You know what I find interesting though, is that muslim and jew and christian will all stand side-by-side on this issue. They can fight about a million different things until the cows come home, but this view is held by all. Infact, the majority of the entire WORLD holds this view.
Gay activists will have you believe differently.... And since in This world we call Earth Truth is just widely accepted fact.. That means that Homosexuality is wrong .... .. But then some gay activist will come and start saying this person and this person and this person was gay... They are like... "DID YOU know Jesus was gay... He spent all his time with men... he must have been gay" orr "Did you know Abe lincoln was gay?" or " (insert pivotal historic character) was gay" and they will swear up and down that that person was gay so it must be ok to be gay... I think i'm gonna start using that argument in my race arguments...
Hey did you know George washington was half-black?.. Did you know Ceasar was half-black?
What's your Wu Name? Donovan --> Wu Name = Violent Knight Methane47 --> Wu Name = Thunderous Leader "Some people call me the walking plank, 'cuz any where you go... Death is right behind you.." <i>ME<i>
I think its pointless to call it a sin. It certainly is disgusting though. However i am friends with gay people, and think if thats the way you CHOOSE to be, then good for you. I'm not willing to support gay marriage, and i think trying to teach kids that historical figures might have been gay, is a load of bs, but gays are people too. Just gross....
Does it REALLY effect you if it's a sin or if it's not a sin? If you said it DOES effect you, then you have some serious issues that need to be looked at right away.
As long as I'm not being told I have to do anything of the sort, I'm fine with you being as gay as a $3 dollar bill. So if it was up to me, I'd like everyone marry each other... why can't gays be as miserable as everyone else who's married?
Originally posted by cornoffcob only because idiots like yourself post idiotic spam posts such as " haha. This is the definition of flamewar." and " yes it is" at least if your going to participate in this thread that is going nowhere post something intelligent, or at least prove to us that you have little more than a brainstem.
Firstly, I fell no need to justify my intelligence to someone such as yourself, and secondly, why post something intelligent? It will only be drowned in the waves of stupidity already present in this thread.
Originally posted by methane47 Originally posted by Blurr
You know what I find interesting though, is that muslim and jew and christian will all stand side-by-side on this issue. They can fight about a million different things until the cows come home, but this view is held by all. Infact, the majority of the entire WORLD holds this view.
Gay activists will have you believe differently.... And since in This world we call Earth Truth is just widely accepted fact.. That means that Homosexuality is wrong .... .. But then some gay activist will come and start saying this person and this person and this person was gay... They are like... "DID YOU know Jesus was gay... He spent all his time with men... he must have been gay" orr "Did you know Abe lincoln was gay?" or " (insert pivotal historic character) was gay" and they will swear up and down that that person was gay so it must be ok to be gay... I think i'm gonna start using that argument in my race arguments...
Hey did you know George washington was half-black?.. Did you know Ceasar was half-black?
Yeah that's a common tactic of some people (especially a couple on this board). Unfortunately it's faulty logic and they don't realize it. Labeling someone else as support for your cause in an argument is just bad form. It's like you take that one point about them which may or may not be true, and make that as their whole character. Thomas Jefferson was this or that, so what? He also did a bunch of political stuff. Alot of good political people weren't this or that, so therefore it doesn't make any difference. Plus I swear I heard someone sayd George Washington was half-black..
"Because it's easier to nitpick something than to be constructive." -roach5000
Does it REALLY effect you if it's a sin or if it's not a sin? If you said it DOES effect you, then you have some serious issues that need to be looked at right away. As long as I'm not being told I have to do anything of the sort, I'm fine with you being as gay as a $3 dollar bill. So if it was up to me, I'd like everyone marry each other... why can't gays be as miserable as everyone else who's married?
Originally posted by modjoe86 Originally posted by Vertex1980
Does it REALLY effect you if it's a sin or if it's not a sin? If you said it DOES effect you, then you have some serious issues that need to be looked at right away. As long as I'm not being told I have to do anything of the sort, I'm fine with you being as gay as a $3 dollar bill. So if it was up to me, I'd like everyone marry each other... why can't gays be as miserable as everyone else who's married?
