Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Do you believe in a God

1222325272836

Comments

  • AldaronAldaron Member Posts: 1,048



    Originally posted by vrtldave



    good point exxcept two things... church is not needed for people to still belive in the teachings of christinaity second though the historical records are superb they have also destroyed and change lots of historical events... it would have been better if 3rd party memebers sucha as in the time of ROmans/Greeks there were Historians to write down info... though that to would have a biased opnion, however since there would be more then one it would be easier to understand the "middle" ground...



    The church has changed from it's original intent. It was meant to be a brotherhood instead of a hierarchy. So yes, the churches of today, and many in the past. Were not the intention of Christ and the Apostles of what they should of been. So in a way your right, you don't need Church to follow and believe Christianity. But the original definition of it anyhow was just a group of people coming together to fellowship, so you'd still have "church" but drastically different then what it is today.

    "Fear not death; for the sooner we die, the longer shall we be immortal."

  • vrtldavevrtldave Member Posts: 558

    [quote]Originally posted by Aldaron
    [b]

    Originally posted by Jamkull


    Originally posted by Aldaron Well I'm mainly looking for you to give an exact implication of what religions you're referring to as to whether or not I can prove or disprove what you're saying. By just generalizing you could be meaning any religion, and some actually do what you say, while others are the opposite. So please give an exact description of what religions you are implicating of.

    [b]
    I'm not good with naming names, but i will try to purpose some historical events and you can place the religion with the event.
    Salem witch trials?
    Spanish Inquisition?
    Various mass suicides?
    Iran and Iraq wars?
    There was a time shortly after King James made Christianity their main religion not sure what it is called. But if you didn't conform you were either killed or ostracized.
    The miens sacrificing for what?
    Sacrificing was the age old way of many religions and even in todays society there are a couple different religions that still do sacrifices. either it being human or animal. The ones that sacrifice other humans of course which are generalized as satanism, but not all of them have vowed Satan to be their reason.
    So many things that have transpired in time that makes religions in general to be considered Evil in one way or another. But that is of course only a perspective.
    There are even my own experiences with the various forms of christianity and various other religions within the great old US of A. In various small towns especially through the bible belt how people are ostracized because they don't believe the way the local folk believe.

    What you got to look at is what the actual belief system is based on. And then what it says before making your decision about that religion.
    Such as alot of people critisize Christianity as being evil because of what some people have done in the past, and that they proclaimed to be Christians. But yet those same people obviously haven't actually studied their basics or they wouldn't make such ignorant statements such as those.
    It's always better to base your thoughts on the religion based on what it actually states, instead of the flawed men who follow it.
    [/quote]
    [/b]

    how horibbly wrong... you should base you opnions on religous belifs from a point of view in which is only looking at the teachings and belifs of a relgion correct.... you should based your opnions on a organized relgion based on the facts of what the orgazation has done... the people make up the organized relgion so on them you must look... the teachings are all fine and dandy but the people the misuse them are wrong.... christinaty is a great relgion when just looking at the bible... but when looking at the actual orgainzed relgion it is pretty crappy, along with all relgions...

    image

  • AldaronAldaron Member Posts: 1,048



    Originally posted by vrtldave


    how horibbly wrong... you should base you opnions on religous belifs from a point of view in which is only looking at the teachings and belifs of a relgion correct.... you should based your opnions on a organized relgion based on the facts of what the orgazation has done... the people make up the organized relgion so on them you must look... the teachings are all fine and dandy but the people the misuse them are wrong.... christinaty is a great relgion when just looking at the bible... but when looking at the actual orgainzed relgion it is pretty crappy, along with all relgions...



    Lol. I hope aliens don't think like you, or we're screwed. image

    "Fear not death; for the sooner we die, the longer shall we be immortal."

