Yes the game is worth a try. I just downloaded the trial and im having a blast.
Im extremely impressed with the game so far, and as for the graphics, hell they look better than half the games coming out today.
Im not just playing devils advocate, but I would have a very hard time imagining Guild Wars 2 having comparable PvP to DAOC, having played the original Guild Wars with its... well, less than perfect open world PvP
Originally posted by chiege
I'm deep within the bowels of Mythic. DAOC II is in the works. Trust me.
Thanks for the results of the colonoscopy, doctor chiege.
Read the end of this article...
http://www.mmorpg.com/gamelist.cfm/game/11/feature/3534
there are also a couple threads going around on mmorpg.com about a possible DAOC2.
I dont think anythings been promised yet, but there seems to be so…
The point that one character per account is important in a FFA pvp game makes sense, but why dont they just say you can only have one player per SERVER?
i dont see any problem whatsoever with this
Originally posted by SeriphinX
I love MMO's..played them for years now..I've played'm all..from UO all the way to modern mmo's....all except this one. I'm finally ready to give it an honest try. But I would imagine if I wanted to do everything.…
Originally posted by Ravenmane
Hey Guys,
AoC had a rocky start (which honestly a lot fot he big named MMO's have, including WoW and WAR). A lot of the angry player base are American gamers who got spoiled by easier MMO's that have been around fo…
yeah its definitely a stupid decision on Star vaults part to only allow first person. sure it helps immersion, and for some, gives an extra reason to play this game, but at the end of the day it will only hurt sub numbers. And i have a sinking fe…
yes, but you didnt even talk about how either of the games look. What I'm saying is that how can these games have worse graphics than a game that is 5 years old???