Originally posted by Vertex1980 Originally posted by modjoe86 Originally posted by Vertex1980
Does it REALLY effect you if it's a sin or if it's not a sin? If you said it DOES effect you, then you have some serious issues that need to be looked at right away. As long as I'm not being told I have to do anything of the sort, I'm fine with you being as gay as a $3 dollar bill. So if it was up to me, I'd like everyone marry each other... why can't gays be as miserable as everyone else who's married?
How are $3 bills gay?
It's a figure of speech... No it's not... Queer perhaps, but not gay. Joe picks apart some random detail in a long post and flips it on them 4tw.
So, like I said, if you're tired of hearing people perpetuate the fear mongering and preaching that you should feel guilt and shame for being created by God with your own form of love for another, then know that there are other religions that allow you the freedom to think for yourself.
You don't have to follow the path of another. Their path to spiritual growth is theirs, not yours.
It's funny reading your comments though. They show exactly what I'm trying to say. You guys are so into your authoritative religions. It really makes you angry to see someone break from them and experience the freedom you're so scared to know.
I offer you the chance to be absolutely free and you choose to remain enslaved by ancient texts.
Hate to tel everybody on this topic, but unless you are the Pope you can't tell people what is or isn't a sin. The pope says gay is a sin, so if you beleive in that religion, its a sin. If you think it is not a sin, you are part of another religion or commiting a sin.
Originally posted by Blurr The funny thing is this whole thread was started as a recruitment drive for Reavo's religion. He makes a topic with a controversial title, then gives you all the propoganda on his church. Shit at the end he basically says "come join us, we're better". You know what I find interesting though, is that muslim and jew and christian will all stand side-by-side on this issue. They can fight about a million different things until the cows come home, but this view is held by all. Infact, the majority of the entire WORLD holds this view. We don't hate you, we just know you're committing a sin.
No they're not. My church says they're not.
And I guess you do whatever the entire WORLD always tells you to do? I mean, they've never been wrong before, have they?
If you're religion says it's a sin and someone in your religion commits the act, then they are a sinner. But if they aren't a part of your religion, then they are following their own path. Different from yours and free from your restraints and guilt.
It effects free thought and personal growth. It leads a person to find their own path of spiritual enlightenment without the constraints of guilt and condemnation. That is a very strong and motivating effect on a person. Can you deny that? When you free yourself of another person's authority then you are liberated to begin your own search for the truth. Not guided by someone elses hand on a path that is not your own.
I am a Christian and nobody is holding a gun to my head and telling me to believe in hell and condemnation. I chose to be a Christian with my own free will. You say your religion wants you to respect other's opinions and beliefs but all i've seen is you trying to convert people from other religions.
Originally posted by reavo So, like I said, if you're tired of hearing people perpetuate the fear mongering and preaching that you should feel guilt and shame for being created by God with your own form of love for another, then know that there are other religions that allow you the freedom to think for yourself. You don't have to follow the path of another. Their path to spiritual growth is theirs, not yours. It's funny reading your comments though. They show exactly what I'm trying to say. You guys are so into your authoritative religions. It really makes you angry to see someone break from them and experience the freedom you're so scared to know. I offer you the chance to be absolutely free and you choose to remain enslaved by ancient texts.
If the religion harbors such a broad range of people, I don't really understand the point of it. If I'm an agnostic, and I'm sharing my religion with a liberal christian, I wouldn't feel very unified. I thought the whole point of a religion was to surround myself with people of similar beliefs.
Originally posted by reavo Originally posted by Blurr The funny thing is this whole thread was started as a recruitment drive for Reavo's religion. He makes a topic with a controversial title, then gives you all the propoganda on his church. Shit at the end he basically says "come join us, we're better". You know what I find interesting though, is that muslim and jew and christian will all stand side-by-side on this issue. They can fight about a million different things until the cows come home, but this view is held by all. Infact, the majority of the entire WORLD holds this view. We don't hate you, we just know you're committing a sin.
No they're not. My church says they're not.
And I guess you do whatever the entire WORLD always tells you to do? I mean, they've never been wrong before, have they?
If you're religion says it's a sin and someone in your religion commits the act, then they are a sinner. But if they aren't a part of your religion, then they are following their own path. Different from yours and free from your restraints and guilt.
Woo, more flawed logic, lol.
