Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Do you believe in a God

1121315171836

Comments

  • firemagicfiremagic Member Posts: 878


    Originally posted by Vodalus
    God did not cause himself, He is infinite meaning He has always existed, there as never been a time where God did not exist.

    What evidence do you have to back up your postulation? Or are we supposed to just take you on your word?

  • MarundMarund Member Posts: 33



    Originally posted by Vodalus




    Originally posted by dekron



    Originally posted by Vodalus


    1. Nothing cannot cause something.
    2. Nothing can cause itself, for it would first have to exist in order to create itself.
    3. Anything with a beginning had to have a beginner.
    a. according to the laws of thermodynamics, the universe began
    4. We cannot have an infinite series of causes.
    a. We would never have arrived at “now”
    b. No infinite number of actual things is possible, for there can always be one more
    5. There had to be an uncaused cause, the first cause, uncreated existence.


    I always love when religious folk use these statements to support the existence of god. Your statements will ultimately work against you. If nothing cannot cause something and nothing cannot cause itself, then that proves against the existence of god as he cannot cause himself to come into existence. Number 5, "there has to be an uncaused cause", directly contradicts number 1 and 2. I beleive these are Anslem's proofs for existence (correct me if I am wrong, I haven't taken philosophy in a while).


    Untrue. God did not cause himself, He is infinite meaning He has always existed, there as never been a time where God did not exist.

    What is your cosmological belief? That nothing caused something?



    There is nothing called infinity. Its the basics of science. There has to be a beginning for everything. Something can not have been there FOREVER. Its just not possible, at all. The only thing that is infinite is time, but time was started at one point. The universe was created by something, somewhere, somehow by something greater that we do not know of.


  • AldaronAldaron Member Posts: 1,048



    Originally posted by firemagic



    Wrong. You are the person claiming that something nobody has ever seen exists. Evade it, avoid it, do everything you can to get away from it, but the fact is that it's up to you to present evidence for the existence of a god.
    If I said that cows ocassionally turn pink and float 10 feet above the ground and that I'd seen it happen, you would quite rightly expect me to give you some evidence. If I said "well you can't prove it doesn't happen" it would not make sense to conclude that it does happen.
    It is up to you to give solid evidence of the existence of a god, and until then it's safe to conclude that there isn't one.




    I'm not the one making the extraordinary claims. Make up your mind already. Does the burden lie on those with the ordinary claims or extraordinary claims?

    The inability to make up your mind doesn't help your crusade...

    "Fear not death; for the sooner we die, the longer shall we be immortal."

  • freethinkerfreethinker Member UncommonPosts: 775


    Originally posted by Vodalus
    There's my evidence...now let's here YOURS.
    And "Because my Bible says so" dosn't cut it.

    The Ica stones. They show men hunting living dinosaurs. If dinosaurs ceased to exist millions of yeasrs before man, how did these people have any idea of their existence and what they looked like?



    Oh, the Ica stones also show people flying on the back of pterodactyls, using telescopes, piloting flying machines, performing open-heart surgery, cesarean section births, and brain transplants.* Those folks in the Bible times were really advanced to be flying around on airplanes. I wonder if God told the pterodactyl to let man ride it. Give it up man...the Ica stones are a fake which is why they weren't accepted as evidence when they were discovered.

    Nice try!

    Now refute my claim about the fossile record like I've done to each of your claims so far. If you can't, then please conceed the argument and admit to everyone you simply WANT to believe these things. Seriously, you are on a losing side of an argument here.

    *http://www.csicop.org/si/2002-09/strange-world.html

    ==========================
    image

  • David_WolfpaDavid_Wolfpa Member Posts: 273

    noah had more than one boat, the animals that couldnt fit on the main boat built lots of little ones and followed the main boat.

    Chapter 6 verse 7

    ...and the animals that could not fit on Noah's boat gathered together and built little boats that one by one they followed Noah's boat on, so sayeth the Noah.

    See ^

    image

  • DekronDekron Member UncommonPosts: 7,359


    Originally posted by Vodalus
    My Bible does no such thing, those footnotes, unlike the Bible are not the inspired word of God. The NLT is a heretical translation, for far better reasons than that.The Ica stones discovered in Peru proove that they did indeed live together

    LMAO. I love it when the only things that are "god inspired" support the christian agenda. How do you know those footnotes weren't inspired by god? How do you know the bible is? Maybe god wanted to make some corrections so inspired the editors to write them. However, in all reality, the footnotes were translation corrections, not changes to the original text.