  • vrtldavevrtldave Member Posts: 558


    Originally posted by Aldaron
    Originally posted by vrtldave
    how horibbly wrong... you should base you opnions on religous belifs from a point of view in which is only looking at the teachings and belifs of a relgion correct.... you should based your opnions on a organized relgion based on the facts of what the orgazation has done... the people make up the organized relgion so on them you must look... the teachings are all fine and dandy but the people the misuse them are wrong.... christinaty is a great relgion when just looking at the bible... but when looking at the actual orgainzed relgion it is pretty crappy, along with all relgions...Lol. I hope aliens don't think like you, or we're screwed. image

    err sorry I dont really understand what you mean... but its ok...

    image

  • AldaronAldaron Member Posts: 1,048



    Originally posted by vrtldave



    err sorry I dont really understand what you mean... but its ok...




    Sorry. Should of been more descriptive. What I was talking about was the fact of you generalizing. You saying organized religion is crappy because of corruptible people, and their abuse of power, and them using the name of their religion when they do something that it's actually against.

    Thus me making a comment about aliens in retrospect to the whole fact of, if you use the same logic in comparison to the human race. The human race would just be a hopeless pile of crap.

    Or maybe i'm mis-interpreting what you said. Please say so if I did.

    "Fear not death; for the sooner we die, the longer shall we be immortal."

  • DregaDrega Member Posts: 225



    Originally posted by vrtldave




    Originally posted by Drega
    I have to defend religion at this point. There has been good things that came from it, mainly that the church has kept historical record that other wise would have been lost centuries ago, along with many laws we cherish today. My favorit being "thouh shalt not kill" which is the one most often forgotten. Even though alot of people will not agree with me on this, the church has been one of the main reasons we still have a historical record dating back to atleast 1500 BC.

    good point exxcept two things... church is not needed for people to still belive in the teachings of christinaity second though the historical records are superb they have also destroyed and change lots of historical events... it would have been better if 3rd party memebers sucha as in the time of ROmans/Greeks there were Historians to write down info... though that to would have a biased opnion, however since there would be more then one it would be easier to understand the "middle" ground...




    Ah, but without the church keeping a documented report dating back to the roman persecution of the jews (before and during the time jesus is believed have exsisted). Historians were able to set a time table, have a rough idea where to gather information, and a loose referance to help them understand the times. from this basis archioligist and historians were able to create a stageringly accurate description of life during roman times and even explore further back into time.

    image
    This place is full of tree-huggers and tofu fartn' faeries...

  • vrtldavevrtldave Member Posts: 558

    you kinda understood but then again kinda way off :)... I am not "generlaizing" I am stating events that happened and why organized relgion is bad... the relgion itself is good and some of the people that fallow it are good to... but the people that corrupt it spread the corruption to everyone else because then they fallow out the "wrong" orders... I dont mean to say I think christinas are corrupt just that they are sometimes lead to do the wrong things, and those wrongs thigns are horrible... so with out the governing relgious leaders people could belive in the good teachings of the bible with out putting themselves in the potion in which they are forced to commit wrong doings... see organized relgion sucks :)...

    image

  • Gythe1stGythe1st Member Posts: 45

    I can't believe this is even being discussed here of all places. Religion is the type of discussion that no matter who you get, will end up ugly or annoying everyone. Now don't get me wrong, I'm not going to side wth any of your religious beliefs. I just find it irritatingly interesting that on a gaming site the discussion of religion has 60 pages of comments. and we can barely get 20 if that many for most any Morg or game published and discussed.

    Not that this is going to make a dent in your need to express your opinion of religion but can't we just let this topic Die.

    Oni

    Frumple bog was here

  • vrtldavevrtldave Member Posts: 558


    Originally posted by Drega
    Originally posted by vrtldave Originally posted by DregaI have to defend religion at this point. There has been good things that came from it, mainly that the church has kept historical record that other wise would have been lost centuries ago, along with many laws we cherish today. My favorit being "thouh shalt not kill" which is the one most often forgotten. Even though alot of people will not agree with me on this, the church has been one of the main reasons we still have a historical record dating back to atleast 1500 BC. good point exxcept two things... church is not needed for people to still belive in the teachings of christinaity second though the historical records are superb they have also destroyed and change lots of historical events... it would have been better if 3rd party memebers sucha as in the time of ROmans/Greeks there were Historians to write down info... though that to would have a biased opnion, however since there would be more then one it would be easier to understand the "middle" ground...Ah, but without the church keeping a documented report dating back to the roman persecution of the jews (before and during the time jesus is believed have exsisted). Historians were able to set a time table, have a rough idea where to gather information, and a loose referance to help them understand the times. from this basis archioligist and historians were able to create a stageringly accurate description of life during roman times and even explore further back into time.