Your church says they're not, but my church says they are. Islam says they are. Judaism says they are. Give me a reason why yours is right and ours is wrong? You can't, cause it's all belief.
Do you always do what a radical splinter group religion tells you to do? I mean, they've never been wrong before, have they? Unless you count the numerous numbers of cults that have killed their followers and stuff like that. More flawed logic.
If my religion says it's a sin, and someone commits the act, they are still a sinner whether they are part of my religion or aren't. If one guy kills another, the killer might not think he's a killer, does that mean he's blameless?
Just because you don't believe something, doesn't mean you won't be held accountable for it.
Perhaps you should read that info from the CRMA again.
"Because it's easier to nitpick something than to be constructive." -roach5000
I apologize for underestimating you Draenor , most don't bother digging under the skin of arguments, as to my rebuttal...
Originally posted by Draenor
Sorry but do not try to outsmart me about my own religious text, I know what is inside of the bible. Now, when you say that most of the bible is not to be taken as fact...I always have fun educating people about this one; ready to be educated? Okay here goes
The Bible was written in a manner of Hebrew that does not denote story telling or metaphor, there is a separate style of hebrew for poetry, metaphor, allegory etc. The bible was specifically written in a manner for people to take it as fact, not fiction.
And how many times has it been written, and rewritten, and deliberately changed? We do not know for sure, but it has been on multiple occaisions. Do you really think that the style of writing won't have changed along with it?
Additionally, of course it was meant to be taken as fact, so was every single creation story across the globe. You do not tell your child how the world around him was made, then tell him it was all something grandfather Ells cooked up to keep the kids quiet with their nagging questions about what's around them. Note: I do not claim this as the origin, simply making a point. Too little is known about the actuall origins of the Old testament to make any real claim one way or the other. The origins of the New testament were... questionable, but thats not the issue at hand
Does that totaly blow your mind? Does it completely usurp your belief that you can pick and choose what to believe? You told me in your post that you cannot pick and choose what to believe in a religion. But if you decide that some parts of the bible are just stories, with the knowledge that the hebrew in the bible does not denote fiction, then you sir, are the one who is picking and choosing.
No it does not blow my mind, for the reasons I stated before. I take every single thing in the bible with a grain of salt, not just the parts that I vocally object to.
This is of course not to say that times have not changed. But just what exactly is condoned in the bible that is not in today's society? Nowhere in the bible does it say that it is okay for man to treat his brother with anything but love and the courtesy of trying to show him the right way in life. Now this of course only extends so far as is reasonable. You do not invite a murderer to dinner with your family and let him sleep in your children's room.
Most of Leviticus, the points in particular are punishments for sins in chapter 20; the forbidding of interest chapter 25 36-37; slavery in Chapter 25, 44-46 Take these laws literally and you will find much of the world against you. Admit they no longer apply todayAS STATED as they did back then and you've proved me right.
Acceptance is not the same as tolerance. And the Bible calls for christians to spread the word of God. What this means is not telling your homosexual friend "hey, you are living in sin and your life is an abomination." but rather pointing them towards the right direction and allowing them to make a decision for themself. It is not up to man to indocrinate someone against their will, and the Christian bible does not call for this.
Precisely my point, it does not, and yet people in this thread and elsewhere continue to treat people living a homosexual lifestyle with revulsion and in some cases hatred. For the record, I am not accusing you of this.
Your reference to the letter of Saint Paul to the Romans, I just reread the letter, and so far as I can tell,
2: Thus a married woman is bound by law to her husband as long as he lives; but if her husband dies she is discharged from the law concerning the husband.
3: Accordingly, she will be called an adulteress if she lives with another man while her husband is alive. But if her husband dies she is free from that law, and if she marries another man she is not an adulteress
Is the line that you are refering to...I see nothing "unspeakable" about this...And many people who follow the Christian faith today still choose to follow this path. If you were refering to a different passage than please let me know, I do not feel the need to quote the entire letter from Paul to the Romans here, as it is very very long.
I do apologize, Romans only contains that vague reference to a woman being owned. I shall endeavor to find the source I thought I was reffering to.
to sum up: The bible is written in a style of hebrew that denotes literal meaning, not poetic metaphor or allegory, this is a fact that any scholar of the bible should be able to tell you.