  • David_WolfpaDavid_Wolfpa Member Posts: 273


    Originally posted by David_Wolfpa
    noah had more than one boat, the animals that couldnt fit on the main boat built lots of little ones and followed the main boat.Chapter 6 verse 7...and the animals that could not fit on Noah's boat gathered together and built little boats that one by one they followed Noah's boat on, so sayeth the Noah.See ^


    its true.

    image

  • MarundMarund Member Posts: 33



    Originally posted by David_Wolfpa

    noah had more than one boat, the animals that couldnt fit on the main boat built lots of little ones and followed the main boat.
    Chapter 6 verse 7
    ...and the animals that could not fit on Noah's boat gathered together and built little boats that one by one they followed Noah's boat on, so sayeth the Noah.

    See ^



    Yeah I'm really beginning to picture elephants, wolves, and aligators gathering together and building a boat... whoopee

    Humans are the only animals with the ability to do such a thing... so.. nope..

  • DekronDekron Member UncommonPosts: 7,359


    Originally posted by Vodalus
    Originally posted by dekron
    Originally posted by Vodalus
    1. Nothing cannot cause something.
    2. Nothing can cause itself, for it would first have to exist in order to create itself.
    3. Anything with a beginning had to have a beginner.
    a. according to the laws of thermodynamics, the universe began
    4. We cannot have an infinite series of causes.
    a. We would never have arrived at “now”
    b. No infinite number of actual things is possible, for there can always be one more
    5. There had to be an uncaused cause, the first cause, uncreated existence.

    I always love when religious folk use these statements to support the existence of god. Your statements will ultimately work against you. If nothing cannot cause something and nothing cannot cause itself, then that proves against the existence of god as he cannot cause himself to come into existence. Number 5, "there has to be an uncaused cause", directly contradicts number 1 and 2. I beleive these are Anslem's proofs for existence (correct me if I am wrong, I haven't taken philosophy in a while).


    Untrue. God did not cause himself, He is infinite meaning He has always existed, there as never been a time where God did not exist.

    What is your cosmological belief? That nothing caused something?



    Sorry, but that is just a belief. It is just the christian's version of the big bang theory.

  • freethinkerfreethinker Member UncommonPosts: 775


    Originally posted by dekron
    Originally posted by Vodalus
    My Bible does no such thing, those footnotes, unlike the Bible are not the inspired word of God. The NLT is a heretical translation, for far better reasons than that.The Ica stones discovered in Peru proove that they did indeed live together

    LMAO. I love it when the only things that are "god inspired" support the christian agenda. How do you know those footnotes weren't inspired by god? How do you know the bible is? Maybe god wanted to make some corrections so inspired the editors to write them. However, in all reality, the footnotes were translation corrections, not changes to the original text.


    I know, I even posted links to back up my claims. All we know about his position is he has some bible that tells him exactly what he believes, therefore it is the True Word of God (tm). What a bunch of nonsense.

    ==========================
    image

  • firemagicfiremagic Member Posts: 878


    Originally posted by Aldaron
    Originally posted by firemagic
    Wrong. You are the person claiming that something nobody has ever seen exists. Evade it, avoid it, do everything you can to get away from it, but the fact is that it's up to you to present evidence for the existence of a god.
    If I said that cows ocassionally turn pink and float 10 feet above the ground and that I'd seen it happen, you would quite rightly expect me to give you some evidence. If I said "well you can't prove it doesn't happen" it would not make sense to conclude that it does happen.
    It is up to you to give solid evidence of the existence of a god, and until then it's safe to conclude that there isn't one.
    I'm not the one making the extraordinary claims. Make up your mind already. Does the burden lie on those with the ordinary claims or extraordinary claims?
    The inability to make up your mind doesn't help your crusade...

    The lengths you'll go to in order to avoid taking responsibility for your beliefs are quite astonishing. You're obviously not very proud of your beliefs if you refuse to defend them.

