  I really didn't feel like getting that involved at the time, so I didn't download it.
    I never needed a macro in Rift, but then again - I never played PvP on a serious level.

    However, the skills tend to overlap - and while there are quite a few of them, a lot of them are minor variations on the same theme.

    Overall, I consider Rift one of the weaker WoW clones out there - but to each his own.
  • BloodaxesBloodaxes Member EpicPosts: 4,662
    YashaX said:
    I get more pain in my wrists from tab targeting games because you have to constantly hold down the right mouse button to look around.
    The biggest reason I hated GW2's combat before they finally acknowledged an option for action style camera.

  • SovrathSovrath Member LegendaryPosts: 32,938
    I've always hated Tab targeting.

    I want to turn and attack, I want to change my targets quickly if needed.

    I don't want to cycle through my enemies, possibly overshooting and then cycling back.


    Like Skyrim? Need more content? Try my Skyrim mod "Godfred's Tomb." 

    Godfred's Tomb Trailer: https://youtu.be/-nsXGddj_4w


    Original Skyrim: https://www.nexusmods.com/skyrim/mods/109547

    Try the "Special Edition." 'Cause it's "Special." https://www.nexusmods.com/skyrimspecialedition/mods/64878/?tab=description

    Serph toze kindly has started a walk-through. https://youtu.be/UIelCK-lldo 
  • kjempffkjempff Member RarePosts: 1,760
    In the ever hunt for new, some mistakenly think every new concept is by definition better.. this goes for "tab targeting" as well.
    Really it is a question of having a system that best fit the game systems, in this case the combat abilities, spells etc.

    If a game only has ray targeted (line of sight) and area targeted abilities, then a "tab target" would usually be a less optimal solution, especially if it is fast paced combat.
    But as soon as you need to use abilities to target specific elements, and elements that are not always in line of sight, then a tab target system is usually more suitable.

    Preferring one or the other is more a question of taste in game style, where speakers against tab targeting prefer a more action oriented combat game, and those for prefer a more tactical combat game.
  • AldersAlders Member RarePosts: 2,207
    It's funny that i prefer tab targetting over action camera despite playing tab target games as if i have an action camera. I'm constantly spinning around and moving my camera while always on the move. Despite all that, i still prefer tab target due to the type of MMORPG's i prefer - group focused and trinity based PVE.

    I've yet to play a good PVE group focused MMO without tab target. I suppose those features are as "antiquated" as tab target though. I'm rolling my eyes as i type.

    However i do agree action target is much better for PVP.
  • jesteralwaysjesteralways Member RarePosts: 2,560
    DKLond said:
    I don't hate tab targeting, but I do think it's a bit antiquated.

    That's because of why it originally came about, which I believe was due to the limited bandwidth available to the average user in the mid-late 90s. Dial-up was still a thing back then, and you couldn't realistically expect a truly dynamic movement and combat system to sync between client and server with that kind of technology, especially not when all players need to be updated when in close proximity.

    Wrong, it was not about bandwidth, it was about how RPG have been. RPG combat at it's core is not about player's skill, it is about chance, all the best RPG before 3D RPG had turn based combat where player used to select skill and system decided whether the skill would hit or fail. That is how RPG have been, when developers chose to make 3D RPG and tried to attract veteran RPG players, they decided to go with tab target system because it is the closest to classic RPG combat system. RPG is all about building up players character, not about twitchy combat.

    Boobs are LIFE, Boobs are LOVE, Boobs are JUSTICE, Boobs are mankind's HOPES and DREAMS. People who complain about boobs have lost their humanity.

  • YashaXYashaX Member EpicPosts: 3,100
    Alders said:


    However i do agree action target is much better for PVP.
    Why?
    ....
  • DKLondDKLond Member RarePosts: 2,273
    DKLond said:
    I don't hate tab targeting, but I do think it's a bit antiquated.

    That's because of why it originally came about, which I believe was due to the limited bandwidth available to the average user in the mid-late 90s. Dial-up was still a thing back then, and you couldn't realistically expect a truly dynamic movement and combat system to sync between client and server with that kind of technology, especially not when all players need to be updated when in close proximity.

    Wrong, it was not about bandwidth, it was about how RPG have been. RPG combat at it's core is not about player's skill, it is about chance, all the best RPG before 3D RPG had turn based combat where player used to select skill and system decided whether the skill would hit or fail. That is how RPG have been, when developers chose to make 3D RPG and tried to attract veteran RPG players, they decided to go with tab target system because it is the closest to classic RPG combat system. RPG is all about building up players character, not about twitchy combat.
    I'm afraid your opinion isn't fact.

    Doesn't make much sense, either :)
  • MikehaMikeha Member EpicPosts: 9,196
    I prefer tab target as long as there is movement involved in the combat.
  • IselinIselin Member LegendaryPosts: 18,719
    It still has a place, especially in crowds when trying to select a specific friend or foe because we don't have the same true 3D depth perception when playing on a standard 2D screen that we would have in RL.

    I like the hybrid system in ESO where it's not needed most of the time but it's available to lock on to a target as long as you keep it in your FOV.

    I see it as just another aid to try to simulate RL perception in a computer game screen. Same reason over the shoulder view works better than first person for simulating spatial awareness.
    "Social media gives legions of idiots the right to speak when they once only spoke at a bar after a glass of wine, without harming the community ... but now they have the same right to speak as a Nobel Prize winner. It's the invasion of the idiots”

    ― Umberto Eco

    “Microtransactions? In a single player role-playing game? Are you nuts?” 
    ― CD PROJEKT RED

  • bcbullybcbully Member EpicPosts: 11,843
    It's boring...
  • VorthanionVorthanion Member RarePosts: 2,749

    Clicking mouse buttons and tapping keyboard keys is so antiquated, lets get rid of them and use console controllers, they're so new and fresh, right?  Wait, wasn't I using a joystick on my Atari 2600 long before a keyboard and mouse?  If you are going to use that silly argument against tab targeting and or avatar based combat, you're going to have to give up action combat too which has been around just as long and is just as antiquated.


    I enjoy tab target, slower paced, stat/avatar based combat.  Not because I'm old or slow or coordination challenged, but rather because I enjoy it more than action.

    image
  • XiaokiXiaoki Member EpicPosts: 4,045
    Because we've been playing Tab Target MMOs for the past 17 years and there has been little innovation with it.

    Yeah, there have been minor additions or changes but nothing truly revolutionary.

    Its also a poor medium for interaction with the game world. Everyone is always clamoring for "immersion" yet there really isnt anything immersive about clicking a hotkey and waiting for a dice roll to determine if my giant axe actually hit them or not. If my giant axe's attack passes through you then it should hit, not "Miss".
Sign In or Register to comment.