Teaching is not the same as bashing someone's head in, the bible calls for us to point people in the right direction and allow them to make their own decision. We are not called to change people, we are called to show them where God calls for the change.
If only the rest of christianity saw it that way...
PS. don't tell me that I can't pick at my religion like a Salad bar when you yourself in your own post said that we can't ever hope to believe the bible as a literal translation, is this not picking and choosing? I on the other hand have chosen to educate myself about what exactly is inside of the bible, and how exactly it applies to every day life, it is an on going process that will not end. As of right now, I could be seen as a religious fanatic, OH MY GOD someone who takes their faith seriously enough to stand naked on mmorpg.com and say what he believes.
Taking some portions of the bible literally, and letting other portions slide past is the picking I was reffering to. As to the rest, I for one admire your statements here and the temperament that goes with it, it is only blind ignorence that gets up my gullet, the type that refuses to learn, that of course does not mean I entirely agree with you either
I'll do me best to answer any questions you may have, but as I said, I am still learning.
Sorry but do not try to outsmart me about my own religious text, I know what is inside of the bible. Now, when you say that most of the bible is not to be taken as fact...I always have fun educating people about this one; ready to be educated? Okay here goes
The Bible was written in a manner of Hebrew that does not denote story telling or metaphor, there is a separate style of hebrew for poetry, metaphor, allegory etc. The bible was specifically written in a manner for people to take it as fact, not fiction.
And how many times has it been written, and rewritten, and deliberately changed? We do not know for sure, but it has been on multiple occaisions. Do you really think that the style of writing won't have changed along with it?
Additionally, of course it was meant to be taken as fact, so was every single creation story across the globe. You do not tell your child how the world around him was made, then tell him it was all something grandfather Ells cooked up to keep the kids quiet with their nagging questions about what's around them. Note: I do not claim this as the origin, simply making a point. Too little is known about the actuall origins of the Old testament to make any real claim one way or the other. The origins of the New testament were... questionable, but thats not the issue at hand
Does that totaly blow your mind? Does it completely usurp your belief that you can pick and choose what to believe? You told me in your post that you cannot pick and choose what to believe in a religion. But if you decide that some parts of the bible are just stories, with the knowledge that the hebrew in the bible does not denote fiction, then you sir, are the one who is picking and choosing.
No it does not blow my mind, for the reasons I stated before. I take every single thing in the bible with a grain of salt, not just the parts that I vocally object to.
This is of course not to say that times have not changed. But just what exactly is condoned in the bible that is not in today's society? Nowhere in the bible does it say that it is okay for man to treat his brother with anything but love and the courtesy of trying to show him the right way in life. Now this of course only extends so far as is reasonable. You do not invite a murderer to dinner with your family and let him sleep in your children's room.
Most of Leviticus, the points in particular are punishments for sins in chapter 20; the forbidding of interest chapter 25 36-37; slavery in Chapter 25, 44-46 Take these laws literally and you will find much of the world against you. Admit they no longer apply today as they did back then and you've proved me right.
Acceptance is not the same as tolerance. And the Bible calls for christians to spread the word of God. What this means is not telling your homosexual friend "hey, you are living in sin and your life is an abomination." but rather pointing them towards the right direction and allowing them to make a decision for themself. It is not up to man to indocrinate someone against their will, and the Christian bible does not call for this.
Precisely my point, it does not, and yet people in this thread and elsewhere continue to treat people living a homosexual lifestyle with revulsion and in some cases hatred. For the record, I am not accusing you of this.
Your reference to the letter of Saint Paul to the Romans, I just reread the letter, and so far as I can tell,
2: Thus a married woman is bound by law to her husband as long as he lives; but if her husband dies she is discharged from the law concerning the husband.
3: Accordingly, she will be called an adulteress if she lives with another man while her husband is alive. But if her husband dies she is free from that law, and if she marries another man she is not an adulteress
Is the line that you are refering to...I see nothing "unspeakable" about this...And many people who follow the Christian faith today still choose to follow this path. If you were refering to a different passage than please let me know, I do not feel the need to quote the entire letter from Paul to the Romans here, as it is very very long.