    When someone claims that something nobody can see exists, it's sensible to conclude that it's an extraordinary claim.

    Here are some examples of extraordinary claims:

    "There is an invisible cat in the yard"
    "There is an invisible man who created the universe"
    "There is an invisible fridge in the basement"

    They would all require proof before they were to be taken seriously, and so they are extraordinary.

    Lets see how you next choose to avoid the fact that you have no proof whatsoever that the thing you've built your belief system around exists.

  • BaagismBaagism Member Posts: 56



    Originally posted by Vodalus




    Originally posted by freethinker



    Originally posted by Vodalus



    Originally posted by freethinker



    Originally posted by Vodalus



    Originally posted by Baagism
    Totally! The bible forgot to mention dinosaurs and tons of other historical events. Because it was written by a bunch of power mongers trying to control people through fear.

    Actually dinosaurs are mentioned in the Bible


    where?


    Job 41, Psalm 104 and Isaiah 27

    Leviathan, thought to be kronosaurus

    Job 40

    Behemoth thought to be brachiosaurus

    Now I'm pretty sure that the Bible does not name every animal in existence by name (as there are tens of millions of discovered species and scientists estimate that there are tens of millions undicovered), but it does mention two dinosaurs.



    Wow...so you believe that humans and dinos existed together...despite scientific evidence to the contrary?? ::::06::

    Also, why do you believe "behemoth" to be a dinosaur (you even narrow it down to a brachiosaurus) and not...say...a hippo. Where is your evidence for this?

    I mean, even YOUR bible footnotes that its possible a hippo or an elephant:
    http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=job 40:15;&version=31;

    In fact, the NLT version just leaves the term behemoth out and substiutes the word hippo:
    http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=job 40:15;&version=51;


    Nice try ::::36::



    My Bible does no such thing, those footnotes, unlike the Bible are not the inspired word of God. The NLT is a heretical translation, for far better reasons than that.

    Can you give me scientific proof that humans and dinosaus did not live together?

    The Ica stones discovered in Peru proove that they did indeed live together



    I hope you're just trying to make people mad with your non-sense because otherwise you sound pretty unintelligent.

    -Let's all be ignorant!

  • BaagismBaagism Member Posts: 56



    Originally posted by David_Wolfpa

    noah had more than one boat, the animals that couldnt fit on the main boat built lots of little ones and followed the main boat.
    Chapter 6 verse 7
    ...and the animals that could not fit on Noah's boat gathered together and built little boats that one by one they followed Noah's boat on, so sayeth the Noah.

    See ^



    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA  On man this is not happening!  The bible is a story book, you can't take it literally.  It's full of more contradictions then George W. Bush.  Take it with a grain of salt and don't quote it to prove a point.  It has absolutely no creditability.  It was written by common folk like you and me.

    -Let's all be ignorant!

  • BaagismBaagism Member Posts: 56



    Originally posted by dekron




    Originally posted by Vodalus


    My Bible does no such thing, those footnotes, unlike the Bible are not the inspired word of God. The NLT is a heretical translation, for far better reasons than that.
    The Ica stones discovered in Peru proove that they did indeed live together


    LMAO. I love it when the only things that are "god inspired" support the christian agenda. How do you know those footnotes weren't inspired by god? How do you know the bible is? Maybe god wanted to make some corrections so inspired the editors to write them. However, in all reality, the footnotes were translation corrections, not changes to the original text.



    Cheers

    -Let's all be ignorant!

  • firemagicfiremagic Member Posts: 878


    Originally posted by Baagism
    Originally posted by David_Wolfpa
    noah had more than one boat, the animals that couldnt fit on the main boat built lots of little ones and followed the main boat.
    Chapter 6 verse 7
    ...and the animals that could not fit on Noah's boat gathered together and built little boats that one by one they followed Noah's boat on, so sayeth the Noah.See ^HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA  On man this is not happening!  The bible is a story book, you can't take it literally.  It's full of more contradictions then George W. Bush.  Take it with a grain of salt and don't quote it to prove a point.  It has absolutely no creditability.  It was written by common folk like you and me.

    I think David_Wolfpa was joking guys ::::39::

  • KiamdeKiamde Member CommonPosts: 5,820

    I love how Baagism replies to every sarcastic post with an attack on the American Government.