    yea but all they did was keep the historical refrences that the 3rd party romans wrote... anyone could have done that... might not have happened but then agian I am thinking that chances are high some one would keep them...

    image

  • vrtldavevrtldave Member Posts: 558


    Originally posted by Gythe1st
    I can't believe this is even being discussed here of all places. Religion is the type of discussion that no matter who you get, will end up ugly or annoying everyone. Now don't get me wrong, I'm not going to side wth any of your religious beliefs. I just find it irritatingly interesting that on a gaming site the discussion of religion has 60 pages of comments. and we can barely get 20 if that many for most any Morg or game published and discussed.
    Not that this is going to make a dent in your need to express your opinion of religion but can't we just let this topic Die.
    Oni

    I am bored... this gives me something to do...

    image

  • AldaronAldaron Member Posts: 1,048



    Originally posted by vrtldave

    you kinda understood but then again kinda way off :)... I am not "generlaizing" I am stating events that happened and why organized relgion is bad... the relgion itself is good and some of the people that fallow it are good to... but the people that corrupt it spread the corruption to everyone else because then they fallow out the "wrong" orders... I dont mean to say I think christinas are corrupt just that they are sometimes lead to do the wrong things, and those wrongs thigns are horrible... so with out the governing relgious leaders people could belive in the good teachings of the bible with out putting themselves in the potion in which they are forced to commit wrong doings... see organized relgion sucks :)...



    Original Christianity was meant as a brotherhood, with only Christ as the head. Sort of fixes that problem doesn't it?

    The Christian church surely does need a reform, going back to it's original intent.

    I couldn't really agree with your statement or not as I do not know where your definition of "organized religion" begins and ends.

    Anyhow. I'm out for the night. I'll continue this later.

    Godbless everyone.

    "Fear not death; for the sooner we die, the longer shall we be immortal."

  • DregaDrega Member Posts: 225
    Well yes and no, the only other group of people that really kept any referance to roman cultur after it fell was the Goths. This is mainly due to the fact that the Goths conquered rome (this city and majority of the empire) twice, looted it, and left. Then at the end worked as a very large portion of its military fighting against other barbarian clans attacking rome near its end. Other than that, there is little referance to roman culture outside the churchs records (extremly biased as they were).

    image
    This place is full of tree-huggers and tofu fartn' faeries...

  • DregaDrega Member Posts: 225



    Originally posted by Gythe1st

    I can't believe this is even being discussed here of all places. Religion is the type of discussion that no matter who you get, will end up ugly or annoying everyone. Now don't get me wrong, I'm not going to side wth any of your religious beliefs. I just find it irritatingly interesting that on a gaming site the discussion of religion has 60 pages of comments. and we can barely get 20 if that many for most any Morg or game published and discussed.
    Not that this is going to make a dent in your need to express your opinion of religion but can't we just let this topic Die.
    Oni



    stayed civil for 62 pages. And this is the off-topic forum, anything goes! image

    image
    This place is full of tree-huggers and tofu fartn' faeries...

  • vrtldavevrtldave Member Posts: 558


    Originally posted by Drega
    Originally posted by Gythe1st
    I can't believe this is even being discussed here of all places. Religion is the type of discussion that no matter who you get, will end up ugly or annoying everyone. Now don't get me wrong, I'm not going to side wth any of your religious beliefs. I just find it irritatingly interesting that on a gaming site the discussion of religion has 60 pages of comments. and we can barely get 20 if that many for most any Morg or game published and discussed.
    Not that this is going to make a dent in your need to express your opinion of religion but can't we just let this topic Die.
    Onistayed civil for 62 pages. And this is the off-topic forum, anything goes! image

    foul temptress... now I have to do it... @&;(@ you mother*@#@! I ahte your @&;!@# guts... :)

    image

  • MarundMarund Member Posts: 33

    How come there are so many pedofile priests?