I do apologize, Romans only contains that vague reference to a woman being owned. I shall endeavor to find the source I thought I was reffering to.
to sum up: The bible is written in a style of hebrew that denotes literal meaning, not poetic metaphor or allegory, this is a fact that any scholar of the bible should be able to tell you.
Teaching is not the same as bashing someone's head in, the bible calls for us to point people in the right direction and allow them to make their own decision. We are not called to change people, we are called to show them where God calls for the change.
If only the rest of christianity saw it that way...
PS. don't tell me that I can't pick at my religion like a Salad bar when you yourself in your own post said that we can't ever hope to believe the bible as a literal translation, is this not picking and choosing? I on the other hand have chosen to educate myself about what exactly is inside of the bible, and how exactly it applies to every day life, it is an on going process that will not end. As of right now, I could be seen as a religious fanatic, OH MY GOD someone who takes their faith seriously enough to stand naked on mmorpg.com and say what he believes.
Taking some portions of the bible literally, and letting other portions slide past is the picking I was reffering to. As to the rest, I for one admire your statements here and the temperament that goes with it, it is only blind ignorence that gets up my gullet, the type that refuses to learn, that of course does not mean I entirely agree with you either
I'll do me best to answer any questions you may have, but as I said, I am still learning.
Originally posted by J0kerr1 Hate to tel everybody on this topic, but unless you are the Pope you can't tell people what is or isn't a sin. The pope says gay is a sin, so if you beleive in that religion, its a sin. If you think it is not a sin, you are part of another religion or commiting a sin.
That simples people.
A. Technically, the pope is the leader of only one doctrine of christianity. Most of the other look up to the Vatican as an inspiration of course, but still whats your explaination for the other hundred or so versions of christianity?
B. You're naming a MAN as the sole interpreter of god's will. Granted, he by all means should be more qualified than most for that purpose, but he is still a man, with all of humanity's weaknesses right along with the tendancy to make mistakes. I am not aware of any such recent behavior, and do not suspect there is any, but in the past popes have been known to exploit their position in numerous ways for their own purposes, hardly an instant qualification.
No man is an island, entire of itself; every man is a piece of the continent, a part of the main. any man's death diminishes me, because I am involved in mankind, and therefore never send to know for whom the bell tolls; it tolls for thee. Hemingway
Originally posted by modjoe86 If the religion harbors such a broad range of people, I don't really understand the point of it. If I'm an agnostic, and I'm sharing my religion with a liberal christian, I wouldn't feel very unified. I thought the whole point of a religion was to surround myself with people of similar beliefs.
It's part of the whole "I'm Okay, You're Okay" movement that is ruining our society. They believe everyone is right, therefore they don't really stand for anything except "we're all good all the time and we're never wrong and we're never bad and whatever you believe is the truth"
"Because it's easier to nitpick something than to be constructive." -roach5000
Originally posted by reavo So, like I said, if you're tired of hearing people perpetuate the fear mongering and preaching that you should feel guilt and shame for being created by God with your own form of love for another, then know that there are other religions that allow you the freedom to think for yourself. You don't have to follow the path of another. Their path to spiritual growth is theirs, not yours. It's funny reading your comments though. They show exactly what I'm trying to say. You guys are so into your authoritative religions. It really makes you angry to see someone break from them and experience the freedom you're so scared to know. I offer you the chance to be absolutely free and you choose to remain enslaved by ancient texts.
Oh actually, by the way, we are just defending our viewpoints and religions from the 'fear mongering' that you started this thread by. You're just pissed cause you can't take your own medicine. You go around preaching how great your religion is and how bad/wrong all the others are, and now all of us are telling you how bad/wrong yours is.
You say "come be free and don't be a slave to ancient texts" and garbage like that, but it's just snake oil. You're trying to sell us your religion and it's not working. We believe what our religions teach us is true, and you can attack us for it all you want but the truth is, you can't say crap cause you have nothing to back it up with. You are just selling a 'no rules' cult where everyone gets what they want all the time.