    "Whoever controls the media controls the mind..-'Jim Morrison"

    "When decorum is repression, the only dignity free men have is to speak out." ~Abbie Hoffman

  • MarundMarund Member Posts: 33



    Originally posted by firemagic




    Originally posted by Baagism


    Originally posted by David_Wolfpa
    noah had more than one boat, the animals that couldnt fit on the main boat built lots of little ones and followed the main boat.
    Chapter 6 verse 7
    ...and the animals that could not fit on Noah's boat gathered together and built little boats that one by one they followed Noah's boat on, so sayeth the Noah.
    See ^
    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA  On man this is not happening!  The bible is a story book, you can't take it literally.  It's full of more contradictions then George W. Bush.  Take it with a grain of salt and don't quote it to prove a point.  It has absolutely no creditability.  It was written by common folk like you and me.


    I think David_Wolfpa was joking guys ::::39::



    I truly hope so since believing in Noah... or God in general is like believing one man created EVERYTHING and always existed... oh wait..
  • MarundMarund Member Posts: 33
    What if god is a woman?
  • AldaronAldaron Member Posts: 1,048



    Originally posted by firemagic


    The lengths you'll go to in order to avoid taking responsibility for your beliefs are quite astonishing. You're obviously not very proud of your beliefs if you refuse to defend them.

    When someone claims that something nobody can see exists, it's sensible to conclude that it's an extraordinary claim.

    Wait...nobody can see it? hrmm...Or maybe you're just the blind man that can't see the color red, so you think the people that can see just fine are making extra-ordinary claims...

    Here are some examples of extraordinary claims:

    "There is an invisible cat in the yard"
    "There is an invisible man who created the universe"
    "There is an invisible fridge in the basement"

    They would all require proof before they were to be taken seriously, and so they are extraordinary.

    Lets see how you next choose to avoid the fact that you have no proof whatsoever that the thing you've built your belief system around exists.

    Do you need an english lesson sir? Would you like me to explain, using that marvelous thing called a dictionary, what extraordinary is?

    k...

    "Beyond what is ordinary or usual:"

    Wow...There ya go! Wasn't that fun. K...Now lets employ a little bit of logic, which you can learn i'm sure, just try really hard. Lets see now...

    You're calling a belief system, that one way or another, was believed in probably 95% of the population of man for the last 5000 or so years, probably longer, extraordinary...

    But yet...logic would presume that something that is widely accepted and believed in, is quite...ordinary and usual. And now you're coming along...saying it's wrong...

    Now...Wouldn't that make those claims...extraordinary? image

    See. That was easy.



    "Fear not death; for the sooner we die, the longer shall we be immortal."

  • methane47methane47 Member UncommonPosts: 3,694


    Originally posted by Baagism
    Originally posted by methane47
    In addition to the above... How do you suppose that Carbon "Atoms" Came together to form life?Inorganic compounds dont just spontaneously change into orgainic compounds.
    The rocks in my yard are not going to all of a sudden run for GovernmentEvery post you've writen is insane. You have no idea what you're talking about and just because you search up electron microscopes before you posted doesn't mean you're educated. It means you're a joke. Read up on EVOLUTION, no one ever stated rocks turn into living forms. Don't be so ignorant.

    OK First of all Instead of just saying everything that comes out of your mouth think it through..
    Secondly Your position would be much more believable if you HAD a position and didn't just reject others ideas by calling it stupid..
    Thirdly In the Theory of Evolution... Where did that first Cell come from? Where in the universe did that one spec of organic material come from that divided and became life. Think about that... Evolution always starts at that single cell.. but where did that single cell come from? There is no version of Carbon or any compount in the periodic table that is organic or has life. But then how did a bunch of compounds come together to make cells?
    Forthly The Comment about Electron Microscopes is because FireMagic Attempted to disprove my point by telling me that scientists have used an electron microscope to see electrons... But he apparently did not know that That is still imposible Due to the limits of Reality (How can you use a physical instrument made to view the smallest building blocks of matter, when there is nothing smaller than that building block to actually provide a representation of such) and Also the limits of Physics, Quatum Mechanics, and any other high-order math.