    Watch out.. he might be touching your child right when we speak.

  • BoulderdashBoulderdash Member Posts: 35

    If you were born alone in this world and lived with no human interaction would you believe in (a) God?

    Hellen Keller thought there was someone like that before she was educated enough to effectively communicate.

     

    I am sorry to say but Hellen Keller did have human interaction.

  • BaagismBaagism Member Posts: 56



    Originally posted by Egold




    Originally posted by dekron


    Originally posted by Vodalus
    wheredoes it say that Adam and Eve (whose name was actually Chavah) were the only two people?
    Adam and Eve are the only people mentioned in the bible as the ones created directly by god. God tells adam and eve to go populate the earth. This implies that they were alone. Now you are just trying to pull "what ifs" to support your argument. Christians can only base their beliefs on the bible, nothing else. Once you stray away from what is said in the bible, you lose all credibility.


    but he's NOT straying from what's said in the bible, because he said that it doesn't say that adam and eve were the only people. It's more likely to assume than there WERE other people, because most likely cain didn't have sex with his mom.



    HAHAHA  We all know incest was going down.  It's the bible!

    -Let's all be ignorant!

  • freethinkerfreethinker Member UncommonPosts: 775


    Originally posted by Vodalus
    Oh, the Ica stones also show people flying on the back of pterodactyls, using telescopes, piloting flying machines, performing open-heart surgery, cesarean section births, and brain transplants.* Those folks in the Bible times were really advanced to be flying around on airplanes. I wonder if God told the pterodactyl to let man ride it. Give it up man...the Ica stones are a fake which is why they weren't accepted as evidence when they were discovered.Nice try! Now refute my claim about the fossile record like I've done to each of your claims so far. If you can't, then please conceed the argument and admit to everyone you simply WANT to believe these things. Seriously, you are on a losing side of an argument here.*http://www.csicop.org/si/2002-09/strange-world.html

    How is it that these ancient people were aware of the existence of creatueres that had supposedly been extinct for millions of years when they drew these pictures?



    The same reason why they were aware of open-heart surgery, flying machines and telescopes. The Ica stones are a hoax. Here's some more info on them that shows why they must be a hoax and why no one takes these as evidence for anything

    http://skepdic.com/icastones.html

    ==========================
    image

  • VodalusVodalus Member Posts: 103


    Well, I believe that the universe was just always there. Why does there have to be a starting point for something? Can't it just be there, forever. There had to be something that was always there, for everything else to build on. Heres a bad comparison; it is thing about if you could keep on cutting something in halves forever, and the answer is you can't, there is a smallest unit (the atom?). And I guess the universe is (metaphorically) that thing that can't be cut up into a start or finishing place. It is that unit, that thing that was there forever. So maybe if you think God was always there, then the universe itself is God. And since we are all byproducts of the universe, we are all made up of the essence of God. We are all "Sons of God".


    That's my reasoning anyways...

    Yeah and btw: I do somewhat believe in God, but loosely. I believe more in the rules and the ideas than in the stories ( I am Hindu).


    The second law of thermodynamics tells us that the universwe had a beginning.

    Linux is free.....if your time costs nothing.

  • VodalusVodalus Member Posts: 103


    Originally posted by freethinker
    Originally posted by Vodalus
    Oh, the Ica stones also show people flying on the back of pterodactyls, using telescopes, piloting flying machines, performing open-heart surgery, cesarean section births, and brain transplants.* Those folks in the Bible times were really advanced to be flying around on airplanes. I wonder if God told the pterodactyl to let man ride it. Give it up man...the Ica stones are a fake which is why they weren't accepted as evidence when they were discovered.Nice try! Now refute my claim about the fossile record like I've done to each of your claims so far. If you can't, then please conceed the argument and admit to everyone you simply WANT to believe these things. Seriously, you are on a losing side of an argument here.*http://www.csicop.org/si/2002-09/strange-world.html

    How is it that these ancient people were aware of the existence of creatueres that had supposedly been extinct for millions of years when they drew these pictures?



