Well, they've already dropped co-op for the single player.
No, they did not.
They just clarified that FIRST you finish the SQ42 narrative missions ALONE so the story can progress as intended. And THEN you can replay the same missions as often as you want in co-op mode via the sim-pod. Which does NOT contradict what they promised in Kickstarter - although some people want you to believe that.
@Turrican187 ; >>>They are about to drop private servers as well. >>>
Can you give us a link to the source for that information ? Because to my knowledge so far they do NOT plan to drop the plan for private servers.
Have fun
PS:
DING ! 102 million. ;-)
You're splitting hairs and you know it. Doing things like this undercuts your other posts.
It is, absolutely, a retreat from a stated goal. While it's a negative for the game, it is interesting that they actually dropped something. I suspect Erin is at work there.
If you are holding out for the perfect game, the only game you play will be the waiting one.
Well, they've already dropped co-op for the single player.
No, they did not.
They just clarified that FIRST you finish the SQ42 narrative missions ALONE so the story can progress as intended. And THEN you can replay the same missions as often as you want in co-op mode via the sim-pod. Which does NOT contradict what they promised in Kickstarter - although some people want you to believe that.
@Turrican187 ; >>>They are about to drop private servers as well. >>>
Can you give us a link to the source for that information ? Because to my knowledge so far they do NOT plan to drop the plan for private servers.
Have fun
PS:
DING ! 102 million. ;-)
You're splitting hairs and you know it. Doing things like this undercuts your other posts.
It is, absolutely, a retreat from a stated goal. While it's a negative for the game, it is interesting that they actually dropped something. I suspect Erin is at work there.
You are most probably correct in that assumption although I would see it as more of a restructuring of a stated goal but as you say that is "Splitting Hairs". Regardless the goal has changed and Erin is most likely the cause which is important to note as this is one example I've noticed of a member of the team reigning Chris in a little.
You're splitting hairs and you know it. Doing things like this undercuts your other posts.
It is, absolutely, a retreat from a stated goal. While it's a negative for the game, it is interesting that they actually dropped something. I suspect Erin is at work there.
You are most probably correct in that assumption although I would see it as more of a restructuring of a stated goal but as you say that is "Splitting Hairs". Regardless the goal has changed and Erin is most likely the cause which is important to note as this is one example I've noticed of a member of the team reigning Chris in a little.
Bren
Erin is a positive in my book. He's actually produced games in the last 20 years. Also, no one I've talked to had anything negative to say about him.
If you are holding out for the perfect game, the only game you play will be the waiting one.
Comments
Have fun
You're splitting hairs and you know it. Doing things like this undercuts your other posts.
It is, absolutely, a retreat from a stated goal. While it's a negative for the game, it is interesting that they actually dropped something. I suspect Erin is at work there.
If you are holding out for the perfect game, the only game you play will be the waiting one.
Bren
while(horse==dead)
{
beat();
}
If you are holding out for the perfect game, the only game you play will be the waiting one.