"Because it's easier to nitpick something than to be constructive." -roach5000
Originally posted by Blurr Originally posted by reavo So, like I said, if you're tired of hearing people perpetuate the fear mongering and preaching that you should feel guilt and shame for being created by God with your own form of love for another, then know that there are other religions that allow you the freedom to think for yourself. You don't have to follow the path of another. Their path to spiritual growth is theirs, not yours. It's funny reading your comments though. They show exactly what I'm trying to say. You guys are so into your authoritative religions. It really makes you angry to see someone break from them and experience the freedom you're so scared to know. I offer you the chance to be absolutely free and you choose to remain enslaved by ancient texts.
Oh actually, by the way, we are just defending our viewpoints and religions from the 'fear mongering' that you started this thread by. You're just pissed cause you can't take your own medicine. You go around preaching how great your religion is and how bad/wrong all the others are, and now all of us are telling you how bad/wrong yours is.
You say "come be free and don't be a slave to ancient texts" and garbage like that, but it's just snake oil. You're trying to sell us your religion and it's not working. We believe what our religions teach us is true, and you can attack us for it all you want but the truth is, you can't say crap cause you have nothing to back it up with. You are just selling a 'no rules' cult where everyone gets what they want all the time.
Finally, someone sees religion for what it is, a cult. All relgions are cults.
Comments
nuh uh
anyway..yea, i think it's time for this thread to die.
it's getting pretty pointless
==========================
..
But then some gay activist will come and start saying this person and this person and this person was gay... They are like... "DID YOU know Jesus was gay... He spent all his time with men... he must have been gay" orr "Did you know Abe lincoln was gay?" or " (insert pivotal historic character) was gay" and they will swear up and down that that person was gay so it must be ok to be gay... I think i'm gonna start using that argument in my race arguments...
Hey did you know George washington was half-black?.. Did you know Ceasar was half-black?
What's your Wu Name?
Donovan --> Wu Name = Violent Knight
Methane47 --> Wu Name = Thunderous Leader
"Some people call me the walking plank, 'cuz any where you go... Death is right behind you.."
<i>ME<i>
Does it REALLY effect you if it's a sin or if it's not a sin? If you said it DOES effect you, then you have some serious issues that need to be looked at right away.
As long as I'm not being told I have to do anything of the sort, I'm fine with you being as gay as a $3 dollar bill. So if it was up to me, I'd like everyone marry each other... why can't gays be as miserable as everyone else who's married?
NGE Refugee.
..
But then some gay activist will come and start saying this person and this person and this person was gay... They are like... "DID YOU know Jesus was gay... He spent all his time with men... he must have been gay" orr "Did you know Abe lincoln was gay?" or " (insert pivotal historic character) was gay" and they will swear up and down that that person was gay so it must be ok to be gay... I think i'm gonna start using that argument in my race arguments...
Hey did you know George washington was half-black?.. Did you know Ceasar was half-black?
Yeah that's a common tactic of some people (especially a couple on this board). Unfortunately it's faulty logic and they don't realize it. Labeling someone else as support for your cause in an argument is just bad form. It's like you take that one point about them which may or may not be true, and make that as their whole character. Thomas Jefferson was this or that, so what? He also did a bunch of political stuff. Alot of good political people weren't this or that, so therefore it doesn't make any difference. Plus I swear I heard someone sayd George Washington was half-black..
"Because it's easier to nitpick something than to be constructive." -roach5000
https://easynulled.com/
Free porn videos, xxx porn videos
Onlyfans nudes
Onlyfans leaked
NGE Refugee.
It's a figure of speech...
It's a figure of speech...
No it's not...
Queer perhaps, but not gay.
Joe picks apart some random detail in a long post and flips it on them 4tw.
https://easynulled.com/
Free porn videos, xxx porn videos
Onlyfans nudes
Onlyfans leaked
Queer perhaps, but not gay.
Joe picks apart some random detail in a long post and flips it on them 4tw.
oh.....
why don't you make like a tree and get outta here
==========================
Queer perhaps, but not gay.
Joe picks apart some random detail in a long post and flips it on them 4tw.
oh.....
why don't you make like a tree and get outta here
Okay Biff.
Hey McFly... your shoe's untied.
So, like I said, if you're tired of hearing people perpetuate the fear mongering and preaching that you should feel guilt and shame for being created by God with your own form of love for another, then know that there are other religions that allow you the freedom to think for yourself.
You don't have to follow the path of another. Their path to spiritual growth is theirs, not yours.