    The same reason why they were aware of open-heart surgery, flying machines and telescopes. The Ica stones are a hoax. Here's some more info on them that shows why they must be a hoax and why no one takes these as evidence for anything

    http://skepdic.com/icastones.html


    The Ica stoens need not be taken literally, thei mportant thing is that they show knowledge fo these things. But how do you know they didn't know of those things? It is proven fact that they had and used hot air balloons. The Nazca lines? explain that one, some of the depictions of animals there feature detail only viewable through a microscope. Perhaps these primitives were a bit more advanced than they are commonly given credit for.

    Who was responsible for the Ica stones' hoax?

    You gonna tell me Dr Cabrera, who discovered the stones sat down and made 10,000 stones, only to give them away (not sell them)?

    What was his motivation then?

    Or was it one of the simple farmers in the area, who somehow found time in his busy life to carve 10,000 stones for God knows why?

    Linux is free.....if your time costs nothing.

  • freethinkerfreethinker Member UncommonPosts: 775



    The Ica stoens need not be taken literally, thei mportant thing is that they show knowledge fo these things. But how do you know they didn't know of those things? It is proven fact that they had and used hot air balloons. The Nazca lines? explain that one, some of the depictions of animals there feature detail only viewable through a microscope. Perhaps these primitives were a bit more advanced than they are commonly given credit for.

    Who was responsible for the Ica stones' hoax?

    You gonna tell me Dr Cabrera, who discovered the stones sat down and made 10,000 stones, only to give them away (not sell them)?


    Whether he sold them or gave them away is irrelevant.


    What was his motivation then?

    His motivation is irrelevant too.


    Or was it one of the simple farmers in the area, who somehow found time in his busy life to carve 10,000 stones for God knows why?

    What does this matter? The point is that you are trying to use these stones to prove your case that man and dinos lived together. The evidence of the authenticity of these stones is shaky..at best. You want to toss out known science that is firmly supported with fossil evidence because of some rock art. Absurd!

    ==========================
    image

  • VodalusVodalus Member Posts: 103

    Show me your fossil evidence.

    So, when accusing someone of doing something, it is not important to establish the fact that they had a reason for doing so?

    Linux is free.....if your time costs nothing.

  • freethinkerfreethinker Member UncommonPosts: 775

    [quote]Originally posted by Vodalus
    [b]Show me your fossil evidence.[/quote]

    It's not MY fossil evidence, it's the generally accepted explanation that scientists use today and I accept it because it's based on solid evidence. You can usually find this information in biology textbooks.

    ==========================
    image

  • AldaronAldaron Member Posts: 1,048



    Originally posted by freethinker

    [quote]Originally posted by Vodalus
    [b]Show me your fossil evidence.[/quote]
    It's not MY fossil evidence, it's the generally accepted explanation that scientists use today and I accept it because it's based on solid evidence. You can usually find this information in biology textbooks.



    Could you please explain in detail what solid evidence you're talking about?

    "Fear not death; for the sooner we die, the longer shall we be immortal."

  • VercadesVercades Member Posts: 1,065



    Originally posted by Baagism



    Originally posted by Egold




    Originally posted by dekron


    Originally posted by Vodalus
    wheredoes it say that Adam and Eve (whose name was actually Chavah) were the only two people?
    Adam and Eve are the only people mentioned in the bible as the ones created directly by god. God tells adam and eve to go populate the earth. This implies that they were alone. Now you are just trying to pull "what ifs" to support your argument. Christians can only base their beliefs on the bible, nothing else. Once you stray away from what is said in the bible, you lose all credibility.


    but he's NOT straying from what's said in the bible, because he said that it doesn't say that adam and eve were the only people. It's more likely to assume than there WERE other people, because most likely cain didn't have sex with his mom.



    HAHAHA  We all know incest was going down.  It's the bible!



    Do you make a living of being ignorant?  In the Bible, they traveled accross the lands and found other folk.  This is a common misconception in Bible studies.
This discussion has been closed.