    PS: I bet you dont understant what i said about the limits of reality, So here it is elemetary style.
    If I am blind and I have a pool table. If I hit the cue ball into a ball I will know there is a ball THERE in that space. But i will have no other information about that ball. Like where it is now or what is the color of the ball, or color of the stripe. All i will know is that my cue ball was deflected... and that is it.

    And Please dont comment on my posts any more unless you have something that doesn't include How "INSANE" I am for telling you the truth about science. If you dont believe me.. take a break and think about it.

    image
    What's your Wu Name?
    Donovan --> Wu Name = Violent Knight
    Methane47 --> Wu Name = Thunderous Leader
    "Some people call me the walking plank, 'cuz any where you go... Death is right behind you.."
    <i>ME<i>

  • MarundMarund Member Posts: 33



    Originally posted by methane47




    Originally posted by Baagism

    Originally posted by methane47
    In addition to the above... How do you suppose that Carbon "Atoms" Came together to form life?Inorganic compounds dont just spontaneously change into orgainic compounds.
    The rocks in my yard are not going to all of a sudden run for Government

    Every post you've writen is insane. You have no idea what you're talking about and just because you search up electron microscopes before you posted doesn't mean you're educated. It means you're a joke. Read up on EVOLUTION, no one ever stated rocks turn into living forms. Don't be so ignorant.



    OK First of all Instead of just saying everything that comes out of your mouth think it through..
    Secondly Your position would be much more believable if you HAD a position and didn't just reject others ideas by calling it stupid..
    Thirdly In the Theory of Evolution... Where did that first Cell come from? Where in the universe did that one spec of organic material come from that divided and became life. Think about that... Evolution always starts at that single cell.. but where did that single cell come from?
    Forthly The Comment about Electron Microscopes is because FireMagic Attempted to disprove my point by telling me that scientists have used an electron microscope to see electrons... But he apparently did not know that That is still imposible Due to the limits of Reality (How can you use a physical instrument made to view the smallest building blocks of matter, when there is nothing smaller than that building block to actually provide a representation of such) and Also the limits of Physics, Quatum Mechanics, and any other high-order math.

    Humans have not expanded their knowledge as of HOW the universe originated. Most of the elements were originated from stars implosions because of extreme temperatures and reactions, but that irrelevant.. anyways. There is always a scientific explenation to something, we just dont know of it yet. The chances are we will never find out before either the sun explodes, or another ice age comes.

    PS: I bet you dont understant what i said about the limits of reality, So here it is elemetary style.
    If I am blind and I have a pool table. If I hit the cue ball into a ball I will know there is a ball THERE in that space. But i will have no other information about that ball. Like where it is now or what is the color of the ball, or color of the stripe. All i will know is that my cue ball was deflected... and that is it.

    what is your point?

    And Please dont comment on my posts any more unless you have something that doesn't include How "INSANE" I am for telling you the truth about science. If you dont believe me.. take a break and think about it. 



  • firemagicfiremagic Member Posts: 878


    Originally posted by Aldaron
    Originally posted by firemagic
    The lengths you'll go to in order to avoid taking responsibility for your beliefs are quite astonishing. You're obviously not very proud of your beliefs if you refuse to defend them.
    When someone claims that something nobody can see exists, it's sensible to conclude that it's an extraordinary claim.
    Wait...nobody can see it? hrmm...Or maybe you're just the blind man that can't see the color red, so you think the people that can see fine are making extra-ordinary claims...
    Here are some examples of extraordinary claims:
    "There is an invisible cat in the yard""There is an invisible man who created the universe""There is an invisible fridge in the basement"
    They would all require proof before they were to be taken seriously, and so they are extraordinary.
    Lets see how you next choose to avoid the fact that you have no proof whatsoever that the thing you've built your belief system around exists.
    Do you need an english lesson sir? Would you like me to explain, using that marvelous thing called a dictionary, what extraordinary is?
    k...
    "Beyond what is ordinary or usual:"
    Wow...There ya go! Wasn't that fun. K...Now lets employ a little bit of logic, which you can learn i'm sure, just try really hard. Lets see now...
    You're calling a belief system, that one way or another, was believed in probably 95% of the population of man for the last 5000 or so years, probably longer, extraordinary...
    But yet...logic would presume that something that is widely accepted and believed in, is quite...ordinary and usual. And now you're coming along...saying it's wrong...
    Now...Wouldn't that make those claims...extraordinary? image
    See. That was easy.