It's funny reading your comments though. They show exactly what I'm trying to say. You guys are so into your authoritative religions. It really makes you angry to see someone break from them and experience the freedom you're so scared to know.
I offer you the chance to be absolutely free and you choose to remain enslaved by ancient texts.
Hate to tel everybody on this topic, but unless you are the Pope you can't tell people what is or isn't a sin. The pope says gay is a sin, so if you beleive in that religion, its a sin. If you think it is not a sin, you are part of another religion or commiting a sin.
That simples people.
No they're not. My church says they're not.
And I guess you do whatever the entire WORLD always tells you to do? I mean, they've never been wrong before, have they?
If you're religion says it's a sin and someone in your religion commits the act, then they are a sinner. But if they aren't a part of your religion, then they are following their own path. Different from yours and free from your restraints and guilt.
https://easynulled.com/
Free porn videos, xxx porn videos
Onlyfans nudes
Onlyfans leaked
No they're not. My church says they're not.
And I guess you do whatever the entire WORLD always tells you to do? I mean, they've never been wrong before, have they?
If you're religion says it's a sin and someone in your religion commits the act, then they are a sinner. But if they aren't a part of your religion, then they are following their own path. Different from yours and free from your restraints and guilt.
Woo, more flawed logic, lol.
Your church says they're not, but my church says they are. Islam says they are. Judaism says they are. Give me a reason why yours is right and ours is wrong? You can't, cause it's all belief.
Do you always do what a radical splinter group religion tells you to do? I mean, they've never been wrong before, have they? Unless you count the numerous numbers of cults that have killed their followers and stuff like that. More flawed logic.
If my religion says it's a sin, and someone commits the act, they are still a sinner whether they are part of my religion or aren't. If one guy kills another, the killer might not think he's a killer, does that mean he's blameless?
Just because you don't believe something, doesn't mean you won't be held accountable for it.
Perhaps you should read that info from the CRMA again.
"Because it's easier to nitpick something than to be constructive." -roach5000
A. Technically, the pope is the leader of only one doctrine of christianity. Most of the other look up to the Vatican as an inspiration of course, but still whats your explaination for the other hundred or so versions of christianity?
B. You're naming a MAN as the sole interpreter of god's will. Granted, he by all means should be more qualified than most for that purpose, but he is still a man, with all of humanity's weaknesses right along with the tendancy to make mistakes. I am not aware of any such recent behavior, and do not suspect there is any, but in the past popes have been known to exploit their position in numerous ways for their own purposes, hardly an instant qualification.
No man is an island, entire of itself; every man is a piece of the continent, a part of the main. any man's death diminishes me, because I am involved in mankind, and therefore never send to know for whom the bell tolls; it tolls for thee.
Hemingway
"Because it's easier to nitpick something than to be constructive." -roach5000
Oh actually, by the way, we are just defending our viewpoints and religions from the 'fear mongering' that you started this thread by. You're just pissed cause you can't take your own medicine. You go around preaching how great your religion is and how bad/wrong all the others are, and now all of us are telling you how bad/wrong yours is.
You say "come be free and don't be a slave to ancient texts" and garbage like that, but it's just snake oil. You're trying to sell us your religion and it's not working. We believe what our religions teach us is true, and you can attack us for it all you want but the truth is, you can't say crap cause you have nothing to back it up with. You are just selling a 'no rules' cult where everyone gets what they want all the time.
"Because it's easier to nitpick something than to be constructive." -roach5000
As for Catholics, Gay is a sin. The pope says so. If you don't beleive the pope you are not a Catholic.
If you disagree with your religion get out. No one forces in it.
Oh actually, by the way, we are just defending our viewpoints and religions from the 'fear mongering' that you started this thread by. You're just pissed cause you can't take your own medicine. You go around preaching how great your religion is and how bad/wrong all the others are, and now all of us are telling you how bad/wrong yours is.
You say "come be free and don't be a slave to ancient texts" and garbage like that, but it's just snake oil. You're trying to sell us your religion and it's not working. We believe what our religions teach us is true, and you can attack us for it all you want but the truth is, you can't say crap cause you have nothing to back it up with. You are just selling a 'no rules' cult where everyone gets what they want all the time.
Finally, someone sees religion for what it is, a cult. All relgions are cults.