    The pride you take in your unabashed determined ignorance deserves an award.

    I asked you what you'd do next to avoid taking responsibility for your belief system, and you showed me by completely avoiding answering my question again.

    Lets say for argument's sake that it's not at all extraordinary when somebody claims that something nobody has ever seen exists. Let's say it's a perfectly normal thing for people to say.

    It still requires evidence or we can safely conclude that it does not exist.

    I ask you again, do you have any evidence to back up your beliefs, or are they based solely on blind faith?

    Pick an option:

    1. I have strong evidence for the existence of a god, and here it is: <-----------FILL IN THE BLANK---------->

    2. I have no evidence. I just hope it's true because it helps me through my day.

    1 or 2. Which is it? See if you can do it. Take your time.

  • AldaronAldaron Member Posts: 1,048



    Originally posted by firemagic



    The pride you take in your unabashed determined ignorance deserves an award.
    I asked you what you'd do next to avoid taking responsibility for your belief system, and you showed me by completely avoiding answering my question again.
    Lets say for argument's sake that it's not at all extraordinary when somebody claims that something nobody has ever seen exists. Let's say it's a perfectly normal thing for people to say.
    It still requires evidence or we can safely conclude that it does not exist.
    I ask you again, do you have any evidence to back up your beliefs, or are they based solely on blind faith?
    Pick an option:
    1. I have strong evidence, and here it is: <-----------FILL IN THE BLANK---------->
    2. I have no evidence. I just hope it's true.
    1 or 2. Which is it? See if you can do it. Take your time.




    I never said I had proof. You did though. So where is it?

    Or is your idea, the lack of proof is proof? In that case. I just proved you didn't exist.

    P.S.

    I'm curious. Are you saying a long while back, atoms were non-existant?

     

    "Fear not death; for the sooner we die, the longer shall we be immortal."

  • methane47methane47 Member UncommonPosts: 3,694


    Originally posted by Marund
    Humans have not expanded their knowledge as of HOW the universe originated. Most of the elements were originated from stars implosions because of extreme temperatures and reactions, but that irrelevant.. anyways. There is always a scientific explenation to something, we just dont know of it yet. The chances are we will never find out before either the sun explodes, or another ice age comes.

    So do you call that truth that their IS a scientific explanation? Or are you believing That there is a scientific explanation for everything? Basically you are saying that you Believe there is a reason for such, even though the scientists who taught you dont even have one yet?

    If it's so Easy so assert that there must be an answer for everything.
    Am I not also justified in believing that the answer will come from God?

    Remember Science is NOT truth. Science is an attempt to explain, or understand what naturally happens in the world. A Scientific theory should never be fully true, because it is only true until it is proven false.

    --> Ofcourse that doesn't prove that there IS a God though....

    image
    What's your Wu Name?
    Donovan --> Wu Name = Violent Knight
    Methane47 --> Wu Name = Thunderous Leader
    "Some people call me the walking plank, 'cuz any where you go... Death is right behind you.."
    <i>ME<i>

  • firemagicfiremagic Member Posts: 878


    Originally posted by Aldaron
    Originally posted by firemagic
    The pride you take in your unabashed determined ignorance deserves an award.
    I asked you what you'd do next to avoid taking responsibility for your belief system, and you showed me by completely avoiding answering my question again.
    Lets say for argument's sake that it's not at all extraordinary when somebody claims that something nobody has ever seen exists. Let's say it's a perfectly normal thing for people to say.
    It still requires evidence or we can safely conclude that it does not exist.
    I ask you again, do you have any evidence to back up your beliefs, or are they based solely on blind faith?
    Pick an option:
    1. I have strong evidence, and here it is: <-----------FILL IN THE BLANK---------->
    2. I have no evidence. I just hope it's true.
    1 or 2. Which is it? See if you can do it. Take your time.I never said I had proof. You did though. So where is it?

    I don't need to provide proof. I'm not the one making the claim that there's an invisible god.

    Shall we go around in circles like this all day or you are you going to have the conviction to actually defend your beliefs?

This discussion has been closed.